The European Holocaust

Part 5a

by

R.E. Prindle

The New Crusaders

Dwight D. Eisenhower

Dwight D. Eisenhower

It is interesting that Supreme Allied Commander Dwight Eisenhower titled his war memoirs Crusade In Europe.  Crusade is a religious term to describe war against infidels.  I have no doubt that in Roosevelt’s mind the two wars- Germany and Japan- were directed against infidels rejecting his Communist program.  Eisenhower probably didn’t think of that consciously but he did have that understanding at least subliminally.  Why a crusade?  Because the German war especially was a crusade against the infidel Nazis.  Infidels to Roosevelt, the Jews and the Soviets.  I don’t think it is generally recognized but Ike says that he sat at the feet of that very wise man, Bernard Baruch, for twenty-six years.  In fact, Ike, as he was universally affectionately known, was a protégé of Baruch.

It is thought that through Baruch’s influence he was promoted over a list of a couple dozen generals ahead of him as Supreme Commander.  Did Baruch have that kind of influence?  It is said that he had sixty congressmen in his pocket, that  he owned them.  That’s a mighty club to wield over a president when you want a small favor like putting what turned out to be a competent and politically trustworthy general in command.

Good advice, Bernie, I'll take it.

Good advice, Bernie, I’ll take it.

Ike rewarded his sponsor post-victory by continuing the Jewish genocide against the Germans and Europe.  After all the crusade was directed at the Germans.  Roosevelt had designated the title ‘aggressor nations’ that the ‘peace loving democracies’ had to exterminate to bring ‘peace’ into the world.  According to Hitler Roosevelt was the warmonger blocking any peaceful solutions to the Europe created by the Versailles Treaty that was supposed to end all wars.  Given the history of the Socialist Revolution it would appear that Hitler was right about Roosevelt.  Roosevelt did not want to come to an accord.

The whole revolutionary movement that began in France in 1789 was founded on wholesale murder as in the Great Terror of 1793.  Post-war Germany was a replica of the Vendee of France in 1793, the year that Victory Hugo named after his fictional account of the Revolution.

The Vendee in the province of Brittany led the counter-revolution, those who rejected the efforts of that small band of revolutionaries who had seized control of France.  At that time the revolutionaries loaded the citizens on barges, taken out on the water and sunk drowning all.  As Hugo explained in his utopian fantasy, in order for the revolution to succeed the old order had to disappear completely so that only true believers were left alive.  Only then was ‘peace’ possible.  At that point the thousand year Reich called the Millennium couldn’t fail.  This was essentially Roosevelt’s attitude.

 

FDR- Off With Their Heads

FDR- Off With Their Heads

Roosevelt might as well have been the reincarnation of Robespierre.  He had the attitude.  If you exterminate the ‘aggressor’ nations the thousand year Millennium will appear.  That is also what Hitler thought.  I guess all great men think alike.

FDR did seem to be an impediment.  As the horrors of the first world war were still fresh on everyone’s mind in 1933 when FDR began his crusade against the ‘aggressor nations’ it is difficult to understand the eagerness that members of his coterie exhibited for getting into another disastrous war in which civilization would be in danger; the war did seem suicidal yet blithely entered by FDR.

As FDR’s key aggressor nations were Germany and Japan the war would be truly global.  It was not only the massive destruction of the war but its continuing destruction, especially of human life, between the wars.  It was an orgy of killing for thirty plus years, rivalling the Thirty Years War of the seventeenth century, truly a European Holocaust that dwarfed anything of its kind in history.  All else was pushed to the margins and beyond.

Looking backward at the period it appears that only a few had a realistic grasp of the situation.  It should have been obvious to all that the scale of matters had changed from the pre-war balance of power beyond recognition.  Certainly by 1940 it should have been obvious that there were only two superpowers, the USA and the USSR that could sway world events.

England and France were both devastated by WWI and by the thirties were only beginning to recover if that.  Both countries had sacrificed a generation of young men while due to their debts to the US they were technically bankrupt unable and unwilling to meet their obligations.

England especially had every reason to come to terms with Germany remaining neutral if not friendly.  Their manpower losses had been horrendous while their worldwide empire even if they had stayed out was at risk.  While the Commons driven from the outside by Roosevelt to war with Germany, the crown while erroneously condemned for it, saw the utility of an accord with Germany.  It was the right attitude to take no matter how unpleasant.  From their vantage point as overlords of what was ‘their’ empire they could probably envision the end result which was the total prostration of England, the end of the country as it had been known.  It would no longer be a power except by the grace of the US.

Roosevelt was a special case.  Having divided the world into Good and Evil with the ‘peace loving democracies’ of the world against the ‘aggressor nations’ of Germany, Italy and Japan he thought that in the age old war between the Children of Light and the Children of Darkness the latter could be stamped flat, totally eliminated, and a golden age of ‘peace’ would be inaugurated under the aegis of his projected United Nations.  Never mind the cost.

 

Uncle Joe Stalin

Uncle Joe Stalin

Stalin from the Kremlin must have viewed Roosevelt as a wonder child, a Fantastic along the lines of the Wonderful Wizard of Oz.

A common thread running through all the participants  was the semi-autonomous nation of Jews.  They were an independent people pursuing their own goals against the welfare of all other participants.  During the Popular Front period of the mid-thirties they virtually directed a wall of hate against Germany from all other European and North American countries.  Thus ostensibly the West was ideologically Capitalist while the USSR was Communist and Judaism was a third ideology operating within the combatants of the USA and USSR.  Germany that had been  battling with them since 1918 suppressed them completely rounding them up and putting them in concentration camps.

As I have mentioned previously in this series the Jews were actively pursuing their Millennium.  The whole Jewish people acting as their Messiah were in all out revolution.  The period of revolution was designated as from 1913 to 1928.  The revolutionary period had kicked off with the The Great War in 1914 followed by the Russian and Bolshevik Revolutions of 1917.  The Jews had integrated themselves into the US government under Wilson although they were stalled during the Republican Interregnum of the twenties.  Still they managed to move ahead under the guise of being Americans.

In their age old strategy of gaining control of the food supply the ploy was perfectly executed in the USSR.  The Kulak slaughter of the twenties had eliminated the most competent farming opposition while the starvation of the farmers in the early thirties broke the back of resistance.  In the US and Canada the so-called co-op movement had been progressing well under the leadership of Aaron Sapiro and Bernard Baruch.  That had been endangered in 1924 when Henry Ford divining the direction Sapiro was taking began an expose of his methods.  Sapiro counter-attacked by bringing a lawsuit against Ford.

That action was converted into an attempt to outlaw anti-Semitism in the US.  When the Communists had taken power in the USSR one of the first things they did was to make anti-Semitism a crime.  Thus Sapiro attempted the same thing with the lawsuit that was tried in 1927.  Sapiro not only failed in that attempt but lost his credibility in the co-op movement.  He was no longer effective.

It may seem incredible that the Jews were attempting a food monopoly in the US and USSR.  But, if you have read your Bible you will find that Joseph in Egypt followed the exact same strategy to help Pharaoh break the back of Egyptian resistance to his authority.  In his prescription Joseph predicted that there would be seven fat years followed by seven lean years.  He advised Pharaoh to fill his warehouses during the fat years then compel obedience in the lean years by parceling out portions from his monopoly of grain to those who submitted to his tyranny.  Thus the strategy had been set millennia before.

As I say the strategy worked perfectly in the USSR where the government had a food monopoly compelling the people to wait hours in long lines merely in the hope of being able to buy their daily bread.

While Sapiro failed in the US, a mere six years later after Roosevelt’s election, led by Felix Frankfurter the Jews gained control of the Dept. of Agriculture organizing that agency along the lines of their ancient strategy.  Even as in Russia at the time it was claimed that millions of America were starving.

In revolutionary terms the outlawing of anti-Semitism in the Soviet Union was a great coup in the assault on the Russian people.  At the same time as Judaism was enshrined essentially as the State religion the Soviets banned the Christian religion turning the country topsy-turvy.  Jews were in control of the country’s mores.

This too was an ancient strategy.  The goal was to destroy the target country’s own mores hoping thereby to replace them with Jewish mores thus stripping the people of their past.  In Egypt, once again, during the ‘peaceful’ infiltration of Egypt by large colonies, much as was accomplished in the US the Jews disrespected all non-Jewish customs and mores.  The Egyptians had a whole cadre of sacred animals that they never killed.  The Jews first started slaughtering them claiming Egyptian reverence was stupid while the Jews of course were intelligent.  Needless to say tensions between the two populations were very high.

Unable to force a law against anti-Semitism through in the US, nevertheless by establishing the B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation League they were able to make criticism of Jews socially unacceptable so that it had nearly the force of law.

Having gained a semi-legal status enforced by a brutal suppression of any sign of dissent the Jews were then in a position to make an attack on American mores and legal and religious practices.

 

The Great Henry Ford

The Great Henry Ford

This also was noticed by Henry Ford who decided to lead an expose of Jewish practices beginning in 1920, four years before the exposure of Sapiro’s shot at a food monopoly.  As in the Soviet Union where Christianity had been suppressed with churches either physically demolished or being expropriated of their treasures Christianity was the enemy to be destroyed.  Having then robbed the American people of their past they would become either morally adrift or adopt the new Jewish mores.  Conditions were different in the US requiring a different strategy.

Remember that you have two different psychologies in play.  The Jews were new invaders transferring from a European environment of an enmity that went back thousands of years while the Russian Jews had been at war with the Czars for over a hundred years.  The Czars looked at their departure as a Good Thing.  Thus the Jews arrived with the expectation of continuing the war while being tempered by it and also expecting the arrival of the thousand year Jewish Reich.

The Americans were easy marks.  With an open hearted generosity bordering on stupidity they expected the Jews as well as all immigrants to exclaim that here was paradise on earth so that they should throw off the old world mores and don the new American ones.  We’re all Americans here, you know.  Psychology doesn’t work that way.

So, while the war waged against the Czar found a successful conclusion in 1917 the Jews had every reason to be buoyant about success in the US.  The freedom and equality of the US had meshed well with their European plans.  The Jews in the US rapidly acquired great wealth.  In the numbers in which they arrived they were able to found compact cohesive colonies.  NYC was so populous that it formed the capital of worldwide Jewry; hands across the water and down to the US capital in Washington DC.

If you haven’t read in Eastern European Jewish history the following won’t make much sense to you but an effort to replicate Eastern European conditions by forming a governing body called the Kehillah of Russia, that is an autonomous Jewish theocracy was attempted but failed so that they were forced to adapt a sort of ecumenical approach adopting American customs, language, etc.  We’re all Americans here, you know.  The adaptation changed from the Russian culture to a more American one but the goals remained the same.  The Jewish culture assumed an American form.

The Jews formed many many organizations.  It may be said that the American Jewish Committee replaced the East European Kehillah and the Western European Alliance Israelite Universelle.  At the same time the Ancient Order of B’nai B’rith founded in the US in 1843 had gone international.  It had a lodge in Vienna, the home of Sigmund Freud.  Sigmund Freud became a member himself in 1895 finding himself in the company of likeminded men.  He remained a faithful member all his life

Freud as we all know was a psychological genius.  And those who understand human psychology are in a position to rule the world.  With the B’nai B’rith Freud had an international political organization in addition to his Psycho-analytical Order to influence and/or manage the direction of world affairs.

It can’t be a coincidence that anti-Semitic propaganda developed rapidly after 1900 as Freud and his B’nai B’rith hatched their plans.  In 1913  B’nai B’rith launched its Anti-Defamation League in the US.  Quite frankly the Anti-Defamation League is a terrorist and vigilante outfit.  People accept the ADL as part of the social geography today but it remains a terrorist and vigilante group now joined and extended by the SPLC in a powerful one-two punch.

It quickly became effective.  As print comprised the whole media at the time, movies coming on, any paper or magazine publishing a comment or even a hint of a comment critical of the Jews was visited by a vigilante committee and terrorized for criticizing the Jews.  If they heeded the threats from the vigilantes, fine, if not sanctions were applied.  A whisper campaign, print, paper and other supplies were interrupted, lawsuits would be filed.  Since the ADL had access to unlimited funds and some hapless editor was living hand to mouth it was easier to give in and go on living than not.  Society had already been conditioned to condemn the accused.

Besides the Jews controlled the two powerful psychological weapons- defamation and its sub-heading ridicule.  No one can stand up to a campaign of defamation and ridicule.  At the same time to defend itself against these powerful psychological weapons Jews had formed their Anti-Defamation League claiming innocence and victimhood.  To defame them was anti-Semitism and anti-Semitism was already a quasi-crime.  The Jews were already semi-autonomous.

And then, along came the unexpected- Henry Ford.  Henry Ford took up the challenge in the year of 1920.  By 1920 Ford had legitimate resentments against the Jews and he would soon be gifted with a lot more.

Ford was a fine man; as fine as any man who ever lived and that is saying a lot.  He was one of the truly great men of the twentieth century.  He has been cruelly defamed and ridiculed.  His entire relationship to his times has been misrepresented, lied about.  And it was all about the Jews.

As all know Ford created the Ford marque of cars.  In 1909 his star was rising and by 1914 he had come into his own.  He had made a fabulous fortune and he knew what to do with it.  In 1914 the European war quickly escalated into a world war.  The US was not involved and should never have become involved except possibly in an emotional way.  Ford easily perceived that the US should let the Europeans fight it out by themselves.  They had to settle their own hash.  Perhaps out of the struggle, a European civil war, might come the birth of a nation.

Hot heads like Teddy Roosevelt who was always trying to prove he was a real man, were demanding that the US go in on the side of the allies, Russia, France and England to which the East Coast Anglos had a sentimental attachment.

Preparedness became the burning issue, that is, the US should begin arming in preparation for our entry.  Ford was opposed to preparedness as there was absolutely no way that the Central Powers, Germany and Austria, could ever attack the US if they had wanted to which they didn’t.  Ford, who was already perhaps the best known and respected man in America, decided to use his influence so he spent big money taking out full page ads in newspapers in NYC and elsewhere propagandizing against preparedness.

Ford was perceived as an ignorant hick by the business classes even though his Model T was ubiquitous and he was one of if not the wealthiest man in the US and the world, he had no political background or connections so his ads were taken derisively.  At that point in 1916 Ford knew nothing of the Jews.  The Jews however had been watching him.  As a wealthy man not committed to them he was a potential threat to be controlled.

Up to 1916 the Jews had taken a neutral position not siding with the Allies because one the Allies was their arch bete-noir, the Czar.  However the Jews of Russia were not inactive.  A movement to unseat the Czar was nearing completion; the trap would be sprung a few months on in February of 1917.  The new ruler would be Kerensky, a Jew.  So, the Jews had won their war with Russia.  Within weeks of the deposition of the Czar the Jews would align themselves with the Allies against Germany.  They were in the war, now against Germany.  As a reward for opting with the Allies the Balfour Declaration would promise them Palestine.

Ford’s rather bumptious display of his emotions called him to their attention.  They decided to humiliate him by a clever appeal to his psychology.  As the Jews directly involved with Ford were associated with the AJC –American Jewish Committee- it is safe to say that men like Jacob Schiff and Louis Marshall were involved.

A woman named Rosika Schwimmer approached Ford filling his mind with the fancies that a man of his stature could go to Europe and talk the principles into ending the conflict.  She said that he could rent a ship, take along a load of peaceniks and sail to Europe.  She knew just the ship; it was called the Oscar II.

At that time Ford was approaching fifty, convinced that he had found the magic formula to bring prosperity to the world and giddy with his spectacular success.  All characteristics of the new made man to indulge those fantasies.  Nowadays with men of a few tens of billions the ability to do harm is virtually unlimited. Viz Bill Gates and Warren Buffett.

Ford bought in to the limit, advertising what he was going to do while inviting scores of prominent men to go along all at his own expense, a mere trifle to the newly minted billionaire.  The country was incredulous, considered Henry a buffoon and the prominent men all declined his invitation.  Clara sat home wringing her hands.  Ford’s attempt in those days wasn’t as preposterous as it sounds as other prominent men also thought that they could talk some sense to the battling nations.  But, the idea was ridiculous.

It was on this voyage that Ford’s reputation as an anti-Semite had its genesis.  An AJC operative who had his own reasons for hitching a free ride was the propagandist Herman Bernstein.  He accompanied Miss Schwimmer and they told Ford that he was foolish to think he could stop the war, that the Jews had started it and only they could end it.   Naturally they denied ever having said such a thing so that Ford was further defamed and ridiculed when he reported what they said.  He had been cut down to size although his reputation as a benefactor of mankind was so great that he wasn’t destroyed.  In fact there were not a few who applauded the attempt.

At any rate by April of 1917 the US was in the war; the incredible barrage of propaganda to standardize opinion and strip Americans of their liberties had begun.  Regimentation was de riguer; that included bringing industry and industrialists under the direction of the government.  This was achieved by the creation of the WIB- War Industries Board.  The director of the WIB was Bernard Baruch, a Jew.

Baruch and the WIB began to subordinate industry and direct its efforts essentially through coercion.  The WIB was largely staffed by Jews who collected detailed information financially and otherwise of the various companies.  Ford and others objected to this because they believed the Jews would use the information for their own advantage.  Of course it is denied that Jews were that numerous in the Wilson administration, however Ford and the others were there and saw what they saw, so, who are you going to believe.  Just on mere say so I’m backing Henry Ford.  The facts speak for themselves.

The third was in 1919 when the AJC, feeling its oats, sent out a questionnaire  to the prominent men and women of the US demanding their opinion on what they called The Jewish Bill Of Rights.  They were adapting well to the mores and coloration of the US.

By this time the Bolshevik Revolution of October 1917 which followed the Menshevik Revolution of February was creating havoc in the Western World by fomenting universal revolution.  Universal also includes the US but even back then the ‘youts’ were rioting.  The Jews were clearly identified with revolutionary activity and rightly so although it is denied.

This was a very serious problem that Communist and Jewish historians have down played.  Ford in 1920 decided to tackle the problem and solve it just as he had solved the problem of mass production and created the modern world.  Except solving mass production was the easier problem.  Mass production involved the rational; the Jewish problem concerned the irrational.  A different methodology was needed.

Ford had the ways and means.

Offended by the way the Jews had managed the WIB while running into difficulties with the Investment Bankers when circumstances caused him to borrow money much against his principles causing him distress Ford had undertaken to ‘solve’ the Jewish problem.  He thought he could attack the problem with impunity.

Ford had purchased a newspaper, The Dearborn Independent, so that he had a platform and through his sales agencies a distribution network.  He had more than enough money to run at a deficit while his Service Department while not on a par with the AJC or ADL nevertheless was a serious investigative organization.  Suddenly the Jews found themselves facing a formidable foe.

Changing the name of his paper to The International Dearborn Independent he attempted to counter the Jews worldwide.  Ford already had plants throughout Europe and England.  He amassed a huge library, since disappeared, of every book he could find, periodical or whatever, that concerned the Jews.  This was a spectacular topical library.  In charge of it he placed his newspaper editor William Cameron to research and write articles exposing Jewish activities and machinations.  These would later be collected in the four volumes of The International Jew.

Cameron was more than competent.  He wrote about ninety articles for the weekly issues before Ford gave it up.  The four volumes are a remarkable compendium covering Jewish activities in every field of their involvement in American society.  Ford through Cameron even takes a crack at mocking Benedict Arnold as a creature of the Jews.  Especially satisfying as during his lawsuit with the Chicago Tribune in 1919 he flubbed a question on the stand confusing Benedict Arnold with the English novelist Arnold Bennett.  Why the question was allowed by the judge isn’t clear because it had nothing to do with the charge, but at least Henry was up enough on current literature to know who Arnold Bennett was.  Henry got his back with that article.

Rather than respond to the content of the articles the Jews naturally began a defamation campaign couple with vigilante action.  Now, the socialist program had been derailed in 1920 when Warren G. Harding as the Republican candidate won the presidential election.

The Democrat combo of James Cox and Franklin D. Roosevelt running on a Wilson/League of Nations platform were slaughtered in a landslide of votes against them.  Harding promised a return to Normalcy that presumably meant a resumption of the McKinley and Taft administrations.  This meant that the Jews were expelled from Washington and the Communists were first outlawed, then under pressure reinstated, then severely harassed.  The twenties would be lean years for the Revolution in the US.

Ford further aggravated the Jews when he attacked their Farm Program led by one Aaron Sapiro, an insignificant San Francisco lawyer, and the infamous and ubiquitous Bernard Baruch, the Grey Eminence of the Roosevelt administration.

Ford began a new series of articles in 1924 exposing the nature of the co-op program Sapiro and Baruch were trying to impose on the farmers of North America.  Sapiro took exception and sued Ford for, of all things, defamation of character.  The trial begun in 1927 dragged on in search of a conclusion that couldn’t be found so Sapiro tampered with the jury and a mistrial was called.

Rather than go through another trial Ford gave Sapiro the million he was suing for but the trial trashed his reputation so that the rest of the organizer’s life was a failure.

According to Victoria Saker Woeste in her 2010 account of the contest, Henry Ford’s War On Jews And The Legal Battle Against Hate Speech the trial was actually intended to outlaw anti-Semitism thus replicating their Soviet triumph in the United States.  Had they succeeded combined with their anti-Christian campaigns their worldwide situation would have been much as they wished.

With powerful organizations such as the AJC and B’nai B’rith pushing their campaigns, appearances would be that Jews were in control East and West of the two emerging powerhouses with a congeries of small European States firmly in the jaws of the vice ready to be filed down.

It was necessary then to recapture the government they had lost with the Democrat defeat of 1920.  The Republican Interregnum has been defamed as a do nothing period when in fact the groundwork for the Roosevelt programs had been laid but were paralyzed by Democrat inaction.

The Republican presidents in response to Soviet Communism developed what they called the American Plan.  The Plan was based on individualism rather than collectivism.  Thus the Tennessee Valley Authority for which Roosevelt took credit was actually developed in the twenties by the Individualists, in another word, the Republicans.   Remember now that Henry Ford and the Jews were mortal enemies.  Hoover was in the government for the entire twelve years of the Interregnum, eight years as Secretary of Commerce and four years as president.  He was individualist and staunchly opposed to collectivism under any name whether Stalinist or Rooseveltian.  Thus he wanted to develop the Tennessee Valley as private industry.  The man he and his presidents wanted to develop the project was Henry Ford.  Ford was going to be blocked in any way the Jews could do it.

Hoover was an engineer and as such could not but admire the astonishing engineering feats Ford had accomplished with the assembly line.  Ford promised cheap fertilizer (from nitrogen) and electricity and it is likely he would have done so but the collectivists opposed any individualistic private effort.  They then stalled the project, much to the country’s detriment for twelve long years until with the Roosevelt and collectivist triumph Roosevelt put through the TVA as a governmental collectivist project taking full credit for the work.

The same was true with the three great dams, the Hoover on the Colorado (changed to Boulder and then back to Hoover) and the Grand Coulee and Bonneville dams on the Columbia.  Roosevelt who was no engineer borrowed freely from Hoover without credit while mocking him as ‘the Great Engineer.’

The huge Jewish slander machine then was directed at the three Interregnum presidents belittling them and depicting them as do nothing incompetents.  In fact they presided over one of the most prosperous decades in American history under the difficult conditions of Prohibition and insurgent Communism.  Working hard against the presidents Congress thwarted presidential plans to push through productive legislation while sabotaging the economy to create disaster conditions that would defeat the successful Republican decade.  That happened in the engineered debacle of the stock market in ’29.

Accounts will differ of Hoover’s efforts to quickly, even instantaneously, solve the business downturn.  The Judeo-Communists who controlled the press and the newly formed radio networks were able to depict Hoover as a do nothing incompetent who stood around wringing his hands and they have been able to maintain that version until the present.  That Roosevelt failed to solve the problem in eight years doesn’t seem to disturb them.

At that time they prepared to rush back into Washington and indeed the Roosevelt Administration was dominated by Jews and/or Communists.  You don’t need a weatherman to tell which way the wind blows.

As Hoover made very clear during the 1932 election the real issue was one of a change in the direction of ideology.  Americans had always been individualist or private initiative, what he called the American Plan.  What Roosevelt embraced was Jewish collectivity or group think.  Communism in a word although Hoover did not use it.

Hoover in his writings says that he had the country on the road to recovery twice but that the recoveries were sabotaged both domestically and internationally. Remember that the Jews were dominant in the Soviet Union while having a pronounced influence in all other European countries except Germany, Italy and Spain.  Japan was anti-Communist although out of the picture here.

There can be no doubt that, wanting to capture the government of the US Jews of both the US and USSR as well as other European countries would do and did everything in their power to prevent the reelection of Hoover putting their puppet Roosevelt in office.  I will go into details in others essays but for here I want to establish the basic groundwork.  Although not a quick victory Jewish collectivism won out.  Today, in the US, the Jews have succeeded in making White males (Aryans) second class citizens living under civil disabilities called hate laws.  White males are thus placed beneath all others. The others are termed ‘protected.’

Herbert Hoover

Herbert Hoover

Thus the American Plan of Hoover was defeated in 1932 while Jewish collectivism triumphed through Roosevelt although they had to start over again after Roosevelt’s death in 1945.

Part 5b will cover the thirties.

 

Part Three

The European Holocaust

by

R.E. Prindle

The year 1900 may be said to have ushered in the New World Order.  Science and technology had broken through the knowledge ceiling to a new level.  It would be tedious to list all the breakthroughs that occurred almost at once, suffice it to say that movies, the internal combustion engine and airplanes shocked the senses, overturning many established ‘facts.’  Man could fly, could go over a mile a minute and could record a living image of historical figures.  With X-rays the human body became transparent.

Nineteen hundred was only a hint of the future.  Developments over the next fifty to a hundred years would be so rapid and astonishing that few if any minds could keep up and grasp the full significance of the changes.  The present and future seemed so unlimited while the average mind was inversely limited.

Unimaginable riches were about to be in the grasp of millions.  Within a century multi-millionaires would be as common as stones while billionaires would be in abundance.  The hundred million dollar fortunes that so terrified the minds of the nineteenth century are today more common than most believe.

Nor are these inherited fortunes, but money earned by the holders on their own merit.  Many minds collapsed under the strains of being able to gratify material desires while psychological hopes remained unrealized and unrealizable.

Intellectually the discovery of the past opened many minds.  While knowledge has moved ahead rapidly and loosened the impact of these early intellectual adventurers the future nevertheless was built on the backs of men like the anthropologist James G. Frazer and his amazing work The Golden Bough.  Frazer was only one of hundreds.

Nowhere was the future plotted more closely than in the field of Psychology.  Who controls the mind controls society.  The twentieth century would see the development of mind control.  Aldous Huxley laid out the model in his 1932 novel Brave New World.  It was a brave new world but the sneaky old world was dragging behind like a collective unconscious, to play on an idea of the psychologist C.G. Jung.

Jung at one time teamed up with Sigmund Freud in the development of psycho-analysis.  As noted in Part Two Freud was instrumental in the implementation of the Jewish Dream to be, in the words of a Jewish spokesperson Samuel Untermyer, the aristocrats of the world.

If the Jews are a separate people, and they do claim to be that, then the Jews as a people must have to be engaged in some kind of activity to realize their dream.  Psychologically that dream is a post hypnotic suggestion and as is well known post-hypnotic suggestions will be acted upon.  While the Protocols of Zion are not necessary to prove anything the text does accurately plot out Jewish intentions.

A modern Jewish writer, the US rabbi Abba Hillel Silver expressed those plans in his book A History Of Messianic Speculation In Israel.  The last big effort to overthrow Europeans occurred in 1666.  The 666 is the number of the Beast, thus maintaining the Satanic connection to Freud.  At that time a messianic candidate named Sabbatai Zevi was active in the Ottoman empire of present day Turkey.  He was called before the Sultan at which time the Jews expected him to declare the Millennium.  Don’t take this lightly, Jews sold all their possessions for a song for a grand fling as money would not be needed in the Millennium.  Across Europe Jews prepared to begin the slaughter of Europeans with Zevi’s pronouncement.  Disappointingly Zevi when confronted by the power of the Sultan opted for conversion to Moslemism rather than announcing the Millennium.

This was a cruel disappointment to the Jews sending them off the rails for a couple hundred years, perhaps even to the present.  The Learned Elders then determined to never rely on an individual messiah again.  Apparently they realized that the Messiah would never appear, something like waiting for the Godeau of Balzac.

According to Silver then, the only way to realize the Redemption was for the whole people to work for the revolution that would realize the Millennium.  As Silver says, the years 1913-28 were designated as the revolutionary period that would usher in the Millennium.  Thus one must believe that as the great years neared the Jewish people became frenzied as they were in 1666 immersed in hopes of the success of the European Holocaust that would bring them into their own.

It nearly succeeded in 1903-05 but a little extra effort was needed to put it over the top in 1917.  The extermination of the European peoples was part and parcel of the revolution.  The Jews certainly must have realized that they would have failed in the slaughter of the Europeans in 1666 so more indirect methods would be required in this latest attempt.  Perhaps they could get the Europeans to shoot each other while in the resulting desolation perhaps enough could be made to starve to death making finishing them off easier.

Yes, I know that sounds farfetched, doesn’t it?  But, look at how it all came down.

-2-

It would be absurd to say that the Jews were not politically involved in European and American affairs, directing things to their benefit, but so they apparently would have us believe.  They said that Henry Ford was absurd, that he ‘invented’ an international Jewish conspiracy and ought to be punished not only for saying but thinking it.  He was a hateful anti-Semite, so they said.

Let’s look at the situation.  As the century turned the Jews were a semi-autonomous people from Russia to North America; that is around the world actually as Russia and North America are narrowly separated by the Bering Straits in the Arctic.

So the Jews in 1900 were influential in Russia, the Baltic States, Poland, Austria, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, the Balkans, Germany, France, England, the whole of Europe as well as having burgeoning populations in the US and Canada.  That’s an international presence.

There were numerous purely Jewish organization in all those States.  The avowed purpose of all these organizations was to look after Jewish interests worldwide.  Wherever an act occurred anywhere in the world that affected Jewish interests, the whole world’s attention was focused on the incident while ‘justice’ was demanded.

Certainly one can say the Jews were ‘breathing together’ which is what the word conspire means and gives the meaning to ‘conspiracy.’

As this is the turn of the twentieth century the great emigration from Europe to North America was reaching full flood.  Fully half of European Jewry would be transferred to the US and Canada from 1870 to 1914.

The great gathering place for the beginning of the Jewish trek across Europe was the city of Brody on the Austro-Hungarian border with Russia.  Brody was 88% Jewish, described by the Jews as a city where wisdom and wealth, Torah understanding, commerce and faith were united.  For forty some years streams of migrating Jews began the trek to the North German ports where they embarked for North America.  Thus just as the immiserization of the US South began in what is described as Reconstruction the Jews set out for the New Promised Land.

The great Jewish money lords of Europe and North America pitched in to organize the flow.  While this was in violation of the regulations governing immigration to the US, as usual, the Jews flaunted all the rules conspiring together.

For nearly fifty years the roads leading Northwest to Germany were clogged with penniless Jews leading toward what they thought was salvation.  Crowds passed by or through Vienna making that city the eye of the storm.  Young Adolf Hitler must have witnessed the phenomenon.

While the Jews were in movement in Europe, in the wake of the US Civil War and the building of the railroads, armies of hobos shattered by the war or unable to adjust to rapidly changing conditions roamed restlessly back and forth, North and South seeking a redemption of their own no less despised than the Jews.

A considerable body of literature of that phenomenon also developed well portrayed in a few of the stories of Jack London and Edgar Rice Burroughs.

As the body of Jews in the US grew, perhaps in anticipation of the coming European Holocaust the Jewish world government was transferred from France to New York City.  The history of revolution in Europe was pointing to a mega attempt in Germany but it finally occurred in Russia then rebounding West after the First European Holocaust of 1914-18.

Thus, with 1913, the first year of the Jewish Revolution’s approach the Jews were scrambling to get into position.  As noted, Teddy Roosevelt gave the Jews as a nation a seat the bargaining table that ended the Russo-Japanese war in 1905.  Using that as a basis for harassing the Russians the Jews demanded a break in US Russian political relations.  Using that strength as a basis for harassing the Russians Jews demanded a break in US-Russian diplomatic relations.  Using the excuse of being American citizens the Jews were entering Russia to manage anti-Russian activities then scooting back across the Russian border.  The Russians saw them as Jews no different than their own thus refusing to honor their US passports.  Using this as an excuse the Jews caused President Taft to break diplomatic relations.

Then with the capture of the presidency in 1913 by Woodrow Wilson the Jews who had backed him flooded into Washington where they began to establish themselves as a semi-autonomous people in the US.  They were well on their way until the Republicans regained the presidency from 1921-1933 ousting them from Washington DC and upsetting their plans temporarily.

-3-

The Propaganda War

Now that I’ve softened up the psychological situation a little we can go into it in a little more detail.  The early decades of the twentieth century laid the groundwork for the manipulation of the citizen’s mind.  Some might call it the mass mind but all great mind manipulation is aimed directly at the individual as a unit of a body.  Advertising is meant to move the individual personally one at a time.  Thus good mind manipulation is aimed directly at you.

As the Jews existed only as a miniscule percentage of the total Euroamerican population with no central base of operations and no military the only method available to them was mind control.  They availed themselves of it, hence the concentration of the media in their hands or under the control of themselves.  The idea being to get the Jewish view across to the exclusion of any other.  Jewish good, Other bad.

This means that the Protocols are an authentic expression of Jewish goals.  The Protocols were obsolete as they were written since the modern media that have displaced the newspaper as a vehicle of dissemination were developing rapidly- that is, the movies, radio, the magazines and color photography, telephones, telegraphy and all related media.  These too fell under the ownership and management of the Jews.  I entertain no denials; the facts are the facts.

At the same time as the rise of Psychology and psycho-analysis, advertising and public relations dependent on psychological ideas and methods also began tremendous propagandistic assaults on the citizen’s mind.  Advertising and public relations are the epitome of propaganda.  The terms are inter-changeable.

Sigmund Freud was a master propagandist, it’s a bit of a stretcher, but psycho-analysis as conceived by Freud is propaganda of the most effective sort.  Freud had a nephew working out of the US who is said to have been one of the founders of public relations by the name of Edward Bernays.  Bernays was related to Freud’s wife.

He and Freud were in relatively close contact; Freud allowed Bernays to publish his writings.  The goal of Judaism as ‘the aristocrats of the world’ as Untermyer claimed is to assume the position of authority which is the place of the aristocrat over the hoi polloi or, in other words, the rest of us.

Not quite as blatant as Untermyer Feud and Bernays expressed their desire in this way:  As people are in the control of their unconscious, which by Freud’s definition is affected by irrational impulses, they are unreliable and subject to error, that is irrational attempts to harm the world’s aristocrats, therefor their minds have to be manipulated by an elite group that knows what is best for them.

While Freud and Bernays don’t define who this group of superior guides is, since Freud and Bernays are chief guides it must be the Jews, aristocratic Jews directing the hoi polloi.

Thus while Freud masks himself as a scientific investigator of the psyche he is actually a propagandist furthering the ends of the Jewish Revolution.  I don’t mean to say that he didn’t introduce some valid psychological concepts, I myself take a Freudian approach, but that he used his knowledge for parochial ends and they were not benign.  Freud was all for the European Holocaust.

Freud was well read in psychological literature.  His chapter on previous research and speculation on the nature of dreams in his Interpretation Of Dreams is exhaustive and believe me, impressive.  Freud took from everyone then trashed their reputations taking credit for their discoveries for himself.  It was criminal the way he shouldered Pierre Janet aside while the attack on C.G. Jung was no less vicious.

As mentioned above the idea of the Unconscious was well established before Freud gave it his peculiar interpretation.  His idea of the Unconscious is just that, his idiosyncratic interpretation.  It is a creation of his imagination, a fiction.

In his configuration the Unconscious is a religious magical or spiritual entity that exists outside the mind and body while controlling it.  The Unconscious displaces the Conscious rational mind in the same way that Lucifer was ejected from heaven by God.  The unconscious becomes Satanic as a repository of evil impulses.  Any attempt to exercise conscious self-control in Freudian terms became Repression and Repression according to Freud’s scheme of things is harmful.  Thus all ignoble impulses are to be indulged less one damages one’s psyche.

This is not too far from Jacob Frank’s notion that before the Jews can become good they must first expel the evil in their hearts by committing all possible crimes until evil is exhausted and good can enter in.  Freud has successfully imposed these mistaken notions on the Western world.  He succeeded in slandering and defaming all other interpretations of the unconscious.

While the unconscious may seem real, in point of fact it merely is a legitimate function of the mind.  Like any other function it can be perverted.  Freud correctly noted that the dream material rehashed events of the day.  What the conscious mind had no time to notice the impressions still entered the mind thus the sleeping mind, the brain still functioning, recalls those impressions trying to make sense of them.  However this sense is distorted by fixations, or actually post-hypnotic suggestions, created by events of the past.  The fixations interpret events according to their faulty understanding.   A fixation may be compared to a computer virus in which an entry for one site is redirected to another.

Thus one has those fantastic dreams that are incomprehensible.  The true purpose of psycho-analysis is to find these fixations or viruses and exorcize them by enunciating them.  Locating the fixations is easy but the victim is terrified by them refusing to enunciate them.  If the analysand can enunciate the fixation it disappears as an influence on his behavior.

If the central fixation is removed the analysand has an integrated personality in which his conscious mind has control.  The brain functions as a coordinated unit rather than being distorted by fixations. This should be the goal of psycho-analysis.  With the conscious and unconscious mind unified into a whole the analysand is probably what Scientologists call a ‘clear.’

Instead of aiming for this goal Freud took the Satanic approach favoring the unconscious over the conscious mind.  Thus Freudian Satanism has triumphed in our time.

The Jews then combined Freudian psychology with Marxism producing such hybrids as the Da Da movement of the war years and subsequently the Critical Theory of the Frankfort School that emerged in the twenties in Germany then coming to the United States in the thirties raising havoc here.  By the early sixties non-Jews in the US had been completely demoralized not knowing who they were.

Using this species of mind control then the Jews released the fire storm of WWI that destroyed the best of the manhood of Europe in the worst holocaust the world had seen to that date.

The principle weapon of the Jews was not cannons but food, or the lack of it, as a weapon of mass destruction- starvation.  The period from 1914 to 1945 would be one of ravenous hunger.  The destruction of Europeans as bad as it was would have been even more phenomenal, much worse than it was, except for one thing- the US.  The US provided a bete noir for the Jews in the person of Herbert Hoover.  Hoover thwarted the famine caused by the war by bringing food to the Europeans.   He would be rewarded for this after 1933 by one of the worst slander campaigns ever directed at a single human being.  It would not be until after the death of Roosevelt in 1945 and the lessening of Jewish influence in Washington that the defamation would let up.

Hoover’s first effort was in Belgium in the opening period of the war.  He single handedly directed the Belgian relief that saved millions of lives.  After the Armistice, Wilson’s great betrayal of the German people, the allies prevented food stuffs from being sent to the Germans in what appears to have been a genocidal attempt to destroy the German people.  Once again Hoover came to the rescue bringing relief to the starving Germans.

The war ravaged Eastern Europe preventing any substantial harvests for the four years so that by 1921 starvation raged from Poland East through Russia.  Millions  died and millions more were dying.  Once again Hoover led the rescue mission earning the undying hatred of the Jews whose genocidal holocaust was to some extent thwarted.

With the Jewish world government out of harm’s way in the US the bodies hit the ground in Europe.  Let the European Holocaust begin.  Now, in 1916 Henry Ford’s testimony is that the American Jewish Committee’s Herman Bernstein and Rosa Schwimmer told him on his Peace Ship the Oscar II that the Jews had promulgated the war and only they could stop it.  Of course Bernstein and Schwimmer denied saying this but Ford affirmed they did.  Ford was denounced as an anti-Semite which is merely a convenient and irrefutable accusation so that between believing the AJC agents and Ford I’m going with Ford not to mention that subsequent facts bear him out.

Among the many organizations devoted to furthering Jewish interests one of the most important, still in existence and active today, was the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee that was organized in 1914 at the outbreak of the war.  The purpose of the Joint, alternatively the JDC, was to aid Eastern European Jews in the aftermath of the war.  The bulk of European Jewry lived in the Pale of Settlement, which was a large strip of land, larger than several US States between Poland and Russia, and this area was ravaged by the contending forces for four years with continuing warfare until 1921.

The JDC then collected money and supplies to go to the aid of the Jews exclusively after the war.  There was a virtual invasion of Russia, The Pale, by American Jewish welfare workers after the war.  As the famine mounted, by 1921 Herbert Hoover, the bete noir of the Jews, organized a massive relief effort while heading the Dept. of Commerce in the Harding Administration.  His relief effort was not appreciated by the Jewish dominated Communist Party of the now Soviet Union.

All was not peace, love and happiness in the nascent Soviet Union.  Remember the Communist Soviet Union supplanted the Czars and Russia.  After the revolution the name Russia was erased from the map by the Jews being replaced by the Soviet Union.  There were very few Russians running the Soviet government.  Stalin himself was a Georgian while the Jews formed a majority of the upper levels while nearly owning the bureaucracy.

As Dostoievsky had prophesied, given the opportunity the Jews would have exterminated the Russians.  This was their opportunity and they set about it with a vengeance.  In Russia abattoirs were set up in which the Russians were pushed in one door, hacked to pieces and the remains shoved out the other door.  It is said that the butchers waded ankle deep through the blood and gore.

While this was going on numerous White, that is Czarist, armies were waging war against the Soviets on several fronts aided by the US, Japan and England.

The immiseration of the Russian people can hardly be imagined.  Hordes of feral orphans were roaming the streets of the cities.

The revolutionary cadres of Soviet operatives flowed back from Russia West into central Europe seriously endangering the German State.  Had the Communists triumphed there can be no doubt that many millions of Germans would have been murdered in a genocidal rage.  Hungary was seized by the Jew Bela Kun and his lieutenant the mad butcher Tibor Szmuelly who then murdered tens of thousands of Hungarians before the Communists were thrown out by the concerted efforts of the Western States and the Hungarians themselves.

In Germany the various Volkist Freikorps, of which Hitler was the leader of one, put down several revolutionary attempts to at least keep Germany out the Judaeo-Communist camp.

The postwar revolutionary battles were not forgotten by the Germans.  The fear of the Communists and Jews was on them.  The war between the Reds and Whites in the East did not end with the Armistice but continued for years.  Thus while the so-called Peace Conference was going on in Paris hostilities still raged throughout the East.

While the Jews claim to be loyal to the States in which they reside there was a national contingent of Jews working solely for Jewish interests at the Peace Conference.  Of course their influence on Wilson, more or less their tool, was enormous.

As noted above the Jews were distributed in every country throughout Europe and North America in each of which they were influential to varying degrees if not commanding.  In this sense then as an international people they had or were on the way to establishing a world government.  The First European Holocaust in which the flower of European manhood went to the grave enhanced Jewish penetration.  This influence or power increased in the twenties and thirties until combined with Communist Soviet Russia a loose Jewish Communist worldwide federation would have come into existence.

The twelve year Republican Interregnum in the US delayed the Jewish triumph until 1933 when having sabotaged the Republicans their tool Franklin Delano Roosevelt was installed.  However their success in Europe in 1933 was spoiled by the election of a Volkist president in Germany, Adolf Hitler of the German National Socialist Party, commonly known as the Nazis.

Hitler and the Nazis had taken the measure of the Judaeo-Communists and meant to eradicate their influence.  The Nazis outlawed the Communist Party and the Jews were disenfranchised within Germany having severe civil disabilities imposed on them.  The conspiratorial Jews, the Critical Theorists of the Frankfort School, Psychoanalysts and others removed themselves to the security of the US under Roosevelt.  In 1941 Hitler moved against the rats nest invading the Soviet Union.

To back track.  The Judaeo-Communist method was the system of the future.  As a man of the past Woodrow Wilson was ardent to establish a parliamentary system called the League of Nations.  The League set up as a supranational State with its capital in Geneva.  The various members sent delegates to Geneva who then chattered endlessly as parliamentarians do.

The newly established Soviet Union however followed the Jewish model.  The USSR as the successor State of Russia established the Communist International- the Commintern.  The central Communist government in Moscow then established subversive stations in key capitals- Berlin, Paris, London and New York City.  The Commintern was aided and abetted by the pinks, liberals and fellow travelers throughout the West as well as the Jews in all countries.  The various national Communist Parties were all over fifty percent Jewish so that the two organizational systems meshed creating very large and effective subversive organizations more effective than the League Of Nations.

When Wilson tried to impose his vision of a League Of Nations on the US he met intense resistance.  The opposition was powerful enough to thwart his design and rightly so.  Nevertheless the Judaeo-Communists ruled the propaganda media.  Defamation was the method of the propagandists.  Each and every person who opposed them, such as Henry Ford, Warren G. Harding and Herbert Hoover was vilified insufferably until their reputations and entire lives past, present and future were tarnished.

On the other hand the mantle of sainthood was promoted for people such as Wilson, Brandeis, and FDR.   One can tell how the lines were drawn by whose reputation was trashed and whose wasn’t.

Thus, when Hitler announced an independent course for Germany free from Judaeo-Communists and, equally as important if not moreso, International Finance Banking, he and Germany were surrounded by enemies bent on their destruction.  German hatred reached a frenzy.  Calls for the Final Solution for German’s appeared before any German retaliation.

To return to the situation in the United States.  The key to Jewish strategy was to control the food supply.  Thus in Europe the famines in Belgium, Germany, Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union between 1914 and 1933-34 were all part of the European Holocaust engineered by the Jews.  The immiseration of Europeans was such as had never been seen in the world before while tens of millions of Europeans ceased to exist.  The European Holocaust was on.

The Soviets having gained control of the Russian food supply by the collectivization of farming, the murder of the successful farmers known as Kulaks and the re-Serfing of the unsuccessful plus the brutally engineered famines of 1933-34 put food in the control of the State.  Food was doled out in small amounts while requiring long waits in longer lines.

-4-

Food In North America

The attempt to control the North American food supplies began in an inconspicuous way just after the turn of the century.  While I may incorporate a divagation or two this section covers the food coops, Henry Ford and Aaron Sapiro.  The story has never been adequately treated.  The most ambitious  attempt has been Victoria Saker Woeste’s  badly flawed Henry Ford’s War On Jews And The Legal Battle Against Hate Speech published in 2012.

One can’t say the Jewish history in the United States has been distorted out of all recognition but it has been distorted while it is forbidden to objectively incorporate Jewish political activities into the context of American history.  One can read volumes that provide no indication of Jewish involvement in American affairs or its extent.  To do so, of course, would leave the author open to charges of anti-Semitism and hence the end of his career and perpetual blacklisting.

Thus few are aware of the various important Jewish individuals who have shaped and directed our politics and history.  Many of the names to be mentioned will be unfamiliar or unknown to the reader.  I will try to give some background.

Aaron Sapiro a central figure in the Ford story would be completely unknown today except for his million dollar lawsuit against Henry Ford.  That suit involved his financial misuse of farm coops to which Ford called attention.

Miss Woeste in her Henry Ford’s War On Jews creates the impression that Aaron Sapiro and his so-called California Plan was some sort of innovator.  In fact farm coops were already common enough mid-nineteenth century without any Jewish involvement.  Sapiro himself under the tutelage of one David Lubin stepped into an already existing orange grower’s coop based in Southern California although Lubin and Sapiro began their operations among a group of Jewish orange growers around Sacramento.

At the time the two orange growing regions in the US were Florida and California.  The California acreage was immense.  The State was nearly one large orange grove.  Florida had the advantage of better and more direct rail transportation to the large Eastern markets than California, thus California growers had to overcome disadvantages.  Originally it took over a month to move oranges to Eastern markets.  In the natural evolution of marketing practices then it would seem that Rubin and Sapiro took too much credit on themselves.  Something like Freud appropriating all psychology as his own.

What Ford objected to in Sapiro’s coop efforts was that Sapiro set up an intermediary company of middlemen between the farmers, growers and end users that benefited financially better than the producers.  There can be no doubt that this was one of the intents of Lubin/Sapiro’s California Plan.  The other was to gain control of the commodity in question.

Thus Sapiro’s plan was to include all producers in a coop with very long contracts of up to fifteen years.  The coop and administrators would take possession of each farmer’s total crop storing the crop themselves.  The farmers would be paid one third of the crop on delivery, the rest being distributed as the overall crop sold.  Thus payments would trickle in over time leaving the producers dependent on the coop managers for income. They essentially became slaves of the coop.

As can be readily seen the coops’ administrators would siphon off a considerable portion of the proceeds as wages and expenses while the producers would have no recourse as the managers were in possession and the producers were under a ‘sacred’ contract for a long period of time.  There was no escaping.  Sapiro himself was making a fortune of up to 80K a year before Ford caught on to him.

In addition, if all the producers of a commodity could be signed on, a coop would have control of the entire annual production.  The stated plan being to keep the crop off the market until the coop got the price it wanted.  Thus a consequence, rather intended or not, was that the population could be starved into submission.

Ford objected to this exploitation of the producers and public so that he began an expose of Sapiro using his very influential newspaper the International Dearborn Independent.  He began a twenty part series condemning Sapiro.  Sapiro took offense at having his activities exposed and brought charges against Ford.  One wonders what his defense would have been as his method was obvious.

Perhaps for that reason he adopted two tactics.  One was to require Ford to take the stand.  Ford had had a bad experience in a previous lawsuit against the Chicago Tribune in 1919 not wishing to have to endure irrelevant and humiliating questioning again especially as Sapiro’s questions would center on anti-Semitism rather than his own coop activities.  The second approach of Sapiro, indeed, was to introduce the irrelevant charge of anti-Semitism, hence the subtitle of Miss Woeste’s book, And The Legal Battle Against Hate Speech.  Thus Sapiro tried to make the trial one that would outlaw criticism of Jewish activities or ‘hate speech’ thus imposing civil disabilities on non-Jews while violating the Constitutional right of free speech.

As it was Sapiro interfered with the jury causing a mistrial.  Thus while nothing was resolved in the first trial Sapiro supported by the entire Jewish establishment of ‘international’ Jews was prepared to refile even though the first trial had exhausted his resources.  Ford himself was in the middle of his first model change from the T to the A and could ill afford to divert his attention.

Rather than pursue a trial that was no longer concerned with the facts of the Coop Movement but had degenerated into some kind of Jewish fantasy Ford gave Sapiro his million and threw in the towel.

However he had been right about Sapiro.  Sapiro mentor David Lubin who had migrated to Sacramento from New York State came up with the plan of the coop’s managers essentially buying the grower members entire crop on credit and then wholesaling it themselves sending the change to the growers on resale.  Sort of a consignment deal.  Lubin left the job of organizing to Sapiro going off to Italy where after conning the King of Italy he died of influenza in 1919.

Sapiro offering his legal services for a very high fee as Ford said then began organizing any commodity that was handy mainly trying to create coop monopolies in wheat that would give the Jews control of the most important food stuff after which one presumes they would demand extortionate prices.

Nor was Sapiro operating alone against Ford.  He had the support of the major Jewish organizations including Untermyer and Louis Marshall of the American Jewish Committee.  There were many important Jews who worked behind the scenes almost anonymously to achieve Jewish objectives.  Perhaps most prominent among these was the Supreme Court justice Louis Brandeis and his acolyte the Harvard law professor Felix Frankfurter who would be increasingly influential through the FDR administration.

Equally if not more important was the Wall Street bear Bernard Baruch.  He gave up speculation under the Wilson administration to enter ‘public service.’  He was named as a collaborator of Sapiro along with Albert Lasker and Eugene Meyer.  Meyer was a banker and Lasker was a propagandist.  Once again Ford was correct.

Ford and his good friend Edison had worked out an alternative farm plan that Edison took to Baruch who was also viewed as a commodity expert to get his opinion.  Whether he knew of Baruch’s involvement in Sapiro’s Plan isn’t clear but Baruch dismissed the Ford/Edison plan out of hand.

The Kentucky tobacco growers sought counsel with Baruch and he referred them to Sapiro and his famous California Plan.  We also know what that plan was.  By this time Sapiro was sucking 80K a year out of the various coops he’d set up.

Then after 1920 Ford got wind of Sapiro and the California Plan deciding to expose Sapiro.  The rest you know.

The consequence of the trial was however disastrous for Sapiro.  He lost his reputation and was forced out of the coop movement.  So for the moment the Jews were frustrated which is to say they had to take a change of direction.  They went full out to defeat Herbert Hoover who was elected president shortly after the trial ended and they succeeded in getting their man FDR elected in 1933.  Brandeis and Frankfurter triumphed.  The two had been working together politically from 1916 on.

Frankfurter had developed a loyal coterie of radical ex-students.  Roosevelt depended on Frankfurter for nominations to posts so that when the AAA was formed- the Agricultural Adjustment Administration- Frankfurter filled the agency with his own men promoting essentially the same agenda as Sapiro although taking a different even more effective form.  By the time of Roosevelt’s death the administration was telling farmers what they could and couldn’t grow and how much.

Ford had already made himself the center of the storm in 1920-22 when he set about to resolve the Jewish problem that arose from the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 that essentially was a Jewish plot of the nature of the First Russian Revolution of 1903-05.  Ford was not alone, there was a worldwide reaction.  It was at this time the Jews pulled out the Protocols as a diversionary red herring.  From out of obscurity the Protocols took center stage as the Jews vehemently denied their authorship blaming them instead on ‘the one armed shaggy man’ otherwise known as the anti-Semites.

The Jewish damage controllers got to work.

Ford was not alone in his campaign to expose Jewish machinations.  In England the Manchester Guardian waged an even more intense campaign highlighting Jewish domination of the Bolshevist Soviet Union accentuating that it was part of the plan of the Protocols.  Unfortunately the Guardian relied too heavily on that publication.

The Jewish response was to claim that the Protocols were a forgery, the work of anti-Semites, while the Protocols were based on an illusory Dialogues Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu In Hell that was not only unheard of but something that no one had ever seen and hence couldn’t have been read and if unread how did anyone know the content.  This fact seemed to pass unnoticed.

At the same time applying political and probably pecuniary pressure to the prestigious London Times newspaper to have ‘experts’ proclaim that the Protocols were indeed a forgery they succeeded although the Times opinion was just that, an opinion.  The Times proclamation took the wind out of the sails of their adversaries who accepted the Times verdict without demur thus defusing the battle.

Ford continued the fight until 1922 when under a terrific barrage of abuse he too ceased publishing.  The 1924 expose of Sapiro that the Jews took personally had nothing to do with Jews per se but the diddling of the farmers by Sapiro and his buddies.

Part Four dealing with twenties and thirties follows.

 

A Review:  The TV Documentary

Night Will Fall

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The Plan

The Plan

The Dachau Blues

Dachau blues, those poor jews

Dachau blues, those poor jews

Dachau, Dachau blues

Down in Dachau blues

Still cryin’ ‘bout the burnin’

Back in world war two’s

Don Van Vliet- Captain Beefheart

And His Magic Band

 

The time is over for the hysteria of the discovery of the Nazi death camps in the aftermath of WWII.  As shocking as their discovery was, seventy years after we have had time to reflect and come to a sounder understanding.  The death camps were only one of a whole series of astounding catastrophes post 1917.  Thus the import of the Army films exhibited under the title Night Must Fall last night (1/26/15) had more of a historical relevance than the horrific shock value of seventy years past.  You can only milk the cow until it’s dry.

Yes, the slaughter of the Jews was horrific but no more horrific than the slaughter of the German people by the allies in the closing days of the war and its aftermath.  Remember the Germans were supposed to be the children of darkness while the Western allies and the Holy Soviets were supposed to be the children of light.  We were not supposed to do things like that.  We can see clearly now.

Not only were the Soviets criminally at fault but the Western allies equally so.  France has nothing to be proud of while Jewish and American reprisals were no less reprehensible.   Let us be sensible.

If there were only one book to read concerning the horrors the German population had to endure at the hands of the ‘humane’ allies that book would be Hellstorm: The Death Of Nazi Germany, 1944-47, Aberdeen Books, 2010.

For those who enjoy accounts of sadism as well as for those of us who would know to better understand:  Hellstorm, p. 4-5.

Thus it was, that on the night of October 26, as Nemmersdorf and other communities nearest the front slept in imagined security, the unthinkable occurred.  After punching a hole through the German lines, the Red Army suddenly burst into the Reich.  Within hours, the Soviets widened the gap and swarmed over the countryside.  After several days of desperate fighting the Wehrmacht regrouped, launched a furious counterattack, then eventually drove the [Soviets] back across the border.  What German troops found upon reclaiming the lost ground, however, was staggering.

“[T]hey tortured civilians in many villages…’ reported one German officer, “nailed some on barn doors and shot many others.”  Along the road “treks” of fleeing refugees  had been overtaken by the communists, the people pulled from their carts, then raped and murdered on the spot.  It was at Nemmersdorf, though, where stunned soldiers first viewed hell on earth.  Recorded a physician with the army, Lt. Heinrich Amberger:  On the road through Nemmersdorf, over the bridge…I saw where a whole trek of refugees had been rolled over by [Soviet] tanks; not only the wagons and teams, but also a goodly number of civilians, mostly women and children…[T]hey had been squashed flat by the tanks.  At the edge of the road and in the farm yards lay quantities of corpses of civilians who evidently had been murdered systematically.”

Added another horrified witness:

In the farmyard further down the road stood a cart, to which four naked women were nailed through their hands in a cruciform position.  Beyond it stood a barn and to each of the two doors a naked woman was nailed through the hands in a crucified posture.  In the dwellings we found a total of seventy-two woman, including children, and one old man, 74, all dead, all murdered in a bestial manner, except only a few who had bullet holes in their necks.  Some babies had their heads bashed in.

Every female including girls as young as eight, had been raped.”

And that’s only page 4, it goes on for another three hundred pages.  Well, you might say, the German had it coming; the Nazis employed slave labor etc., etc. etc.

Europe After Proposed Scrubbing Of Germany Per Kaufman

Europe After Proposed Scrubbing Of Germany Per Kaufman

This may be true but then I suppose one has heard of the Soviet gulags where millions and millions, whole nations, were worked to death under the most miserable conditions, supervised by Jewish commandants and guards.  But, perhaps they were only following orders.  There is no Nazi atrocity that could not have been learned from the Soviet Union from 1917 to the end of the war.  Millions were murdered in the years immediately following the Soviet takeover in 1917 in the Soviet Union, Hungary and even Germany.  Had the Revolution succeeded in Central Europe as it had in Eastern Europe tens of millions more would have been slaughtered and that largely at the hands of the Jews.

It should always be remembered that Weimar Germany was a battlefield between the Judaeo-Communists and the various German volkist parties that coalesced into the NSDAP.  The Stormtroopers fought Judaeo-Communists in the streets for over a decade before the Nazis assumed control of the government in 1933 and suppressed the Reds.  The invasion of the Soviet Union was merely a continuance of that war.

Nor did the Jewish war against the Germans end in 1933, it had just begun.  The international Jews outside Germany declared war on Germany.  This war was carried on most effectively from the United States of the Roosevelt dictatorship; he was given war powers on assuming office.

The Jews accused the Germans as being savage beasts?  But how innocent were the Jews?  Ans. They weren’t.

Jewish atrocities in Russia, Hungary, Germany and other places after 1917 to, say, 1921 have all been suppressed.  If holocaust deniers are supposed to be bad they are nothing to Jewish deniers of their atrocities.  I have no doubt that the books concerning the horrible atrocities committed by Bela Kun and Tibor Szmuelly have been removed from the Library of Congress.  One sometimes reads veiled references to the crimes against humanity (a big phrase thirty or forty years ago) but the grimness of that horrible period would dwarf anything that happened at Dachau.  Even today the Jews are calling for the genocide of the entire Aryan race.

In Russia Jewish abattoirs were busy all day long as Russians were pushed in one door hacked to pieces and the gore shoved off that gruesome assembly line out the door at the other end.  Russians were crucified in one giant pogrom on endless miles of telegraph poles, the blackened skin of their hands flapping in the breeze because the skin had been loosed by chemicals.

No, no, you won’t find it easy to read about their atrocities but some few books are out there if you look hard enough.  Of course, the Jews say that those are all lies.  Yes, the Nazi atrocities did occur but in many ways they were payback, maybe even in emulation of what had gone before.

As indicated, the Jews were at war with the Germans all through the Weimar years finally declaring war in 1933 when under Roosevelt’s aegis they flowed back into power in DC.  Brandeis, Frankfurter, Baruch, Untermyer and the rest.  They ran Roosevelt.  They demanded and did get sanctions against Germany.  Roosevelt famously called for quarantining the aggressors.  He just neglected to identify the true aggressors.

Congress frantically tried to hamstring Roosevelt and the Jews by passing very strict neutrality legislation.  Roosevelt just ignored it, inventing excuses for his aggressions.

Listen to the German indignation at FDR.  That’s not just balderdash.  They were constantly provoked from DC.  Whether we are willing to acknowledge it or not the Germans were under constant assault from 1917 to the end of 1945.  It wasn’t just the Nazis, the Jews led a chorus of hate against not only the Nazis but the whole German people, both before and after the war.

In Part IV of my review of Wendell Wilkie’s One World, Chumps Playing Stud, I begin assembling the various steps of Jewish propaganda during the thirties and forties as they jockeyed for a position for the control of Roosevelt and through him the United States while whipping up German hatred for the ‘just’ war.  FDR was their dupe.

A key document in their Germanophobia was a book, pamphlet really, issued under the name of Theodore Nathan Kaufman entitled ‘Germany Must Perish!’  Kaufman was a petty criminal from Newark, New Jersey.  Newark- New-Ark- was a leading Jewish colony at the time fully insulated from the United States.  There is no way Kaufman could have written Germany Must Perish.  The scope and range of knowledge would have been quite beyond his limited education.

Just as the composition of Undercover in 1943 supposedly written by an Armenian immigrant Arthur Derounian and assigned to a corporate name, John Roy Carlson, Germany Must Perish must have been written by AJC writers and sent up as a trial balloon to see how Americans would react to the idea of the extermination of all Germans.

The book, or pamphlet, it is only forty pages, called for the eradication of Germany from the map and the genocide of all Germans though sterilization so that the entire German nation would disappear from the earth forever within one generation.  Something like the extermination the Amalekites of old.  Old habits die hard.

That the ideas were being bruited around in Jewish councils is evident from post-war efforts to implement the plan by the Secretary of the Treasury Henry Morgenthau Jr.  Between the Soviet atrocities committed by Russians and Jews in the East and Allied criminality in the West also centered around Jewish wishes Germans were fortunate to survive.  As I indicated the crimes are fully documented in Goodrich’s book Hellstorm.  The hellstorm was just as horrible as the so-called holocaust if not moreso.

Kaufman’s Germany Must Perish, now denigrated as the work of an eccentric with no effect is a complete misrepresentation of the facts.  Germany Must Perish received national exposure via Time Magazine and numerous city newspapers.

German intelligence picked up on the book and a reply was issued by Joseph Goebbels agency titled The War Goal Of World Plutocracy.   Note the enemy identified.  Wolfgang Diewerge to whom Plutocracy is attributed says this:

At almost the same time that the two chief warmongers Roosevelt and Churchill were meeting on the president’s luxury yacht “Potomac”, singing pious songs and praying for the victory of Bolshevism, leading personages in the United States and England received a small long package that contained a miniature black coffin.

Upon opening it, they found a card telling them:  “Read the pamphlet ‘Germany Must Perish!’”

The day after this announcement they received a 104-page booklet with a red cover, with “Germany Must Perish!” in gold lettering.

The coffin might be interpreted as a warning to the recipient while the red cover gives away the political position of the sender.  So this was a very serious campaign by master propagandists not a nitwit criminal like Kaufman.  The Jews had not a few very capable propagandists including the Grand Master of Propagandists the recently deceased Sigmund Freud, his nephew Edward Bernays, Albert Lasker, Gustavus Myers, and others.

The Kaufman campaign began in 1941 when the US was not at war with anyone and supposedly neutral.  Did the Germans sit up and take notice?  Why shouldn’t they?  As Goebbels said, If Germans must die then Jews must die.  It became of a question of who would act first.  The Germans did.

If they were to be exterminated then they would exterminate the exterminators.  How smart was it of the Jews to provoke the Germans?  Yes, the scenes in Night Must Fall were horrendous but no less so than the Soviet Jewish abattoirs in Russia in the wake of 1917.  No less so than the post-war crimes planned by international Jewry at war’s end.  No less so than the current Jewish campaign for the genocide of Whiteness.

Henry Morgenthau was rabid and actually tried to implement the Kaufman plan.  Power shifted to the Jews after the Nazi defeat.  Fortunately Roosevelt died just after being elected to his fourth term.  Harry Truman, his successor was compelled to replace the rabid Morgenthau in 1946 in order to get some sanity into postwar plans.

While we viewers were warned to be prepared for outrageous gruesomeness in this propaganda piece, ‘suppressed’ for seventy years, the film was quite mild.  Of course over the last seventy years we have been conditioned to much worse.  Much more horrific was the 1958 exposure when the Jews commandeered all three networks to show a really horrible exposure of Auschwitz.  As the time slot was appropriated on all three networks there was no escaping it other than turning off the TV which few did.  Yes, I, we, were shown what it was unnecessary for us to see.  I don’t know about others but I was hardened by the film resenting the people who gave me no escape, the intellectual Jewish Nazis.

As if that were not horrible enough a stream of movies was released including 1964’s holocaust porn flick The Pawnbroker.  That foul movie drove the ice pick deeper into our skulls.  Starring Rod Steiger in a great if offensive performance this slimy film was meant to sicken and crush our resistance and nearly did me in.  My resentment deepened while it elicited no sympathy for the Jews in me.  I found their obsession evil.  My resentment only grew.

Then the incredible sadistic brutality of movies since then propagated by these same Jews has succeeded in desensitizing one for whatever horrors were intended to be shown last night.  Actually it wasn’t clear what the movie intended to show.  Mostly filmed in Bergen-Belsen all that was shown was massive starvation.  Starving people to death is a slow process.  Actually American and German soldiers were miraculously thin themselves indicating that no one was eating too well while being very active and under great stress.  Even in their great coats the Germans had flat stomachs and prominent waists.  Not round at all.  Apparently food was scarce.

Many of the scenes seemed staged so a certain sense of falseness crept in,  it quite obviously was intended as a propaganda piece.  The movie seemed more to celebrate the introduction of hand held movie technology more than anything else.  One long scene was a movie of a cameraman filming whatever.  Originally filmed in black and white it was breathlessly announced that color film came later.

Fairly tame stuff for myself having been indoctrinated with the real/reel thing all my life.  At this point, who really cares?  I’m sated.

NightMustFall3

Henry Ford And Albert Lasker

December 17, 2014

Henry Ford And Albert Lasker

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Gunther, John:  Taken At The Flood, The Story Of Albert D. Lasker, 1960, Harper, NYC

Hoover, Herbert:  Memoirs Of Herbert Hoover:  The Great Depression 1929-1941,  1952, MacMillan Company, NYC

Weir, Alison:  Against Our Better Judgment: 2014, Self-published.

Schmidt,  Sarah,  The Parushim: A Secret Episode In American Zionist History, http://ifamericansknew.org/history/parushim.html

Tugwell, Rexford: The Brains Trust, 1968, The Viking Press, NYC

Woeste, Victoria Saker:  Henry Ford’s War On The Jews And The Legal Battle Against Hate Speech, 2012, Stanford U. Press, Palo Alto

 

In 1924 Harold Gray sat down and drew the first panels of his new comic strip.  A comic strip that outlived him.  Yes, Little Orphan Annie made her first appearance in the newspapers.  It was in 1948 that I spread the newspaper out on the floor and made my acquaintance with the little orphan girl and her dog Sandy.  I myself had just gotten out of the orphanage so there was an instant bonding.

I hadn’t been reading the strip for too long before the most fascinating character of the comics ever made his appearance.  Daddy Warbucks stepped on stage.  Warbucks, what a name.  Did he make his incredible fortune making munitions in WWI?  If so, it was only implied.

Warbucks was tall and slim, supremely confident with an incongruous joyish attitude.   I mean this guy killed people who got in his way as a matter of course.  Imagine trying to reconcile murder with business as usual in a young boy’s mind.  He had his own private army with two killer sidekicks.  The sinister looking Asp and the jovial giant East Indian, Punjab.  If your transgression was mild Punjab waved his cape over you and you disappeared.  If you made Warbucks angry The Asp pulled out his stiletto and you heard a splash.  The Asp always killed near water.  Daddy knew how to manage his affairs.

The Dangerous Duo

The Dangerous Duo

Warbucks was fabulous.  He had his own grotto where he moored his own private submarine.  He had unlimited cash so he was able to maintain his own secret service.  I wasn’t aware enough then but now I think that Daddy Warbucks was modeled on the great industrialist Henry Ford.  Henry didn’t have a submarine,  but he owned a fleet of Great Lakes ore ships, sort of his own personal navy, with a big F-O-R-D blazoned on the sides you could read a mile or more away.  He even had his own personal river up which his ships delivered the ore from his own personal iron mines.

His estate was upstream a bit on the River Rouge, his river, just above the incredible turn around basin he dug so his ships could go back out on the lakes to pick up more iron ore to keep his Model Ts chugging out the other end of the most astonishing factory in the world.  One time he unloaded the ore into his huge River Rouge factory and 24 hours later a brand new Model T rolled out the other end.  Daddy Warbucks had nothing on Henry Ford.

While the rest of us had to settle for our little electric train sets Henry owned his own personal real life railroad, locomotives, cars and all, real smoke.  Henry was pictured sitting on the coal from his own mines in his own coal car playing the harmonica as he chugged on down the line.  How cool was that?

Better yet, like Daddy Warbucks, he had his own secret service, the Service Department of Ford Motors led by his own intrepid Edgar Hoover, Harry Bennett.  I’m tellin ya, that guy Henry was on the spot, heck, he was the spot.  During the twenties he needed a secret service what with kidnappers, bootleggers, the Jewish Purple Gang, the Italian Mafia, and numerous other free lancers going around, labor fanatics waving bombs in the air, it paid to sniff things out.

Shots flying here and there, rough times in Detroit City.  All Henry wanted to do was make his cars, not battle in a war zone.  And then when the Jews began to war with him he sent his force out to gather incriminating evidence of their activities against him.

Of course the Jews reviled him for defending himself with his Service Department although of course they had no room to talk being awash in paramilitary and terrorists groups themselves.  They even had their own personal shadow government conspiring for a quiet takeover of the country.  Henry took them a step further pointing out that they had an international government working toward a takeover of Europe and the Americas.  He was right too.

2.

All US histories have excised the Jewish influence on politics and social affairs.  To mention them is to be defamed as an ‘anti-Semitist.’  Jewish histories written by Jews for Jews are quite explicit.  They are seldom read either by Jews or gois.  Copies are sent free to libraries however they are seldom and quite often never checked out, even have the presentation slips inside.  If they are read they tell a clear tale of Jewish activities.

In point of fact there was and is an international Jewish government.

In the nineteenth century the government was run from France by the Alliance Israelite Universelle.  During the first years of the nineteenth century the US was disregarded as a fledgling country while the ocean transit was difficult in small sailing ships.  However as the century progressed the country blossomed, large capacity steel ships replaced the wooden ones and failed revolutions like that of 1848 displaced Jews sending them to the US.  With the industrial development after the Civil War it was realized that Jewry could be more effectively directed from the US with much better security.  Hence beginning in the 1870s the European Jewish population began to be transferred to the US while in 1898 the Alliance Israelite Universelle was shipped from Paris to New York City transferring the Jewish world capital to the latter city.  International Jewish activities began to multiply.

A big one was the International Order of B’nai B’rith in the US.  It was organized in 1843 but having branches throughout Europe by 1900.  The Vienna branch was a key lodge as it was joined by Sigmund Freud in 1895.  He remained a lifelong member.  Freud was beginning his psychological career at that time.  Nineteen years later his system of psycho-analysis was the standard of the emerging discipline.

His influence on world affairs through his association with B’nai B’rith would be increasingly felt throughout the twentieth century.  He was essential to forming the Jewish ideology through the death of Roosevelt in 1945.

Now, the Jews had been awaiting a messiah to redeem them for two thousand years.  The last bona fide messianic candidate, Sabbatai Zevi failed them in 1666.  Unwilling to place their hopes in a single individual the Elders then evolved the notion that the Redemption would come from the whole people.  The years set for the Redemption or Jewish Revolution were from 1913 to 1928.  As Ford understood, the events in all countries of Europe and North America were coordinated.  The two key events of the plan were the assumption of the control of US currency in 1913 through the creation of the Federal Reserve and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia of 1917.  Both countries were seemingly secured although the US Redemption was about to be consummated but was aborted by FDR’s death in 1945.

The history of the Jews in the US from 1900 to 1945 then is the progression or realization of their goal.  The first key event of their plan was the fortuitous election of Woodrow Wilson in 1912.  Had Theodore Roosevelt not split the Republican vote by his Bull Moose third party candidature William Howard Taft would have been reelected and the Republican program perfected.

As it was the American public clearly did not want Wilson as President as his vote was half that of the combined Roosevelt-Taft total.  He got in by a fluke proceeding to begin elaborating a socialist government he called the New Freedom.  His administration was a virtual partnership with the Jews who assumed a position of power in his government through 1920.

One of the first acts Wilson performed in 1913 was to sign into law The Federal Reserve System.  In recent years it has been publicized to an increasing extent that the Federal Reserve is not an agency of the US government; it is a private corporation wholly owned and operated by nine international Jewish banks in both the US and Europe with a Rockefeller interest being the tenth thus forming a minyan.

The US monetary affairs had previously been managed by the J. P. Morgan interests also from NYC.  The Jews thus switched that responsibility from the Morgans and also beyond the control of the US president who had no authority over it or influence on it.  When the Fed engineered the Crash of ’29 Herbert Hoover the president bitterly remarked that the Fed had been placed outside of governmental and presidential control specifically to prevent such debacles while guaranteeing that under the Fed they could never again happen.  Woody blew it there, bless the Democrats.

In preparation for WW1 the remaining components of the Jewish government were transferred from Germany to the US.

Now, the Federal Reserve is responsible for the currency of the US so that the Fed actually issues the currency then loans it to the government, that is the citizens, for their use at interest.  Thus the Jews earn interest on every dollar in circulation. As the currency standard for the world you will understand how many trillions are now out at interest.  At the time the upcoming war would expand the currency in circulation exponentially thus providing huge interest to the Jews.  This is a key point because Jewish activities during the redemption would require more money than the Jews could ever have raised on their own.  While so-called Jewish charity did raise a few millions that was nothing compared to their financial needs.  Remember the Jews were supporting dozens of committees and congresses such as the American Jewish Committee at enormous expense as well as hundreds of synagogues along with their rabbis

Organized crime provided huge sums while Prohibition was a positive godsend.  All those criminals are buried in consecrated ground.  Today a museum in Las Vegas has been built to enshrine the activities of Jewish criminals.  No stigma attached.

Organized crime was important to the Jewish program but so were legal activities.  Thus it was that in 1916 Wilson appointed Louis Brandeis to the Supreme Court of the United States.  This was a break with the past as formerly the court was all Anglo.  As imperfect as his appointment was, the fact that Brandeis was a Zionist was even more important.  Zionism was and is in conflict with what was then the American system now almost completely eroded.

Perhaps it was not known to Wilson that Brandeis had the dual identity, or perhaps he did and was complicit.  An objector to Brandeis’ appointment described him as ‘a man who had certain high ideals in his imagination, but who is actually unscrupulous in reaching them.’  What the objector was describing is what is known as a justified sinner; that is one who is ‘saved’ in Christian terms at birth and thus can be as unscrupulous as he likes to satisfy his desires without sacrificing his guaranteed redemption.  The objector might as well have been describing the whole Jewish belief system, essentially the end justifies the means.

The drum roll began to establish a reputation for Brandeis as the greatest living jurist and the purest man alive.  Actually Brandeis was a ringleader of both Zionism and the Jewish Revolution.  Using his status as a Supreme Court justice one of the first things he did was buy a professorship at Harvard for his lieutenant Felix Frankfurter.  The drum roll then began to portray Frankfurter as one of the wisest legal scholars backed by his professorship at Harvard.

Thus he and Brandeis became two secular saints of both societies.

Frankfurter then began recruiting a cadre of acolytes to further Jewish objectives.  Over the next twenty years Frankfurter assembled the cadre that became important when Roosevelt brought the Jews back to DC.  No sooner installed than Frankfurter filled the Dept. of Agriculture with his acolytes.  Thus in one fell swoop he completed the program fostered by Aaron Sapiro that was temporarily frustrated by Henry Ford from 1924-27.

A key event in the establishment of Jewish supremacy was the trial of Leo Frank from 1913-15.

3.

The Leo Frank Affair

The Leo Frank affair is a very important event in the Jewish calendar.  They never tire at bringing it up while it had long ranging repercussions.

For those unfamiliar with the story Leo Frank was a Jewish businessman living in Atlanta Georgia.  While his personal life is carefully avoided he is depicted as a Jewish secular saint who never did nobody no harm.   Contrarily he was described as a sexual pervert.  He employed young girls to make his pencils. By young girls we are talking child labor, pre-pubescent and pubescent.  So our secular saint was exploiting young children to line his pockets.  The temptation of all those young girls may have been too strong for his resistance.  On this occasion he called fourteen year old Mary Phagan to the factory on a Saturday when he was alone in the office, all others being absent, to pick up her paycheck.  Probably the amount was 1.86 or some such ridiculously low figure as that.

None saw Mary pick up the check obviously, but she was discovered in the basement on Monday murdered.  Frank tried to pin the crime on a Negro janitor.  Of course there was no hard evidence as to who had committed the crime but Frank was condemned as the perpetrator.

Why call the girl back to get her paycheck on Saturday after all the others?  Frank was tried in an American court of law and found guilty.  Louis Marshall, president of the American Jewish Committee, considered the conviction and death sentence as an anti-Semitic act somewhat like the blood libel.  Frank had been convicted solely because he was a Jew in Marshall’s eyes.  Marshall then began to organize a committee to free Frank.

Marshall was the president of the AJC, the AJC was the most important Jewish organization at the time as it is now.  It has always kept a low profile or semi-secret existence.  My wife’s aunt who was very active in Jewish affairs and the civil rights movement had never heard of the AJC until I told her about it which I find stunningly remarkable.

Mr. Marshall was a lawyer as well as president of the AJC.  In his lawyer guise he frequently accuses opponents of being ignorant of the law, yet on page 295 of his Champion of Liberty he says ‘…I am morally convinced that the young man is innocent.’  I have no idea what legal standing being morally convinced of innocence is but I rather imagine, slight.

On p. 297 he writes:  It is desirable to eliminate from consideration of the case, that Frank is a Jew.  The important thing to consider is, that he was a respected industrious, law-abiding citizen…’

The question is a legal one not a question of the status of Frank’s reputation.  In fact there was some question as to whether Frank was a sexual pervert.  Certainly his desire to be alone with Mary in his factory, a poor defenseless very young girl, might tend to confirm the opinion.  I am morally convinced this was so.

Marshall sets the wheels in  motion in his attempt to reverse the conviction.  In his reply to the letter from Judge Irving Lehman he further goes on to write, p. 295:  “Obviously it would be most unfortunate if anything were done in this case from the standpoint of the Jews.  Whatever is to be done must be done as a matter of justice and any action that is to be taken should emanate from non-Jewish sources.”

So, Mr. Marshall is falsely going to act on justice rather than the fact that Frank is a Jew.  He is going to conceal the fact while getting non-Jewish persons to front for him.  He apparently believes that if Frank were not a Jew the murder would be let drop.  On the other hand he seems to feel that Frank has been convicted solely because he is was a Jew not a rapist murderer.  Apparently overlooking the dead child he believes a Christian would never have been convicted.  Thus it is not a matter of justice but a question of the religion of the murderer but we’re not going to talk about that.

While recruiting a Christian front group to mislead the actual actors Marshall also recruits, one might almost say commands, a Jewish cadre of activists.  Now, Marshall was convinced or said so that the Frank case was the most important case since the Dreyfus Affair in France of the 1890s.  Dreyfus was a Jewish spy in the French army who was originally convicted but after a furious publicity campaign by the Jews using French front men they had the decision reversed a few years later.   It was then that the important French novelist Emile Zola was recruited as a front issuing his famous J’ accuse letter.  One guesses that the Dreyfus campaign was the model for the Frank case.

Of the variety of Jews recruited to act behind the front one was the advertising executive from Chicago, Albert Lasker.  Today both Marshall and Lasker have been obscured by time and may for practical matters be considered forgotten.  Yet both men had significant roles during this time.  Lasker as a young man entering his twenties at the turn of the century took a job with a Chicago advertising firm Lord and Thomas.  At the turn of the twentieth century advertising had nowhere near the importance or prominence that it has today.  Lasker joined the firm just as the advertising industry was about to develop.  Lord and Thomas, the founders, were men of the nineteenth century not having yet learned of the psychological learning developing under their noses.  Advertising was more educative at the time and less propagandistic.  Lasker would develop newer methods based on propaganda and psychology.

We are not too concerned with his work on the Frank case although its work would require a leave of absence from his agency that would continue through the Aaron Sapiro legal battle with Henry Ford.  Lasker was much involved in Sapiro’s attempt at a Jewish food monopoly.

4.

The question that is never addressed by goi historians and not fully disguised by the Jewish historians is what were the Jews doing after emancipation.  The two key American agencies after 1913 were the American Jewish Committee and the Order of B’nai B’rith while Freud’s psychoanalytic Order played in the background.  One should not underestimate the Freudian conspiracy and its activities in Central and Eastern Europe.

Organization stepped up after the inauguration of Wilson in 1913.  Brandeis and Frankfurt would be key players from Wilson through FDR.  Alison Weir gives some indication of the basic Jewish attitude in her Against Our Better Judgment in her discussion of a Jewish revolutionary group called the Parushim of 1913 and on.

This was a Jewish guerilla group formed as an order with elaborate oaths.  As reported by Miss Weir:

Quote:

“You are about to take a step which will bind you to a single cause for all your life.  You will for one year be subject to an absolute duty whose call you will be compelled to heed at any time in any place and at any cost.  And ever after until our purpose shall be accomplished you will be fellow of a brotherhood whose bond you will regard as greater than any other in your life- dearer than that of family, or school, or nation.”

Unquote.

Horace Kallen the author of the Order made Louis Brandeis, before his Supreme Court appointment, an honorary member.  Brandeis’ acceptance may have been more political in nature while as an honorary member he may not have felt bound by the oath, nevertheless as a Supreme Court justice he had pledged himself to an authority higher than the ‘nation’ and actually US law.  Of course he had pledged himself as a Zionist to that end.  Judaism uber alles.

Whether or not Lasker had pledged himself to the Parushim, as an ardent Jew and Zionist he also would have the same attitude as Brandeis and Frankfurter.  After his activities in the Leo Frank case Lasker devoted several years to Jewish activities, the Lord and Thomas interests being managed by his surrogates.

Bearing the Parushim oath in mind, in 1924 Henry Ford used his newspaper to expose the activities of Aaron Sapiro, a Jewish lawyer organizing North American agricultural cooperatives leading to the Jewish goal.  According to Ford’s researchers, a competent corps of men, Sapiro was aided in devising the co-op movement by Bernard Baruch, Lasker and Eugene Meyer.

As noted Sapiro had been recruited by the co-op plans deviser, David Lubin.  The first step in the plan had been the organization of the Jewish orange growers of Sacramento.  Lasker had been called in to promote the sale of oranges which he successfully did, thus it seems that he would have known both Lubin and Sapiro and probably was clued to the plan thus there should be no surprise that he was subsequently involved as Ford’s articles indicated.

Bernard Baruch, the King of the Shadows, served as a commodity expert in the Wilson administration thus he would have been very useful in forming these co-ops of commodities.  Working from the shadows Baruch had more power than one would believe.  As an instance FDR had to take him into account because as FDR said, he owned sixty congressmen.  That almost amounts to a shadow government.  Of course you will never learn that from Baruch’s autobiography.

Eugene Meyer was president of the Federal Reserve which would have been very useful although gaining information on him has been difficult.

One must believe that Ford’s exposure made Sapiro’s co-op organizing difficult although his influence was in decline after David Lubin’s death in 1919.  Apparently Lubin’s direction was essential.  Thus Ford’s exposure was effective regardless of any results of Sapiro’s lawsuit.  However the agriculture issue was not settled by Sapiro’s defeat.

As noted Brandeis was given terrific influence over American political affairs when Wilson appointed him a Supreme Court justice.  Like Baruch he was a major influence in forcing Jewish affairs forward leading a double life.

Brandeis, in whose honor Brandeis University was is named, bought a Harvard professorship for his disciple Felix Frankfurter.  The drum roll then began to blazon Frankfurter as well as his master as the greatest legal minds the world had ever seen.  Frankfurter himself began to indoctrinate decades of students, Jew and goi alike in the goals of Parushim.  Thus the oaths terms ‘on behalf of the Jews, my [own] people, and of mankind’ were inserted to include not only Jews but any of the goyim Frankfurter might seduce.  Plus Frankfurter could control to a great extent who was at the top of their class and who was at the bottom.

Brandeis and Frankfurter were rewarded in 1933 when Roosevelt was inaugurated.  Frankfurter immediately filled the Dept. of Agriculture with his disciples, none of whom were farmers.  One of the first acts of the Roosevelt administration was the passing the Agricultural Adjustment Act- the AAA.   Thus although temporarily derailed in the mid-twenties by Ford, in 1933 the Jews obtained more under Roosevelt than they could have by the laborious and patient work of Sapiro, Baruch, Lasker and Meyer.

Of course the AAA was declared unconstitutional in 1935 by the Supreme Court confirming Ford’s opinion of the plan but that was nullified in after years by its implementation step by step anyway.

It is probable that Ford never met Albert Lasker but their lives touched indirectly.

 

 

The Secret History Of The Jews

In The Twentieth Century

By

Magus Incognito

1.

There is that which is manifest and that which is hidden. The former is for the compliant and the latter is for the inquiring mind, the cognocenti. This history is meant for the cognoscenti but all are welcome. The cognoscenti will be knowing; the rest will be wondering.

The character the Jews have projected of themselves is at variance with their true character which they keep hidden. Like a magician of old they have the ability to cloud men’s minds so that they see what the Jews want them to see. Prior to the twentieth century the Catholic Church had kept the Jews under control; with the French Revolution and the erosion of Church influence the Jews escaped that control and began to veil men’s minds although resistance was always high in Europe.

A key event for the Jewish rise was the establishment of the United States in 1789. That event opened a new vista for the Jews allowing them to escape European dominance. The process slowly gained momentum during the nineteenth century, the key event being the failed revolution of 1848 that sent a wave of Jewish revolutionaries to the United States. This wave was then augmented by the arrival of the second wave from Eastern Europe beginning in the 1870s and continuing in accelerating numbers until 1914. By 1914 there were perhaps five million Jews in the US.

The Jewish people have always been at odds with all other peoples, none moreso than Europeans whether known as Aryans, Caucasians or Whites. The Jews became exasperated with Europeans following their just expulsion from Spain. At that time they declared war on Europe vowing to destroy all Europeans as they had previously done to the Amalekites and others. The means would have to be conspiratorial as they lacked military might.

In Europe they had been expelled en masse from Spain, England and France for several hundred years before the French Revolution. The majority had taken refuge in Central and Eastern Europe where they lived a semi-autonomous existence, that is in an uneasy accord with the Slavic peoples. That situation ended when the Russians annexed Byelorussia, Lithuania and participated in the partition of Poland. Thus the Russians acquired the largest population of Jews in the world. The semi-autonomous period for the Jews was over as the Russians made them subjects. The Eastern Jews rebelled becoming permanent revolutionaries declaring Russia and its Czars enemies to be defeated and ruled. Remember the Amalekites.

The German Jews having settled in the US since 1848 then found the US the New Promised Land. The Americans having been separated from Europe for a couple hundred years while reverencing the Jews as the biblical Hebrews had lost their knowledge of the Jews becoming innocent babes waiting to be fleeced.

The transfer of the Eastern Jews began in 1871 while by 1900 they had reached critical mass. They were about 9% of a population of 70 million, possibly 10% if you exclude the Negroes.

In the land of unlimited opportunity the German Jews had acquired large fortunes. Thus they were able to manage the incoming Eastern Jews on their own maintaining a high degree of cohesion, becoming in fact colonists.

European technological advance of the nineteenth century such as all metal steamships providing fast and reliable transportation and Marconi’s telegraph made it possible as never before to maintain constant contact, instant contact, so that a truly international Jewish conspiracy coordinating all national communities became a fact.

2.

Whereas Paris with its Alliance Israelite Universelle had been the central clearing house for Jewish affairs, at the turn of the century that government was transferred to New York City in the United States making that city the capital of world wide Jewry. From NYC the Jews were able to coordinate international Jewish affairs without the least interference, indeed, the active assistance of the US government.

Thus, from Russia across Europe and the United States the Jews formed a supra-national government over all the national governments.

Even in the turmoil of constant emigration from the East and accommodation to the United States the Jews were able to wage incessant warfare on Russia which they have always denied but, remember the Amalekites. Bear in mind that the Russian Jews emigrating from that country came to the US in a revolutionary state of mind. They transferred their aggression toward Russia to the United States where their dream of autonomy and domination seemed not only possible but probable and as we shall see it was.

Now, concerning the state of mind of the Jewish people. Those in the West, that is Germany, France, Holland, Belgium and England living among the most scientifically advanced people in the world naturally acclimated themselves to that scientific mindset becoming quite different from their Eastern brethren who remained sunk in medieval Judaism while they were conditioned to be at war with a society they abhorred. This made a big difference in the US. The transition from a primitive non-technological existence in the Pale of Settlement was as though traveling from one parallel universe to another with the old hostilities intact. One should bear in mind that when the Russian Jews first came to the US they had probably never heard of electricity much less seen it in use. The effect of Coney Island blazing away in the night on their approach was awe inspiring to them.

Thus in New York City the Russian Jews tried to replicate the conditions that had existed in abandoned Russia. This created friction between themselves and the German Jews of ‘48 who like their European counterparts had accepted to some extend Western mores. This would change as Eastern Zionism became the established Jewish ideology. Through the two wars the German Jews guided Jewish fortunes.

The German Jews countered Eastern Jewish attempts to recreate Russia by guiding them in adapting Jewish ways to American customs. Thus beginning in the first decade of the century a series of new organizations were added to the ancient Order of B’nai B’rith that had existed since 1843 becoming international in the course. Sigmund Freud joined the Vienna lodge in 1895. That lodge, guided by Freudian psychological ideas was instrumental in fomenting the Russian Revolutions of 1903-05 and 1917.

While Henry Ford in the third decade of the twentieth century was castigated for recognizing the international Jewish conspiracy he was nevertheless right. It isn’t clear how much he knew or believed but there were many rumors swirling around the events of the first Russian revolution that was fomented by the Jews.

The large Jewish banking houses of England, France and Germany proscribed Russia refusing it loans while at the same time forbidding gentile firms from doing so. Thus, as the Russo-Japanese war of 1903-05 approached in far off Manchuria the Russians were strapped for cash to fund it. The Japanese also were unable to finance their war and except for the intervention of the Kuhn-Loeb banking house of New York that war may have been averted. However, Jacob Schiff of the ‘48 generation a partner in Kuhn-Loeb was also on the board of the giant Equitable Life Assurance Society that had hundreds of millions of dollars of liquid assets. Using his position on the board Schiff converted those assets to cash loaning it to Japan thus allowing the Japanese to engage the Russians who they defeated.

It was then arranged that the peace negotiations should be conducted by President Theodore Roosevelt in the US. In those peace negotiations Schiff wrangled a place as an independent people for the Jews in the negotiations thus being able to impose Jewish national concerns on the Russians.

Subsequently, knowing that American Jews were fomenting troubles in Russia the Russians refused to honor the passports of American Jews, denying them entry into Russia. Having successfully manipulated Roosevelt once the Jews tried again. They became aggrieved American citizens whose passports were not being honored simply because of their ‘religion.’ You didn’t have to be a genius to see through that one. Not only were the Jews acting as double citizens but the Irish were too. Using the US as a base of international operations as were the Jews the Irish also planned in the US and executed trouble in Ireland. If caught they claimed American citizenship and as a courtesy to the US the English allowed them to leave Ireland.

As with the Irish it was essential for the Jewish agenda that they be allowed to travel freely back and forth. Thus they corroborated Henry Ford’s characterization as international Jews. Knowing their intent the Czar of the Russias refused to bend to admit American Jews. Intense pressure was then placed on the American presidents Roosevelt and Taft to break off diplomatic relations with Russia. Incredibly enough Taft gave into Jewish pressure breaking off diplomatic relations in 1911.

Thus Jews became influential in directing US foreign policy. This would develop and continue until by 1940 the Jews guided Franklin Roosevelt into their war with Germany.

3.

History Of A Hoax

How did the Jews get into this position? I am going to suggest by creating the most fantastic hoax ever and that hoax was the so-called Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion. Having created the Protocols the Jews then denounced the document as an anti-Semitic forgery. They have always maintained that the so-called forgery is a fact but it is not.

The provenance of the Protocols has never been proven. There is no more proof that agents of the Czarist Okhrana produced it than it is an authentic Jewish plan. The only thing that has ever been agreed upon is that the Protocols were derived from an earlier book supposedly written in France in the 1860s by a French Jew named Maurice Joly.

According to the Joly legend the book was published and printed but before any distribution was made the entire press run was confiscated and destroyed by the French Emperor Napoleon III to whom it is supposed the book referred but there is no proof of this either. One would assume the confiscation would mean that there were no memory traces of the book forty years later in the twentieth century so that there could have been no one who could be in existence who ever thought there was such a book as Joly’s Dialogues Between Montesquieu And Machiavelli In Hell. Having read the book I can tell you the mere title is overblown while having little reference if any to the Protocols. We are asked to believe this incredible story straight from the pages of boilerplate fantasy: During the Bolshevic Revolution the Protocols appeared depicting the Jewish plan to make them Masters Of The World. No science fiction there, right? According to the Jews the Protocols were a devastating defamation of the Jewish people.

What to do? Denial was insufficient to appease the anti-Semites. Something positive was needed. It was then ‘remembered’ by whom isn’t clear that the Dialogues of Joly that no one had ever read was the basis of the Protocols hence making them we are led to believe, a forgery to defame the Jews and justify their persecution. Alas, no one had a copy of Joly’s dialogues, as why should they, nor after a thorough search of the world’s libraries, not surprisingly, one could not be found.

Oh, lack a day, what to do? Then an amazing thing happened not only in one version but in several although the location was always Constantinople or, by the current name, Istanbul.

After the Armistice, Czarist armies, otherwise known as Whites as opposed to Reds, fought to regain the Czardom. The Southern troops under Wrangel having been defeated the stragglers continued South entering or passing through Constantinople.

Paydays having ceased, the troopers were broke trying to sell any possessions they had for whatever pittance they could get. Now, this is indeed miraculous, almost supernatural. There was an old Jewish second hand book dealer who was offered a coverless book with the title pages missing as well one presumes several back pages. Incredibly this astute book dealer bought this wreck of a book that should have been unsaleable. Having it now in possession our book dealer, being, as usual with all Jews, fluent in numerous languages including French began to read.

Our book dealer was also thoroughly conversant with the Protocols, presumably printed in Russian, no obstacle, so that to his surprise what he was reading sounded familiar. Like a bolt he realized he was reading the only now known copy of the lost Dialogues by Joly. I’ve read both books and I am myself amazed that he recognized the Protocols in the Dialogues as the two books are not that similar.

This being 1920 or so he immediately posted the book off to Paris to the astonished Rabbis, or whatever, who then began a new search of the libraries. Actually I don’t see the reason for looking as there was such a small chance of the confiscated printing finding its way to libraries. Well b’gosh and b’gorrah a copy was now found in Oxford’s Bodleian Library. Proof said the Jews that the Protocols were a forgery.

In another version perhaps even more fantastic, or a spoof, Allen Dulles of the CIA, then in some subordinate position in the State Department on assignment in Constantinople in this momentous year says that he was offered the copy by the Russian soldier thereby saving the Jews bacon. I’m not sure how many languages Dulles was fluent in.

I’ve read some Darby Ram stories in my time and these two are excellent but too incredible for any conspiracy theorist. I’m just guessing, of course, but I don’t think there ever was a Dialogues Between Montesquieu and Machiavelli In Hell.

As anyone who has ever seen the movie Wag The Dog, itself a Jewish hoax, would understand, I think, this is what happened.

4.

We Found Our Way In, Now How Do We Find Our Way Out?

Even though the Jews deny their dominant role in the Bolshevic Revolution the true facts are obvious to the most rank beginner.

The Jews had been at war with the Romanov Czars since the partition of Poland in the eighteenth century. During the nineteenth century they were the driving force while designing and coordinating the first Russian revolution of 1903-05. They had worked relentlessly from that date to the October Revolution of 1917. Lenin’s whole cadre of revolutionaries were Jews, Bela Kun in Hungary was Jewish, Eisner in Bavaria was as well as the major figures in Berlin, Rosa Luxembourg et al. Everyone knew it so that at that point mere denial was not enough. A truly smelly red herring was needed, so one appeared.

The Protocols were give a history, the history of a lie according to Herman Bernstein, although no one had heard of them before 1917. Watch Wag The Dog for the method. In the Protocols the Jews themselves accused themselves of what they were doing. But since 1895, the master of mass hypnotism, Sigmund Freud had been working both inside the Vienna B’nai B’rith and his Wednesday night psychoanalytic group to both condition his fellow Jews for the horrendous sadistic crimes they would be called on to perform in the East and to persuade European minds the Jews were holy people without fault. To criticize them in any manner made one a foul, evil anti-Semite.

Thus the Protocols called to Europeans to reaffirm their benevolence toward innocent Jews while at the same time condemning their native ‘anti-Semites.’ And it worked. Attention was diverted from their crimes and projected on their denouncers and critics as anti-Semites. Thus the Manchester Guardian, their leading English critic was forced to pull in their horns when the also forged Dialogues were ‘discovered’ while the leading American critic, Henry Ford, ran out of steam in 1922 also as a result of the revelation of the Dialogues.

It seems clear that the Dialogues were fabricated after 1917 and planted in the Bodleian much in the manner of the planting of the Old Shoe song in the Congressional Library of the US in that fabulous movie fable Wag The Dog.

Ford’s exposes were revived in 1924 when he discovered the Jewish machinations in agriculture of Aaron Sapiro. This brings us to the relief work of Herbert Hoover who unwittingly frustrated the efforts of the international Jews.

5.

Food As A Weapon Of Mass Destruction

We have seen how the Jews created a hoax to lure their opponents into using it as a tool to denounce them and thus in their turn denouncing their creation as a forgery intended to misrepresent them. Their critics were then exposed as anti-Semites for which all people are abhorrent. Their disguise was well maintained.

It will be remembered that at the time of their expulsion from Spain at the cusp of the sixteenth century the Jews declared eternal war on Europe. Their hatred was the same as that held against the Amalekites of an earlier time. In that instance when it became possible the Jews or their predecessor people, the Hebrews, returned to exact vengeance on the Amalekites by exterminating them root and branch, meaning no survivors. Who now remembers the Amalekites? Their goal was no less for the Europeans or what their current agent Noel Ingnatiev would call Whiteness.

To move slightly ahead, after the Jews seized power in the US under the aegis of Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1933 they waged war on those who had offended them, most notably Herbert Hoover and Henry Ford in the US and Hitler in Germany. The criminal defamation that Hoover endured from 1933 to 1945 when Roosevelt died and Hoover’s rehabilitation began was unrelenting and incredibly vicious. Historians have wondered why Roosevelt felt such an animus against Hoover. He didn’t, but the Jews did and FDR was their creature, thus when he died and Truman assumed the presidency the Jewish spell was broken allowing Hoover to regain at least some of his former reputation as The Great Engineer.

The question then is why did the Jews equate Herbert Hoover with their ancient enemy, the Amalekites. Quite simply Hoover frustrated their goal of exterminating tens of millions of Europeans by starvation. This occurred mainly in three places, Belgium, Eastern Europe and Germany.

The next question then is in whose interest were the two world wars? Who were the chief beneficiaries. The answer to both questions is the Jews. There is a strong body of opinion that believes the Jews were chief fomenters of both WWI and WWII. During WWI the Jews seized control of Russia with dire consequences and almost succeeded in annexing the rest of Eastern and Central Europe including Germany. Had that swath of Europe fallen to them then the West would have fallen too. The only force between Jewish domination of Europe was Hitler and the Nazis. Hence the Jewish hatred of Hitler. The Jewish hatred of Hitler began after WWI and not later although it became intensified.

The war itself with the terrific loss of European manhood was itself balm to the Jewish soul. When the Germans in WWI crossed over into a nearly defenseless Belgium the country was devastated and its people destituted. By 1915 it became obvious that the whole Belgian population would die of starvation.

The ‘democracies’ did not attempt to alleviate Belgian distress and obviously could not as enemy combatants of the Germans. It was then that Herbert Hoover as a private citizen and on his own initiative and partial expense stepped into the breach to rescue the Belgians.

Hoover, born in 1875 had been educated as a mining engineer at the newly formed Stanford University of California. During the intervening years between graduation and 1914 he had obtained a formidable reputation as an engineer while working the mines of Australia and China. He had been present at the Boxer rebellion of China. He was the very best of the mining engineers inventing many processes while being universally admired as the Great Engineer. His title was well earned.

Horrified at the potential fate of the Belgians he set about to relieve their distress. Acting on his own he convinced the leaders of both sides to allow him to bring food to the Belgians. The Germans gave and honored their promise not to appropriate his supplies for their own use.

Hoover then organized the US food sources and transportation to restore hope to the Belgians. After the armistice the so-called ‘democracies’ and humanitarians placed a food embargo on German allowing no food through in an attempt to exterminate the Germans as a nation. Shocked at the barbarity and inhumanity Hoover once again stepped in to allay the ferocity of the allies and allow food into Germany.

As you can well imagine Central and Eastern Europe had been devastated by four years of warring on its soil. No crops had been planted, the spectre of death floated over the entire immense territory. Neither the US nor the allies were prepared for this unprecedented disaster, indeed, only the US untouched by war was in a position to do anything.

The only people who had prepared for this disaster were the Jews. Among the many organizations formed to further their interest was a now little known organization called The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee. It had been formed during the war with the express purpose of alleviating Jewish post-war distress in Eastern Europe. Organized as a ‘charity’ for Jews then, US Jewish operatives roved the Pale providing food for Jews and Jews only. They thought hopefully that Europeans would starve en masse.

The Europeans could only count on Herbert Hoover who once again came to their rescue.

VI.

The Jews Among The Aryans

The question then is not what did Roosevelt have against Hoover but what did the Jews have against Hoover. That can be answered quite simply. Because Hoover relieved the Europeans of famine, that is he saved European lives that the Jews had condemned. Yes, the Jews were bent on the genocide of Europeans. There is a high degree of hypocrisy in the Jewish condemnation of what they call the holocaust. The Jews had been working toward something like the two world wars since their expulsion from Spain. They had created their perfect storm and then along came Herbert Hoover to mess it up. Now do you understand Hitler and the so-called holocaust? Hitler like Ford had the program figured out.

You didn’t have to be too smart to understand that famine was not only a possibility but a certainty after the war. The Jews did learn from Hoover’s effort in Belgium. After observing Hoover the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee was formed for the express purpose of alleviating Jewish hunger in the post-war East.

The Armistice did not end the war, it was merely a laying down of arms in the West. As incredible as it may seem the war weary Western States continued the war against the Bolshevics in the East. The American and Japanese were active in Western Siberia while British and American troops landed at Archangel in the North.

Wrangel was leading the White forces in the South receiving aid from the Allies. All was chaos from the Western border of Germany to Siberia. Russians were virtually excluded from the governance of their country as it was taken by the previously conquered peoples- Poles, Georgians, Jews, Letts, Lithuanians, Ukrainians and what have you. Chief among the conquerors were the Jews. And from the United States Jews rushed to them. The president of the international Jewish community, the US resident Jacob Schiff immediately rushed multi-million dollar loans to the revolutionary government. Wilson called him on the carpet but Schiff chatted his way out of it.

The Joint Distributing Committee sent cadres of operatives to bring relief to Jews and Jews only; this involved both food and money to establish businesses.

Meanwhile a general slaughter of Russians began. Abattoirs were created that rivaled the Nazis in killing efficiency. Russians were crucified on the telegraph poles lining the railways. And of course, starvation was the main genocidal tool. Food as a weapon of mass destruction. Hostilities in Russian lasted six or more years rather than the four in the West. Large scale farming had been impossible so any food reserves had been consumed. By 1921 tens of millions of Russians were on the brink of extinction. The Jews were truly remembering the Amalekites.

By 1921 Hoover was the Secretary of Commerce under President Warren G. Harding. He thus had greater resources at his command. He undertook to relieve the suffering Russians not without objections that he was aiding the enemy.

Of course by 1921 the Bolshevic menace was known and recognized. While the post-war chaos was in fact a revolutionary attempt that fact has been papered over to deny the reality. In any event the Harding administration stomped down hard putting a stop to it within months of his inauguration.

While the Communist revolution was inaccurately named the Russian Revolution the Russians having little to do with it, nevertheless ’Russians’ were held accountable for it so that there was some US opposition for Hoover’s relieving the enemy. Not only was there opposition from the US but the Soviets interfered with the relief mission preferring to see the millions die. Nevertheless Hoover was successful. Therein lay his offense to the Jews. He foiled their attempts at genocide. He forestalled their vengeance for the expulsion from Spain. Revenge on the Amalekites still eluded them.

6.

What Happened Next

Depending on your reading of history, the Jews of Europe were a privileged caste albeit despised for their differences. In an almost incredible turn of fate the Catholic church forbade the faithful to loan money for interest thereby handing the Jews an unbelievable monopoly to fleece Europeans. Of course the Jews smirkingly despise this monopoly as a curse.

In Spain the Jews sought and received a monopoly on tax farming thereby enabling them to grind the Spanish between a millstone of taxes and interest. Believe me the Spaniards were ground fine.

After the expulsion those who settled in what became the Pale of Settlement devised a corrupted German language known as Yiddish that was universal to all European Jews. Thus while European nationalities were devising distinct national languages that made international communication difficult to impossible Jews could roam Europe freely able to communicate freely with each other. Thus in international movement of goods Jews had, if not another monopoly, at least a distinct advantage.

They thus became the agents to move commodities such as wheat from one nation to another. Without realizing at the time what they had, they had the means to control who could have bread and when. Even though they lacked the military might to destroy the Europeans they had, or would have, the very formidable weapon of food- starvation as a weapon of mass destruction.

Even before WWI the Jews had formulated a plan for the control of wheat and had begun implementing the plan under the direction of one David Lubin, of whom I’m sure but very have heard of.

Lubin who emigrated to the US as a child moved West to Sacramento where having made his fortune he began his plan by organizing Jewish California orange growers. At some point he met Henry Ford’s nemesis, Aaron Sapiro, an unsuccessful lawyer from San Francisco. Taking him as his apprentice he taught him his plan then decamped for Italy where he persuaded the King of Italy to back his plan. Unfortunately for Rubin he caught that deadly strain of flu and died in 1919. This probably affected the implementation of his plan in the US.

In the US Sapiro allied himself with a mega villain named Bernard Baruch as well as Eugene Meyer and a publicist, Albert Lasker. It is probable that Baruch knew Lubin. The quartet were in the process of securing control, or attempting it, of US and Canadian wheat growers when Henry Ford got wind of it.

Ford had begun a serious investigation of Jewish activities publishing the results in his own newspaper alluringly named the International Dearborn Independent. The paper was the first attempt at a national newspaper although how successful it was internationally hasn’t as yet come to my attention.

While the Jews always objected to the paper that took the Protocols of Zion as its guide they settled for merely defaming Ford as an anti-Semite. For whatever reasons Ford discontinued his Jewish articles in 1922 perhaps because Jews portrayed their hoax as a forgery that was initially accepted by all.

But in 1924 alerted to Sapiro’s activities to form wheat co-ops while having learned who knows what about Jewish food plans in his studies, Ford took exception beginning a new series of articles exposing the attempt at what he perceived, correctly I believe, as an attempt to seize a wheat corner. He may not have known of their ultimate goal but if he did he wisely kept it to himself as who would believe it. Shucks, it took more than a decade before people really believed the Nazis had been exterminating the Jews. Hitler did remember the Amalekites while the even more recent extermination of the Armenians had already been forgotten. ‘Who now remembers the Armenians?’ as Hitler put it. It pays to have a long memory.

The attack on Sapiro’s farm activities threatened their ultimate goal so that legal action was taken against Ford by Sapiro. As the men Ford styled international Jews formed a backdrop to the legal suit it may be assumed that their interest was more than casual. In any event the period from 1924-27 when the trial ended fell between the East European famine of 1921 and the largest man made famine ever in Russia during 1932-33.

The outcome of the Ford trial is immaterial, the point is that Ford disrupted Sapiro’s plan to form a wheat monopoly. Actually the trial was declared a mistrial because of Sapiro’s Jury tampering while Ford in the midst of his first ever model changeover since 1909 settled out of court so that he could devote his attention to his new Model A.

7.

When Warren G. Harding assumed the presidency in 1921 the Jews lost the influence they had enjoyed in Washington under Wilson. This disrupted the progress of their plans while the Republicans regained control of the country for the next twelve years under Harding, Coolidge and…Herbert Hoover.

Those twelve years known as the New Economic Era or just New Era were the most prosperous years the country had ever known while the riches were spread far and wide. While they might have been called the Republican prosperity they were called the Coolidge prosperity instead. Had that prosperity been allowed to continue who knew when the Democrats and hence the Jews would be back in power. Obviously the New Era couldn’t be allowed to continue. The Democrats needed a disaster to get back in.

The Jews who were 25% of NYC controlled the leading Democratic politician, Al Smith. His principal advisor Belle Moskowitz and among others the rising Robert Moses latched unto him. And then there was Franklin Roosevelt who was being groomed having been indoctrinated in the Settlement House scheme. As Frank succeeded Al as the NY governor the New Era was securely in Jewish hands.

The 1928 election was at the height of the Coolidge prosperity there being little chance of his Republican successor, Herbert Hoover, losing. Smith who was the weaker national candidate may have been sacrificed by being put up against a shoo-in, with Roosevelt held in reserve until 1932 while serving two terms as governor. In his race Eleanor who had also worked Settlement House but was more canny concerning Jews advised her husband to steer clear of Moskowitz and Moses.

Obviously the attempt to undermine the Republicans would have to be by destroying prosperity. There is no doubt that Hoover would have been re-elected had prosperity continued. The attack then would come from monetary policy.

It will be remembered that Paul Warburg was sent over from Germany to set up the Federal Reserve Bank. The Fed controlled monetary policy while the bank was privately held by 10 international banks, nine owned by Jews and the other by the Rockefellers. The currency actually was owned by the Fed, gotten for nothing, and then loaned at interest back to the American people.

Then by managing the discount rate the Fed could control the direction of the economy. A stock trading frenzy was thus created by lowering interest and flooding currency. This did not go unnoticed contrary to the myths of the period. Hoover served as Secretary of Commerce under both Harding and Coolidge thus was conversant with monetary policy. He did object early and frequently to the regular loosening of credit especially that of 1927 which he and anyone the least bit knowledgeable knew would lead to runaway speculation in the stock market. The crash occurred at the end of 1929.

At the same time in 1930 the big boom of the New Era turned into the big bust. While the Stock market crash was spectacular it wasn’t thought by itself to have created the Great Depression. However, the crash could be depicted as the failure of capitalism at a time when the Soviet first five year plan was being billed as an economic miracle. The propaganda value of the Crash then was invaluable. Perhaps the failed post-war revolution could be revived and succeed.

The media of course piled on Hoover demanding he turn the economy around on a dime because he was the brilliant reliever of the Belgians, Germans and Russians. Now he was smirkingly derided as The Great Engineer. He would be defamed to near oblivion. Now with a disaster staring both he and the country in the face he was unable to help in Europe so the Jews took this time to create the greatest man made famine in history destroying many millions of Russians. So, while Hoover had aborted the Belgian and Russian famines he was powerless to help in the current Russian famine. The Jews had stuffed it to him at last. Meanwhile as another cruel joke WWI army veterans were on street corners selling apples for a nickel each.

It could be a coincidence but in 1932 the Jews marched back into Washington at the head of the Roosevelt column as the band played Happy Days Are Here Again. Even if it is a coincidence funny how it all falls into place isn’t it? Now was the time for Jews to settle old scores. Now America was at their mercy. Internationally they appeared about to realize their millennium, the thousand year reign.

To all appearances Russia was theirs. In France and England they pretty much ran the show. To which ‘estates’ they could now add the United States. The only hitch in their plan was that as Roosevelt captured Washington Hitler assumed control in Berlin. Wasn’t he an international clinker. The Jews may have been fooling the rest of the world but they weren’t fooling him. Hitler himself had a plan that didn’t include Jews. Nor was he concealing it, he was making his plan perfectly clear.

While it should be obvious to everyone the German Volkists of which Hitler and the Nazis were one had been at war with the Jews for the full extent of the New Era, that is the twenties. Thus in 1933 the Jews began to direct US military might toward war with Germany. This also should be clear at first glance. Lindbergh saw it.

There was every hope to foment the Communist revolution in the US. While a cultural revolution was achieved, or at least, the direction of American social thought changed, there would be no overt seizure of the government. While Roosevelt was a dictator no less than Stalin and Hitler the outward presidential forms remained in place. There was no break in institutions.

In the hurry to get things done in the hundred days programs were just cobbled together without any regard for constitutional review by the Supreme Court. None of these programs seem to have been directed toward alleviating the Big Depression. Their main thrust was social, to destroy individualism and install a collective Jewish style mind set.

Thus the famous keystone program of the arch, the National Recovery Act- the NRA- sought only to bring American industry into a series of industry codes that removed competition and made them into collectives or cartels under government supervision not unlike the attempt of the WWI WIB under the direction of the Jew Bernard Baruch.

The CCC- Civilian Conservation Corps- brought young men under military discipline where they could be indoctrinated in socialist and collectivist thought patterns. All of the programs destroyed individuality in favor of the hive mind after the Judaic pattern.

Although Herbert Hoover was no longer president he was still a voice to be reckoned with and he used it to denounce the collectivism he saw being imposed, a collectivism that he had foreseen as he knew what the plan was.

Now, the Depression ran from Hoover’s last couple years to the most massive collective conscription of all, WWII, eleven year. Unprecedented in American history.

So the animosity directed at Hoover augmented that felt because of his thwarting of the Jewish genocidal starvation plans for Europe. Not surprisingly intense hatred was directed at Henry Ford also. It is not improbable that his exposure of Aaron Sapiro aborted a planned takeover of the grain crops that would hopefully have coincided with the engineered Russian famine of 1932-33 thus potentially ensuring a US revolution.

Sapiro stated that the purpose of his co-op plan was to gain control of wheat production then withhold grain from the market until not so much the farmers but the co-op managers got the price they wanted. If the plan had gone as scheduled the co-op managers would have had the power to keep the grain from market and that would essentially replicate the situation in Paris during the French Revolution that was a cause of the revolt.

It does seem clear that revolution was being fomented during Roosevelt’s first two terms. Certainly his collectivist purpose was in itself revolutionary. While no actual warfare broke out a civil war of sorts was being fought not unlike that the Negro Obama administration of our time.

It is clear that the Roosevelt administration was riddled with Communist, Leftist and Progressives, whichever label you choose to use. Members of Congress, such as Samuel Dickstein were on Stalin’s payroll. Dickstein himself worked directly with Roosevelt to form the House Un-American Activities Committee thus, one presumes, acting on Stalin’s direction. One might say Stalin was a sleeping partner of the Administration, as conceived un-American activities did not include Communists only ‘Fascists.’

Not only attacking Hoover and Ford the Administration went after all critics as un-American Fascists, enemies of the people so that dissident congressmen and Senators were defamed as FDR attempted to hound them from office. Others such as redoubtable critic, Mrs. Elizabeth Dilling were treated as insane.

Gradually, in the Jewish mind, they began to visualize themselves as the true Americans, the true democrats while FDR’s critics were Fascists out to destroy the fantastic American democracy the Jews had created and turn America into the dictatorship that they themselves were creating. A standard psychological ploy is to project your evil plans onto your enemy. By 1940-44 then this fiction had become a reality in their minds.

While they were secure in their minds that the Soviet Union was in their hands and the Western democracies firmly under their influence the problem then was to lead the Soviets, the US and the democracies into war with their arch enemy Hitler and his Germans.

There was no reason for the US to enter the European war, or theatre as it was known. Any rational administration would have realized that it was better for the combatants to exhaust themselves and then go in and pick up the pieces. The same was true in the Pacific actually. In China the Japanese had bitten far more off that they could chew. Let them be.

Instead FDR was squandering America’s irreplaceable wherewithal by sending materiel to China that merely ended up in Communist hands going to fight the Chinese Nationalists rather than the Japanese. Ultimately Roosevelt egged the Japanese on to attack the US and then using that as an improbable excuse for declaring war on Germany realizing Jewish hopes.

As the US entered the European war that was used as an excuse to place pre-war dissidents virtually under house arrest until they could be brought to trial. The end result then was a virtual concentration camp for anyone who had opposed the Jewish Roosevelt Administration. Thus the difference between Hitler, Roosevelt and Stalin was only a matter of form or degree.

The Jewish program began to unravel to some degree after Roosevelt’s death in early 1945. While they had discredited the pre-war critics as un-American while representing themselves as the true Americans the war had forced Roosevelt to come to terms with his Wall Street and industrial enemies giving them places in the war effort. Thus the State Department was run by old line Americans while new agencies such as the CIA were created and staffed by anti-New Dealers. In a sense those defeated by Roosevelt created a sort of counter government in the CIA.

At the same time it became clear to the Jews that Hitler had made a genocidal attempt to eliminate them. While Stalin had covertly done the same eliminating all Jews but one from his government while planning to exterminate the rest that was only averted by his assassination in 1953. This news devastated the Jewish mind. Even though they had been managing the Roosevelt Administration to their advantage while never having been under any threat, acting on a basis of international Jewish solidarity as Ford had indicated they projected their national fears on Americans classifying them as a Jew hating society bent on their extermination. This attitude would condition post-war Jewish actions.

Part II will follow.

 

 

 

Henry Ford And The Aaron Sapiro Case

Part VIII

Bernie

Bernie

Enter The Speculator Bernard Baruch

by

R.E. Prindle

This chapter will attempt to get Bernard Baruch’s involvement in Sapiro’s career a littler clearer. Always circumspect in his two volume auto-biography one gains the impression from Baruch that he is only telling you so much as he wants you to know. That so much is always of a very positive character regarding himself. Although Baruch frequently finds or at least obtains no success in his public career it is always that he was right but the other fellow isn’t quite quick enough to get Baruch’s meaning. Thus when FDR fails to take Barney’s advice it is inexplicable to himself and as he imagines to Roosevelt’s later regret. However everyone consults him with gratitude.

For instance here is an interchange with Thomas Edison, then considered America’s greatest inventive genius:

For many years I carried on a heavy correspondence with men who were in a position to help the farmer. One of these was Thomas A. Edison, whose interest in agriculture must have been as surprising to some people as my own. One day I received a call from Edison’s secretary. Edison was on his way over to see me at my home, he told me. I had never met the “genius of Menlo Park” and could hardly fathom why he should be calling on me. When he arrived he told me that, having heard of my interest in the farm problem, he wanted my views on a plan for credit and marketing which he had drafted at the suggestion of his friend, Henry Ford. I undertook to comment on Edison’s plan, and he accepted my criticism graciously. I felt highly complimented when he wrote: “You are the first man who has had imagination enough to throw off the trammels of the money religion and analyze the proposed scheme like an engineer.”

That is the general tenor of the hundreds of encounters with very prominent men, the majority of whom are Baruch’s friends, over the 800 pages or so of his auto-biography. Edison, who had a reputation as an anti-Semite second only to Ford, seems strangely to have selected not only a Jew to read his plan but a principal in the Lubin-Sapiro Cooperative farming plan. He could have received nothing but a negative reading.

Bernard Baruch was born in 1876 in the former Confederate State of South Carolina. His father, though Jewish, had fought for the slave states and in the aftermath of Reconstruction had been a Klansman. This was a small marvel to the young Bernard before he left home for New York to become notorious as one of the bears of Wall Street. Bears are never thought well of on the Street so that Baruch’s reputation was always on the negative side.

While he never tells us how large his fortune was at any rate he was able to give up Wall Street during the Great War to enter public service, as he says, at the insistence of President Woodrow Wilson himself. That’s the way it was with Barney, all the great men came to him for advice unsolicited.

More than financially secure he was able to dispense considerable largesse, as he says. He entered Wilson’s war administration as the head of the War Industries Board- the WIB. Here he began the collectivization of American industry somewhat like the industrial codes of Roosevelt’s NIRA. Bernard’s reputation was as a speculator on Wall Street and a bear at that so when he was chief of the WIB and demanded all industrialists submit their financial data to him this would have an invaluable asset to him for his speculations. In fact he was accused of the very thing.

One shouldn’t be too surprised then that there was strenuous opposition to his request. None was more strident than that of the automakers of Detroit including the most famous industrialist of all, Henry Ford. As in 1935 when the Supreme Court defused the same type of situation in which Ford was embroiled so the end of WWI defused this one, but Ford had had his first encounter with Baruch and Jewish collectivist methods.

During the War farmers had benefited as much or more so than industry. These were a couple fat years as prices rose and demand exceeded supply. Farmers are not actually businessmen. Wartime orders both made and destroyed companies. The orders were so large that companies had to expand their capacity at great expense. Some like the small arms manufacturers did so at great expense only to fall on hard times when orders ceased in 1918, but the expenses went on causing them great distress much like the farmers.

On the other hand Dupont was heavily criticized when having received a huge order from France they explained to the French that they would have to build a new factory and would only do so if the French paid for it. Thus, when the orders stopped Dupont’s expense stopped and they made the transition to peacetime easily.

The farmers were in the position of the small arms manufacturers. They had bought lots of equipment as farming became more mechanized. When their sales collapsed and expenses went on they were in a desperate situation as banks had no choice but to foreclose. Not being businessmen the farmers were slow at financials.

Agriculture through the twenties was in desperate shape. Ford who had a soft spot for farmers from his youth on the farm took a great interest in the problem working out his own solutions apparently with the help of his great friend and fellow ‘anti-Semite’ Tom Edison.

According to Baruch he also became interested in the farm problem. From the quote about Edison it would appear that he had been for at least a decade or so. This raises the question of whether or how much he knew about David Lubin.

Then, in 1922- Bernard Baruch, My Own Story Vol. II, The Public Years, p. 159:

By 1922, a total and tragic collapse of the tobacco market had brought Kentucky to the “verge of anarchy,” in the words of Judge Robert Bingham, publisher of the Louisville Courier-Journal and the Louisville Times and later Ambassador the Court of St. James. At the suggestion of Arthur Krock, the editor-in-chief of the Louisville Times, Bingham asked me to join him in organizing the Kentucky tobacco growers, which I did.

The services of Aaron Sapiro, the foremost expert on the organization and management of cooperatives, were enlisted.

Who are you going to go to when you’ve got a tough problem? Why, Super Bernard Baruch of course. And Bernie, naturally, went to the top expert in the field his fellow Jew, Aaron Sapiro. But, had they known each other before, were they fellow conspirators? Baruch doesn’t say. Now, the reader unconsciously accepts Bernard’s opinion that Sapiro is THE foremost expert. That he was foremost implies that there were several other experts. So Sapiro is not alone in his field. According to Baruch, then, Sapiro was head and shoulders above all the others. Perhaps, but probably not, but what and how does Aaron know about cooperatives? After all, he began as a nickel and dime lawyer in San Francisco.

The Jewish cooperative movement of which Baruch and Sapiro were exemplars had begun back around the turn of the century under the leadership of the Jew David Lubin among Jewish orange growers around Sacramento, California. What was known as the Sapiro Plan was actually the Lubin plan.

Aaron Sapiro

Aaron Sapiro

Sapiro began as a shyster lawyer in San Francisco becoming known to Lubin who made him a cooperative ‘expert.’ Lubin who had grand international plans then departed for Europe where he managed to sell his plan to the king of Italy. Taken under the king’s wing, financed by him, Lubin set to work. A question is did Ford know about Lubin? As he mentioned that the Jews had an international plan, and Lubin was behind one, I’m guessing that he did. Unfortunately for Lubin and possibly for Sapiro he was cut down by influenza in 1919. After 1919 then Sapiro was on his own and appears to have begun drifting. His fortunes began declining so he was already on the skids when Baruch brought him into the Kentucky tobacco affair. By 1924 it may have been necessary for him to seek a million by suing Ford.

David Lubin

David Lubin

Ford had his newspaper, the International Dearborn Independent. During 1920-21 Ford had published 91 articles exposing Jewish machinations in the US. The articles were all true, that is, factually correct, but the Jews ever sensitive to criticism denounced Ford as an anti-Semite. Exposes had a long history and the debunking authors coming along on the heels of the muckrakers became prominent in the twenties so in that sense Ford was right in step with the times. Ford wasn’t doing anything that the Jews weren’t doing with the exception that he was doing it to the Jews.

Sapiro having come to his attention, in 1924 he began a series of 20 articles exposing what was the Lubin-Sapiro plan but Ford didn’t know of or at least didn’t mention David Lubin. Ford’s articles did couple Bernard Baruch’s name with Sapiro’s as well as those of fellow Jews Eugene Meyer and Albert Lasker.

In Volume II of his memoirs, The Public Years, Baruch discusses this involvement. 159-162:

It seemed to me that farmers could spare themselves many trials if, instead of trying to create an organization, they could acquire one already established, one with adequate facilities, experienced personnel, and a standing in the marketing field.

In other words, organized as businessmen, which they weren’t.

I approached J. Ogden Armour the meat packing tycoon, in the spring of 1923. I proposed that he sell his Armour grain company, one of the largest grain marketing houses in the country, to several farmer organizations. This idea was not without its implicit irony. Armour was then anathema to farmers, representing all that was evil in the creation and operation of the Chicago meat packing empires, which Upton Sinclair had execrated in his famous book, The Jungle.

So, the farmers have the leading Wall Street bear speculator getting a scourge of the farmers, Armour Packing Co., to sell that what appears to be a very profitable business. At what price?

I suggested a plan which he readily endorsed. Under its terms a farmer organization would purchase the Armour Grain Company. Its duration would be entrusted temporarily to a board comprising the present management, representatives of the farmers, and representatives of the public. When the farmers’ indebtedness to Armour was liquidated, direction would be left entirely to the farmers.

Not clear exactly what Baruch is smoking here. I can see about twenty things that could go very wrong here. First we have sharpers vs. rubes. Very bad start. Then we have ‘entrusted temporarily’. Two bad words there, trust and temporary. And skipping over to the end, direction by farmers. Farmers are farmers busy farming. They aren’t going to direct any of this. They are going to have to trust permanently after having given up their independence. My daddy always said you can’t trust anybody and I found that to be true. I couldn’t even trust daddy.

The farmers weren’t going for any of it and between Baruch and Armour I don’t blame them. Now, we’re getting a little closer to the bone after this carefully worded preface:

Many people who admired the doctrines of competition, more in theory than in practice, professed to see in the cooperative marketing movement a violation of the anti-trust laws at the very least; and, at worst, a dangerous form of collectivism.

Yes, it was a dangerous form of collectivism. The farmers wouldn’t be any better off and they would be bound by the collective of which Baruch and his group would be the beneficiaries. There were other cooperative plans so farmers seeing their plan as a number of violations wasn’t necessarily opposition to cooperatives.

zzzzSapiro4

One of the loudest voices in the hostile pack was Henry Ford’s who used his mouthpiece, the Dearborn Independent to unleash a particularly violent an bigoted attack on cooperative marketing, labeling it the handiwork of Jews and Communists, and naming Aaron Sapiro and me as among the alien influences responsible for this un-American idea.

I don’t see how being opposed to an unsound plan makes one evil as Baruch says here. I don’t know how you can be bigoted against the concept of cooperative marketing while I don’t believe Ford was actually opposed to farm coops. I may be wandering but I’m not sure farm coops and Baruch’s use of cooperative marketing are the same thing.

To my knowledge the Sapiro articles from the Independent haven’t been published in book form so I haven’t read them but I am unwilling to accept Baruch’s self-serving characterization of them. After all, what we have here is an us vs. them situation. One can’t expect fair play from Baruch and the rest.

Following the above Baruch gives a long paragraph of character assassination of Ford. Then, as if to vilify Ford further he gives us this diatribe, p. 162:

Beginning with the issue of May 22, 1920, and leading with a front-page editorial captioned “The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem” the Independent had carried on one of the most violent and sustained anti-Semitic attacks ever seen in this country. Its pages were filled with it for ninety-one consecutive issues. It was an operation as fantastic in its planning as in its execution. E.G. Liebold, a Ford executive, had established a detective agency in New York City to investigated the private lives of Jews and providing fodder for the Independent campaign. Many of the agency’s men had numbers like 121X. It was this bureau that bought a translation of the spurious “Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion,” a notorious and classic anti-Semitic document, which provided the Independent with material for a year and a half.

One day the Independent appeared with a headline and story proclaiming me as the “pro-consul of Judah in America’ and a Jew of Super-Power,” the head and front of a dictatorial conspiracy.

—–

I ignored these assaults, but Sapiro was irate.

The detective agency would have been part of Ford’s Service Department. I can’t fathom why Baruch was irate because the Xs were spying on the private lives of Jews. While I find that, if true, offensive however the fact is that the American Jewish Committee and the ADL keep files on 3,000,000 of what they presume are American anti-Semites of which there is a file on me. Believe me it can be quite an invasion of privacy.

Currently some of my essays are displayed on the ADL site as examples of anti-Semitism which I consider defamation. No one thought to ask me. So, Bernard is being somewhat disingenuous here.

As far as his being a pro-consul, whatever is meant by that, I believe he probably was an officer of the international Jewish government. As far as being a Jew of Super-Power, any reading of his auto-biography would indicate he obviously thought of himself as that.

So here in these quotes from four carefully written pages of Baruch’s we have a principal participants view of what the thought was happening and how he was involved in it. He carefully selects what information to release but it isn’t that difficult to read between the lines.

Tracking down Eugene Meyer and Albert Lasker’s involvement looks to be more difficult however the more one looks into this issue the more Henry Ford is exonerated.

 

Henry Ford And The Aaron Sapiro Case

Part VII

by

R.E. Prindle

AaronSapiro2

 Whose Heaven On Earth?

 Now let’s examine the apparent expectations of the two men, Henry Ford and Aaron Sapiro in light of their ethnic backgrounds and/or religious outlook, what the famed Jewish psychologist would call group psychology.  How were their attitudes and opinions conditioned by their respective ethnic educations?

The leading characteristic of the Jews is that their approach is based on domination, the need to be Top Dog ‘by any means necessary.’  While I am not aware of Ford’s religious beliefs, if any, he reflects a Christian-American point of view, that is to say he considered service the highest virtue.  Therefore he violated all established business practices by offering the highest value for the lowest price.

In that light then Ford founded his company and conducted its business on the basis of service, possibly what the Communists mean by ‘social justice.’  In constrast Sapiro exploited the farmers he claimed to represent extorting the highest fee for little value while aggrandized his persona.  Ford created benefits for the many in everything he did including more than doubling the wage rate.

The Great Henry Ford

The Great Henry Ford

Just as Sapiro’s actions were based on his religion or ethnic collective, Ford’s activities were based on Christian-American ideals.  Americanism could be placed on the same religious level as Judaism while Ford was busy developing his own variant of Christian-Americanism.  It seems to have been his intent to reform the socio-economic basis of American life as a sort of American religion with himself as its prophet.

The clash between Ford and Sapiro was essentially ‘religious.’  As Miss Woeste points out Ford had his own vision of the farmer’s well fare based on service which clashed with Sapiro’s vision of dominance.

Ford had been a farmer while Sapiro never was.

Now, if one considers the psychological yearnings of the Ford Plan and those of the Sapiro Plan one has something like this:  Ford’s Plan was essentially utopian in which he sought to create a heaven on earth for everyone while Sapiro’s Jewish Plan was millennial with the intent of creating a heaven on earth for Jews, they dominating everyone else.

Ford, believing he had the industrial key for bettering conditions for all was busy reforming every institution he came into contact with from industrial conditions to hospital care to electricity generation, not to mention his railroad.  He was, like many of his generation, including W.K. Kellogg and his corn flakes and Bernarr Macfadden and his juice bars,  interested in finding the miracle food, and he thought he may have found it one time in soy beans.  In fact it was nearly a miracle bean.  Ford established the bean as a premier American crop which had more than a little to do with aiding the farmer.

Sapiro’s notion can be seen in this photograph where he stands at the head of a group of Canadian farmers symbolically their master.

Sapiro In Alberta

Sapiro In Alberta

As should be clear the Jewish War Against Ford was long standing before the Independent articles.  Jewish animosity toward  him began with the five dollar day and added to by the six  dollar day and eight hour five day week improvements.

Ford in a religious sense was working miracles that threatened to overturn the Jewish system.  If Ford were able to establish his earthly utopia that would obviate the Jewish millennium.  It will be remembered that the Jews believed the advent of the millennium was imminent at the time so Ford was construed as a very dangerous threat to the Jewish millennium as well as the Communist Revolution in which the Jews were also heavily involved.

Thus when the Communists attacked Ford plants in the thirties, the Jews through Roosevelt were undermining his authority through legislation finally forcing a union on him in 1942.

Ford was quite right to challenge Sapiro.  It would be nice if Ford or Uwayne State published the Ford Sapiro articles for all of us to study.  While Miss Woeste laughs at them claiming them full of misrepresentations we are obligated to either take or reject her word for it.  Uncharacteristically as a historian she offers no examples.

For instance what was Sapiro’s relationship to Albert Lasker and Bernard Baruch?  What publicity was Lasker, as a publicist, giving Sapiro?  How was he represented in the press?  If he was, what kind of advice was the commodity expert Baruch giving Sapiro?

Are we to believe the articles lie when they say Sapiro was involved with these men?  It just doesn’t seem reasonable or if not Miss Woeste might have given examples and refuted them.  Her charges don’t have to be insinuated.  After all, while not a historian, she is a lawyer.

That UStanford, one of the most prestigious universities in these United States, would imply that they accept Miss Woeste is a credible scholar leads me to ask the question, Why?

 

A Review

Themes And Variations

The Tarzan Novels Of Edgar Rice Burroughs

#14 Tarzan The Invincible

Part V of X

by

R.E. Prindle

First Published On The Ezine, ERBzine

The Man

Six White Men In Search Of An African Empire

     If one believes that Burroughs is merely on a rant against Communism in Tarzan The Invincible and Tarzan Triumphant then there is nothing more to say.  Still, it is remarkable that ERB specifically names Stalin as a persecutor of Tarzan in both books.  As Burroughs says he doesn’t mind fictionizing political and religious realities the question is , is he fictionizing a real life situation where Stalin, or the Communists are giving him a hard time?

     Seems really improbable doesn’t it?  People are used to thinking of Burroughs as a barely literate fantasy writer better ignored by the literati.  But more insignificant men than ERB have been the victims of hate campaigns.

Dr. Harvey Springer- The Cowboy Evangelist

      Who now, for instance, remembers Harvey Springer?  Harvey Springer?  Never heard of him?  I don’t wonder.  Oddly enough when I was in San Diego in 1957-58 Harvey Springer, who was some kind of evangelicalist, was going to appear at some church out where no sailor ever went.  He was kind of a cowboy evangelical from Denver.  His most dramatic stunt was placing one of size fourteens, he was a tall rangy man, on one chair and the other on another to harangue the crowd.

     I hadn’t heard of him, you know, nor had anyone I knew, but Harvey Springer was reputed to be an arch anti-Semite.  Could have been for all I knew, but I’m not going to take anyone’s word for it.  The point is the Jews sent all kinds of people into the streets to tell people not to go see Harvey.  I don’t how many times they must have heard- Who’s Harvey Springer?- in reply.  Rather than say he’s an anti-Semite, of which I had even less knowledge at the time never having heard the term, all that was necessary was to say the two words, church and evangelical to cool my ardor, if I had any, to find where he was speaking and go see him.

     In addition the AJC and ADL published books in which they denounced Harvey Springer as a very dangerous anti-Semite.   Now, if certain people would go to such extremes to persuade someone not to do something he had no intention of doing what would they do to defame someone with an international reputation?  The only one who didn’t realize the extent of ERB’s fame seems to have been ERB himself.  He was no self promoter, he thought it best to keep his head down.

     In that sense, judging from the unpublished Under The Red Flag and the published Moon Maid, Invincible and Triumphant Burroughs was actually a leading anti-Communist voice.  I mean, people read this stuff.  They read it in America , they read it in England, they read it in numerous translations and they read it in the Soviet Union.  Here’s the kicker, Stalin read it.  Not only that, Stalin was a movie buff.  And he requested Tarzan films (reported in a recent UK Telegraph story and the book of Simon Sebag Montefiori: Stalin:  The Court Of The Red Tsar.)

     History is not a mystery, it’s just schoolyard bullies bigger than life.

     We also know that Stalin ordered his scientists in the 1920s to attempt to cross an ape and a human to create a super warrior.  It’s clear to me that Stalin had read Beasts Of Tarzan.  The Man of Steel may have had a difficult time distinguishing between fact and fiction as many another.  Besides, remember eugenics was a hot topic of conversation in Red circles then as it is today.  Not knowing what we know now about genetics crossing an ape and human may not have seemed that far fetched.  It doesn’t to a lot of people now.  Heck, the Old Testament enjoins one to destroy the results of an animal-human union so the ancient Hebrews thought it was not only possible but a regular occurrence.

     There is very clear evidence that the Reds were conducting a campaign of vilification against Burroughs.  I’ve mentioned it before but the clearst evidence is H.G. Wells’ novel Mr. Blettsworthy On Rampole Island.

Bertie Wells

     May we take a moment to look more closely at Wells?  Don’t think I’m antagonistic toward Wells.  I dearly love Wells just as I do Burroughs.  I have a complete collection of Burroughs while I’m looking for the odd volume of the more obscure Wells.  I’m not boasting,  I’m just saying this in the way of credentials.  I’ve read all of Burroughs more than once and I’ve read all the Wells’ titles I have, many of them  more than once.  In point of fact I love all the literature from say, Haggard’s King Solomon’s Mines to 1930 and perhaps an odd year or so beyond.  I love.  I mean, I love it.  I love Edgar Wallace who, if you can believe it, is claimed to have sold one out of four books sold in England during this period.  If you don’t know him  he was one of the co-writers of the movie King Kong and then he died.  All  this stuff of this period is wonderful.  Robert Hitchens, P.C. Wren.

     So, you know, it’s like this:  H.G. Wells was a Soviet literary hatchet man.

     The man had a wonderful career.  You know his most famous novels, The War Of The Worlds, First Men In The Moon, The Island Of Dr. Moreau, In The Days Of The Comet.  If you like Wells, and I do, those are the tip of the iceberg.  A few of his short stories and he wrote many  are as good as short stories get.

     He was always a socialist and perhaps a terrorist conspiritor, but he was a child of the nineteenth century until his mind broke at the end of the Great War.  At that time he lost faith, in god, transferring his faith to the Revolution, becoming a Soviet dupe.  His literary career may be divided into two halves, pre-God- The Invisible King and post-God.  That was one of his books.

     He was not taken seriously as a fiction writer after the war.  During the twenties and thirties he turned out an unending stream of novels that were ignored.  It’s not difficult to see why, but I find them a little more tolerable.  I like Wells.  His reputation and career were saved by his 1922 effort An Outline Of History.  It was a massive volume and it sold massively for twenty years or more while being hugely influential in literature.  Put him on easy street for the rest of his long life.  As much as any artist who is skilled at spending money can be on Easy Street.

     As a novelist however, he was pretty much a has been.  While none of his post-1920 novels take off he hits the spot with me.

     From 1920 on his soul belonged to the Revolution, which is to say the Socialist homeland, which is to say the Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics.  That means he was more loyal to Russia than he was to England.  In short, a traitor in intent if not in deed.  While no Liberal ever deals in realities hence are in constant denial, The Man of Steel, Josef Stalin, was his boss.  Wells naturally would have denied this.

     The Soviets had a pretty comprehensive system which once again is denied.  There were a number of State prostitutes who were assigned to the various important Red writers to service them as mistresses, while reporting back to the Kremlin.  This is, of course, denied by the Liberals.  I don’t understand living a life that has to be denied, where everything you do has to be represented as something else, but such duplicity is apparently congenial to the Liberal mind.  They must seek it.

   

Moura Budberg

   Wells was assigned a woman named Moura Budberg.  She must have known how to turn on the charm as she was able to make a number of men she was assigned to sincerely love her, including the British diplomat Bruce Lockhart, the Russian writer Maxim Gorky and H.G. Wells.  She wasn’t that good looking either.  All of these people led double, triple or quadruple lives.  They must have been really able to compartmentalize their minds.  Freud didn’t touch that type.

     After Wells’ visit to Lenin in 1921 he was signed on.  He began his career as literary hatchet man.  In his writing he portrayed recognizable people, sometimes under their real names, in negative or positive lights.  As a skilled writer, whether you like his later stuff or not, he was more than competent to do this.  It appears that he first targeted Burroughs in his 1923 novel Men Like Gods.  Among his science fiction novels this one should rank more highly than it does.  Burroughs’ 1926 Moon Maid reads like a reply to Wells.  Especially the first part of the trilogy where Burroughs dances imaginative rings around the First Men In The Moon.  From there Wells took up the challenge with Mr. Blettsworthy On Rampole Island of 1928 which unmistakably is a parody of Burroughs in which he portrays Burroughs as insane, but not a bad analysis.

     Burroughs responded possibly with At The Earth’s Core but definitely with Tarzan The Invincible.  At the same time one interprets Stalin’s interest in crossing apes with humans as being derived from Beasts Of Tarzan and other Tarzan novels there may have been more direct Soviet interest in ERB.  One notes that Tarzan The Invincible was the first title published under the Burroughs imprint.  I think it highly probable that his publishing was being interfered with by the Reds in addition to whatever other grievances against his publishers Burroughs may have had.

     One may say that Burroughs was too insignificant for Stalin to bother with, yet according to Simon Sebag Montefiori Stalin put out a contract on John Wayne because he was such an ardent anti-Communist.  Khruschev is said to have told Wayne that he concelled the contract after Stalin’s death.  Edgar Rice Burroughs was at least as significant in 1930 as Wayne in the 1940s and 50s.

     At any rate in 1930 Burroughs has Stalin and the Reds invading his dream world of Opar to steal his gold, i.e. put him out of the publishing business.  Invincible and Triumphant, notice the titles,  both deal with Stalin and the Soviets then the topic disappears from the oeuvre.  Was Burroughs given incentive to counter-attack the Reds?  I think there is enough evidence to warrant the opinion while time will tell even more.  Research is just beginning.

     It is signficant that Burroughs introduces the story in his own voice, not a framing device.  He may be simply talking to the reader or he may be addressing Wells and, dare I say say it, The Man Of Steel himself.  Perhaps a subtitle could be ‘The Big Bwana Meets The Man Of Steel.’  Now, it should also be remembered that this is the fourteenth novel of the series.  the first title had been written eighteen years earlier.  At that time the surprise of the character had knocked the socks off the reading public.  In 1930 Tarzan was in danger of becoming old hat.  Burroughs had to think up new and interesting devices to keep his readers coming back.  As with most series of this type the readership was limited.  Maximum sales could be predicted so that success meant not falling below a certain level of interest or letting interest diminish below unsupportable levels.  As his own publisher Burroughs was now taking all the risks financial as well as literary.  He had to turn out a successful book.

     I think he did a superb job.  Since the series continued to flourish his readers must have thought so too.  I do wish ERB, Inc. would release some sales figures though.

     For the premiss of his story Burroughs postulates that Stalin and the Soviets wish to instigate a new world war which will allow them to pick up the pieces establishing a complete European dictatorship.  Not at all farfetched.  Burroughs postulates that Mussolini and his Fascists are aiming at a European hegemony.  This is 1930 so Hitler and the Nazis are not on anyone’s radar as a threat to world peace except for a few fringe elements.  At the time Hitler and the NSDAP were in hand to hand combat with the Communists for control of Germany.  They would not assume power until three years hence.

     The Reds then wish to create an incident that would cause the Italians to attack France.  The indirect approach is usually more effective than the direct approach so they wish to create an incident in Africa where French colonial troops appear to invade Italian Somaliland.

     At that instant expendable confederates in Italy would reveal a bogus French plan to Mussolini.  It is assumed that Italy would then declare war on France and the holocaust would begin.  As we all know Italy did not declare war on France in 1930 so the plan must have misfired somewhere along the way.  Tarzan was the reason.  Burroughs gives these little known details that would have been lost to…well… if not history, remembrance.  So, uh, really ERB is providing a valuable service here.

     There may be two sides to every story, but usually one is on one side or the other.  We don’t have to be reminded ERB is not on the side of the Reds.  In fact, ERB is exposing their plans and weaknesses.  He displays a fairly profound understanding of the goals and workings of the Communists.  He is read up on the subject,  He has studied.  He is not shooting from the hip.  He knows whereof  he speaks.  If not an authority on the subject he is pretty darn close.

     ERB has his eyes on how ‘American’ manufacturers are relating to Moscow.  He has Zora Drinov analyze the situation this way, p. 12

     “But what do the puny resources of this single American (Wayne Colt) mean to us?”  demanded Zora.  “A mere nothing compared to what America is already pouring into Soviet Russia.  What is his treason compared with the treason of those others who are already doing more to hasten the day of world communism than the Third Internationale itself- it is nothing, not a drop in the bucket.’

     “What do you mean Zora?”  asked Miguel.

     “I mean the bankers, and manufacturers, and engineers of America, who are selling their own country and the world to us in the hope of adding more gold to their already bursting coffers.  One of their most pious and lauded citizens is building great factories for us in Russia, where we may turn out tractors and tanks; their manufacturers are vying with each other to furnish us with engines for countless thousands of airplanes; their engineers are selling us their brains and their skill to build a grreat modern manufacturing city, in which ammunitions and engines of war may be produced.  These are the traitors, these are the men who are hastening the day when Moscow shall dictate the policies of our world.”

     “…their government is a capitalistic government that is so opposed to our beliefs that it has never recognized our government; yet in their greed, these swine are selling out their own kind and their own country for a few more rotten dollars.”

     Sound anything like the US and China today?  That was a mouthful.  The first thing FDR did upon taking the reins of government was to recognize Soviet Russia.  Tell you anything about FDR?  That was a mouthful that should have eraned ERB the hatred of the Liberal Coalition.

     You can see why they wanted to stop his mouth.  Passages such as this are probably the reason Richard Slotkin and his crowd, John Taliaferro, group ERB with Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard.  A charge of racism is usually a cover for a multitude of offences that have nothing to do with race.  One is merely opposing the Liberal program.   If they were to say- the fellow opposes the Liberal program they would get no rise- they might even have to explain the Liberal program- so the charge of racism is used as a red herring.  One should always suspect such an accusation and disregard it.

     Liberals however, never answer such charges.  They merely deny them.  In 1953-54 they were even denying themselves as Communists or taking the Fifth, which is the euivalent of saying, yes I am, but I’m not going to admit it.

     The Revolution was only twelve years old in 1930.  The CPUSA had been briefly outlawed in the early twenties but ‘disinterested parties’  believing in the time honored notion of ‘free speech’  had the ban lifted.  Over in Russia their free speech loving comrades were filling cattle cars with dissenters destined for the Gulag or else they were murdered outright.  Today, of course, these freedom loving people are throwing dissenters in prison on the basis of trumped up laws.  The Program is moving right along isn’t it?

     Even William Z. Foster denied he was a Communist as he was running for President on the Communist ticket.  Today a tenured Law Professor at Harvard actually denies that AIPAC, which is a registered lobby group, exists.  They ought to throw such people into cells next to David Irving.  Denial of themselves is what Liberalism is all about.  You couldn’t find anyone to admit to being a Communist.  They all denied it.  The hypocrisy of Liberals throwing men as decent  or moreso than themselves into jail for denying the holocaust is mind boggling.  Well, it would be, if you didn’t already know what’s going on.

     So ERB would have been roundly denounced as a paranoid delusive for the above passage.

Henry Ford- Philanthropist

     Men like Armand Hammer, Bernard Baruch, essentially the whole Jewish government in exile here in the US were working furiously to make the Revolution a global reality.  They really had no idea of Hitler’s intentions at the time, yet they attempted assassination while through the German Communist Party they were waging street warfare against the National Socialists.  The word National is what they objected to not so much the man Hitler.  Burroughs mentions the Third International.  The Comintern- short for Communist International as it was known- was essentially a beta model for what is now multi-culturalism.  It was the Jewish cultural vision of the world.  Thus industrialists like Armand Hammer and Bernard Baruch using their Jewish identity as a shield from criticism, any criticism would be characterized as anti-Semitism, were directing huge sums of money into the development of Soviet Russia.

     In addition a well-meaning industrialist, Henry Ford, who would later be denounced as a Nazi, was doing the

Armand Hammer

same thing.  The mention of tractor factories refers to Henry Ford- the Jewish bete noir-  who was trying to relieve the Communist induced famine by selling or even giving tractors to the Russians to increase food production.  He was also building the factories for them.  I mean, you know, gratis; altruism run rampant.   The great industrial city probably refers to Stalingrad.

      Even Burroughs biographers Porges and Taliaferro disparage Burroughs for his rational stance against Communism.  Burroughs doesn’t stop his analysis with the multi-cultural contradiction within American society, p. 35:

      “The general plan, of course, is no secret to any of us here,”  said Zora, “and I shall betray no confidence in explaining it to you.  It is part of a larger plan to embroil the capitalistic powers in wars and revolutions to such an extent that they will be helpless to unite against us.”

     “Our emissaries have been laboring a long time toward the culmination of the revolution in India that will distract the attention and armed forces of Great Britain.  We are not succeeding so well in Mexico as we had planned, but there is still hope, while our prospects in the Philippines are very bright.   The conditions in China you well know.  She is absolutely helpless, and we have hope that with our assistance she will eventually constitute a real menace to Japan.  Italy is a very dangerous enemy, and it is largely for the purpose of embroiling her in war with France that we are here.”

     Once again you will note that there is no reference to a threat from Germany.  No one could have seen it but the Communists who were opposed not merely to Hitler but any Volkish attempt to govern.  The Volkish movement was inherently anti-Communist.  To be anti-Communist was equivalent to being anti-Semitic, so that Hitler was automatically an enemy to be destroyed.  When he and the Nazis assumed power in 1933 an automatic boycott of Germany and things German was instituted by the Jews.  One might say that WWII began in January of 1933 at the instance of the Jews.  The obvious conclusion is that if Hitler’s actions against the Jews were not self-defense, they were acts of war in which the first offensives had been begun by the Jews.  Needless to say any such opinion is and will be denied.  Any such discussion of such matters will be ridiculed and suppressed.  But there you have it.  At any rate ERB was not one of those far-sighted individuals who foresaw the rise of Hitler.  Italy turned out to be a not so dangerous enemy.

     In his story Italy was merely to be a dupe of  the Soviets.

     In order to present his analysis ERB had to be especially well informed.  What he read or where isn’t clear as there is nothing in the existing library that even deals with the Communists per se.  ERB does have a copy of Hitler’s Mein Kampf but that could only have been obtained after 1940 when the war was in progress.

     As the story opens then, the Reds are assembling their forces for the march on Italian Somaliland.

     Things aren’t to be quite so simple as the leader of the expedition, Peter Sveri, develops delusions of grandeur hoping to establish his own Empire in Africa with himself as Emperor.  On the one hand Communism breaks down on the rocks of the interests of the various cultures, while in seeking to establish himself in Africa Zveri is infringing on the domain of its current Emperor, Tarzan.

     Tarzan handily frustrates Zveri’s designs, while at the same time beating Stalin and the Reds, hence the title Tarzan The Invincible.  One imagines though that there may be something more behind it.  Originally titled Tarzan, Guardian Of Africa the change of title indicates something deeper.

     In order to finance his operations Zveri intends to loot the fabled treasure vaults of Opar of which, one assumes,  he has read about in The Return Of Tarzan, Jewels Of Opar and Tarzan And The Golden Lion.   This makes him somewhat a fan of the amanuensis of the Big Bwana.

      This is the fourth and last of Burroughs’ Opar stories.  In section six let’s review Opar and its significance to this story.

 

 

   

 

The Deconstruction Of

Edgar Rice Burroughs’

America

by

R.E. Prindle

Part V

 The Byss And The Abyss

You could kiss your lips, and have all the fun

to yourself,

If you only knew the trick.

It would be perfectly easy

If they would only stay there

Until you got around to them.

Why don’t you manage it somehow?

Benjamin Paul Blood:

Quoted by William James

The Varieties Of Religious Experience

     In 1914-15 the great modern Jewish cultural adventure was beginning.  The culture was prepared.  As they say of a good football team, it makes its own breaks.  It was a matter of waiting patiently for opportunity then taking advantage of it.  In 1917 the Big Break came when the German General Ludendorff transported Lenin and his cadre of Jewish Revolutionaries to the Finland Station in St. Petersburg.  In October Trotsky drove the nail home.  The Jews had been prepared.  They had been working out the details for a couple decades or more.  At least since Freud joined with his like minded fellows of B’nai B’rith in 1895.

     Little details pop up in his writing.  In his 1914 On the History Of The Psychoanalytic Movement he lets drop a line that the progress of the French Revolution had been charted and understood.  A few years later the Jewish Revolutionaries in Petersburg would be running around with this little volume of analysis in their back pockets.  Freud refers to the revolution, Thermidors, epigones and reaction.  Psychologically events have to follow in a certain order.  they will follow in that order so if you are aware of things to come in their proper order you will be in a position to anticpate and manipulate.  What the French Revolution had to do with the history of the Psychoanalytic movement isn’t made clear.

     My feeling is that the study of the French Revolution was the role of the men of B’nai B’rith to which Freud was privy.  His role as a psychoanalyst would be to prepare the minds of the revolutionaries for the slaughtering to come while he probably also assisted in the damage control applications for the inevitable reaction when the Europeans had realized what the Jews had done.  Remember in a multicultural environment each culture maintains its identity so that it is necessary to speak of a distinct Jewish and European cultures.  The cultures will of necessity be antagonistic contrary to the ill informed Liberal projection of universal brotherhood.

     Thus in 1917, four years into the Jewish Revolution the culture enjoyed a signal success in Russia; implementing the plan then became the problem.  While the culture might well have expected a rapid worldwide success as all allied governments, including the US, were heavily infiltrated with fellow culturalists.  However the Jews were baffled by the successes of Hitler and Stalin

     While things seemed to be going according to plan in Russia the premature death of Lenin was not accounted for nor the success of Stalin.  You can understand the rage of Trotsky in exile in the swamps of Asia against the triumph of what he considered the epigone, Josef Stalin.  The Man of Steel was a National Socialist who aborted the international revolution pursued by Trotsky and his culture.  This was no small thing for the Jewish Revolution.

Herr Doktor Professor Sigmund Freud

    In the West as Freud had predicted a firestorm of protest against the Jewish culture took place.  Behind the phalanx of Liberals who took their side the culture had two main lines of defense.  One was simply to deny everything much as they accuse the so-called Holocaust deniers of today and the second was to denounce accusers as madmen, conspiracy theorists, cranks and anti-Semites.  As they pretty effectively controlled the media, which they denied, these courses were easy for them.

     As an historian this stuff is my meat.  I like it.  It was at that time that a little book appeared entitled The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion.  This volume is the center of the firestorm.  Naturally the culture denied any involvement with the book calling it a forgery by which they meant someone other than themselves had written it and palmed it off on them.

     Over the next twenty years or so it was claimed that their authorship was ‘proven’ false.  This is not true.  The authorship is still an open question, nothing has been proven either way.  As the book was reproduced by Henry Ford in his Dearborn Independent articles and we know Burroughs read the articles let us deal with that issue first.

————————————

     While the Protocols are claimed to be a forgery it is also universally assented that they are pased on an 1864 predecessor by the French Jew Maurice Joly entitled Dialogues Between Machiavelli and Montesquiou in Hell.  Clearly so.  Both works are now readily available if you’re interested in this sort of thing.

     It is claimed that Joly was a Jew while being denied, naturally, by the culture.  Joly was at the least of Jewish descent, which is to say the son of Jews,  while I have seen his picture and he looks Jewish to me.  But perhaps he was a secular and not religious Jew whatever than distinction might mean.

     It is said the Dialogues applied to Napoleon III then reigning in France but then it is said the Testament Of Dr. Mabuse parodies the Nazis.  I don’t think either is true.  How many times can you pull the same trick before someone, anyone catches on?

     At any rate it is said that Napoleon III got wind of publication of the book that it so alarmed and inflamed him that he confiscated the entire printing at the printers.  Thus the book must have been legendary and unable to influence anyone.  The stories are too good to pass over thoughs which is why I like this sort of thing.  This stuff would make a good movie.

     Here is one version I just pulled up on the internet that I had not heard before.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/anti-semitism/protocols.html

     Quote:

     Joly’s “Dialogues” while intended as a political satire, soon fell into the hands of a German anti-Semite named Herman Goedsche writing under the name of Sir John Retcliffe.  Goedsche was a postal clerk and spy for the Prussian secret police.  He had been forced to leave postal work due to his part in forging evidence in the prosecution against the Democratic leader Benedict Waldeck in 1849.  Goedsche adapted Joly’s ‘Dialogues’ into a mythical tale of a Jewish conspiracy as part of a series of novels entitled “Biarritz” which appeared in 1868.  In a chapter called “The Jewish Cemetery In Prague And The Representatives Of The Twelve Tribes Of Israel,” he spins the fantasy of a secret centennial rabbinical conference which meets at midnight and whose purpose is to review the past hundred years and to make plans for the next century.

     Unquote.

     To delet the paranoia I am familiar with the Goedsche story, this from Jewish sources only, but I have never heard of his using a copy of the Dialogues before.  As a government spy in a government post office I fail to see why the government wouldn’t have covered for him unless something else was involved.  In any event there is no shame on Goedsche involved.

He was simply doing his job for the government rather than the revolution. 

     My studies indicate that the chapter referred to was from a trilogy called ‘To Sedan’ that would indicat a publication date after 1871.  I have read the indicated chapter which is good Gothic stuff.  As a novel I see no reason to take the chaper seriously as history or based on Joly.  It may have happened, it may not have but the atmospheris care terrific and it moves the story along.  A nice bit of writing.  the bit about the representatives of the twelve tribes I took as a literary touch but then I’m not that sensitive on the matter.

     If the Jewish Virtual Library means to imply that the culture was not an organized political entity with specific political goals carried on in a conspiritorial manner than I would have to take issue with the wirter or writers.  As we have Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver’s testimony that sometime after 1666 when the Sabatai Zevi messiahship failed that the, shall we call them the Elders Of Zion, met and formulated the hope of the Jewish Revolution.  Virtually as Goedsche wrote the ‘elders’ of B’nai B’rith were sitting in Vienna in the company of Herr Doctor Professor Sigmund Freud planning to bring about the Revolution imminently.  While I don’t accept the novelist’s meeting of the Elders in the Prague graveyard as a fact I don’t think the idea can even be called a stretcher nor because of the story should Goedsche be defamed as an anti-Semite.  One would expect the culture to deny the story, naturally.

     Back to the Protocols.  It is not improbable that the culture disseminated the Protocols so that its proponensts could be defamed for

Maruice Joly

making a ‘forgery.’ After all mis- and disinformation is a part of the game.  One should always look for it.  In order to discredit the Protocols, and hence any notion of an international Jewish conspiracy, it was suddenly remembered, by whom it is never said, that the Protocols must have been based on the earlier Dialogues.  A great public search was instituted  throughout the great public libraries of Europe although if the edition had been confiscated and destroyed one wonders why.  Aw heck, in fairness, let’s disregard logic.  Needless to say the search was fruitless.  No copy could be found of this legendary book, not even that used by Herman Goedsche who we all know must have had one.  The suspense mounted hauntingly.  Would the Dialogues ever be found?  Not to worry.  An emigre soldier of Wrangel’s passing through Constantinople, now Istanbul,  had a copy missing cover and title page that he sold to a Jewish second hand book dealer.  I mean, this is good stuff; I wish the story wasn’t already taken.  This more than kind hearted book dealer paid good money for this piece of trash unable to even know what he had bought or what the book was about.  Stories of really human kind hearted bood dealers like this warm the heart.

     One doesn’t know in what language the book was printed, possible French, which fortunately this kind hearted Jewish second hand book dealer could read.  This fellow was also an expert on The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion.  What a concatenation of coincidences, hey?  As he was reading along to see what he might have bought he said to himself:  Wait a minute! I’ve read this before.  A light went on in his head.  By golly or perhaps, oy vey, he said to himself,  What I’ve got here must be the long lost Dialogues Entre Machiavelle Et Monstesquiou Aux Enfers.  Remember this was the first copy of this book anyone had ever seen except, possibly, Herman Goedsche.  Be damned it if wasn’t.  Filled with joy at his lucky buy the used book dealer turned the book over to B’nai B’rith or whoever and saved the day.  It was now ‘proved’ that the Protocols were a forgery based on the Dialogues.  Hey, listen, the Dialogues could have been a forgery themselves.  There’s a good chance even that the Nineteenth Century is a forgery.  The history of the nineteenth century is one of the more implausible stories.  I’ve heard.  What do you think.  At any rate this beat up copy of the Dialogues disappeared never to be found again.  One wonders where the copies now being published came from.

     So, the damage controllers enlisting the support of their Liberal allies shouted down their accusers.  For myself, the culture’s story is so fishy and contrived that I at the very least doubt the defense but I sure as heck like the story.  Could Conan Doyle have done any better?  Pshh…

     Well, so much for the prep work.  As there was no longer room in Russia for the dead Czar’s men a very large number of them fled to, where else, the United States of America.  Hence all those jokes about waiters who used to be Russian dukes.  Some of them were.  Among the emigres was a gentleman named Boris Brasol who just happened to have a copy of the Protocols in his back pocket.

     The plot thickens.  Gets really good.  Now, Henry Ford had been picked out as an anti-Semite back in ’14 when he ‘unilaterally’ doubled the prevailing wage.  This act was considered a blow at the Revolution.  No good deed shall go unpunished.

Hooray for Honkety Hank and his hootenanny automobile.

     Consequently Ford was lured into the Peace Ship deal of ’16 by the Jewish Rosa Schwimmer.  The folly was one from which Ford’s reputation never recovered although the idea of the Peace Ship isn’t as absurd as it sounds.  As a result of the Peace Ship Ford began to have his doubts about the sincerity and motives of the culture which were certainly justified.

      The doubts were sharpened into certainties by the role of Bernard Baruch and his Jews of the WIB and in the government.  It wil be remembered that the Dodge Brothers lost their lives because of a confrontation with Baruch while Ford had his company’s finances attacked as a result of the confrontation in 1919-20.  At that point Brasol showed up with his copy of the Protocols which he provided to Ford for the small sum of 10,000.  Ford then bought the Dearborn Independent which began to publish the articles that became the four volumes of the famed International Jew.

     Today these volumes are classed with the Protocols and are forbidden reading.  On the Coalition Index.  The Liberal Coalition has the bad habit of denying history by preventing its examination.  I haven’t leafed thrugh the Dearborn Independent  but there are a couple sample copies on the internet.  It was a pretty decent newspaper cum magazine of the uplifting sort.

http://www.rationalrevolution.net/special/library/dearborn_independent.html      

     The story of Ford and the Independent articles is an interesting study made more delicious by being forbidden.  One  knows how much better forbidden fruit tastes, doesn’t one?

     It should be remembered that the Jewish culture was especially active after the October Revolution, the fourth year of the Jewish Revolution.  the fourth through eighth years are especially important.  The AJC- American Jewish Committee- wished to ascertain where the centers of American resistance might be the strongest.  At sometime either during or after the War the AJC drew up something called the Jewish Bill Of Rights.  They sent it to prominent men and women to ascertain their stance toward the Jews.  Their responses or non-responses would determine if the recipient was an ‘anti-Semite’ or not.  If not, fine; if so then efforts would be made to marginalize or destroy them.  Edgar Rice Burroughs was sent a copy of this Jewish Bill Of Rights.  He failed the test by questioning one or more clauses while taking an independent attitude.  He was thus marked down for destruction.  It would be interesting to know to whom this questionnaire was sent and how they fared.

Horace And John Dodge

      As I noted the Dodges were assassinated in 1920 while Ford’s business was attacked.  It might also be noted that Ford was run off the road while returning home one night suffering injuries but nothing serious.  His Ford pulled him out of another one. 

     Had the bankers succeeded in filching Ford Motor Co. it would have been quite a coup.  At the time the company was valued by Ford at a billion dollars, a hundred billion in today’s dollars.  In the bankers valuation the company put on the market at that time could be made to produce three to five billion dollars.  As I said the Revolution was an expensive affair.  If the Jewish banking houses had been able to secure Ford they could have recouped a profit of as much as four or five billion in 1920 dollars for their projects.  You will be able to understant the sort of assault that was made on Ford.

     The coalition, which has written all the histories, characterizes Ford’s defensive maneuvers as cranky anti-Semitism which he displayed for no other reason than that he was an insane cranky anti-Semite who attacked Jews qua Jews.

     Nor were Ford’s Independent articles mere ranting without an understanding of the problem as some would have you believe.  The articles were written by William Cameron Ford’s employee.  Ford as usual did things in a thorough way.  Almost overnight he amassed a huge library concerning Judaism.  I mean, this was massive.  The Jews wanted it.  They asked him for it after the apology.  Ford sneered.  While the library is described as anti-Semitic it embraced the whole range of Jewish activities.  Perhaps a unique collection

     Cameron set to work master this huge mass of material.  The result was the four volumes of The International Jew with several uncollected articles left over.  While the volumes have been defamed as anti-Semitic balderdash they are nothing of the kind.  They are well researched accurate accounts of the topics covered.  The first volume dealing with the Protocols merely duplicates what already existed but the remaining three volumes recording the various roles of Jews in American are interesting studies and true, which is to say based on verifiable facts.  However as we have recently learned- the truth is no defense.

     When the articles began appearing they created quite furor.  If you have checked the Dearborn Independent samples on the internet site you will have an idea of what the paper looked like.  Just insert one of the Jewish articles and you have what the readers of the twenties saw.

     Ford’s liquid wealth in today’s terms was in the tens of billions of dollars so he was well able to afford a defense.  Mr. Deep Pockets.  He created something called the Service Department that was a counterspy outfit not unlike that of Daddy Warbucks of Little Orphan Annie fame.  It will be remembered that Little Orphan Annie made its debut at this time.  Ford Employed agents who were supposed to get the lowdown on Jewish activities such as those featured in the Dr. Mabuse series.  Starting from scratch the Service Department was no match for Jewish agences like the AJC, ADL or B’nai B’rith and others that had had decades if not centuries of experience in subversive activities.

     One only has the Coalition accounts of these years of the Jewish Revolution so the reader has undoubtedly been conditioned to view Ford as an insane crank.  To my knowledge no other accounts have appeared.  How contemporaries other than the Liberal side reacted isn’t recorded at present.  However Edgar Rice Burroughs tried in his modest way to assist Ford.’

     Ford and Burroughs were Americans raised on the ideals of that scrap of paper, the Constitution.  They therefore made the mistake of thinking that they could appeal to the reason of ideologues or bigots.  You can’t.  An ideologue has his projection and he knows he got it from from God.  As I have pointed out before a devout member of a religion must, of necessity, be a bigot; there is no room for any opinion that contradicts dogma.  So Ford and Burroughs were wasting their time.

     By 1924 Burroughs must have known he was under attack both demestically and internationally by the Communists.  His 1919 effort, Under The Red Flag, had signaled his antagonism to Communism just as his response to the Jewish Bill Of Rights signaled his refusal to be bulldozed from that quarter.

     Using material gleaned from the Independent concerning the role of Jews in the theatrical business Burroughs wrote a book entitled, Marcia Of The Doorstep in support of Ford and gently rebuking his fellow Americans for their authoritarianism.  The book didn’t see print until 1999.  The novel isn’t bad.  It would have sold reasonably well under the Edgar Rice Burroughs name.  As has been indicated the Liberal Coalition was in control of publishing; nothing was published that didn’t pass their censorship.  Burroughs novel was rejected.  Now, this is interesting.  Burroughs began his own imprint in 1930 eventually publishing all his titles but not, I repeat, not Marcia Of The Doorstep.  One might well ask  stayed his hand on that title.

     At any rate, probably as punishment, there were no Tarzan movies made by Jewish controlled studios from 1922 to 1928.  Ford also was having his problems.  The auto industry was p;rogressing faster than he was.  By 1927 the Model T was approaching obsolescence losing its sales lead to Chevrolet which it never recovered.

     It became necessary to call off his war with the AJC-ADL to concentrate on saving his business.  In 1927 he was forced to sign a bogus apology.  It was a forgery.  Ford had no hand in its writing.  However he promised to abandon the battle.

     With Ford’s collapse anything approaching to resistance to the Jewish Revolution in America collapsed.

     While the Republican interregnum of 1920-32 slowed the Revolution down the Liberal Wilsonian Revolution was resumed in 1933 by Wilson’s disciple Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  With Roosevelt the Jews returned to Washington in force.  Among the first things FDR did was to recognize the Soviet Union just as Jacob Schiff had immediately reversed the Jewish policy toward Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution by granting huge loans to the still nascent and insecure Bolshevik government.  This was OPM- other people’s money.  The money of the citizens of the United States Of America.  Thus the everyday American was forced to underwrite the Bolshevik Revolution whether he knew it or not.

Jacob Schiff- The PM     Schiff who was the Prime Minsister of the International Jewish Culture, was called down to Washington by the President of the United States to justify himself on the charges of Bolshevism.  He was apparently successful as when he left the capitol of the United States to got back to the Capitol of the Jewish Revolution, NYC, it was with a face wreathed in smiles.  Jacob Schiff didn’t smile often.  He quickly resumed his loans to the Bolsheviks.

To return to 1919.

This part if followed by Freud which is Part VI and the Deconstruction Of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ America without a part number which is Part VII.

Thanks for your interest.

The Deconstruction Of

Edgar Rice Burroughs’

America

by R.E. Prindle

Part IV

The Red Triumph

How long, how long,

Has that leetle old evenin’ train

Been gone?

How long, how long,

Oh baby,

How long?

Trad.

     A pall fell over the world when the Communists assumed power.  Joy left the planet in favor of the sour envy of that ilk.  There were no happy Communists.  They knew no contentment.  They were as disaffected, dissatisfied with life, civilization and themselves, especially themselves as psychologically possible.  Misfits, envious with no prospects in life they were.  They were incapable of generating wealth; they could only appropriate and waste what others had created.  The spirit of vengeance which had been their dominant characteristic in the French Revolution would remain their goal throughout their existence.  There has been no Red government from the France of 1793 to the present that hasn’t believed in wholesale massacres of ‘enemies’ at the the least, genocide at the worst.  Quite frankly they can only think in terms of crime no matter how they rationalize it and they can rationalize like nobody’s business.

     Murder is part of their psychotic nature.  I do not exclude Hitler  and the Nazis as Red organizations.  Placed in the context of Redism Hitler and the Nazis are perfectly understandable.  The Nazis were National Socialists.  One can’t be socialist without being Red; one can’t be Red without believing in mass exterminations.  History speaks the for the truth about Reds; I merely repeat history.

     No one Red faction can be held  less accountable than others.  All participated equally and as joyously as their sour temperaments allowed.  Mild mannered college professors and sanctimonious ministers of the social gospel wholeheartedly supported the murders and atrocities of Communist regimes just as today they raise no outcry against the genocide and crimes against Whites taking place in Africa because they think the ‘right side’ has the upper hand.  Reds never did and never will have a disinterested concept of morality.  The Red idea of law and morality is merely a projection of their subconscious desire.

page 1.

     In the giddiness of the Russian success the Revolutionaries believed that the world revolution had arrived so that it was a matter of a few months before they assumed control of the world.

     Post-war success in Hungary encouraged them on.  Revolutionaries flowed back into Germany from Russia intent on bringing to fruition the ‘German’ revolution.  Success in Germany eluded them.  There the world revolution stalled.  It was going to a tougher job than anticipated.  The United States especially was not as ripe for their plans as they had projected.

     Resistance was prompt if somewhat flaccid.  Wilson’s program, while Red was opposed to that of Bolshevism.  Some have said that Wilson was merely envious of Lenin as the leader.  His Attorney General, A. Mitchell Palmer, to whom we all owe a debt of gratitude, cracked down hard on the Red cadres deporting a very few while putting the rest in disarray as a law was passed that outlawed the Communist Party temporarily.

     But all the Parlor Pinks, Fellow Travelers and Liberals interested in their form of ‘social justice’ and the ‘true American Way’ had the ban repealed.  As usual they misrepresented their motives.  The task now became one of subverting the ideals the country held sacred.

2.

Heroes And Villains

     We must now delineate the sides in the American struggle for supremacy as it stood in the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution.

     The Liberal Coalition had gained the power of the Presidency in 1913 when Woodrow Wilson was inaugurated.  Although not appreciated as such this was an occurrance for the both the Jewish and World Revolution as significant for America as that of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.  The Wilson administration began the ‘partnership’ between America and the Jews as celebrated by Irving Berlin in his song, God Bless America, while this year of 1913 was the inaugurating year of the Jewish Revolution.  Off on the right foot.  At this point in 1913 for the first time the Jews became influential in the US government.  In 1916 Wilson created the ‘Jewish seat’ on the Supreme Court when he appointed the confirmed Zionist, Louis D. Brandeis, to the bench.

     During the War the Jews played an ambiguous or perhaps duplicitous role.  So long as Czarist Russia was in the War they refused to support the Allies.  This refusal led the British to attempt to buy their cooperation with the Balfour Declaration involving Palestine.  This was unnecessary as  after the Spring Revolution the Mensheviks dethroned the Czar effectually taking Russia out of the War.  At the time of the October Revolution of the Bolsheviks the Jews threw their support to the Allies against Germany.  As they had no troops to offer one wonders what this support was worth.  Perhaps a cessation of sabotage?

     In the US the Socialistic Wilson administration used its window of opportunity to attempt to impose it version of ‘equality’ on the American people.  The key agency was the WIB- War Industries Board- headed by the Jewish financier- the bear of Wall Street- Bernard Baruch.

     I’m not sure that the ultimate or secret plans of Wilson have ever been revealed but Baruch in his autobiography drops a few helpful hints.  The plan depended on the continuance of the War so that when that ended prematurely in 1918 the plan was aborted.

     At that time Wilson, through the WIB had orders ready for execution that would have limited the styles of shoes and clothing to just three or four styles within a definite price so that everyone would be dressed alike without distinction.  Wilson deemed inequality to be based on differences in dress.  Obvious, hey.

     If you think the Liberals discarded the plan just because the war ended all you have to do to look around you today and observe everyone in jeans or sports outfits of one kind or another.  The plan is about seventy per cent or so implemented.  It was done through infiltration of the fashion industry.

     Most troublesome for the leaders of industry was that the WIB required all businesses to submit financial and other data to the WIB for their evaluation.  Most significantly a center of resistance came from the auto industry of Detroit.  Noting all the Jews on the board who essentially had the industrial base of the US in their hands the auto makers demurred.  Of course the Masters of Denial deny that Jews were that involved but if the matter was noted who are you going to believe the Jews or the auto makers?  One of the other must have it wrong.  I’m betting on the auto makers against the Masters of Denial.

     The resistance of Detroit would have consequences.  The Jews never forget.  Significantly Henry Ford was not in thrall to the Eastern bankers thus being independent.  Now, Henry Ford and the Dodge Brothers, accurately noting the number of Jews on the WIB correctly divined their purpose.  Remember, if the War had gone on for another year or two Wilson would have been able to complete the revolution in toto changing the American character in one stroke while Jews would have assumed the role of Commissars or the role they had enjoyed in pre-expulsion Spain, that of middlemen under the crown administering to the general populace.  This is the ultimate cultural dream.

page 2.

     Objecting vociferously to the Wilson plan some intemperate remarks concerning the nature of Jews were made by the Dodge Brothers allowing the administration to play the race card with AS for anti-Semite up there in the corners.  Both the Dodges subsequently died in mysterious circumstance in 1920 while a strenuous effort was made to destroy Ford by bringing his company under the control of the New York bankers, that is to say, the Jews.  Thus there was very little cranky about any of Ford’s supposedly eccentric beliefs.  Such a characterization is mere defamation by his enemies.  Failing to break Ford the anti-Semitic race card was played against him that resulted in his excommunication from society.  They haven’t been able to flush him out of history yet but that may be just a matter of time.  I wouldn’t be suprised to see the marque changed to something other than Ford.

     The Jewish culture shifted the onus from themselves to the ‘anti-Semites’ in a clever damage control move to exonerate themselves.  Internationally the damage controllers also shifted the onus from themselves to ‘anti-Semites.’

     The Liberals, continuing the Reconstruction policy, now set the Jews, Negroes and immigrants over what we may call the Conservatives precisely as they had set the Negroes over the Southern Whites during the Reconstruction after the Civil War.  This was extended to the international field where the Liberals self-righteously adopted an anti-colonial policy.  As European colonialism was equated with Southern slaveholding in Liberal minds they took the side of the colonials, that is to say the colored Third World peoples against the Europeans.  Thus as Charles De Gaulle despairingly noted that America while a White country behaved as though they were a colored or Third World country.  Europeans then were classed with the Southern Whites and Conservatives of the United States.

     The Jewish Culture continued the ultra self-righteousness based on their projection that they were an exceptional people chosen by god to administer the affairs of the people of the world.  Although patently absurd and scientifically impossible the Jews were able to impose this notion on both the Liberal and conservative religious cultures of the US.  Thus although the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith was organized in 1913 as a terrorist organization and the NAACP came into prominence as a terrorist organization as members of the Coalition these patently racist outfits were considered virtuous.

     On the other hand Nativist organizations in reaction such as the APA- American Protective Association- or the the KKK- Ku Klux Klan- were considered kranky or actually terrorist.  In reality there was no difference in intent between any of these organizations.  You may call them protective or terrorist as you wish but they all functioned with the same goal in mind but for different sides.  That intent was to intimidate all others into submission.

     These were cultural wars, in other words, Cold Wars, not shooting wars so the battles were for the control of the dissemination of information, opinion and institutions.  In this the Jews were particularly effective having a clear idea of their objectives effectively seizing control of the key publishing units, the film industry and the emerging radio-television industries.

     Thus the Jews in the US were uniquely positioned to implement Freud’s program of cultural domination.  Now, all of this was done in the light of day so that it was impossible for the program to pass unperceived.  A firestorm of indignation against the Jewish culture ensued after the Russian Revolution.  It might be noted here that culturalism is merely latter day nationalism.  Its defense is patriotism.  So let’s keep the meanings of the terms straight.  The damage controllmen went to work successfully silencing all opposition while censoring the entire media over the next few years except in Germany.

      I will here examine a few literary voices that saw the nature of things but in different ways.  One novel, three movies and one short story that was turned into a TV show.

page 3.

     The short story was by Charles Beaumont published in 1959 then made into a TV script for Rod Serling’s Twilight Zone.  In the TV script the time is set just after the Great War.  A traveler while staying at a monastery unintentionally releases Satan whom some monks were holding captive.  Among various possible interpretations one is that the Bolsheviks represented Satan.  An allegory was necessary as a more direct representation would never have been published as Edgar Rice Burroughs found to his chagrin in 1919.

     The horrors of Communism immediately presented themselves to that writer’s mind who quickly composed an anti-Communist polemic.  Politics was nothing new to Burroughs who sniped at various political affairs from the time he began writing.  About the time he took up his pen in 1912, the Socialist convention of that year took umbrage at the nascent IWW- Industrial Workers Of The World- booting them out of the congress.  The Socialists were led by Jews while the IWW, also known as Wobblies, were Americans of the true working class, the people the Socialists were supposed to represent.  Must have been a culture clash when American workers met European style Jewish intellectuals.

     Now, the Wobblies were the Real Thing compared to the Socialist ‘labor fakers.’  Under the leadership of Big Bill Haywood  the Wobblies took direct action in an attempt to shut down industry and bring the government to heel as the United States was entering the Great War.  These guys meant business.  Their role in this period as well as the whole period has been misrepresented and distorted by Liberal control of the media.

     Burroughs whose anti-Left attitude can be traced back to his boyhood cast the IWW as villains in several of his novels from 1915 to 1924.  Nothing was more natural than Burroughs pillorying the Bolsheviks.  As publishing was controlld by the Reds his effort came to nothing in 1919.  He rewrote the theme in his dystopian novel, The Moon Maid, that was published in 1926.

      The third and most interesting examination of the Red assault on civilization was made by the Jewish-German film maker, Fritz Lang.  While the notion of conspiracy is derided by the conspirators nothing can be more obvious than that events from 1913 through this period were not merely spontaneous.  I doubt if there ever has been a period of history that has not been directed by a cabal or any number of cabals and conspiracies.  Check out your own neighborhood.  You just don’t call them conspiracies, that’s all.  Even the Trojan war was a conspiracy headed by Agamemnon.  You don’t think Ulysses wasn’t coerced by the cabal do you?

     One can call anyone who disagrees with you, bigots or anti-Semites as Liberals do but that doesn’t change the facts.  There is no one group of people more sensitive to subterranean movements than artists.  Paranoia rightly channeled is a gift of the gods not a curse as Freud himself discovered.  He thought he succeeded where paranoiacs failed.  Does that say something?  Lang being himself a Jew from Austria might be expected to be a little more aware of what Freud was up to.  It might be interesting to check to see  if Lang was a member of B’nai B’rith.  Hitler himself was an Austrian who had lived in Vienna at the time Freudianism was being formulated while he was highly critical of  ‘Jewish psychology.’  Hitler was at least as intelligent and aware as either Freud or Lang.

     Lang first tried to land the directorship of the 1919 movie titled The Cabinet Of Dr. Caligari.  Although silent this is a great film and great art.  As great art the movie must be allegorical.  As with Lang’s films there is a war being directed against civilization from a mysterious source.  Civilization is represented here as a fair or carnival, a common device of the artist.

     Dr. Caligari is some sort of showman who doubles as an agent of the conspiracy or is the ‘unknown superior.’  He is obviously intended to be Jewish as he has a Golem, a sort of Frankenstein’s monster, to carry out his dirty work.

     When he would be exposed by the injured party it turns out that Dr. Caligari is also the director of an insane asylum, in other words a psychoanalist not unlike Herr Doktor Freud.  In the denouement rather than he being exposed his accuser is committed to the insane asylum.  Obviously an ‘anti-Semite.’  An unexplained crime wave directed at civilization continues.  One believes that Dr. Caligari is responsible.

page 4

    Lang didn’t get to direct this picture but having fought for it he was familiar with the story line which had on influence on him if he, indeed, wasn’t part of this particular cabal.  He converted Dr. Caligari into Dr. Mabuse.  Dr. Mabuse was based on a novel by Norbert Jacques.  I haven’t read the novel so I can’t compare how Lang adapted the character for his uses. 

     While depicting a gambler, which in a way I suppose Freud was, Mabuse is nevertheless a psychologist and master hypnotizer not unlike Freud.  Like Caligari and Freud he is at war with civilization doing everything he can to undermine it.  In this case that favorite dodge of counterfeiting money is used.  He is able under cover of a gambler (one of many guises) to direct several people to destruction by his use of hypnotism.  It will be remembered that Freud was a master hypnotist.  In a stunning scene Mabuse, presenting his act on stage, mass hypnotizes the audience into believing they are seeing a parade not unlike the episode of the Lotharians in Burroughs’ Thuvia, Maid Of Mars.  In the end Mabuse is captured, but his ravings are such that unlike Caligari he himself is committed to an insane asylum.

     He, one imagines, pined there until 1932 when Lang chose to make his masterpiece and the first Mabuse sequel, The Testament Of Dr. Mabuse.  During the intervening several years Mabuse has been catatonic sitting up in his pajamas in bed saying and doing nothing.  And then one day he takes up his imaginary pen simulating writing on an imaginary pad.  The astute head of the asylum, one Dr. Baum, realizes what he is doing giving him a real pen and paper.

     The master criminal Mabuse/Freud then writes out his manifesto or testament for the destruction of civilization non-stop.  As a master hypnotist he is able through his writing to hypnotize and take control of Dr. Baum’s mind who then sets in motion an incredible series of crimes including the counterfeiting of money meant, naturally, to undermine civilization.

     Mabuse having delivered his testament dies.  His ghost then merges with Dr. Baum who becomes in effect Dr. Mabuse executing his Testament.  In the end Baum certifiably insane is incarcerated in Mabuse’s room with all his papers taking his place as head of the conspiracy.  One assumes that another will eventually replace Baum and once set in motion the plot will continue of its own accord, so to speak.

     So, we have a neat allegory of Freud’s goal of destroying civilization.   That Lang chose 1932 to revive the character would correspond neatly with the direction of Freud’s writing at the time which included his attack on Christianity ‘The Future Of An Illusion’ and Civilization And Its Discontents.  While Lang would later say that Mabuse was an attack on the National Socialists when the same character with the same goals was introduced in 1922 there was no National Socialist Movement of consequence to pin the crimes on.

     No.  Both films of Dr. Mabuse were about someone and something else.  The use of psychology points more directly to Freud than it does to Hitler.  How involved Lang was in the conspiracy I leave to your conjecture.  That he made a copy in French and that that French copy was smuggled into the US in 1943 when the Nazi defeat became not only apparent but certain would imply that he too was one so discontented with civilization that he wanted his blueprint for destruction brought to the attention of the American Communist cadres.  By 1943 Lang had been in the United States for about ten years.

     As a footnote Dr. Mabuse became a franchise with many sequels including one by Lang, The 1000 Faces Of Dr. Mabuse.  There is a Mabuse/Tarzan  connection.  The former Tarzan, Lex Barker, who spent the rest of his career making movies in Europe was involved in Mabuse sequels himself.  So, in that way Mabuse and Tarzan are connected.

     Freud’s intent then was divined by many people including Fritz Lang.

     The question then was how to go about undermining European Civilization.  Ostensibly the most ‘pacifistic’ culture in the world while having neither numbers, territory or means for a frontal attack, just in case the disaster of the Great War didn’t present an object lesson, Freud and his culture would have to use surreptitious or clandestine means, in other words, an international conspiracy.

page 5.

     Even on a cultural level Freud was shrewd enough to understand that a mere frontal attack on the cultural traditions would be met with stern resistance so that first the effort must be made to deconstruct the culture according to the desires and needs of the minority culture.  Freud was a master of reduction.

     One doesn’t know whether the signal failure of the Anglians in the South when they merely tried to impose their will on the Southern Whites influenced Freud or his culture but the failure was certainly an object lesson before them of what not to do.

     As I say the Coalition was already in possession of the publishing and news apparatus of the United States.  Through the Jews it controlled the movies and would control Radio.  Thus they controlled access to the media.  Only those writers who met their apporval stood a chance of being published.  As the Red slogan had it:  All things are permissible to Revolutionaries, all others are to be denied.  This while they availed themselves of the freedoms of the Constitution which they claimed to respect.

     While the older authors posed a problem the editorial function can be wielded in such a way that content can be substantially altered while publication of a novel might no longer be able to be taken for granted.

     Overnight, almost miraculously, the nature of the authorial community changed.  While the percentage of Jews and homosexuals was relatively small prewar, after the War non-Jews and heterosexuals seem to have lost the talent to write while Jews and homosexuals miraculously acquired it.  As the editors explained it:  All the best new writers seem to be of the Left.  Thus what people were allowed to read tended to shift their opinions from Right to Left.

     The Social Gospel was preached from the pulpit while college professors subtly rewarded Left thinking students while punishing those of the Right.  Of course it would take time to turn the universities into the Red seminaries they are today but from 1917 to the present is only ninety years.  Once can judge the indredients from the pudding so there is no reason for the Left to deny the results as they did the process for at least seventy of those ninety years.

     Make no mistake the Cold War began with the October Revolution of 1917.   It broke out into a shooting war only because the National Socialists refused to accept the Judaeo-Communist yoke.  It matters not what anyone else says, the reason for WWII was the German volkist refusal to accept Jewish volkism under the religious guise of Communism.  That the leaders of the resistance turned out to be Hitler and the National Socialists may be only coincidental.  They understood the problem and had the will to resist.  It was inevitable that there should be casualties but the extent of destruction was truly phenomenal.

     Only after WWII when the American Right had regrouped under cover of the War essentially exercizing a hegemony over Western Europe did the West acknowledge the Cold War.  The American resistance only solidified after the death of FDR when his less ideological successor Harry Truman took the helm.  What took place before FDR’s death was maneuvering in the Culture Wars.

     The maneuvering took many forms, all of which tended to undermine or destroy the existing culture.  While Jews and Liberals were the key elements in the Coalition each was in competition with the others to impose its culture as supreme.  You can read culture as nationalism by another name.  The contest was both temporal and spiritual.  While I am primarily concerned with the spiritual or culture aspect one may look at the temporal event of the Crash of ’29 and its resultant Depression as the work of the Liberal Coalition.

     While I’m sure there were many reasons for the Crash there were also many ways to make it worse than it need have been.  The restraints that were thrown off the Stock Market are worth investigating.  For instance it was at this time the Jews invented the Holding Company.  Now, I will not tolerate charges of anti-Semitism.  I attempt a scientific analysis of a religious culture, one of only a great many in the US, and refuse to kowtow to any cultural projection.  If Christianity which is a Semitic religion is thought to be ridiculous then how much more ridiculous must the other two Semitic religions, Judaism and Moslemism, be?  One must have at least a modicum of consistency.  So, as I say, the Jews, as an instrument of their particular cultural revolution invented the Holding Company.  A holding company owns a number of producing companies.  Therefore the value of the stock of a holding company is dependent on the dividends it receives from the producing companies.  If there are no dividends  the holding company has no source of income.  then the Jews invented Holding Companies of Holding Companies whose stock was based on value at all.  But these stocks were traded and purchased with bonafide capital.

     Now, when the market crashed if you owned your stock outright you may have taken big paper losses but you weren’t wiped out.  Your stocks still had considerable value.  If you bought on margin that is to say if you put a small amount down when your margin call came you couldn’t meet it and you were wiped out.  The Holding and Holding Holding companies were a total loss as it was all phony money.  And the bankers called Henry Ford a fool!

     I don’t know if a study has ever been done on winners and losers but a survey of those left standing might provide some interesting insights.

     But to return to culture.  The Freudian attack was primarily centered on sex, that is, the destruction of Euroamerican morality.  It is important to bear in mind that Freud was a despicable person, a master hypocrite.  He was a homosexual, Libertine and dope addict.  It should hardly come as a surprise that the ‘morality’ he wished to impose on civilization was precisely the morality of homosexuals, Libertines and drug addicts.

     The key to such morality is sex.  Western morality from the time of Homer was based on the control of sexual apetites or, at the very least, channeling sexual energy into productive habits.  The sexual story of Homer’s Odyssey is Odysseus’ conquest of his sexual nature.  First he resisted the wantonness of Circe, then the allure of the Sirens.  He stayed for some time with Calypso who was the most complaisant of females but who demanded his full attention and finally a vision of the peacful home before his return to Penelope.  Even then he immediately left his wife after taking twenty years to get back to continue his wanderings or his search for salvation, meaning or whatever.  The Roman Catholic Church reinforced these sexual attitudes.

     The ruling attitude then was what Freud wanted to overturn.  In the destruction of the goyim’s culture to be reconstructed on the Semitic cultural model was the most important step.  First the ‘prudish’ ‘Puritan’ attitude toward sex had to be dismantled.  Censorship of explicit sexual material had to be removed.  Hence a campaign ensued to impugn anyone who ‘didn’t appreciate the beauty of the nude human body.’  Sounds reasonable doesn’t it?  But what does it mean?  It means the legitimization of pornography.  ‘There shouldn’t be any shame connected with sex.’  The Freudians said.  Well, that’s an opinion not a fact.

     The first effort was to legitimize literary works of questionable morality or, at least, which contradicted the prevailing morality.  So, books such as Madame Bovary, Lady Chatterly’s Lover and James Joyce’s Ulysses were promoted as the highest form of literary attainment, whatever exactly that might be, rather than as salacious novels.  Literary,  well there’s a thought to be considered.  Eventually they were all legalized.  ‘They started out on Burgundy but soon hit the harder stuff.’  The standards of society had been breached.   Then came the Marquis de Sade whose ‘literary’ value was said to override his sadistic psychosexual content.  Literary, hmm?  From thence we passed through Esquire Magazine to Hugh Heffner’s Playboy.  The latter magazine opened the floodgates of pornography which of course legitimized homosexuality; but, Playboy published stories of the highest literary quality.  Literature, yup, but everyone looked at the dirty pictures.

     So that, as of today we have this peculiar, need I say disgusting, homosexual and Libertine sexual morality.  One judges the tree by its fruits.  What the Satan Freud cut loose which has come to fruition today must have been his intent.

     The driving wheel for this transformation was the film industry of Hollwood.  The very essence of the film is hypnotic suggestion.  While it is true that poetry and novels also serve as suggestion there is a great quantitative and qualitative difference.  One’s intellectual distance and guard are always present while reading while with movies the opposite is always true.  Since one could maintain distance in the silent era being always able to discuss the movies with others while viewing them without disturbing people the suggestive power of any film required the same degree of consent as ‘literature.’

page 7.

     This was not true with sound movies.  Talking was not tolerated as it disturbed concentration.  Thus the mind was left open in a hypnoid state to visual and audio stimulation.  What goes in the mind stays in the mind.  Nothing is forgotten.  During the thirties and forties suggestion was employed but without the effectiveness of the technical changes that began in the fifties.  Huge wrap around screens began to fill the entire visual field enveloping the viewer in the suggestion.  Huge, powerful surround sound speakers filled any void left by the screen.  The volume was overpowering, virtually blocking out critical attention, actually placing the viewer very deep into the hypnoid state, almost the same as the feeling of terror wherein the suggestion becomes implanted in the subconscious somewhat on the order of a fixation.  Then the movie going audience was being hypnotized without being aware of it.

     Realizing that young minds were somewhat more malleable than older ones movies were directed at the ‘critical audience of from twelve to twenty-five.’  this age group also has the most leisure for movies.  Yeah, I know there were good reasons to direct movies at the age group but I’m interested in the real reasons.

     As the Jewish culture had a near hammerlock on the making of movies it could control the content.  Thus while having to ‘pander’ to the dominant culture, especially in the thirties and forties, the Jewish culture could subtly condition the viewers to their own cultural goals.

     Naturally this had to be done openly if not obviously  so that there was always a sizable minority who understood what was being attempted; voices were raised in objection.  Once again the Jews and the Coalition denied this was so deriding any objections as anti-Semitism or in violation of the Constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech and conscience.  The dissidents allowed themselves to be silenced too easily although the charge of anti-Semite was and is indefensible.  Unless you just dismiss it as a joke like I do.

     Thus by the process of gradualism control was established so that no movie not passing a very strict Jewish censorship could be shown.  Christian movies depicting Jesus were absolutely forbidden hence the huge flap over the Mel Gibson movie led by the Jewish culture who, that’s right, denounced Gibson as an anti-Semite.   The key word here is culture, not individual Jews but the entire culture denounced Gibson.  That’s why they call them culture wars.    

     In the thirties and forties the studio heads abjured movies with Jewish themes even in some cases refusing to employ actors because they looked too Jewish.  That’s the legend anyway.  Gentlemen’s Agreement broke that taboo although the lead characters were all goys playing goys but posing as Jews.  Interesting ploy.  Elia Kazan directed.  During the fifties movies that Jews considered purely reflected Jewish culture although the goy audiences were too oblivious of the fact were successful.  Two big films of this genre were A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Forum and Cabaret.

     Gradually what Jews called ‘Christians’ were made the butt of the jokes while Jewish characters became heroes.  Then as in the Adam Sandler movies he as a Jew although it was never made clear he was acting as a Jew put down ‘Crhistian’ characters, treating them as buffoons and fools while abusing goy women who were portrayed as sex crazed sluts and bimbos.

     Of course criminal behavior and sleazy approaches were used to condition the viewers mind in the direction of Freudian criminal and sex crazed morality.  The ‘Christian’ family was always attacked, fidelity, honor and uprightness demeaned.

     This attack was paralleled by a similar attack made on TV and also significantly in recorded popular entertainment.  First Vinyl records and then more openly on CDs.  Thus the public mind was constantly bombarded by propaganda reflecting the desires and needs of the Jewish culture. 

     So that, if in 1918 you had stood up and said that it was the intent of Freud and the Jewish culture to hypnotize the entire American population they wouldn’t even have had to call you an anti-Semite to discredit you, you would have been laughed to scorn.  Yet here it is.  You are all hypnotized. Except for a small disregarded and vilified minority, a small body not unlike the excommunicated heretics of the Middle Ages, everyone has been conditioned to accept the value system of the Jewish culture.  Of course when you abandon control of your culture to another you can’t expect anything else.

     As a side excursion let us consider the field of pornography.

page 8.

3.

     Let me say that while I deplore the Jewish culture’s methods I vastly admire their chutzpah.  it is the same as the admiration I have for the great Midwestern bandits like Jesse James, the Youngers, the Daltons or Pretty Boy Floyd The Outlaw.  Well, let’s exclude Pretty Boy, he has a special place in my affections.  While their careers were based on a false premise yet there was a dauntless courage and actual justification for the Outlaws’ choice of means to redress their grievances.  While I am aware that it was necessary for society to terminate their careers in one way or another, still I have that secret admiration for their attempt.  So it is with the Jewish culture.  While I can’t endorse their ideals and feel their methods will always doom them to failure, much as those of the Outlaws did,  like the Western train and bank robbers there is something thrilling in the attempt.

     But the return to the question.  Freud in his essay ‘The Aitiology Of Hysteria’ which is certainly approriate here, said:  Collected Papers Vol. I, p. 194:

     Quote:

     (I) am prepared to let my belief outrun the evidential force of my discoveries for the present time.  Besides, I am influenced by another motive, which for the moment is merely subjective value.

     Unquote.

     I am not quite so ready to allow my beliefs to outrun my evidence nor am I willing to abandon objectivity as was the good Herr Doktor Professor Sigmund Freud.  No. No.  We must adhere more closely to our science than that.  While Freud doesn’t tell us what his subjective motives were I think I can guess.

     As a Libertine and homosexual Freud would have been a proponent of the distribution of pornography.  We have seen that Freud made advanced studies into the nature of emasculation.  Well, pornography is what emasculation is all about.  It seems certain that Freud misinterpreted the nature of the Anima following rather the lead of his friend Fliess, of nose fame, that there was an inherent bisexuality.  In other words in keeping with his homosexuality he believed that a man desired sexual relations with either men or women.  Any port in a storm, or even fair weather.

     In fact an affect of emasculation is the estrangement of the Animus from the Anima.  In the process of emasculation the Animus apparently has the understanding that the Anima failed in its duty therefore wishing to punish it.  Indulging his or her hatred then the homosexual is attracted to pornography with is attendant sadomasochism.  Indeed the mainstay of the pornography business is the homosexual by which I include Lesbians.

     In use then terms from individual psychology to group psychology the same Freudian rules apply.  Freud realized his own emasculation, probably that of the Jewish culture, and therefore sought to emasculate the Euroamerican culture in return.  We have seen through the media of movies, TV, radio and recordings how successful he was.    There is a French film entitled Dr. Petiot.  Dr. Petiot was a real person who realized his full potential under the Nazi occupation of France.  A bonafide psychotic as well as a physician Petiot lured those seeking to escape France to his home under the pretense that he would smuggle them out of France.  Instead he murdered them but before he did he mocked and ridiculed them deriving full enjoyment from their humiliation.

     Now, in the Winter 2004 edition of the European magazine The Jewish Quarterly an essay was published by a lecturer of American History at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland by the name of Nathan Abrams.  His bit is entitled Jews In The American Porn Industry.  What this essay shows is the divorcement of the cultural or group Animus from the Anima of the Jews.  This should come as no surprise because Semites in general suppress the role of women, or the Anima in favor of the Male Animus which is an expression of the Culture’s unhealthy Anima-Animus relationship.  Here Mr. Abrams mocks and ridicules Euroamerican civilization.

page 9.

     Mr. Abrams begins his essay thus:

     Quote:

     A story little told is that of Jews in Hollywood’s seedier cousin, the adult film  industry.  Perhaps we’d prefer to pretend that the ‘triple exthnics’ didn’t exist, but there’s no getting away from the fact that secular Jews have played (and still continue to play) a disproportiate role throughout the adult film industry in America.

     Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United States as Jews have helped transform a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana.  These are the ‘true blue Jews.’

     Unquote.

     The most virulent anti-Semite couldn’t have expressed it more succinctly.  At the same time we have a cultural confession of emasculation.  I haven’t been able to discover the exact meaning of ‘triple-exthnic’ but the term is probably just another obfuscation  in terminology.

     While everyone has known of the Jewish role in the ‘sex industry’, where they are as over represented as they are in Hollywood itself, for a hundred years, only Jews have been permitted to write about it.  The goys have been so thoroughly emasculated in their turn that they would rather leave it alone than be denounced as anti-Semites thereby being excommunicated or thrust out of society so Mr. Abrams has the field to himself.  However one is free to criticize the content of the essay.

     When Mr. Abrams identifies pornography as the seedier cousin of the Hollywood film industry he tacitly admits that Hollywood itself is seedy to which conclusion I heartily assent.  All, or nearly all films, are pornographic in intent.  The only area in the world in which the production of pornography is legal is right here in these United States Of America and that place is within a twenty mile radius of Hollywood where you know who is over heavily represented.  Not American but Israeli, Jewish.  Hollywood is an Israeli colony in the United States.

     Mr. Abrams says that Jews have helped transform a ‘fringe subculture’- read criminal- into what has become a primary constituent of Americana.  Further he says that this legitmization of crime has been the work of the Jewish culture.  Mr. Abrams is projecting badly when he believes that pornography has anything to do with Americana, rather by his own admission he should say Judaica.  He further states that these pornographers are ‘true blue Jews.’  In other words, the best that Judaism has to offer.  If so, then the Jewish culture must be analyzed with this notion in mind.

     Pornography is essentially an extension of prostitution.  That is to say, the degradation and exploitation of the Anima, let alone women.  To keep the business running there must therefore be procurers and procuresses.  Men may volunteer but women by and large have to be dragooned.

     As an expression of emasculation one finds a disproportionate number of homosexual also involved which means sadomasochism and drugs.  Sadomasochism is an affect of emasculation.

Thus the seedier cousins of seedy Hollywood itself are governed by a psychotic state of mind.  In fact Hollywood movies are psychotic visions of a psychotic sadomasochistic projection on the world as examples of American culture or as Mr. Abrams would have it, Americana; quite falsely so.

     How far they represent other cultures than the Jewish is open to question.

page 10.

     Pornography was taken mainstream by the goy, Hugh Heffner, who developed this affect of a mental disease in the guise of Hedonism rather than Libertinism which is its true guise.  He was joined by the major ‘players’ Larry Flynt of Hustler Magazine and Bob Guccione of Penthouse Magazine.

     Although Jews had been instrumental in kicking down the doors of sexual censorship, most notably with the legitimization of Joyce’s Ulysses, it was Heffner beginning in 1953 who paved the way for the porn film industry which arose in the sixties.  In competition with Heffner, Flynt and Guccione constantly stretched the limits from Heffner’s Hedonism to outright pornography.  The three magazines above were sold openly across the counter which meant high grosses.  It should be noted that while tremendous effort was made in lifting censorship of obscene material at the same time the same effort was made to censor political and social thought by the same parties.

    The smut industry of peep shows and whatnot Mr. Abrams quite correctly identifies as being primarily Jewish.  Mr. Abrams then gets involved with the motivations of the smut peddlers.  As is consistent throughout Jewish writing he distinguishes between ‘secular’ Jews and ‘religious’ Jews as though they were two separate entities.  The distinction will undoubtedly confuse those who haven’t scientifically studied the culture.  In point of fact crime and prostitution had a significant hand in financing Jewish political activities from the beginning of the Revolution from 1913 and before to the present.

     The Revolution didn’t come free and it didn’t come cheap; there’s a price tag on everything and a very high price tag on this one.  On the financial and banking level it was fairly easy, the bankers just used other people’s money.  Loans are loans and expenditures are expenditures; loans have to be repaid while expenditures are cash out of hand.  So for expenditures the money came largely from vice.  One usually thinks of organized crime as Italian or Sicilian while in actuality the organizers were Jewish.  Enormous sums were raised by crime especially under the kingpins Arnold Rothstein and Lepke Buchalter.  But, lo and behold, when these men died the vast sums that passed through their hands which they could not possibly have spent were nowhere to be found.  To all intents and purposes these men died penniless.

     On the other hand men like Julius Rosenwald who became a principal of Sears, Roebuck contributed millions upon millions of dollars to Jewish ‘charities’, read- political organizations.  While there is no reason Rosenwald couldn’t have become rich from his position at Sears still the amounts of money he contributed seem well in excess of any possible earnings.  While Jewish criminals were donors to Jewish causes, and very welcome ones too, it seems probable that the money pouring into their coffers which, after all was a joint Jewish effort, may well have been funneled thrugh intermediaries like Rosenwald as a money laundering scheme.

     After all men like Rosenwald maintained magnificent establishments while making these contributions.

     The Liberal position from 1815 or so when Liberalism per se came into existence had always been that crime and prostitution were the result of the inequitable distribution of wealth.  Always on the qui vive for another utopia it was assumed that when the working class had its share crime and prostitution would disappear.

     For all practical purposes that particular utopia was realized in the United States.  Lo and behold, instead of crime and prostitution having disappeared they have prospered mightily.  Indeed, rather than being repulsed by this particular form of prostitution women have apparently embraced it.  Yes, as Mr. Abrams so quaintly puts it:  Once (women) had laid down, they could stand on their own two feet, particularly as female performers typically earn twice as much as their male counterparts.  Once they had laid down that is.  Good paying prostitution is still prostitution, but at least the girls were paid better than the boys.  I’d still rather be a boy in those circumstances.

     So, if not driven into prostitution by poverty it seems that women are lured into it by the pursuit of wealth or as Mr. Abrams insultingly puts it, in pursuit of the ‘American Dream.’

      Nor are these entrepreneurs of porn from poverty backgrounds.  Mr. Abrams proudly claims that these porn pros come from ‘upper class’ and prosperous Jewish families.  What motivations does Mr. Abrams attribute  to these Libertine criminals other than the pursuit of the buck.

     Mr. Abrams:  Porn is just one expression of [the] rebellion against standards, against the disciplined life of obedience to the Torah that marks a Jew living in Judaism.

     So, their rebellion is really culturally internal and has nothing to do with the mainstream culture.  They find Judaism too restricting.  Indeed, ‘America provided the freest society Jews had ever known.’ Adds Mr. Abrams.  Including his own Judaic culture one assumes.  One might think the Promised Land had been realized.  But, read the sentence carefully and it is made evident that the Jews still consider themselves strangers in a strange land but now they have the freedom to rage at all, even themselves.

     Quote:

     Extending the subversion thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America.  Some porn stars viewed themselves as front-line fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism.  (read- the Jews)  According to Ford (Luke Ford) Jewish X-rated actors brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast.’  Jewish involvement in porn by this argument is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority:  They are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.

     Unquote.

     Quite right.  While the revolution or 1913-28 has been extended that War still rages on.  Furthermore it is being waged on the terms laid down by Freud.  The Jewish culture permits even encourages these pornographers toward that goal.  One doesn’t really believe that a bunch of scum criminal pornographers were able to get a law passed legalizing their criminal behavior does one?  Of course one doesn’t.  Such a law could only be passed by very influential ostensibly respectable people of porn’s less seedy cousin.

     This area of legal pornography is Hollywood.  Whether fronted by goys or not Jewish moguls passed this law.  Are they taking a rake-off as a reward for providing the pornographers a legal sanctuary of are they sleeping partners of the pornographers or has it made it possible to release such racist pornographic filth as Shadow Boxing as legitimate entertainment in mainstream theatres.  Gosh, let me think long and hard on that one.

     So , we have the results so far of Freud’s psychological program for the conquest of Euroamerica.  Of course along the way his program would be reinforced.  Here’s Mr. Abrams again:\

     Quote:

     Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish.  Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s.  Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse, and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required reading.  Reich’s central preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction.  Goodman wrote of the ‘beautiful cultural consequence’ that would follow on legalizing pornography.  It would ‘ennoble all our art’; ‘humanize sexuality.’

     Unquote.

     I’d put those statements in quotation marks too.  These writers might be considered the second wave after Freud to refreshen the program and keep it moving forward.  There is a particular reason why these writers should have been published and lauded over others and it isn’t literary value.  As we will see in the next section, when a book was to be promoted a cadre of boomers ran through the universities and cities touting this stuff.

     Thus this very powerful organization was very effective.  The effectiveness was made total when any who objected could be isolated and harassed by teams of damage controlmen.  Not only could an individual be silenced and marginalized by a whispered imputation of ‘anti-Semitism’ but the entire population could be emasculated by the same charge.

     Freud then had devised the means to emasculate the hundreds of millions of Euroamericans and that purely by their own acquiescence.  Rather than be known as anti-Semites they willingly abandoned their sexuality.  This abandonment was conditioned and reinforced by the entire media of the land.  Most especially Hollywood.

page 12.

     Do not think I condemn the Jewish culture, or nationality in fact, for this fait accompli.  On the contrary I applaud it.  Imagine this atavistic religious consciousness projecting a state of ignorance over the most enlightened population on the planet.  Think about it.  It stuns one to silence.  This achievement is so amazing it leaves one standing with mouth gaping.  If the entire Euroamerican population is willing to voluntarily surrender not only their intelligence but their manly and womanly sexuality to another culture why should the receiving culture be blamed?  No force was used.  Only psychological manipulation that any fool could have seen and easily rejected.

     Further, just like Dr. Petiot with his victims, the Jewish culture humiliates its slaves via the media.  I have pointed out Adam Sandler movies where he plays a vacuous nerd who triumphs over athletic men and humiliates nubile women.  If the past is any guide to the future one can look forward to a gulag system where opponents are mass executed.

     I can say no more on the topic here.  Suffice it to say that on the sexual level Edgar Rice Burroughs’ America hs been deconstructed per Sigmund Freud’s plan and reconstructed to the complete advantage of the Jewish culture and to the complete disadvantage of the Euroamerican culture.  All it took, and this the most astonishing fact of all, was a little chutzpah.

     All credit belongs to the Jewish culture and I say that to the shame of my own.