Note #9:  A Mention Of G.W.M. Reynolds In G.M. Young’s Compendium Earl Victorian England.

by

R.E. Prindle

I came across an interesting reference to Reynolds in a book titled Early Victorian England edited by G.M. Young, published by the Oxford Press in 1934.  The book is a compendium of essays covering different aspects of early Victorian England not unlike Charles Knight’s London.  The article in question is E.E. Kellett’s The Press

Each article is written by a different person and while not all are probably in their sixties and seventies most are so they were born possibly as early as 1855 while most must have been born in the 1860s and 70s so they have memories close to the period 1830-65, thus being more familiar with the way things were.

The article of interest to us is this essay on the press by Kellet.  Interestingly of all the authors he could have chosen to mention he has a page or two concerning Reynolds. 

In the quote Kellett’s discussion begins with the publisher of Penny Dreadfuls Edward Lloyd.  Here I quote pages 65, 66, 67, 68 in full and part of 69.  This is terrific background with an acknowledgement of Reynolds.  An excellent perspective.

Quote:

Very different alike from Chambers, Eliza Cook, and Cleave was Edward Lloyd, the founder of the ‘Salisbury Square School of Fiction.’  Lloyd appealed to yet another class, and gave that class what it wanted, with but the pretence of a desire to elevate it in morals and in taste.  In September 1841 he started the People’s Police Gazette, a penny weekly consisting solely of what to-day are called ‘thrillers’, or narratives of some sensational crime of the day.  He did not touch on politics, and allowed no political cartoons, but made his stories still more horrible by ghastly illustrations.  The success of this paper was unprecedented, and Lloyd followed it up with another (1843).  The Weekly Penny Miscellany, sixteen closely-printed tales and novels, short or serial, saving space for these by omitting the illustrations.  This also was enormously popular.  There seemed indeed, to be no limit either to the fecundity of Lloyd’s press or to the willingness of his public to absorb its products.  In 1843, also, he brought out the Penny Atlas and Weekly Register of Novel Entertainment, while in an endless stream he poured forth penny novelettes, either selected from his magazines or quite new; not forgetting the serial, in which the ‘To be continued’ at an exciting point ensured the purchase of the next number.  The style of these works was what used to be called ‘elevated and impassioned’; and their general character may be gathered from such titles as Alice Horne, or the Revenge of the Blighted One, Ada the Betrayed.

What the refined classes thought of all this may be easily guessed.  In the Report of the Committee on Public Libraries, 1849, are many proofs of the anxiety caused by the popularity of this ‘Saturday trash.’  Lovett, who owned, however, that he had not himself read it, considered that, at least in the early stages, Lloyd’s publications were immoral and anti-social.  The evidence of George Dawson (a name well remembered in Birmingham) may carry still more weight.

‘We give the people an appetite to read, and supply them with nothing.  For the last many years, in England, everybody has been educating the people, but they have forgotten to find them any books.  In plain language, you have made them hungry, but you have given them nothing to eat; it is almost a misfortune to a man to have a great taste for reading, and not to have the power of satisfying it….The Penny stamp upon newspapers makes the cost of a good thing dear; and adds facility to the cheap people to circulate trash to an extent which is almost incredible:  the rubbish issued every Saturday is very great.’

Dawson, as we many believe, was overcolouring the picture; but it is not surprising that he spoke strongly.  Nor is it surprising that Charles Knight, who attributed the failure of the Penny Magazine to the competition of Lloyd’s papers, should have felt some indignation.  But Lloyd was quite unrepentant.  He noted with contempt, in the preface to the Miscellany (1846), the wailings of Knight; and he always insisted that his stories had an ‘elevating’ tendency.  Thus, in another of his prefaces, he declares:

‘It has ever been our aim, in the management of Lloyd’s Penny Atlas, to combine as much practical and real knowledge of human life as possible with the “’brain-woven’’ narratives, which from time to time appeared in our pages; for we hold an opinion, which in practice we have had frequent opportunities of verifying, the true morality, sound reasoning, and exalted sentiments may be more easily, more effectually, and more pleasantly conveyed to the mind through the medium of works of fiction than by any other means….We paint virtue oppressed and borne down by the wicked, and then we show the rebound of its energies: while the wild turbulence of vice has brought forth nothing but evil fruits and deep vexation of spirit.’

‘We lay before a large and intelligent circle of readers those same pleasures of the imagination which have hitherto, to a great extent, graced only the polished leisure of the wealthy.’

Nor was Lloyd without his defenders.  Thomas Frost, who made an attempt to earn the half-sovereign which Lloyd paid for each installment of his novels, considered that the Salisbury Square School, provided a useful connection link between the ballads, ‘last dying speeches’ of murderers, and terrific legends of diabolism, which had been the favourite literature of the 1790s, and the more wholesome reading of his own time.  The whole controversy was, in fact, another instance of the eternal quarrel between realism and idealism, with this curious difference, that Lloyd’s business-like realism induced him to supply his public with stronger doses of romanticism than the idealist could endure.

Lloyd had but one serious rival.  This was G.W.M. Reynolds, a strong Chartist, who thoroughly knew the taste of the people he met day by day.  As a novelist he challenged the supremacy of G.P.R. James, and was equally prolific.

[In a note Kellet adds:  Several of his novels, in double columns, paper bound, sixpenny form, were still circulating  in the present writer’s youth.]

In 1846 he started Reynold’s Newspaper, in which innumerable stories represented vice as a monster of frightful mien, yet, it is to feared, not in such a manner as to render it hateful.  There is the usual assemblage of bad baronets, designing marquises, and harassed maidens.  From time to time there are sheer horrors, outdoing Mrs. Radcliffe at her most horrible.  A typical specimen of Reynolds’s style is perhaps the following, from Ellen Percy, or the Memoirs of an actress (ii. 268):

‘ “Ah, is it so?”  I ejaculated’ and the next instant my hands were at the throat of Lady Lilla Essendene.

‘So sudden and so powerful was my attack, that she was completely overpowered in the twinkling of an eye; and she fell upon the floor.

‘ “ Let her go, Miss Percy! And don’t be a fool!” ejaculated Dame Betty.  “Those ruffians will come up and murder us.!”

‘ “Be quiet, dame!”  I said in a most peremptory manner.  “Listen!”

‘And we did listen, while my hands were still upon Lady Lilla’s throat,–my looks showing such stern determination that she evidently thought I should strangle her outright at the first indication of an attempt to cry or resist.  For several moments we listened, and still all was silent.

‘ “Now, I said, “you see Lady Lilla, that thus far the victory is my own, and the momentary conflict has not reached the ears of your myrmidons.  Answer me!—for you see I am desperate, in as much as my position was rendered desperate by your menaces.  Tell me in what part of the building is the young man confined, who was captured by your ruffians in the middle of the night?  Beware how you deceive me, for I must inform you this is not the first time I have been a prisoner in these ruins, and I am familiar with situations and details.”

‘ “That young man,” said Lady Lilla, who was just enabled to speak in a whisper as I loosed to the slightest degree the gripe which I had upon her throat,–“that young man is a certain William Lardner—”

‘ “Yes, yes, I know it,”  I ejaculated: “he is a sailor on board the yacht where you used to meet Edward St. Clair and plot your horrible schemes for my destruction.” ‘

It is clear that Reynolds’s readers would not only snatch a fearful joy out of his narratives, but also acquire some acquaintance with polysyllabic resources of the English language.  Not the least noteworthy characteristic of all the novels of the time is the way in which the heroes, at the most exciting moments, contrive to retain command of a Johnsonian vocabulary.

Whatever may be said against the ‘Salisbury Square’ School, it was clean.

End of Quote.

That account quite nicely places Reynolds in the context of this time.  It also shows from whence he found the format for his own novels and magazines.  It is interesting that while Lloyd paid half a guinea, that is 126 pence for an installment Reynolds was paid a five pound note each Friday for his.  That would seem to indicate that Stiff and Vickers knew what they had and were willing to include Reynolds in the profits.  He would have been more of a partner in the enterprise. 

That might explain why they were so miffed when Reynolds chose to abandon them and struck out on his own.

That Reynolds’ story, The Mysteries of London, was doing so well in apparently heavy traffic indicates how well he was thought of by his readers.

Kellett’s article proves valuable to myself and us because it gives an accurate and detailed account of the press in which Reynolds was working.

Note #7:

George W.M. Reynolds, John Dicks And Politics

by

R.E. Prindle

What I find amazing in my study of George W.M. Reynolds is that for a writer who was supposed to be the best selling author of the nineteenth century so little of his work can be found.  Endless copies of obscure nineteenth century English authors can be found on Ebay,  yet virtually nothing in earlier editions of Reynolds.  If you search John Dicks, early copies of other writers are occasionally available.  But, no Reynolds.

True, Pickwick Abroad was recently available but those fairly numerous copies have now disappeared. Bought up.  Even then the available edition was the 1864 reprint issued after Reynolds had stopped publishing new novels.  It also was not published by Dicks.  A little mystery there, perhaps?

Why did Reynolds not have Dicks publish it?  When George stopped writing there seemed to be a split between he and his printer John Dicks.  There have been questions asked about how politically aligned Reynolds and Dicks were.  I have as yet no settled opinion but I am beginning to think that they were worlds apart.

There can be little doubt that a man of Reynolds revolutionary mentality who not only had literary talent but great business ability with a superb printer for a lieutenant was a threat to the government of England.  It is impossible that he was not under close surveillance.  Reynolds quite frankly was a revolutionary while Dicks wasn’t.

Dicks had an unusual background, quite interesting really, but much more sedate, even scholarly, and conventional.  He probably saw Reynolds as his main chance, took it and was rewarded with great success.  If he wasn’t the originator of cheap reprints of literature he was still an innovator.

The crux of the problem in Dicks’ mind was the Reynolds’ magazine, The Reynolds Miscellany.  The Miscellany was a very successful publication although seen as quite violent in its political advocacy.  There had to be close public scrutiny.  This would have offended Dicks.

As a solution to the problem Dicks created a competing magazine he called Bow Bells following the format of the Miscellany but reversing its direction.  Having established Bow Bells he then persuaded Reynolds to fold the Miscellany into Bow Bells thus the Miscellany disappeared and Bow Bells went on to be a multi-decade success. I have a couple bound annual issues for the eighties.  Pretty lame stuff, but it made Dicks life more comfortable.

About 1860 Reynolds had exhausted his fund of stories.  Probably about 1856 and the termination of the fourth series of The Mysteries Of The Court Of London he began to dry up.  While his writing is still quite good in his later novels after ’56 the fire is gone.  His Empress Eugenie’s Boudoir is a mere summing up.  Perhaps the 1864 Pickwick Abroad rounded it off.

About this time either Reynolds chose to completely walk away from his novelistic career or Dicks persuaded him to sell out or forced him out.  Dicks took the company while Reynolds sold him all his copyrights and walked away.  To me, an author may burn out completely and stop writing but as the best selling author in England to sell his copyrights and walk away is incomprehensible.

Dicks had been making it harder to sell for Reynolds as he kept reducing the type size down to nearly diamond point making the books very uncomfortable to read.  The last printing in the 1880s is so small, although clear, that it is hardly worth the struggle.  That could have been a way of forcing Reynolds out.

At that point then Dicks published nearly the whole catalog of Harrison Ainsworth.  Perhaps when he signed on with Reynolds he thought that he would be another Ainsworth.  By the late seventies Ainsworth was struggling with his new works barely selling but Dicks undertook to publish one of them along with the earlier catalog.  The impression I have is that Dicks was disgusted by Reynolds’ writing.

George lived on until 1879 in a comfortable state, having amassed his fortune of 20,000 pounds, although his last few years were plagued by disease.

Dicks lived a little longer, turned his business over to his family and headed South to the Riviera to live out his last couple years

I rather suspect that the 1850s became increasingly difficult as the government found ways to turn the screws of the revolutionary writer.  Even then Athe 1880s were a far cry from Reynolds’ hey day of the 40s and 50s. It was a new England after 1860 while the mind of George was locked into the Romantic Period.  After 1859 the talk was all Evolution as Darwin published.  Time was creeping in like a tidal wave.  The ocean just swells and rises almost inperceptibly  and sweeps all before it.  The times changed, George didn’t.

George W.M. Reynolds And Benjamin Disraeli

17. Time Traveling With R.E. Prindle

by

R. E. Prindle

It is impossible to write accurate history if you excise the activities of the Jews. Their rise after Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo cannot be ignored.  They are integral to understanding history.  Why ignore them as if they weren’t there?  One also requires an understanding of who they are and what their goals may be.  A major claim of the Jews is that they originated monotheism as though that were a good thing and the end result of religion.  The fact is that monotheism does not now nor ever has existed.  The Jews have never practiced it.

The Jewish vision of a supreme god snaps into place with existing notions at the dawn of the Age of Ares. 

I have read  of a similarity between the religious views of the Jews and those of the ancient Greeks but I could never discover it until recently.  Zeus and Jehovah are really identical except for the different interpretation the two peoples put on their supreme deity.

At the beginning of the Arien Age the god spoke to men and interfered in their activities.  As Man conceived it heaven and earth existed and both were mirror images of the other or as it was expressed:  As above, so below.

The Jewish Lord’s Prayer says:  Thy will be done as it is in heaven.  That raises the question of how Heaven is ordered and what is God’s will.  If the earth is a reflection of heaven then heaven is a very imperfect place and God’s will is frankly malicious.

In Homer’s Iliad the Greeks portray the antics of the gods led by their supreme god, Zeus, and they are identical to the men of earth.  The foibles are the same.

  In Greek mythology during the Age of Taurus which preceded the Age of Aries Zeus and the gods were thought to be much closer to men.  Select families professed to be descended from one god or another, that is, in religious terms they were angels.  For instance Achilles is the son of the goddess Thetis and she gives him divine assistance when he asks her for it.

When Achilles began to draw his sword during a dispute with his King, Agamemnon, which would have been a gross violation of divine law, Athene incredibly arrives from heaven, or Mount Olympus, seizes his hair from behind and cautions him against striking Agamemnon. Achilles heeds and desists.  It is to be noted that Agamemnon comes from a family that rules by divine right, a deputy of Zeus. 

In the Jewish tradition Israel is magically entailed to them forever while the House of David occupies the same relationship to the Jewish God as Agamemnon to his god.

But as the story takes place at the cusp of two stages of mental evolution the belief in divine origins is being superseded.  Those who profess divine origins are scoffed at.  The Greeks are transiting to an Age of Reason and proto-scientific thinking.

The Jews on the other hand wish to have a supreme god who they aver supersedes the gods of all other nations called Jehovah.  Jehovah does not deny the existence of other gods hence not monotheistic but merely the god of gods as the Persian Darius was the king of kings with dozens of other kings in his train.

Jehovah had as many subservient gods and a heavenly host called angels which have a very real existence to Jews.  Zeus resided on Mt. Olympus while Moses was said to have met Jehovah on Mount Sinai.  Both people revered high places.  Thus as the Ages passed from Taurus to Aries all peoples evolved into the same understanding of the relationship of the gods to man except for the Jews.

With the Jews Jehovah was a supreme god and he ruled a heavenly host with many minor gods called angels and between the rest of human kind the Jews were placed between them and the angels, hence they are of divine origin which they still magically believe.  The Jews, unlike the Greeks, simply refused to give up a divine connection of the whole people rather than individuals except for the House of David.  David is still semi-divine.

Thus, they never really left the beliefs of the Age of Taurus, or Saturn the ruling archetype of Taurus.  As the chosen of god, that is those who never transited from Taurus to Aries and now Pisces and soon Aquarius they believed and continue to believe that in creation they exist elevated above common mankind. Between the two species.  There has never been a transition from magic or superstition to reason.  They always infuse science with magic.  I give as an example Freud.  Psychology began as a science in the minds of the Greek successors of Europe.  The conscious and unconscious minds were being examined scientifically.   In Freud’s hands psychology became supernatural.  He chose to minimize reason, that is the conscious mind, and enthrone the unconscious mind as two different and separate entities.  As he had opted to serve Satan he made the unconscious the home of evil while even existing as a separate entity outside the body over which Man has no control.  This is magical thinking, that is subjective thinking, and it is an unshakeable characteristic of the Jews.

This attitude is nowhere better exemplified than in the character of Isaac D’Israeli, Benjamin Disraeli’s father.  Isaac 1766-1849, Benjamin 1804-1881.

Disraeli’s father Isaac, who retained the spelling D’Israeli that Benjamin changed to Disraeli, was a fanatical Jew who imbued the religious characteristics explained above although he likely did not understand them.  I will quote from his book The genius of Judaism here, published in 1833, which places Jews high above the rest of humanity.  It might seem strange in that case that he would insist that son Benjamin should convert to Christianity at the age of the Bar Mitzvah.  One wonders whether Benjamin first celebrated his Bar Mitzvah and then converted or whether he skipped his Bar Mitzvah entirely. 

There were disabilities placed on Jews and Catholics at the time that prevented them full enfranchisement thus Benjamin would not have been able to serve in politics.  As a Christion convert he could.  As Isaac had fully indoctrinated him into Judaism by the time of his Bar Mitzva Benjamin’s mind’s first loyalty was to Judaism thus his goal was to bend the Cristian’s mind to Judaism.  Like it or not the Jews seek supremacy  A good question is why they chose not to transit from Taurus to Aries.  Was it because of certain mental qualities in the Taurian mind that they thought superior that weren’t present in the Arien dispensation?  I don’t know, but it is true that the Jews remain a magical people.

Isaac himself says that a Jew of the nineteenth century could not accept the status of a Jew of the nineth century, while in 1916 the German Jew Walter Rathenau advised Europeans that when WWI ended Europe would not be returning Jews to their status in the nineteenth.  Thus the Jews advance in a quantum leap of a mere hundred years to be able to challenge the Europeans for supremacy on their own turf.  Benjamin would be instrumental in that leap.

Isaac D’Israeli had his ulterior motives.  The American Jew of the twentieth century Greil Marcus, a music critic, had his favorite song.  The lyrics went:

I wish I was a mole in the ground.

Yes, I wish I was a mole in the ground.

If I’se a mole in the ground

I’d root that mountain down.

That was the Jewish task and the role Isaac chose for his son Benjamin, so Benjamin wore the mask of a Christian while serving as a spy and conspirator to pave the way for the Jews.  Thus he worked as a mole to bring that mountain down.  Disraeli brought himself to the attention of the public by writing novels.  They aren’t very good novels but they were noticed and gained acceptance.  Especially with his 1844 novel Coningsby.

In his own character of the Mole that novel introduces a character named Sidonia.  Sidonia was based on the son of Nathan Rothchild, Lionel, who was to break down many walls containing the Jews.  Coningsby was published in 1844.  The novel, because of Sidonia who would have been easily recognizable, was something of a sensation at the time  so that it undoubtedly came to the attention of George W.M. Reynolds.  Between the preceding activities of Nathan Rothschild and the current ones of Lionel, meaning Lion of the Lord, both Isaac and Benjamin Disraeli and the growing Jewish presence, the threat of the Jews were perceived.  In response Reynolds then in 1851 wrote his novel The Necromancer that portrays the Jewish threat in a fantastic way, sort of a predecessor of Sci-fi.

Reynolds places his novel in the reign of Henry VIII.  It warns of the presence of a look alike that is a Dark government posed by Reynold’s protagonist Lionel Danvers.  Very discreet.

.II.

Let us now consider The Genius of Judaism by Isaac D’Israeli who also had literary ambitions.  This was written in 1933 so keep track of the dates.  He and son Benjamin also compiled a six volume set titled Curiosities of Literature.

By ‘genius’ Isaac means that Judaism is superior to and better than any other belief system that ever existed or could exist.  He believed that the first Jewish society called Theocracy, and he gives it special meaning, was perfection and like the Word has been lost forever.   All Jews who lived after the Theocracy ended have created a less perfect political entity.

Chapter One is titled:  ‘With the Israelite Everything is Ancient and Nothing is Obsolete.  By that Isaac means that Judaism is eternal and unchangeable unlike the others that come and go.  On Page one he begins:  The existence of the “peculiar people” professing the ancient Jewish faith has long been an object of religious conviction and of philosophical curiosity.’  Then comes a confusing sentence:  ‘The Hebrew separated from the Christian at a period of highest civilization holds an anomalous position in society.’  I take that to be two separate sentences.  The Hebrew separated from the Christian’, that sentence is backwards as, since the Hebrew came first, the Christian separated from the Hebrew.  Perhaps it reads that a period of highest civilization might mean the Roman period or it could mean, in the nineteenth century the period of highest civilization, the Jew ‘exists in an anomalous position’ at the bottom of the highest civilization and not the top.  In that case it either means that Judaism being much better should be atop the highest level of civilization then occupied by inferiors.  Difficult to determine.

Then a non-sequitur follows:  “with some truth it may be said, that he exists in a supernatural state.”  That is, Isaac believes that the Jew is not natural as are other animals but he exists in a state above them and as we have seen below the angels.  The Jewish mind then must be ruled by magic rather than reason or science. After four thousand years as a people this must be an unchangeable belief.

Then Isaac makes the bald statement: “The Genius of Judaism remains immutable requiring every concession but yielding none…”  I suppose that means that as the chosen people of God his real position is as Top Nation cannot be altered or changed by science and it is a crime to not acknowledge the ‘fact.’  The Genius of Judaism exists eternally. The European must concede all but the Jew will not give an inch. 

The sentence continues: “…perpetuating human institutions, which, from their very nature passed away [that is at the end of the Taurean Age] and still cherishing the prejudices of a barbarous aeras.”  In other words, Jewish antiquity and the present are one.  Next:  But that the Christian of the nineteenth century should remain for the Hebrew the Christian of the ninth is a moral anachronism.”  In other words, I presume, the changeable Christian is less than the Eternal Jew.

And then he restates his position “requiring every concession but yielding none”….”It will not be by taking a popular view of the manners of this singular people that we shall allay the fanaticism of Jew or Christian.  We [you] must learn to feel like Jews when we tell of their [our] calamities, and to reason like Christians when we [both of us]  detect their [our Jewish] fatuities.”

In other words:  Mourn with them over their disasters and with Christian forbearance ignore their crimes.  Very nice work if you can get it and they have.

This then, is the background of Benjamin Disraeli, born a Jew, indoctrinated and conditioned on the notion of the innate superiority of the Jew, converted to a surface Christianity as a Bar Mitzvah and sent as a Mole to undermine Christian society to raise the Jew above the Christian.

Benjamin then was a believer in his portrait of the ideal Jew, Sidonia, in his novel Coningsby.  It would seem apparent then that Coningsby and Reynolds’ The Necromancer are inspirer and inspired.  Following Benjamin’s father’s image Sidonia might seem ‘supernatural’, too good to be true, hence Reynolds’ Lionel Danvers is supernatural.

A longish quote from Disraeli:  Coningsby pp. 261-63, Wildside Press edition:

Coningsby: “But surely it would be easy to repeal a law so illiberal.”

Sidonia:  “Oh! As for illiberality, I have no objection to if it be an element of power.  Eschew political sentimentalism.  What I contend is that if you permit men to accumulate property, and they use that permission, to a great extent power is inseparable from that property [Sindonia is a Rothschild] and it is the last degree important to make it the interest of any powerful class to oppose the institutions under which they live. [The origins of the two world wars.]  The Jews, for example, independently of the capital qualities of citizenship which they possess in their industry, temperance and energy and vivacity of mind, are a race essentially monarchical, deeply religious, and shrinking themselves from a convert, as a calamity, are ever anxious to see the religious system of the country in which they live flourish; yet since your society has become agitated in England, and powerful combinations menace your institutions, you find the once loyal Hebrew invariably arrayed in the same ranks as the leveler, and the latitudinarian, and prepared to support the policy which may even injure his life and property rather than tamely continue under a system that seeks to degrade him. [Here we have blackmail insinuated: Accept us at our own evaluation or we will sink your ship of fools.]  The Tories lose an important election at a critical moment; ‘tis the Jews come forward to vote against them.  The church is alarmed at the scheme of a latitudinarian university, and learns with relief that the funds are not forthcoming for its establishment;  a Jew immediately advances and endows it.  Yet the Jews, Coningsby, are essentially Tories.  Toryism, indeed, but copied from the mighty prototype which has fashioned Europe.  And every generation they must become more powerful and more dangerous to the society which is hostile to them.  [Hence the holocaust.]  Do you think that the quiet humdrum persecution of a decorous representative of an English university can crush those who have successfully baffled the Pharaohs, Nebuchadnezzar, Rome and the Feudal Ages?  The fact is, you cannot destroy a pure race of the Caucasian organization.  It is a physiological fact, a simple law of nature, which has baffled Egyptian and Assyrian Kings, Roman Emperors, and Christian Inquisitors.  No penal laws, no physical torture can effect that a superior race should be absorbed by an inferior, or be destroyed by it.  The mixed persecuting races disappear; the pure persecuted race remains.  And at this moment, in spite of centuries, of tens of centuries of degradation, the Jewish mind exercises a vast influence on the affairs of Europe.  I speak not of their laws which you still obey, of their literature, with which your minds are saturated; but of the living Hebrew intellect.

You never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate.  The first Jesuits were Jews, that mysterious Russian Diplomacy which so alarms Western Europe is organized and principally carried on by Jews, that mighty revolution which is at this moment preparing in Germany [Revolution of 1848] and which will be in fact, a second and greater Reformation, and of which so little is yet known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of the Jews who almost monopolize the professional  chairs of Germany.  Neander, the founder of Spiritual Christianity, and who is Regius Professor of Divinity in the University of Berlin, is a Jew.  Benary, equally famous and in the same university is a Jew.  Wehl, the Arabic professor of Heidelberg is a Jew, years ago when I was in Palestine, I met a German student who was accumulating materials for the History of Christianity and studying the genius of the place; a modest and learned man.  It was Wehl; then unknown, since become the first Arabic scholar of the day, and the author of the life of Mahomet.  But for the German professors of this this race their name is legion.  I think there are more than ten at Berlin alone.

I told you just now that I was going up to town tomorrow, because I always make it a rule to interpose when affairs of State were on the carpet.  Otherwise I never interfere.  I hear of peace and war in the newspapers, but I am never alarmed, except when I am informed that the Sovereign wants treasure, then I know the monarchs are serious.

A few years back we were applied to by Russia.  Now, there had been no friendship between the Court of St. Petersburg and my family.  It had Dutch connections, which have generally supplied it; and our representations if favor of the Polish Hebrews, a numerous race, but the most suffering and degraded of all the tribes, have not been very agreeable to the Czar.  However, circumstances drew to an approximation between the Romanovs and Sidonias.  I resolved myself to go to St. Petersburg.  I had on my arrival an interview with the Russian Minister of Finance, Count Cancrin, I beheld the son of a Lithuanian Jew.  The loan was connected with the affairs of Spain; I resolved on repairing to Spain from Russia.  I traveled without intermission.  I had an audience immediately on my arrival with the Spanish Minister Senor Mendizibel; I beheld one like myself, the son of a Nuevo Christian, a Jew of Aragon.  In consequence of what transpired at Madrid, I went straight to Paris to consult the President of the French Council; I beheld the son of a French Jew….

The consequence of our consultations was that some Northern power should be applied to in a friendly and meditative capacity.  We fixed on Prussia; and the President of the Council made an application to the Prussian Minister…Count Arnim entered the Cabinet and I beheld a Prussian Jew.  So you see my dear Coningsby that the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.

Finish of quote.

Obviously is important to lift the veil and look at what is behind it.  Some call this curiosity, others conspiracy theory, but whether Jewish or other the result is the same.  If the string pullers are Jews then the results are Jewish.  Yet, if the above had been written by other than a Jew, that writer would be called an anti-Semite.

As Disraeli shows, Jews have insinuated themselves into all levels and aspects of national governments.  As an example the Russian Rasputin is said to have been running the Russian government through his influence on the Czarina who apparently ran her husband, Czar Nicholas.

Rasputin was accused of having conspired with the Germans which he probably wasn’t, however, his secretary was a Jew,  behold, as Disraeli would say, we find a Jew. The secretary, who was privy to all that Rasputin knew or projected, was certainly dealing with German Jews much as the Frenchman Dreyfus did.

Now, by 1844 when Disraeli wrote Coningsby the Jews were rapidly growing in influence and eager to change the laws to remove disabilities.  They included the Catholics, under the same disabilities, so as not to appear merely self-interested.  It was a matter of social justice.  And that is really what Reynolds’ Necromancer is all about.

Despite slowness in full emancipation of the Jews in Central Europe, as Disraeli points out Jews were already prominent in the universities and governments.  They actually had been in modern times since the institution of the Court Jew.  While many Jews other than the Rothschilds were wealthy, if not as wealthy, so that Disraeli says if they weren’t going to get the respect due to them according to their own valuation they would act against their own interests to put a finger in the eye of those in power who did not honor them to their satisfaction.  They would root that mountain down,  Hence they were not only an irritant but a threat.  He gives one example in the latitudinarian university that was funded by a Jew when the projectors couldn’t find the funds elsewhere.  As he points out, this is the way Jews acted then and throughout history.

Disraeli then get into a confused discussion on the importance of race; his Jews being a ‘pure’ race and hence superior to all others.  Remember he was writing in 1844 when historical records weren’t as clear as they are today.  For instance the befuddled Bishop Ussher of the eighteenth century who believed that the world was created by God 4004 years previously, that is the Age of Taurus, and I believe, he even gives the hour the world came into existence.  As we know today the world evolved billions of years ago from cosmic dust. But as Isaac said, facts cannot alter Jewish subjectivity.  According to their own records the Jews separated themselves from their native Semites at the change from the Age of Taurus to Aries four thousand years ago from today.  Disraeli had to assume that the Jews were three thousand years old making them I believe coequal with the supposed Garden of Eden.

He then goes on to boast that Jews are responsible for nearly all the good things in life.  Sidonia himself is the Crown of Creation as perfect as any human has ever attained.

One must ask what effect this tirade had on the English mind.  George Eliot, as one example, took to it hook, line and sinker. In her novel Daniel Deronda published in 1876 but plotted in 1865 he is a near perfect human being who for whatever reason takes up with an English tramp that he picked up in a Monte Carlo casino.  Eliot’s novel is being touted heavily today.

That was her take.  George Reynolds saw through the scam.  However even then one had to be circumspect in criticizing Jews, that is not taking them at their own valuation as Eliot did, while there is something offensive to the Aryan intellect in direct criticism.  Certainly the English aristocracy that considered itself the crown of creation would have scoffed at Disraeli’s depiction of his people as superior to themselves.  Dizzy himself, as he was affectionately known, cut a rather bizarre figure in English society.

Let us also remember that British Israelites were beginning to claim that the British themselves were descended from the lost ten tribes.  As the ten tribes were Samaritans that wouldn’t have made the British descended from Judaism but close.

With the capture of the Bank of England by Nathan Rothschild began the rise of what is today known as Financial Capitalism.  At some point it was determined that fiscal or monetary matters were so important that they couldn’t be entrusted to revolving elected representatives with no understanding of money and finance so the currency should be in the hands of bankers, who, they imagined, did. Thus a sort of dual government arose, elected politicians on one side and semi-permanent financial experts on the other who were not under the control of the government, of which the latter functioned independently of the former.

Inevitably the bankers were Jewish or under the domination of the Jews.  As these companies such as the Federal Reserve of the US were owned primarily by Jewish bankers the currency of the world was in Jewish hands.  As Nathan Rothschild was alleged to say:  Give me control of the currency and I care not who makes the laws.

As in 1851 when Reynolds published The Necromancer the developing monetary situation wasn’t well understood still Reynolds had a very good understanding of compound interest, that is usury and as banking is merely usury on a grand scale he very likely understood well enough.

His first foray into the world was when he was sixteen and drawn into a scheme to defraud the money lenders and the lender happened to be Jewish.  He first wrote this situation up two years later when he was eighteen as The Youthful Imposter.

That novel involved the defrauding of a Jewish usurer.  In a very interesting passage Reynolds seems to lapse into the first person in observing this particular Jewish usurer chosen to be defrauded.

As a sixteen year old observer the young Reynolds carefully studied and analyzed the man in order to understand the type.  The usurer gives his interviewer a history of his life. 

In the novel the defrauding of the usurer seems improbable but if based on a true encounter the ploy must have worked.

His portrayal of the master usurer Lionel Danvers is convincing.  It would seem most unlikely that the rise of the Jew would go unnoticed by Reynolds as he and his contemporaries mention Jews frequently although without usually going into details.

Of course, his fellow writer Charles Dickens got into a scrape in his depiction of the Jewish criminal Fagin of Oliver Twist.  He found that the truth was no defense.  Unlike in the twentieth century when serious ultra violent Jewish criminals have been celebrated, even idolized, think of Bugsy Siegel, perhaps as Jews were just emerging they were a little more sensitive.

Dickens was forced to apologize and possibly rewrite passages downplaying Fagin’s nationality then sentimentalizing a Jewish character in another book.  One might contrast Oliver Twist with Daniel Deronda.

Perhaps heeding the chastisement of Dickens Reynolds was careful not to mention the nationality of Danvers even though it is fairly clear. Still by 1855 in the last series of Court of London, The Fortunes Of The Ashtons, he comes out and roundly berates a Jewish clothier from the City.  Fairly strongly too as though he would be silent no longer.

Determining the character of Musidora Sinclair on whom the novel hangs is more difficult.  The meaning of the name could be The Golden Muse, d’or in French, Muse of Gold.  Gold being  considered the most pure metal hence resistant to evil while being at the same time what the usurer most desires.  She will be the woman who defeats Lionel Danvers and sends him to hell.

The story is that in the fifteenth century Lionel Danvers sold his soul to Satan but the Devil gives him a chance to redeem his soul.  If then, he could find six women to love him body and soul so that they would die for him he could annul the deal and recover his soul.

As the story begins in the nineteenth century Danvers has seduced Clara Manners in England, his fifth victim while Musidora will hopefully be his sixth and redemption.

Musidora is a mystery girl.  Happy and carefree until she was sixteen then for the two years after, as she is now eighteen, cold and unloving.  Some distant cousins living in Greenwich, who are out of favor at court and wish to be redeemed invite her to come and stay with them.

King Henry VIII then dissatisfied with his wife Catherine of Aragon is searching for a replacement.  The Granthams, Musidora’s cousins, remember their cousin, very beautiful by repute, living on the Isle of Wight invite her to stay with them hoping to tempt Henry.  Amazingly Henry almost immediately comes to Greenwich where he finds Musidora outside the Grantham’s door helping a mendicant who turns out to be Clara Manners father.  The King quickly falls in love with Musidora.  He assiduously courts her winning her over.

Danvers, who has an ancient ruined castle on the Isle of Wight where he takes his victims to be sacrificed, also knows Musidora and in fact as we will learn near the end of the novel he was the cause of Musidora becoming an Ice Queen.  He, therefore, cannot approach her in his true form.

Aha!  Henry is called away on State business so Danvers transmogrifies himself into a fake Henry VIII.  A real shape shifter.

So here we have what amounts to an allegorical representation of the career of Suss Oppenheimer of Wurttemberg and the current career of Lionel Rothschild.  Think of Musidora as ‘England.’  Lionel Rothschild through what will be called Financial Capitalism has established himself and his fellow Jews as a shadow government.  Lionel through financial means is actually the most powerful man in England as he controls the currency and he can deny it or advance it at usury.  Remember that the management of the currency is in private, that is Rothschild, hands.  Thus Danvers poses as the actual King to woo Musidora.  Similar.

All charm, he succeeds in persuading her to elope.  He takes her for a wild ride on his magical steed down through the night to his castle on the Isle of Wight.  Here we have a uniting of two famous stories of the time, Leonor by the German, Burger and Dick Turpin’s ride from London to York from his novel, Rookwood.

Leonor, an epic poem by Burger took England by storm; several authors including a version by Walter Scott adapted for English sensibilities.  Dick Turpin’s Ride is included in Harrison Ainsworth’s Rookwood of 1832 that would have impressed Reynold’s.  Reynold’s printer, John Dicks, was quite taken by Ainsworth, even preferring his work to that of Reynolds.

At this point Danvers is confident that he has redeemed his pledge to Satan.  He leads Musidora to the secret room in his ruined castle but she having been hurt when she was sixteen now sees through Danvers disguise as Henry and now gets her revenge by refusing her body and soul.  Fire and brimstone and Danvers evaporates.

If Musidora symbolizes England and Lionel Danvers symbolizes the Jewish usurers then England is saved at the last moment.

.2.

It seems certain that Reynolds read Benjamin Disraeli’ novel Coningsby with its very flattering depiction of Lionel Rothschild.  One wonders if Reynolds also read Benjamin’s father’s book The Genius of Judaism of 1833. Isaac’s volume is a delirium of the perfection of Judaism and Jews over all mankind by more than  somewhat.  Actually Benjamin was the child of his father growing up in that happy delirium. 

In 1833 Nathan Rothschild was still alive, dying in 1836 to be succeeded by his son Lionel Nathan Rothschild born in 1808, dying in 1879, the latter year the same as George Reynolds, while Nathan’s son, six years before George so they were near perfect contemporaries.  Disraeli’s years were 1804-1881, all three then quite contemporaries.

Disraeli as a writer might be considered a talented amateur.  Coningsby, written when he was forty is as good as he gets.  Reynolds 37 in 1851 is incomparably above Disraeli while the Necromancer brought forth his brightest talent.  As a novel it is quite excellent, the brightest jewel in his diadem.

Due to his time in France and his love of things French, Reynolds is not purely an English writer, more Anglo-French or perhaps best described as a European writer as much of his historical novels have European settings.  The Necromancer seems to be an answer to Coningsby, possibly affected by Isaac D’Israeli’s Genius of Judaism if Reynold’s ever read it.

Here’s another longish quote from Disraeli describing the impossibly brilliant Sidonia, Coningsby pp231-3.  Wild Side Press.

Quote:

With an imagination as fiery as his native Desert, and an intellect as luminous as his native sky, he wanted, like that land, those softening dews without which the soil is barren, and the sunbeam as often a messenger of pestilence as an angel of regenerative grace.

Such a temperament, though rare, is peculiar to the East.  It inspired the founders of the great monarchies of antiquity, the prophets that the Desert has sent forth, the Tartar chiefs who have overrun the world; it might be observed in the great Corsican, who, like most of the inhabitants of the Mediterranean isles, had probably Arab blood in his veins.  It is a temperament that befits conquerors and legislators, but in ordinary times and ordinary situations, entails on its possessor only eccentric aberrations or profound melancholy.

The only human quality that interested Sidonia was intellect.  He cared not whence it came; where it was found: creed, country, class, character, in this respect, were alike indifferent to him.  The author, the artist, the man of science, never appealed to him in vain.  Often he anticipated their wants and wishes.  He encouraged their society; was as frank in his conversation as he was generous in his contributions; but the instant they ceased to be authors, artists, or philosophers, and their communications arose from anything but the intellectual quality which had originally interested him, the moment they were rash enough to approach intimacy and appealed to the sympathizing man instead of the congenial intelligence, he saw them no more.  It was not however intellect merely in these unquestionable shapes that commanded his notice.  There was not an adventurer in Europe with whom he was not familiar.  No Minister of State had such communication with secret agents and political spies as Sidonia.  He held relations with all the clever outcasts of the world.  The catalogue of his acquaintance in the shape of Greeks, Armenians, Moors, secret Jews, Tartars, Gypsies, wandering Poles, [read Schnorrers.] and Carbonari, would throw a curious light on those subterranean agencies of which the world in general knows so little, extensive travels, his knowledge of languages, his daring and adventurous disposition, and his unlimited means, had given him opportunities of becoming acquainted with these characters, in general so difficult to trace, and of gaining their devotion.  To these sources he owed that knowledge of strange and hidden things which often startled those who listened to him.  Nor was it easy, scarcely possible to deceive him.  Information reached him from so many, and such contrary quarters, that with his discrimination and experience, he would almost instantly distinguish the truth.

The secret history of the world [read: conspiracy theory] was his pastime.  His great pleasure was to contrast the hidden motive, with public pretext, of transactions.

One source of interest Sidonia found in his descent and in the fortunes of his race.  As firm in his adherence to the code of the great Legislator as if the trumpet still sounded on Sinai, he might have received in the conviction of divine favor an adequate compensation for human persecution.  But there were other and more terrestrial considerations that made Sidonia proud of his origin, and confidant in the future of his kind.  Sidonia was a great philosopher, who took comprehensive views of human affairs, and surveyed every fact in its relative position to other facts, the only mode of obtaining truth.

Sidonia was well aware that in the five great varieties into which Physiology has divided the human species; to wit, the Caucasian, the Mongolian, the Malayan, the American, the Ethiopian; the Arabian tribes rank in the first and superior class, together, among others, with the Saxon and the Greek.  This fact alone is a source of great pride and satisfaction to the animal Man.  But Sidonia and his brethren could claim a distinction which the Saxon and the Greek, and the rest of the Caucasian nations, have forfeited.  The Hebrew is an unmixed race.  Doubtless, among the tribes who inhabit the bosom of the Desert, progenitors alike of the Mosaic and the Mohammedan Arabs, blood may be found as pure as that of the descendants of the Scheik Abraham.  But the Mosaic Arabs are the most ancient, if not the only unmixed blood that dwells in cities.

An unmixed race of a first-rate organization are the aristocracy of Nature.  Such excellence is a positive fact; not an imagination, a ceremony, coined by poets, blazoned by cozening heralds, but perceptible in its physical advantages, and in the vigor of its unsullied idiosyncrasy.

End of Quote.

So, as Benjamin’s father , Isaac, said in the first quote of the essay, he believes that Jews are a supernatural people, below the angels but above human kind.  As semi-deities, no terrestrial condition high or low can affect that.  The Jew of any status can walk, head held high, that he is superior to all non-Jews he meets.

In point of fact, Benjamin was always treated with a sense of amusement so that one must believe that confessions of faith such as this and that in Tancred, a third part of the trilogy were disdained by the English.

Reynolds himself must have read this with a raised eyebrow.  The Necromancer is his refutation of Disraeli in my reading.  Whether it was so understood at the time is unknown to me.  Nevertheless the deeper I study Reynolds, the Regency and the Romantic period the more obvious hidden things become.

ERBzine 1458: by R. E. Prindle

ERBzine 2097: R.E. Prindle

Jud Suss And The Origin Of World War I And II

by

R.E. Prindle

As a preface to this essay refer to the essay linked here.   This essay is an extension.

The Jud, or Jew, Suss as he was known was a Court Jew to Duke Karl Alexander of Wurttemberg, a province of Southern Germany next Bavaria.  He set about to usurp Duke Alexander’s position as ruler.  He committed heinous crimes against the Duke’s subjects.  When the Duke died in 1738 Suss was arrested, tried, convicted and executed.

The execution of Joseph Oppenheimer, the Jud Suss, for heinous crimes against the German people of Wurttemberg was taken by the Jews as a bigoted attack on the Jewish people throughout Central Europe.

Suss had been an adviser to the Duke Karl Alexander the lawful ruler.  Taking advantage of his position as Karl Alexander’s Court Jew  Suss cunningly attempted to usurp the Duke’s position and become the ruler of Wurttemberg himself.  His crimes were egregious and when Karl Alexander died Suss was arrested, tried and executed.

What the Jews considered the injustice of the execution rankled with them for two hundred years before they found the means to avenge it.  That vengeance was the total destruction of all of Germany and the attempted genocide of the German people along with the devastation of all Europe.

No one except for the very astute of Jewish theologians could have guessed this underlying motive for the origins of World War I and II.  The first intimation of the outcome rippled from a 1916 play celebrating Suss by Lion Feuchtwanger that was performed once and then withdrawn.  1916 was not the right time.

Then in 1925 and 1926 two new examinations of the Suss affair appeared.  In 1925 the same Lion Feuchtwanger rewrote the play into his novel, Jud Suss which appeared immediately in English translation as The Jew Suss; a year later a woman called Selma Stern published her historical study titled, The Court Jew having Suss as the central figure although the study examines the phenomenon of the Court Jew in the eighteenth century Holy Roman Empire, that is Germany and Austria.

The Court Jew arose after the end of the First Thirty Years War in 1848 taking form thereafter until the Napoleonic period.  After Napoleon the modern institutionalized State appeared, democratic in form, which gave a larger and freer organization in which anti-social organizations were allowed more latitude.  Thus, using decentralized democracy the Jewish central power from the beginning of the nineteenth century rose managed by the Rothschild family.

Both Feuchtwanger and Stern emphasize the centrality of the Suss affair and their desire to replicate the state of affairs which Suss almost achieved, that is the supremacy of the Jew.  In Germany where the action was played out in the twentieth century the Volkist Movement led by Adolf Hitler and National Socialists proved an unexpected stumbling block to Jewish plans which were proceeding as planned after the Suss model.

In 1930 an International Bank was formed in Europe headquartered in Basle, Switzerland.  This bank may be considered the European Equivalent of the Federal reserve of the United States. With the two banks allied the Jews would have had control of Western currency.   I quote from Edith Starr Miller’s Occult Theocrasy, Vol. II of 1933 pp. 658           

Quote:

The internationalization of finance reached its apotheosis when, on April 23, 1930 the International Bank at Basle, commissioned to enroll the central banks of nine nations in its membership was founded.

As for the delegates from the different countries attending the meeting their names signify little for, owing to the speed and unanimity with which official appointments were made, it is evident that they were all instructed, or, in other words pledged, to obey orders.  By whom were the orders given?  History may answer that question some day!

The significance of this international institution was commented upon in an article entitled “Mammon being enthroned” by “Arthurian” in the Referee dated Sunday, April 13, 1930, in the following terms which, while constituting a warning to the English people, is actually an appeal to the people of the world.

“One is amazed at the equanimity with which Sir Charles Addis describes the difficulty of enabling the Bank for International Settlements to avoid interference with the Sovereign Rights of the people of each of so many countries!  Surely the possibility alone ought to be adequate condemnation of the bank.  The opening for chicanery, brute force, bribery, corruption and war, in the supposed solution of this problem, is unprecedented in the history of the world. 

“The Bank is to exist for fifty years, if it can, it is to pay no taxes during all that time, and its assets and deposits are to be immune from seizure, confiscation, and censorship, in peace or war; it is also to be subject to no restriction or prohibition of any kind on its imports and exports of gold or currency.  So little do Government decisions regarding the Bank really count that, before the scheme has been sanctioned, the first part of the subscription has already been subscribed.  The Bankers and businessmen to be associated are to ensure that there will be no uncertainty about the business that the Bank will promote, industrial depression and financial uncertainty are, of course, going to be cured by them—so they say.  The Governor of the Bank of England (Mr. Montagu Norman) is going to be a director of this foreign Bank.  What an honour!  This Board, with the daily lives of hundreds of millions of people at its mercy, is going to meet at least ten times a year—four times in Basle… ‘The Bank owes allegiance to no single Government.’  It need keep no currency reserve…”

‘This Bank that owes no allegiance to anyone, can do as it likes…. Mammon is enthroned upon the world, to make what profits it can, with unrestricted powers, it has control of the ‘Machinery of Reparations’ [war reparations] which contains the means by which the wherewithal to liquidate Reparations can be squeezed out of the receivers at a profit to the payers…Economic control involves political control as well as every other control of any people.  Truly, the megalomania of finance never went further, truly there has never been anything like it in the world before….

“People of England!  Remember how the stranglehold of the Bank of England on all other banks, on all the other financial houses, upon every business and upon every home and family has grown from the comparatively negligible sum of 1,200,000 pounds of similar credit free of interest and the’ usufruct’ thereof.  This new usufruct will be the impoverishment, debasement, extinction, and disintegration of all that the masses of this country care for, and the certain decline and fall and redistribution into foreign hands, of the British Empire…

Unquote.

In 1933 when the National Socialists were elected in Germany, it’s leader, Adolf Hitler disrupted the whole scheme, not only in Europe but in the US.  1933 was also the year the Jews returned to Washington DC under the aegis of FDR, and the year that the Jews declared war on Germany.  It was also the year that Feuchtwanger translated his book to the screen in the English movie Jud Suss and its American edit, much different than the English version, titled Power.

The following year, 1934, Hollywood produced the supporting propaganda film The Rothschilds celebrating Nathan Rothschild’s seizure of the Bank of England.  The two films rankled the Germans as the movies attacked the National Socialist government.  They, in their turn several years later, would counter the two Jewish propaganda films with answering films of their own.

Ancillary to the Suss films in March of 1941 the US Jews through their American Jewish Committee and its agent from Newark, New Jersey, Theodore Kaufman with the assistance of B’nai B’rith published a little pamphlet called Germany Must Perish in which Kaufman and the Jewish organizations advocated the dismemberment of Germany and the genocide of the German people, man, woman and child within one generation.  They did succeed in wiping Prussia from the map.

This pamphlet was issued as though from a crank so the AJC, ADL, B’nai B’rith could dissociate themselves from their product if it failed.  However the pamphlet received maximum exposure, was seriously considered and eventually moved into FDR’s program.

In 1945 the Jewish Secretary of the Treasury and soi-disant co-president Henry Morgenthau Jr.  published his own book based on the ideas of the AJC and Kaufman titled Germany Is Our Problem that was then known as the Morgenthau Plan.  He didn’t clarify whether ‘Our’ represented the Jews or the US.  FDR, now deceased in April 1945, had backed this plan now called the Morgenthau plan but Harry Truman succeeding Roosevelt was horrified by it and dismissed Morgenthau.

The denouement to the Suss affair occurred a few years later when the Jews finally rehabilitated Suss and he was declared innocent of all charges and wrongfully executed.  That part of the war was over.  Thus the Jews wreaked havoc on Germany and the Germans in the name of Joseph Suss Oppenheimer.  Suss was his last name, by the way and he was from Oppenheim.

.II.

What was the relationship of the Jews and Germans through the centuries?  Selma Stern will have to be our guide as she very generously favors us with a fairly accurate history.  The unsigned preface introduces us to the problem, p. xi:

Quote:

 Sharing in two different cultural heritages, the Jewish and the German, she did not feel the tension of such a relationship as a perplexing inner conflict and contrast; this dual heritage served rather to enrich her being and to broaden her Lebensgefuehl.  She was therefore in a position to study, from a positive historical standpoint, the chief problems that interested her, namely, the emancipation of the Jews, that is, the process of becoming an integral part of the political, economic and social life of the State, and the assimilation of the Jews, that is, the process of their self-adaptation to the culture and spirit of their surroundings.

Unquote.

A key phrase is …’becoming an integral part’…  That doesn’t mean that Jews would blend in with the German people because in so doing they would lose their Jewish identity.  It means that they would compete with the Germans assuming important positions as Jews to influence German life in their direction much as Suss was doing in attempting to usurp preeminence from Duke Karl Alexander.

This is the problem Napoleon had with the Jews.  He thought emancipation meant that the Jews would give up their national identity and become merely a French religious sect.  Instead the Jews cared little about religion but were fierce nationalists, a nation within a nation as they had always been but now without any restriction of the activities to become preeminent.

Just as assimilation to the Jews didn’t mean consolidation but ‘their self-adaptation to the culture and spirit of their surroundings’, that is, the outside veneer.  Thus they would dress, adopt the German language as a second language but still maintain their national identity secretly as they did in Spain and Portugal.

This would be the root of the problem that their twentieth century messiah, Sigmund Freud, would implant when he devised the method to subvert European morals, mores and customs.

Mrs. Stern on p.179 of her Court Jew explains Jewish expectations as a nation within the German nation:

Quote:

Thus the Jewish communities in the period following the Thirty Years War represented everywhere autonomous, corporate bodies possessing their own treasuries, their own welfare and educational institutions, their own legal and tax systems, their own synagogues and cemeteries.  They were governed by elders (Parnassim) elected by members of the community, who had also the right to choose all the communal officials.  The elders were the spokesmen for the community in its relations with the State, drew up the budget, obtained loans, determined assessments and turned over the money gathered by the tax collecters to the State treasury.  To a certain extent they even supervised commerce and the moral behavior of the members of the community, utilizing at times their power to fine or banish.

Unquote.

As can be seen ‘integration in the State’ meant merely that Jews should be give a free hand to the Jews while sapping the strength of the whole as they expected special treatment as God’s chosen people.  For that soon meant that the Jews wanted to be co-rulers as Suss nearly obtained in Wurttemberg, or may have actually and then usurp pre-eminence.

Duke Karl Alexander, who was deeply involved in European affairs having to fend off the French invaders had to entrust internal State affairs to someone.  The Estates were useless because they didn’t understand international problems.  The Duke then chose to rely on Suss.  Suss quickly expanded into a co-ruler much as Bernard Baruch and Henry Morgenthau Jr. did in the US Wilson and Roosevelt administrations in the twentieth century.  He as they exploited his position.  His hatred of the Germans meant humiliating and humbling them while exalting his own nation, the Jews.

This was the same thing happening in twentieth century Germany, Russia, the US, France and England.  WWI was a bold move by the Jews to seize Europe.

This is the way Feuchtwanger describes the wild fancies of Suss that caused him to be hanged by angry Wurttembergers:  pp 131-132.

Quote:

To maintain his house in such princely magnificence and to keep the Duke in the hollow of his hand he needed money, money poured out at his feet in fantastic profusion.  In Vienna, among his relatives the Oppenheimers, the Imperial bankers, he had learned to handle large sums.  But now the revenue of the whole Duchy ran through his fingers; he could dispose of the income of two hundred towns and twelve hundred villages.  With feverish industry he cast it here and there, and let roll in mad gyration.  He had dealing with all the financiers in Europe, and through his innumerable  and mostly Jewish agents the money of Swabia flowed through the most complicated channels, founded plantations in the Dutch East Indies, bought horses in Barbary, and sent trains of elephants and black slaves down to the coast of Africa.  His fundamental principle, and his deliberate goal, was a fevered and whirling exchange of commodities.  Not large profits on single transactions, but a huge total profit through making a little on everything.

His private income was enormous.

Unquote.

This was what all the Court Jews did although not placed high the governments as was Suss.  They all had fabulous establishments rivaling or besting the highest dignitaries of the State governments.  Perhaps even topping the kings.  Where did the money come from?  Usury from the common folks and massive skimming from government contracts.  In other words, from the blood and sweat of the peoples.  Naturally it caused resentment; the Jews prospered while the Germans suffered.  In retaliation when the debt load became too enormous the various governments refused to pay.  What else could happen?  What does anti-Semitism have to do with it?  Pure economics.  Over grasping reaps its due.

Feuchtwanger is writing a novel, however he and Selma Stern are using private histories of the Jews not available to goy historians.  Mrs. Stern makes a reference to ‘the chronicles’ so both she and Feuchtwanger must have had access to chronicles and other material.

It is certain that Suss was internetting with Jewish contacts throughout Europe.  He spent much time in Frankfurt where he had an additional establishment outside the ghetto.  Frankfort and Prague were the two great Jewish nerve centers at the time.  Suss himself must have been a very important Jew among his people else how could he arrange slave purchases in Africa  and horses from the Barbary Coast.  How much money did that take?  And the taxpayers of Wurttemberg were financing such transactions and getting nothing in return.  Were they unjustifiably angry?  No. No.  Suss was executed with just cause.

While employed by Duke Karl Alexander he was allowed to operate in his own interests which were very lucrative.  He must have been a great prince among his people.  He had monopolies on several commodities forcing Wurttemburgers out of business while using as Feuchtwanger says, Jewish agents, wide associations with other Court Jews so that Jews being an international network speaking the same language while being familiar with both Jewish and Europeans laws and customs had an inestimable advantage over a German people divided into over 250 constituencies.

Suss traveled extensively and frequently.  At one point he took a ‘vacation’ visiting the Jewish communities of Holland, England and France.  Thus he was able to coordinate Jewish commercial and political activities in a veritable international Jewish conspiracy.  He became a sort of Jewish messiah only a couple decades after Sabbatai Zevi had died and while Hasidism and Frankism were beginning to thrive.  Thus, at the end of his career a martyr for the nation, a crucified messiah.  He was duly revered and mourned while vengeance was sworn in the hearts of his people.

The above representation is not my invention but spoken from the Jewish hearts and mind of Stern and Feuchtwanger.  Now we must turn  to the resurgence of hope to redress Suss during the Weimar Republic of 1920s Germany.  The field of interest will extend to France, England and the Soviet Union in Europe as well as the United States of America, that the Jews called the New Jerusalem.

.3.

The Role of Money

Probably not too many people really understand the role money plays in society and politics.  Having been granted a monopoly of usury by the Catholic Church in early times the Jews knew exactly what money could do and did.  Lending without interest of course is a futile exercise.  So interest either simple or compound in low digits is necessary, but using the knowledge of compound interest the Jews were able to subject all societies in which they were involved sometimes charging 50 percent or even 100  Obviously all currency would gravitate into their hands.

Feuchtwanger explains the role of money succinctly.  On pp. 12-13 his fictional Court Jew Landauer expostulates:

Quote:

He knew that there was only one reality in this world—money.  War and peace, life and death, the virtue of women, the Pope’s power to bind or to loose, the Estates’ enthusiasm for liberty, the purity of the Augsburg Confession, the ships on the sea, the coercive power of princes, the Christianizing of the New World, love, piety, cowardice, wantonness, blasphemy and virtue, they were all derived from money, and they could be expressed in plain figures.

Unquote.

It is a mistake, a cynical belief, to think that these qualities were derived from money.  They could be corrupted by money but not derived from it.  A too close relationship with money corrupted the Jewish attitude to it.  Jewish morality is based on ‘by any means necessary’.  Thus, the Jews knew that they could obtain their desires by the use of money either through giving it or denying it.

In Spain before the Moslem conquest the Jews had obtained complete mastery through the use of money.  They, as tax farmers, obtained the money for the Court while as tax farmers exploiting the people of their freedom, foisting usury on them and then making them debt slaves while the Jews lived in luxury at their expense.

The same was true just West of Wurttemberg in Alsace of the time of Suss.  By late century Alsace was totally enslaved by usury rescued only by Napoleon who compelled the Jews to moderate their usury allowing the Alsatians some relief.

Now, while Suss was exposing the vulnerability of the goyim, or Germans in this case, not only making himself co-ruler along side Karl Alexander, but actually his superior by an adroit use of money he was carefully observed by the father of Mayer Amschel Bauer soon Rothschild and clearly saw the procedure.  He educated his son Mayer Amschel in Suss’ methods.  Fate played into Mayer’s hands in 1806 when Napoleon invaded Hesse-Cassel and the Jewish quarter of Frankfort.  The Margrave of Hesse-Cassel was a very rich man whose wealth Napoleon coveted.  To protect his wealth the Margrave entrusted Mayer Amschel, who functioned as a Court Jew with enormous wealth.  Mayer Amschel knew exactly what to do with it.  Mayer had five sons distributed in the capitals of Europe and England bound by him to cooperate with each other to secure the money of Europe.

England and France, that is Napoleon, were at war.  So as to weaken Napoleon Mayer despatched a huge sum to his son Nathan in England.  Nathan soon found the means.  The French had ravished Spain and the English had sent an army to Spain under General Wellesley.  Nathan Rothschild who had obtained a monopoly of gold with the wealth of the Margrave in England affirmed his ability to get the gold to Spain.

Nathan had originally been sent to England to take over the textile industry.  He failed.  In shifting for himself he turned to crime, smuggling and then banking.  His brother James was established in Paris so between them they arranged to get the gold to Spain through many hands and commissions.  This set Nathan up.  He couldn’t dominate as yet but he was substantial.  Then, Napoleon lost his prestige in the Russian campaign and was exiled to Elba.  Risking all, Napoleon escaped to meet his defeat at Waterloo.

England was on tenterhooks awaiting the result of the battle of Waterloo.  Nathan Rothschild construed to make the stock exchange believe that Wellesley lost causing a panic in which financially astute bankers in a panic sold wildly driving prices down precipitately.  Having advance knowledge that the British won Nathan bought up the stocks at absurdly low prices and became the dominant force on the exchange while owning the Bank of England.  A dependency of England became his private property.  He had nearly assumed Suss’ wish.

Suss had become a secular saint to the Jews who desired nothing more than vengeance for what they considered a wrongful execution.  They did not forget.  As with Suss in Wurttemberg, Nathan Rothschild who was now the richest man in England, possibly the world, through the judicious use of money began the effort to establish his family as co-rulers of England regardless of which party was in office.

.4.

The Problem And Towards A Solution

There is an eternal conflict between the Jew and the other and it is of Jewish making.  Mrs. Stern in her Court Jew explains it succinctly.  I had come to this conclusion myself through long lucubration and deep study but you probably wouldn’t believe me so let her tell it.  Pp. 131-2:

Quote:

Like most men of action Suess did little reflecting about his conception of State and society.  We can therefore deduce his political theories only from his actions.  Since very one of his acts was the consequence of some immediate experience, it was not as a result of abstract contemplation but rather as a result of observing existing States that he came to the conclusion that the absolute monarchy was a necessity for the German territories.  His study of the cameralists and of the philosophical theorists of his period, whose works were found in his library, doubtlessly also played a part in making him a proponent of the modern doctrine of natural law.

The form of State which he wanted to establish in Wuerttemberg was the stern police State of the eighteenth century.  He believed that it could be constructed like a machine, according to certain logical principles, without paying attention to the organic development of the people, the constitution, the economy and the social order of the country.  He unquestionably was familiar with the history of the Wuerttemberg constitution and he was well acquainted with the Swabian character.  Nevertheless it seemed to him that if one appealed to reason it was entirely possible to replace the medieval dualistic State by the sensible and utilitarian police and welfare State.

This State was to be led by a monarch whose function he considered to be of the utmost importance.  The ruler was for him identical with the State itself.  Just as the State must possess complete power, so the ruler must enjoy unlimited authority.  He must consequently possess a large standing army so that he can make his importance felt at home and abroad.  He must be in a position to dictate laws to neighboring princes and, if need be, to subjugate the surrounding imperial free cites.  To make his greatness evident he must maintain a magnificent court and through his wealth and splendor be set off from the masses and be distinguished from ordinary mortals.

For in him rests complete sovereignty.  The people, incapable of determining their own fate, have no right to share in the government or to question the monarch’s acts.  By virtue of his absolute power, the prince can declare all previous agreements null and void.  Should the people offer resistance, the regent was free to use force, intrigue and espionage to enable him to attain his goal.  “For whoever wishes to achieve his purposes,” he asserts in a quite Machiavellian vein, ‘must use those ways and means which are effective in that direction.”

Unquote.

And that pretty well sums up the direction that 21st century America is headed.  It also sums up the eternal Jewish notion of government.  Of course, the ideal was to have Jews being the government and having a favored place for all Jews over the other.  It would seem clear then that since Suss was actually attempting a complete revolution over the people, laws, mores and manners of the Wurttembergers that he was justifiably executed.

So, this is the Jewish ideal and that ideal is to ‘integrate’ it into the State not only as an equal but an unchallengeable superior.  This is what they have striven for over history.  In Russia after the Russians appropriated the Pale of the Settlement the Jews wished for autonomy within the Russian empire which the Russians refused to grant.

As equal means that one or the other had to be superior, warfare existed for a hundred years or so until the Jews finally succeeded in conjunction with other subject peoples in overthrowing the Russian government, even replacing the Russian people with the name Soviet Union.  Russia was erased, vengeance was nearly complete.

So also in the United States after the huge influx of revolution minded Russian Jews from 1870 to 1914 which I will address shortly.

In seventeenth century England, while after Cromwell’s victory over the Crown, the Jews were readmitted having been banned in 1290 for usury excesses, but they were only tolerated having no political rights same as the Catholics.  Nathan Rothschild as the richest man in England gave this lack of rights  a grudging acceptance; his successor, Lionel Rothschild, made it his responsibility  to obtain those political rights in which he was ultimately successful aided by the renegade Jew Benjamin Disraeli who posing as a Christian did have political rights.

It is not my purpose to fellow the Jewish trajectory throughout the nineteenth century but there was a significant event in 1830 which played out in the aftermath of the 1830 July Revolution in France.  Ever since the expulsion of the Moslems from Spain in 1492 Moslem raiders known as the Barbary Pirates from Algeria had preyed on the Mediterranean shores of Europe plundering, burning and abducting tens of thousands of Europeans for slavery in Moslem lands.  Eugene Sue, the French novelist, has a good novel titled the Knight of Malta describing such a raid.

In any event in 1830, Europeans finally took action and invaded Algeria annexing it as a province of France.  Now, it so happens that a Jewish lawyer and politician named Adolph Cremieux was able behind everyone’s back to include a clause including Algerian Jews as French citizens thereby reversing the Algerian situation elevating Jews over Moslems.  That would be a problem for Charles de Gaulle to deal with if the fifties of the twentieth century.   That was the nature of the warfare between Jews and Europeans in the battle for ‘equality.’

The Jews discovered the US after the 1848 Revolution that sent thousand of Jews and Communists to the shores of the US.  Plans were immediately drawn to bring over the Russian Jews.  The Civil War in the US delayed that procedure until the 1870s when the millions began to arrive.

When the numbers were sufficient in New York City where the bulk of immigrants resided, the Jews began the drive to become an autonomous people in the US.  Today Rockland County in New York State is an autonomous State of Jews with an outlier in the borough of Brooklyn.  Rockland County is exactly what Mrs. Stern described in the quote from The Court Jew.

The German Jews or 48ers, as they were known, while Jews thought themselves superior and above the Russian Jews while having been in the US for better than fifty years thus acclimatizing themselves after a fashion they, after 1900, began to direct or influence US foreign affairs away from US interests towards Jewish needs.  As you may well imagine the primary target was to make war from US shores on Russia.  Not only did the Jews make the US a sanctuary base of operations so did the Irish in their war on England, the Indians in their war on England,  the Chinese in their revolution and many others.  Millions upon millions of dollars of US currency went to wars from the US.  When I say war I mean asymmetrical war.  The Jews could not command armies which in fact were very small, but they could control politics.  From the US they were instrumental in fomenting the failed 1905 Russian revolution.  As part of the revolution Jacob Schiff, commanding 200 million or more dollars loaned them to Japan enabling them to fight the Russians in Manchuria.

Jacob Schiff was a major financier commanding the Kuhn-Loeb/Harriman combination.  He was a trustee of the Equitable Assurance Association.  It had the two hundred million Schiff illegally abstracted to loan to the Japanese.  By any means necessary.

President Theodore Roosevelt hosted the signing of the peace treaty at Plymouth New Hampshire at which Schiff and his fellow Jews participated thus confirming Jewish direction of the revolution.  If that was not an acknowledgement of an act of war using Japanese and US surrogates I don’t know what would be.  And the Jews were not through with the Russians yet nor would be down to the time of this writing of 2021.

The next stage was to get the US to break off diplomatic relations with Russia.  This came about because Jewish revolutionary activities against Russia increased in the wake of the Japanese War and would continue to increase until they murdered the Russian Czar, Nicholas II and his entire family in 1917 during the Soviet Revolution.

Russia in defense against the subversive activities of the Jews going and coming to and from Russia simply banned all Jews entry from Europe and that naturally included Jews residing in the US.  The Jews who were attempting to form a Kehilla in New York City, that is an autonomous Jewish State, somewhat in the manner of Rockland County, now claimed that the Russians discriminated against US citizens by refusing them entry as Jews, therefore the US should not tolerate this and break off diplomatic relations with Russia.  Schiff was sent storming from the Jewish State in New York City to the US capital in Washington DC to demand that President Taft break off relations with Russia, that Taft, for some incomprehensible reason, did.

Matters had now reached a breaking point in Europe but two things were needed in the US for war to begin.  One was that Taft be defeated in the 1912 election as he could not be relied on to follow Jewish direction.  The second and perhaps more important but dependent on the first was to secure control of the currency.  An absolute necessity as would be indicated by the Jewish attempt to unite the European banks under their control in 1930.  US currency would fall to their control in 1913 when their presidential appointee Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act shortly after taking office.  At that point it was a matter of time for the Jews to control the currencies of the European States and the US all bearing interest.  Jewish activities required huge amounts of money.

In 1912 an election between Taft and a Democratic candidate meant that Taft would be elected.  Thus the election had to be rigged or controlled for the Jews to succeed.  Not to be daunted the first step was to cultivate the Governor of New Jersey, Woodrow Wilson, as their pocketed presidential candidate.  To bring Wilson in they chose a wolf of Wall Street, Bernard Baruch.  Both Baruch and Wilson were from South Carolina so one may assume that having that in common along with Baruch’s reputation and wealth a relationship could be developed.

Baruch then introduced Wilson to the various Wall Street Jewish money men.  Schiff agreed and Wilson was in.  Step two was to split the vote with a strong third party candidate.  In such a three way race it was possible to slip Wilson in.  And so it was.  Wilson #1, Roosevelt #2 and Taft #3.

For their third party candidate they chose the very popular ex-president Theodore Roosevelt.  The impulsive Teddy who was feuding with Taft because the latter didn’t follow Roosevelt’s program close enough eagerly snapped at the bait founding the Bull Moose Party.  He was never forgiven this traitorous act by his fellow Republicans.  TR died in 1919.  The first thing Woodrow Wilson did as President was to sign the Federal Reserve into existence in 1913.  The Fed is a privately owned bank functioning independently of the US government and the Jews owned it collecting interest on every dollar issued.  WWI could now begin and in August 1914 it did.  As the Jews inferred to Henry Ford in 1916 they were in charge and they were.

Zionism was formed in 1897 by Theodore Herzl in Vienna quickly becoming the driving force of Jewish aspirations.  Through Zionism the Jews hoped to be able to acquire Palestine as a Jewish country.  They claimed some right of entailment. God gave it to them so it was permanently entailed to them eternally.  Having roots in Germany as we’ve seen they were trying to con Germans into acquiring Palestine as their homeland.  The Germans were reluctant and in 1916 gave their refusal.

And now our complexity increases a great deal.  Let us recall that the Jews are a separate nation pursuing its own goals; while having no offensive forces they were equal in influence with any of the participants in politics.  Woodrow Wilson was the Jews’ creature and creation.  He was totally beholden to them.  Bernard Baruch who inducted Wilson into the Jewish power structure would be made a co-president officially much as Suss was a co-equal in power to Duke Karl Alexander of Wurttemberg when the US entered the European fray.

Baruch has slipped from the public consciousness today.  Except for specialist historians  it is unlikely to find any one who knows his name much less anything about him.  In his time he was true eminence gris functioning behind the scenes.  I think it necessary to sketch him a little.

He was born in 1870 during Reconstruction.  His father was a doctor who moved the family to New York City in 1881 when Baruch was eleven.  He graduated from the City College of New York.  His first impulse was to be a professional gambler.  But as any pro gambler knows the odds are against you.  If you can’t change the odds you can’t win in the long run.  To win consistently you have to be able to fix the game.  All games are fixed in someone’s favor.  Only a ‘sucker’ thinks otherwise.  Thus one is either ‘wise’ or a ‘sucker.’  Unable to defeat the odds Baruch rejected gambling choosing to become a scarcely less respectable Bear speculator on Wall Street where at the time you could easily fix the game.

It was easier to fix a stock decline than an increase so he became despised as the Bear of Wall Street.

He was very ‘lucky’ as a Bear and made a fortune before the age of thirty.  If he graduated at the age of twenty-two and made a fortune before thirty, say twenty-nine, that meant he had only seven years to do it. Less his gambling period.  Quite extraordinary but things were very loose, unregulated at that period on Wall Street.  In 1903 he established his own firm having bought a seat on the exchange.  He remained a lone wolf probably because there is no one to share your secrets and confidentiality was important to him.

Now a very rising star in Jewish circles his thoughts turned toward politics although he preferred to remain in the background rather than run for office.  Elective office might not have been an option at the time because of his nationality.  In preparation for his political career Baruch bought an immense nearly seventy thousand acre estate in South Carolina called the Hobcaw Barony.

This expanse included land and water, hunting, fishing and boating.  In the coming years he would entertain lavishly mixing politicians, sports and entertainment figures so that he could know anyone prominent.  Son Eliot Roosevelt wrote a series of Eleanor Roosevelt murder mysteries, one of which took place at the Barony with real live characters Eleanor, Humphrey Bogart and others.  In his declining years of influence he gave the Barony to his daughter, it still exists as a park.

After inauguration Wilson began filling posts with his Jewish benefactors.  Louis Brandeis became the first Jewish Supreme Court Justice of the US in the critical year of 1916 that would be the premier State after the war.  He was an ardent Zionist and a fanatical Jew.  So, a mere twenty years after Herzl created Zionism a Jew claimed a seat judging US law.

Already closely associated with fellow lawyer Felix Frankfurter the pair would triumph when FDR entered Washington. Frankfurter became a law professor at Harvard University where he trained a whole generation of lawyers that accompanied himself and Brandeis to Washington where they were known as Frankfurter and his Happy Hot Dogs.  They were all Red and many became Soviet spies.

The teens of the twentieth century is when the Jews began their takeover of the US.  They virtually owned New York City making it their headquarters and capital whence worldwide Jewish affairs were coordinated.  Every summer dozens of top operators trooped off to Europe where the next years activities were organized.  These were what Henry Ford called the International Jews.  They were a specific group and did not include the general Jewish population.

In New York City a serious attempt was made to recreate the Russian political organization know as the Kehilla.  It is important here to note the mental state of the immigrants from the Pale.  They had been at war for a hundred years with the Russians which they personalized as the Czar.  They were in full revolutionary mode.  Zionism had inflamed them.  They did not come so much as immigrants as invaders.  I have read no study of their mindset and know of none but this was it.  They wanted autonomy in Russia and meant to have it in the US, the New Jerusalem.

The Kehillah sought to replicate the ideal political organization described by Selma Stern as noted above.  The Jews attempted to form an autonomous State within the US State much as in Rockland County New York today.  They attempted to impose Yiddish as a second official language which they pursue down to this day.

Realizing that the European war was about to begin their plan was to remove all the Jews of Europe from harm’s way bringing them to the US.  Facilities were developed to receive this mass of about seven to eight million people at New Orleans and Corpus Christi.  The plan was about to be put into execution but too late as the war in Europe began in August, 1914.

Baruch rather than take an early appointment in Wilson’s government which was his due opted instead to wait and see.  He ultimately would accept a government post just after 1916 as the US prepared for war.  Why is 1916 so important?

Nineteen sixteen was an interesting year.  After two years of indiscriminate slaughter of the prime manhood of all England and Europe the Germans became disgusted at this slaughter so that they made peace offers to the French and British to call the whole thing off.  Both States would decline the peace offers opting for continuing the slaughter.  Also as noted, the Germans refused to promise Palestine to them as a homeland.

An interesting thing occurred in the US.  In 1912 the automobile tycoon, Henry Ford, had declared a 100 per cent increase in wages, a doubling, from the US standard of 2.50 to 5.00 dollars an eight hour shift.  This was perhaps the most astonishing act since the founding of the country.  He coupled the wage increase with a decrease in the price of the Model T.  He became a real hero.  By 1916 he was perhaps the most revered man in America and in much of the civilized world.  That’s a dangerous position as people in a position to injure you take it.  Get Henry.

Quite naturally the Jews had a plan and the plan was the famous Peace Ship, Oscar II.  In the height of his glory a Mrs. Schwimmer persuaded him to rent a ship, take a group of celebrities aboard go to Europe and personally negotiate a peace.  Ford who did believe that his manufacturing techniques would bring the millennium bit.

Today, of course, the whole notion seems preposterous but then when people were unaware of the German peace offer it seemed ludicrous although in the circumstances was within the realm of possibility.  Individuals had much more influence in those days and Henry Ford’s influence was immense.  Henry was very aware of the situation in Europe.  The Jews were also.  They knew the Germans were offering a peace proposal and they knew the French and English would reject it.

So, instead of sending Henry to France and England that really needed persuading they destined Ford for Germany.

Aboard the Oscar II as well as Mrs. Schwimmer were Jewish agents including Herman Bernstein of the American Jewish Committee, he was a very well informed person being sent also on a mission.  They were getting a free ride and as they knew the Germans knew of the missions intent they were sure that  a submarine would not torpedo the ship assuring a safe passage.  On shore Herman Bernstein of the AJC bolted the ship heading for his assignment.

Now, on the journey, as Henry Ford revealed, he was told by Schwimmer and Bernstein of how the Jews began the war and that he was merely duped as only they could end the war.  Of course, the Jews denied they had ever said such a thing so that Henry was not only ridiculed for making the trip but inventing a preposterous anti-Semitic lie.  There is no evidence either way so one must either believe Henry or the Jews.  I believe Henry, he has a better record for telling the truth.  Nevertheless the Peace Ship episode seriously damaged his reputation, becoming what one might call intentional defamation.  Other assaults would ensue making him look like a boob.  They’ll getcha if you don’t look out and often if you do.

So, now, up to 1916 the Jews had been neutral or leaning to a German victory, but, they wanted the Germans to guarantee that in that event to hand over the land of Palestine.  In 1916, perhaps coinciding with Ford’s adventure the Germans informed them, no deal.  Infuriated a Jewish embassy approached Great Britain and said:  Let’s deal.  The result was that Lord Balfour gave them a written promise that Palestine was theirs if the war swung in the direction of the Allies.  That could happen only one way.  That way was for the Jews to bring the US into the war.

The Jewish game involved the destruction of Czarist Russia.  In March of 1917 Czar Nicolas abdicated the throne of Russia.  That was the moment the Jews were waiting for, in April the US entered the war;  Bernard Baruch had continued to cultivate Woodrow Wilson.  His influence on Wilson was enormous.  Thus the US entered the war and Baruch after biding his time sought government employment.  Wilson not only gave him control of the whole of US industry and business as the chairman of the War Industries Board but…Jud Suss revisited…, made Baruch his co-president with full independent powers. Baruch’s decisions could not be appealed.  He was a dictator or in the nomenclature of the time, a Czar.  He had full plenipotentiary powers.  He was a Jewish dictator of the United States in full.  Well, as you may believe, this astonished and perplexed everyone who were left scratching their heads.  Not that you will read this in any academic history.

We must now interrupt the narrative here to insert the EuroAmerican reaction to the Soviet Revolution in Russia.  Remember Russia disappeared from the map at this time, in the hauteur of their victory the Jews wiped the name from the maps replaced by the title, The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.  Quite an astonishing turnaround.

The revolution was more of a revolution of subject peoples rather than a revolution of Russians.  When Russians expanded West into Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland and by accident as it were, the Jews of what would be named the Pale of the Settlement, they tried to Russify the subject populations not unlike the US trying to Americanize the immigrants from the same places.  The Americans succeeded because the immigrants moved into an established culture while the Russians tried to impose their culture on populations in situ.

Led by the Jews a revolutionary furor built up  that expressed itself in the revolution of 1905 just after the Jews formed their Zionist front. And then came the successful Bolshevik revolution of 1917.  The yeast of the 1917 Soviet Revolution was the Jews.

Unlike the Russian serfs who had been kept dumb and down for hundreds of years the Jews had formed a major role as students in the Russian University system hence had a population ready to form a dominant role in the revolutionary government.  At the same time they had fomented the German revolution in the wake of the Armistice.  Thus both the Russian Czar and the German Kaiser had been removed replaced by so-called democracies.  A ‘democratic’ revolution was the result.

The Jewish-German revolution was frustrated by the veterans returning from the Western front.

At the same time, as we have seen, the Jews had virtual control of the US through the co-presidency of Bernard Baruch.  In England the Rothschilds had a major influence as well as in France.  The age old dream of world domination thus seemed to be within reach.

As a nation the Jews were represented at the Paris Peace talks as well as forming a large representation in the US delegation. Baruch had not been invited but wouldn’t have missed it for the world. It is also not improbable that as his power with the WIB had collapsed with the end of the war that he fled the US for a more secure Europe to escape hard feelings.  His high handedness would come back on him.

The Jews astounding presence as a co-equal nation alarmed a large part of the goyim of all countries creating strong anti-Jewish reaction.  After all the Jewish advance into power since their emancipation of a mere hundred years is something to be marveled at.  A loud cry went up.  The alarmed Jews aggressing further sent up a shout of anti-Semitism while moving to shut down the literature exposing their activities.  This even went to the point of censoring such thought. And successfully censoring it.

Chief among the literature was a slim volume called The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.  The book first entered Europe in Russia in 1905 but was ignored making no impression.  It was most likely, the issue has never been settled, written at the 1897 founding meeting of Zionism in Vienna.  It outlined the Zionist method for world domination.  This was rather damning evidence so the Jews called the text a forgery even though the evidence of the plan was clearly visible to the naked eye.  No matter, the propaganda value of a book was slight while soon being augmented by much better propaganda methods, specifically phonograph records, radio, sound movies and finally 24/7 television.

Another chief volume alarming the world was an also slim volume titled:  The Cause of World Unrest by that world famous author, Anon.  This volume was quickly followed by Henry Ford’s articles in his newspaper, The International Dearborn Independent.  The ninety-two articles were collection in four slim volumes, slim volumes were impressive in those days, titled The International Jew.  International brought the focus down to a Jewish cabal excluding the general population.  The articles were not anti-Semitic, they were directed at a cabal.

Thus a battle of words was waged until, probably, the Aaron Sapiro trial between them and Ford in 1927.  More battles were waged through 1945 but they took a different form.  To backtrack a little…

.5.

Navigating Still Waters.

Bernard Baruch as WIB, War Industries Board director, acted as a dictator.  He issued ukases like a Czar that must be obeyed, no questions asked, no discussions.  Baruch had full plenipotentiary powers.  There was no way to appeal his decisions.  He was also a full fledged socialist as was Woodrow Wilson.  Under cover of wartime emergency powers as would recur in WWII Baruch tried to gather all American economic activity under the umbrella of the WIB.  There he could dictate who made what and when and where while allocating resources.   If you displeased him you went off allocation.

Most businessmen wished to cooperate under the delusion that they were furthering the war effort rather than surrendering their legitimate rights.  The entire country was cooperating, it was like individualism evaporated over night.  Everyone but a few fell into lock step.  And then there was Detroit.

The auto makers objected strenuously and went on making cars, especially the Dodge brothers and Henry Ford.  They were industrialists, they made things, while Baruch ripped money off as a Wall Street speculator.  He was intelligent enough with a wide ranging intelligence but he never worked the assembly line.  He knew little or nothing about manufacturing except perhaps statistics. The automakers saw no reason to give their business model and manufacturing details to someone who after the war would be, along with his people, in possession of something they could use to further their interests over the other. Baruch was Alfred Dreyfus on steroids.  Baruch was compiling a mountain of information about US industry that could easily been shared with his fellow Jews to the detriment of the industrialists of the US. 

One might consider Baruch in this instance to Dreyfuss in France.  Dreyfuss was a French intelligence officer who was convicted of giving secrets to the Germans during the eighteen nineties.  It was one of the biggest news stories of the century.  It took the Jews five years or so to get the verdict reversed.  Of course it wasn’t that Dreyfuss wasn’t spying but he wasn’t spying for the Germans, hence, not guilty, but he was transmitting secrets to his fellow Jews much as Baruch was in a position to do.  In the twentieth century Johnathan Pollard was doing what Dreyfuss had done and the information Pollard transmitted to his fellow Jews in Israel damaged the US a great deal.  There is no reason not to believe that the Dreyfuss and Pollard affairs are not doubles.

Baruch personally held contentious meetings with the three dissenting automakers.  These would have repercussions in a couple years.  They were loud noisy meetings during which the Dodge Brothers voiced certain national aspersions about Baruch.  There is no question that the Brothers should have been more temperate.  On the other hand there was this question of national loyalty.  It has been truly said that no man can serve two masters.  Given our just discussed Dreyfuss case there was every reason for the Dodges and Ford to be concerned.  I have no idea what the three thought of the Dreyfuss case which was certainly live in their minds as it had just occurred a few years previously but Baruch should have been a little more understanding. 

Baruch was not a forgiving guy as we shall soon see.  Ford was more circumspect according to Baruch but he was nevertheless bucking Baruch’s infallibility as a Jew.  Remember that there was no appeal to Baruch’s decisions, he had full dictatorial powers.

Ford’s reputation rested on the assembly line, mass production, the marvelous organization that allowed him to mass produce hundreds of autos a day.  He once turned out a finished car from ore to finished machine in a single twenty-four hour day.  That was a pretty astonishing stunt and unequaled stunt.  There was no one else who could even conceive such a deed.

Today it is impossible for younger people, or even older people, to understand the reputation that Ford made.  He was a one-man industrial revolution.  From doubling wages to making the most inexpensive cars in the world as his fable assembly line boggled every mind.  Aldous Huxley in his novel Brave New World tongue in cheek even reset the calendar from AD to year one AF, After Ford.

So, to humiliate Ford Baruch gave him the seemingly impossible task to mass produce the Eagle Patrol Boat, starting from scratch.  While Ford did mass produce them, without knowledge of ships and sea, the Eagles were rather unwieldy boats but serviceable while casting aspersions on Ford’s mass production methods.  But then, how many people bought cars and how many bought Eagle boats?

The same stunt was played on Ford during WWII when he was asked or ordered to mass produce B-24 bombers not only from scratch but without production facilities.  Those had to be found, and built to entirely new specifications before he could begin.  Talk about Hercules and the Augean Stables.  He was able to produce a plane an hour and that would have been equivalent to several hundred cars.

Now, both Wilson and Baruch wanted to regiment Americans into good Socialists.  The American ideal had been laissez-faire, or extreme individualism- Jesse James, Billy the Kid, the Daltons-you know, Do What Thou Wilt.  That’s pretty close to anarchism and totally impracticable but soul satisfying.   The Jewish ideal was slowly being imposed in contradiction was a regimented collective in which every minute was controlled.  America had extreme diversity in every field of endeavor.  The American socialist ideal was to reduce everyone to equality, except the Rabbis.

The post-Civil War era from 1865 to 1914 was the heart of the Golden Age which was a wide open time of unequaled opportunity and unrivalled opulence.  This was when Thorsten Veblen wrote his famous Theory of the Leisure Class (1899) condemning conspicuous consumption against what created so much that was fabulous in American Civilization. 

It wasn’t so much that Veblen was against leisure as he himself lived with time on his hands but it was sans funds.  He couldn’t consume conspicuously.

As Baruch waved his magic wand of an unlimited power that Jud Suss would cried from envy, equity was the order of the day.  Baruch was devising schemes.  A socialist ideal at the time, and this may be related to Veblen, was that there should be no distinction in dress.  All should dress alike.  As a starter Baruch’s plan was that there should be only eight different  dress styles for women, this was nation wide all economic classes,  of the most economical of fabrics that all women of all classes would be required to wear, shoes were reduced to three or four types, affordable to all and Baruch was just getting started.  If you’re wondering about a source it comes straight from the horse’s mouth, Baruch’s auto biography. Also, remember, that at the time the entire clothing industry was in Jewish hands, all apparel from hats to shoes, this would have post war consequences..

That would have happened but unfortunately for Baruch and his Socialists the war ended on November 11, 1918.  The tremendous ordeal was over; as soon to be President Harding would say:  Back to normalcy.  Like the world of 2021 it was a new idea of normal.

In 1916 Lion Feuchtwanger revived the memory of Jud Suss when he wrote a play exalting the Jewish hero.  1916 was not a propitious time to reveal future plans so the play was shut down after one performance.  Quite possibly it was only meant for one performance and those who were meant to see it had seen it.

At about the same time the Jew, Walter Rathenau of Germany publicly pronounced that when the war was over there would be no going back to the nineteenth century, it would be to a new reality. In other words, it would be a world in which Jews dominated.

He said that there were three hundred people in the West who managed affairs and he knew every one of them and that there would be a different political organization.  Like all predictions of the future it didn’t work out quite like Rathenau projected but it did come close.  Weimar Germany was dominated by the Jews and in their minds they almost realized Suss’ dream.

Thus, when that Great Betrayal called the Armistice was announced the German Communist revolution commenced and was launched under the direction of the two Jews Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknect. 

The Kaiser was deposed seeking refuge in Holland.  The soldiers returning from the Western Front took up the battle to defeat the Communists.  The State was rescued but as Rathenau had predicted the Weimar Republic heavily represented by Jews was nothing like the nineteenth century.

The Jews did not give the battle up so easily and street warfare continued through the years of the Republic.  Under the guise of Communists the Jews were confronted by Volkist groups of which the most prominent were the National Socialists.

From the Jewish perspective the Weimar Republic was a realization of Suss, the German Moses, attempt to take over Wurttemburg.  Thus, Feuchtwanger’s novel Jud Suss and Selma Stern’s quasi-history coming in 1925-26 were much more than literary events, they celebrated the supposed arrival of the Jewish millennium and the Jewish redemption.

This dream was interrupted by the government falling to the National Socialists in January of 1933.  The Jews immediately declared war on Germany.  In England the war was announced in the Daily Express  under the banner headline Judea declares War On Germany:  Jews of the world unite in action.  Thus, one might say the long run up to the fighting began in Germany, at the beginning of 1933.  In the US the official of the American Jewish Committee, Samuel Untermyer, announced the war after the Jews returned to Washington under the aegis of FDR in March.

Thus, one must say the long run up to the outbreak of the shooting war began in Germany, in March 1933 as they began mobilizing for the isolation of Germany with boycotts, blockades and other harassments.  The US, England and France enclose Germany from the West while the gigantic Soviet Union fenced them in from the East.  Britain and France with strong Communist and Jewish influence set up Polish treaties so that combined with Russia war could be forced on Germany.

.6.

Back In The USSA

The Armistice came in November of 1918 cutting Baruch’s political career short, just as he was really getting rolling.  In his autobiography he describes what he would have done if the war had continued.  He was not invited to attend Wilson to Paris but he abandoned his job and went anyway where he entertained lavishly.

 When the was over and people had time to reflect Baruch’s reputation took a major hit so that he was no longer trusted.  He wandered ‘lonely as a cloud’ during the twenties with the Republicans in power but still as a figure.

When FDR came in in 1933 Baruch expected to be made co-president to FDR but the President rejected him perhaps remembering his activities in 1918 that disqualified him for office.  In the end Baruch could be found sitting on a park bench across from the White House looking longingly from afar.  He held a sort of court there. 

Before I attack the core of the twenties, in the US the war of the Jews on Ford and the Suss revival in Germany, I’d like to bridge the political situation from the physical collapse of Wilson to the Era of Roosevelt.

The center of Jewish activities was in New York.  Make no mistake, the Jews were acting as an independent political entity directing their world wide affairs from what would become the Big Bagel. It is important to understand that, the Jews considered themselves to be beholden to no one.

They tasted rather astonishing success under Wilson but then the Republican interregnum of 1929 to 1933 left them out in the cold.  So their understanding of America was essentially New York City.  They had no chance in 1920 while the 1924 election was a time of intense Democratic disorganization so Coolidge wedged through.

The Jews were cultivating Al Smith an Irish Catholic who they put in the governor’s office.  If one was New York centered Al Smith might have seemed a good national candidate but as a New York City, Tammany Hall, Irish Catholic he wasn’t nationally minded as he chose for his campaign song:  The Streets of New York.

Many readers might view with horror my mentioning that Al was a Catholic Irishman but those were times when these things mattered.  Anti-Catholic sentiment was very strong while the Irish had controlled Tammany Hall since their arrival in the US.  Tammany was the symbol of corruption so Smith had a lot to overcome.  He also had a strong New York accent so he wasn’t the ideal candidate when Herbert Hoover and a strong economy opposed him.

Smith’s defeat left the Jews in a quandary as their only backup was a very sick Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  Roosevelt had served in the Wilson administration as an under Secretary of the Navy.  In 1920 he had run with Cox as his VP when they were swamped by Harding.  He was a believer in Wilson’s ideology. Then, in 1921 Roosevelt was struck down with a severe case of polio that destroyed his legs.  Roosevelt would never take an unassisted step again.

Smith had been serving as governor of New York under Jewish management, abandoning the post to run for the presidency.  Roosevelt was the only backup they had.  He ought not to have accepted the call to replace Al as governor as he was still a very sick man obsessed with recovering the use of his legs.  He very reluctantly ran, succeeded, filled two terms.  Thus, in 1932 he was the sole candidate the New York Jews had. Capturing the presidency was a real coup.  Politically things were changing fast so that Jews could be elected for State positions.  Herbert Lehman was thus selected to succeed Roosevelt as governor.  In broad terms then the years from 1918 to1932.

Back to the US in 1918.  The world was in turmoil.  All was quiet on the Western Front even though Germany was still blockaded in a way that differed little from genocide. No food was allowed into the country from abroad.  The Germans were in a difficult position with its population starving and dying.  The situation was only relieved when Herbert Hoover led the move to release the blockade thus rescuing the Germans from mass deaths and possibly totally.  This is real and this is true.  The same will be repeated after WWII.  This cruelty has nothing to do with the Jewish war casualties called the holocaust.  German hatred began in 1871 with the union of all the Germans.  Once united economic competition began with the French, English and Americans.  The fact is that those three countries could not compete economically with the Germans.  There are many who say that the main cause of the war was to remove Germany as a competitor.  I believe it.

While the Western Front was quiet it was not so in the East warfare existed for another three or four years.  While it is little known the war in Russia was carried on by British, US and Japanese troops.  Armies of Czarist partisans and lots of others such as the Czechs which is quite a story.

The Soviets fighting on all four fronts, North, South, East and West still managed to keep the Germans occupied in the German Revolution and brutally took over Hungary always murdering the thousands in a manner little different from genocide.  In these Eastern Front battles the Jews were foremost in planning and execution.  The atrocities committed by them have been swept under the rug, suppressed so that any information on them is difficult to procure and then unbelievable.

On the home front Wilson was pushing hard for his dream baby of the League of Nations.  The notion was very strong that WWI was the end of wars.  It was thought that that the League would do it.  Wiser heads thought otherwise considering the very idea ridiculous. They prevailed at the time.  The issue was a hot one in the 1920 election.  Harding was even forced to agree to advance the cause but after the election and his victory the issue was allowed to drop.  However the proponents merely regrouped forming the Council On Foreign Relations that vowed that there would be a League.  The CFR worked hard as an alternate government then came into their own when FDR was elected.  FDR was a member of the CFR.  The League in Europe broke up in the thirties but undeterred heads were already busy planning the United Nations.  Roosevelt didn’t live to see his dream come true but even in the turmoil of the ending war the UN was made a fact without discussion or a vote.  Never let a good disaster go to waste.

Of course Wilson had a mental break down and for the last two years of his term was never seen in public.  Baruch back from Paris found himself bereft of the terrific power he had as head of the WIB and the co-presidency.  He was now merely a rich Jew but not without influence.  He had neither forgotten nor forgiven  the fierce resistance of the Detroit automakers to his autocratic rule.

It may be a coincidence that he and Horace Dodge met in the same New York City Hotel in 192O.  By 1920 Prohibition was in force so that bootleg or bathtub gin was the drink of the day.  While Baruch was cold and distant Dodge was warm and friendly inviting Baruch upstairs for a drink.  Baruch haughtily informed Dodge that he didn’t drink and wished him well.  Wished him well…Dodge died that night from bad gin. Was he murdered by Baruch?  A little later John Dodge died a mysterious death.  Was it a coincidence that both Dodges died?

Not too long after Henry Ford driving  home one night was forced off the road over an embankment almost into the River Rouge.  Fortunately he was only badly shaken up but not seriously injured or killed.  Can it be a coincidence that all three men who had antagonized Bernard Baruch either met their deaths or survived an attack?  There is no proof that it wasn’t a coincidence but three men who Baruch hated dying almost in a group?  Think what you will but I give my vote for a guilty Baruch.

.7.

Henry Ford And The Jews

Henry Ford was the greatest genius of the twentieth century and in his own way a great philanthropist in that his work created livelihoods for hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions.  His action forced others to increase wages.  He didn’t hoard his money but spread it around, doubling wages and lowering the price of his cars.  These actions were done in violation of the business code prevailing.  These actions brought the business community down on his head and every effort was made to humiliate him, destroy his mammoth reputation and to filch his company from him.  The post-war years brought him misery.

His great success gave him a feeling of great omnipotence, he began to think he could solve any problem no matter how difficult.  This attitude brought him into renewed contact with the Jews.  His first encounter was in 1916 and the Peace Ship.  He was humiliated in this endeavor which was very philanthropic.  His second encounter was in 1917-18 with Bernard Baruch and the WIB that had its own consequences including an attempted assassination.

Then in 1919 after an attempt by stockholders of which there were a few to force him to increase dividends he was forced to buy them out.  In order to do that he had to go to the bankers who he had always abhorred.  For some reason he dealt with Jewish bankers. Near insanity given his previous experiences.  It was a short term loan that had to be paid in full.  In 1920 his financial position was not so sharp.  The Jews refused to extend the loan or accommodate him in any way.  They were salivating in the expectation of acquiring Ford Motors on the cheap.  However Ford sucked it up, reorganized, sold everything he didn’t need, and paid on the date disappointing his creditors.  He escaped their clutches.

Now, after the Soviet Revolution and the noticed involvement of the Jews in Russia, Germany, Hungary and elsewhere, a great alarm arose in the various nations that the Jewish dream of world conquest was nearing reality.  It was said there was a Jewish problem.  Henry set out to solve that problem and end it forever.  While he was great on mechanical problems this socio-political problem required a different approach.  Bear in mind that the Jews were already on his case.  They didn’t respond to his ministrations.

So, he tried to apply reason to an irrational problem.  That’s never going to work.  Not realizing this he set to work to expose the effects of several million Jews on American civilization in a series of articles in his newspaper the International Dearborn Independent.  He was now condened as the Great Anti-Semite.  Something like the anti-Christ of Christians.

In order to write these articles he amassed an amazing Jewish library.  Probably nothing like it in the world.  He hired a man named William Cameron to research and write the articles.

Henry published an article a week demonstrating adverse Jewish activities affecting American civilization.  He made the mistake of reprinting the Protocols in the first several articles reprinted in the first volume of The International Jew.  Or, perhaps it was an act of defiance as the Jews had suppressed the book in America and the world.  Then, through his researcher and writer William Cameron an amazing series of articles showing how influential and detrimental these activities were.  The articles then were collected in four slim volumes under the stormy title:  The International Jew.  A more politic title might have served better; perhaps After The Deluge referring to immigration.  Ford wasn’t much of a propagandist or he wouldn’t have published under that title. The Leftist writer Frederick Lewis Allen writing in 1932 covering much of this same ground used the more sentimental title Only Yesterday.  Disarms the reader and suggests pure sentimentality.

 Ford’s title was offensive to the Jews even though titled titled their own volumes Born A Jew and others that you would swear were conceived by ‘anti-Semites.’  No matter.

The whole of the Jewish world rose up in condemnation.  Remember that these articles continued to appear for two years as Ford fought back giving as good as he got.  As he was now considered the world’s leading anti-Semite he came under tremendous pressure not only from organized Jewry but from family, friends, relations and many others.  Fortunately his cars continued to sell.  Ford had his security chief Henry Bennett and his Service Dept.  on the job investigating the Jews and the Jews had their organized and deputized people working on Ford.  This was quite a drama better than anything, even the Trump administration of the twenty-first century.  The war would evolve in differing forms through 1945 when Henry was thoroughly beaten.

After two years he could see he wasn’t going anywhere so he ended the articles.  However, his Service Department was still at work and coming up with new developments.  This was to take shape in 1924 when he became aware of the Aaron Sapiro farm co-op scheme.

If you have a sense of humor and are not bigoted toward either Ford or the Jews this episode could be a great comic movie.  It’ going to involve Sapiro, who was something of a bumbling twit, our old friend Bernard Baruch the commodities expert, Albert Lasker a prominent propagandist and  Eugene Meyer         whose function is unknown to me at this time.

His investigators reported to him the activities of a failed San Francisco Jewish attorney, Aaron Sapiro who was setting up farm co-ops.  Examining the situation Ford inferred, correctly, that an effort was underway to establish food monopolies.  And then he detected the hand of Bernard Baruch the commodities expert shadowing behind the effort.  This produced a new series of twenty articles, currently unpublished in book form, examining the effort.

Now, this part of the story brings up a new character named David Lubin.  I doubt if any reader has heard of him but he was more influential than one might think.  Lubin was a Jewish agitator who came up with the co-op plan now named the Sapiro Plan.

Rubin was an immigrant who gravitated West to Sacramento, California where he was instrumental in bringing Jewish immigrants where they congregated around Sacramento establishing citrus orchards.  At that time citrus was strictly a seasonal fruit available only at a certain time of the year.  Rubin was also instrumental in setting up a marketing organizing which was promoted by the propagandist Albert Lasker.

Sapiro met him at this period.  Lubin already had plans to migrate to Italy so he adopted Sapiro as his successor instructing him how to set up co-ops.  The co-ops weren’t set up for free but were a very lucrative business.  At his peak Sapiro took in nearly 100,000 dollars in one year.  The inflationary multiple on that is millions and millions on top of millions in today dollar.  Those fees came from the victims. 

Somewhere along the way Sapiro came to Baruch’s attention.  Harding not need a co-president Baruch had time on his hands so he teamed up with Sapiro helping to bilk the producers. 

Rubin had left the US to go to Italy to sell his plan to the King there.  He was on the way but unfortunately he died of the flu in 1919 thus stepping outside the frame of the picture.  It would have been interesting to see how he and Mussolini got along.  Lasker had joined and Eugene Meyer had signed up.  All three denied being involved when Sapiro began his lawsuit.  Without having read the articles it isn’t clear to me how they bedeviled the conspirators but Sapiro, at least, thought they impugned his character so he brought a defamation suit against Ford.

Sapiro was backed by leading American Jewish Committee officials led by their president Louis Marshall, who, I assume no reader has ever heard of.  He too was a very influential person, no Jacob Schiff but a real trouble maker.  A major propaganda campaign against Ford was raised while the trial was in progress.

The trial was called a mistrial when it was discovered that Sapiro had attempted to suborn jurors.

A retrial was possible and while that was impossible for Sapiro to finance, Ford was in the midst of designing his transition from Model T to Model A thus he couldn’t spare the time and annoyance so he actually settled the case for a million dollars. No retrial ensued.

Sapiro took the money but he had completely destroyed his reputation, thus falling by the wayside.  Baruch had wisely dissociated himself from the case, remaining in the background so he escaped with minimal damage.  Now let us return to Europe.

.8.

The Rise Of The Suss Controversy

Back in 1916 Walter Rathenau warned that Europe would not return to the status quo ante.  As he said, the nineteenth century  situation would not be reestablished.  We will have to take a moment to understand what he meant by that.  Suss had functioned mid-eighteenth century and had been succeeded by the Rothschilds who perfected his method aided by the triumphs of Democracy and the Industrial Revolution sixty years after into the nineteenth century.  But, the era of magic on which the Jewish Talmud system is erected was over.  It was no longer possible to breath into a pile of dirt and create a Golem.  While the Jews had become dominant in finances they were still marginal because of the rise of science and technology in which Jews did not participate.  The days of Golems and magic were dead.

The Jews also made no mark in literature anywhere in England, Europe or America.  The transfer of population from Russia to the US also absorbed Jewish interest although they did make a fortune with their Hamburg-America shipping line filling steerage with fellow Jews.  What a period!  History is wonderful if you have the mind for it.

Perhaps Rathenau meant that in the twentieth century Jews would be in charge.  In 1920 that seemed like a real possibility and in many ways his prediction has come true.  Feuchtwanger’s play, Jud Suss, was a minor tremor.  In 1925-26 Feuchtwanger began the rehabilitation of Suss and Selma Stern began the apotheosis.

Following Suss’ methods in Wurttemberg in Post-war Germany the Jews were rapidly approaching the success that Suss had achieved with Karl Alexander.  He had the Duke so dependent on him that Suss had very nearly supplanted the Duke as the actual authority in the State.  So in post-war Germany the Jews were in the process of supplanting the Germans as the primary race.  The ferocious inflation of 1923 when the mark was devalued to the point where you needed a trillion marks to buy a loaf of bread had devasted and impoverished the native Germans.

On the other hand if you had had other currencies such as the pound or dollar you could buy up Germany cheap.  Naturally Jews were prime beneficiaries.  On an interesting side Roosevelt, recovering from his polio discussed whether he should take advantage of the German  situation but backed out.

The Communists, much like Antifa in twenty-first century US, had control of the streets.  That means they burn and beat with impunity just like Antifa.  German Volkists such as the National Socialists were in the position of Conservatives in 21st century US in that the police were told to stand down when the Communists had the upper hand but then arrest the National Socialists when they were on top.

While the Jews denied that they were the majority of the Communist Party at the time and subsequently, in the 21st century they freely admit it.

Before the National Socialists assumed control they were the hated enemy.  Thus the Jews immediately announced open warfare when the National Socialists won the ’33 election.  They then began to manipulate the various nations to hurt the Germans in every way possibly much as they did in the presidencies of Herbert Hoover and Donald Trump.

Thus one may say with justice that the Jews initiated WWII beginning in1933.  The problem then was how to bring in the armed nations.  The Jews were clearly the aggressor nation.

Is it a coincidence then that Lion Feuchtwanger realized his cinema version of Jud Suss in 1933 as a propaganda vehicle to stir up the neutral peoples?  Essentially he was throwing down the gauntlet.  Revenge for the hanging of their secular saint Joseph Suss Oppenheimer.

This was an all out war aiming at the total destruction of the German people and the territory of Germany itself.  Germany was to be wiped from the map the same as Russia.  Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists were the good reason but not the real reason.  The real reason was a takeover of German territory while the Germans themselves were to be subject to genocide.  Stop!  Yes, that seems preposterous yet it is fully documented as we shall see.

Once the Jews began the war it was only natural that the Germans would retaliate. 

Just as there was nothing Germans could do to stop the penalties imposed on Germany or the interference in their economic affairs from outside their borders, there was little the Jews could do to prevent their harassing the Jews within their control.  World propaganda was in the control of the Jews and there was no way for the Germans to effectively counter it. 

Understanding this makes acts like Kristallnacht make sense.  There was a war in progress that the Jews began; what else could they expect?

Their propaganda machine was much more effective than the German.  The idea of Jews declaring war without a territory or army is ludicrous on the surface and few if any saw below the surface.  Perhaps the Jewish bete noir Charles A. Lindbergh did.  He was an unofficial US ambassador in Germany for years, revered by German people and government.  He must have perceived the true situation, that there was a declared war in progress.

The question was how do you overcome Jewish propaganda in the West?  Winston Churchill was firmly under the thumb of the Jews financially; without their financial support in the form of loans he could not have existed.  He worked closely with the American Roosevelt.  The latter himself was virtually a tool of the Jews.  As such he worked with them to finagle the US into the European war against all national interests.  Of course Lindbergh knew all this and he actually announced the true situation in his Des Moines speech in 1941 just before Pearl Harbor.

He announced to the assembled crowd that the British, that is Churchill, Roosevelt and the Jews were the driving force seeking to involve the US in this Jewish war.  Lindbergh was instantly declared an awful anti-Semite while his reputation was shot to ribbons.  Every newspaper in the US leaped on him.

Ford too who had multiple complaints of mistreatment by the Jews probably understood the Jewish-German situation.  His harassment by the Jews didn’t end with the termination of the Sapiro co-op case.  While the Jews were seeking for a grip on him things were relatively quiet but shortly after the inauguration of Roosevelt, the so-called hundred days, came the criminal Wagner Labor Act that gave virtually unlimited power to the labor unions over the employers.

Ford, of course, put up heroic resistance  for which he received nothing but further defamation.  Under cover of the Communist Party led by Jews the union marched on Ford Motors with the intent to tear River Rouge down stone by stone, plank by plank and smash the machines to destroy the magnificent assembly line.

So yes, Ford knew what was going on.  He had his Service Department.  He had investigators.  Of course, the Jews portrayed them as bumbling idiots but that was mere defamation.  In 1938 Ford accepted an award from Germany which convulsed the Jews.  Listen, this was America, the United States where different laws and mores from Zion ruled.  Our national interests were different than Jewish interests.  The US hadn’t declared war, Zion had.  The US was at peace with Germany but Jewish propaganda overruled reason.  This was nonsense. It is quite possible that the National Socialists with their own spy service to match that of Ford, Jews and US, understood the US machinations in their true light.

Now, I’m going to go ahead a little and then retrace my steps.  The Germans are portrayed in orthodox histories as a sort of nation consumed by an irrational hatred.  This is nonsense.  Writing in Mein Kampf Hitler said that in the conflict between the Jews and Germans that if the National Socialists lost their heads would roll in the sand.  This was true and Russia was the proof.  They did lose and Germans and Germany were only saved by the timely death of FDR in April of ’45.  His successor Harry Truman who was not in sympathy with the criminal Jewish solution.

The Jewish intent to avenge Jud Suss had always been the genocide of the German people and the dismemberment of Germany.  Remember the Amalekites.  In 1941 they came out in the open with maximum publicity and using an important member of the American Jewish Committee, Theodore Kaufman of Newark New Jersey as putative author they published a slender volume titled Germany Must Perish which outlined the method of cleansing all Germans within one generation.  A sort of eugenic plan, while erasing Germany from the map.  Prussia was actually erased from the map.  That territory no longer exists under that name.  It must be reinstated.

The book received maximum distribution and exposure.  It received serious consideration.  FDR himself was convinced.  Nor was Kaufman a sole voice.  FDR’s co-president and Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau Jr, iterated the plan in his book, Germany Is Our Problem.  ‘Our problem’ being that of the Jews not the US.  Had Roosevelt lived this plan could have been put in operation.  Actually Germany was dismembered into four zones governed by the USSA, USSR, England and France.  They were not tender and killed and as many Germans as they could get away with although Germany was spared genocide.

As you may believe the National Socialists were enraged when they learned of Kaufman’s book.  All the German leaders were well aware of Jewish criminal activities in Russia, Hungary and Germany committed after it went quiet on the Western Front.  True those evil deeds have been nearly erased from histories but those deeds were genocidal and horrendous beyond description.  They made Auschwitz look like child’s play.

As the Jews made their genocidal plans known in 1941 well before the Germans began their preemptive strike it is not remarkable that the Germans  would respond in kind.  But files disappear from the records, don’t they?

What is the difference between fleets of heavy bombers pommeling German cities with the sole intent of killing German civilians night after night for months on end and the German extermination camps?  Nothing.  Guilt?  Well, I make no excuses for mankind.

Let no one accuse me of denying any holocaust but let us include the German holocaust as well as the European holocaust that existed much longer and more effectively than the Jewish holocaust.  While the firestorm of Dresden occurred only because there were so many refugees that it was the highest concentration of Germans in one spot.  Pure unadulterated hatred can be the only excuse for Dresden.  Genocide.

Certainly as the shooting war began the Germans must have realized that propaganda was their weakest point.  The Jewish ability to create hatred of Germans far exceeded the German ability create counter-propaganda in the US and Britain.  The propaganda war then extended to the level of motion pictures

.9.

The Movies Go To War.

The Jewish Masquerade is such that have  chosen to live behind a mask in which they deny what is obvious to the causal observer.  In the US the entertainment business in general was dominated by them when not owned outright.  The movie business consisting of several studios at the time were wholly owned by Jews.

As one might expect then the immense propaganda power of the films was turned against Germany. The distribution of the English film Jud Suss, re-edited under the name Power kicked of the propaganda campaign.  Power was followed in 1934 with a falsified account of the Rothschilds activities after Waterloo.  Then there were numerous movies condemning Germany but operating behind the Mask not openly pro-Jewish.  As the theatres were predominately owned by Jews there would have been no chance of a pro-German film being shown if one had been made.

Beginning in 1940 three major German films were made:  The Eternal Jew, the German answer to Jud Suss and the answer to the Rothschilds.  The Eternal Jew may be classified as low propaganda better not having been made but Jud Suss and the Rothschilds, given movie capabilities of the times may be termed masterpieces.

The Jews denounce both movies as anti-Semitic which they weren’t.  As vehicles countering Jewish propaganda from when they announced the opening of the war in 1933 they can be considered as legitimate counter-propaganda.  There is nothing vicious about them; in fact the Jewish Jud Suss  is much more vicious as a propaganda vehicle.

Feuchtwanger’s England made film was not overly successful.  Neither the English or American public was interested in or sympathetic to any such appeal.  Feuchtwanger’s movie was so Jewdeocentric the he offended swaths of viewers and critics.  Of course, in 1933 few non-Jews and probably most Jews would not have known how to evaluate the film as they had no knowledge of the subtext.

Having viewed both the English and German versions of Suss several times I find the English version not a very good film because of Feuchtwanger’s very obvious bigotry.  The American version edited out the most offensive scenes making the movie more jumbled.  Of course, Power is a very appropriate title as Suss was trying to usurp the power of  Wurttemberg, just as the Weimar Jews were trying to wrest Germany from the Germans while believing that they were very close to success.  Given Feuchtwanger’s vile bigoted attitude, which he vaunts quite openly, I am sure the English edit offended greatly.

In the US Power of 1933 was followed in 1934 by the Hollywood film The Rothschilds.  Given the prejudices of the twenties and thirties the very title the Rothschilds would have been provocative.  The film only details the doings of the English Jew Nathan Rothschild who founded the dynasty in the post-Waterloo capture of the English economy.  In fact, Nathan Rothschild did a George Soros and neatly finessed the Bank of England making it a Jewish power center.

Having privately obtained the news of the English victory he concealed it first to drive the price of stocks down indicating a French victory and then buying up when the news of Wellington’s victory became known.  He became the richest man in England by that single coup.

The Germans watched these films in disgust.  Germans at that time were superb historians.  Their published histories are second to none.  You may be sure that they knew the history of the Court Jews of which Suss was one while having an absolutely correct understanding of the Rothschild doings in sabotaging Napoleon and diddling the English.

Thus in 1940, before Kaufman’s threat became known, they answered both Jewish movies.  What activated the National Socialists to do so in 1940 isn’t clear to me.  Perhaps in re-examining the Suss matter they put it together, in any event their Suss movie was the German side of the matter.  Two sides to every story and this was theirs. Naturally the German Suss is now characterized as the most anti-Semitic film of all time.  That is nonsense.  It is a more than decent response to the one-sided Jewish version.

In fact, the English Jewish Jud Suss presents a more unflattering picture of the Jews than the German film.  It actually shows the seamier side of the Jewish character.  It does however depict the Jewish fixation on the supposed unjustified execution of Suss.

Both Suss movies are closer to the facts than the Hollywood movie of the Rothschilds in 1934.

The Hollywood movie is just a fluff piece to show what truly fine people the Jews were and how devoted Nathan Rothschild was to his ‘adopted’ homeland.  The German film is a pretty accurate historical telling of the Rothschilds involvement in sending the money to Wellington in Spain coupled with the significant event of Waterloo.  There was nothing over stated or anti-Semitic about it.  Waterloo was a significant world changing event on more than one level deserving a detailed analysis.

I especially liked  the portrayal of Napoleon’s minister of police, Fouche in his confrontation with Nathan’s brother James.

As 1940 rolled along Churchill, the Jews and Roosevelt were frantic to get the US into the war.  Churchill knew before he led England into the war that his country could not hope to win without US involvement.  His whole game plan was to bring in the US. 

Facing determined resistance from Americans led by the America First Committee and Charles Lindbergh Roosevelt nevertheless led various subterfuges to essentially wage an undeclared war on Germany.  US navel units were used to combat the German submarine warfare.  He allowed US warships to be sunk, the most famous being the Destroyer Reuben James made famous in a propaganda song to arouse Americans.  He extended the three mile coastal limit to the middle of the Atlantic beyond Iceland.  FDR was champing at the bit sending billions of dollars of American resources to aid the Soviets who after all had declared war on the US and the world when they assumed power in 1917 and were still waging it through the Third International.

In an effort to defuse the America First Committee it’s spokesman, Charles Lindbergh was defamed as a German agent trying to deliver the US to the Germans.  As implausible as this seems the hysteria was rising so high as to be ridiculous but the American public had to be whipped up. 

As there was no way that the Germans had the military resources to conduct both a two front European war and attack the US mainland the hysteria was totally unwarranted and criminally dishonest.

As a personal anecdote, I was  three years old living a thousand miles from the Atlantic in Saginaw, Michigan far, far beyond range of any bomber in existence and the Germans did not even have any heavy or even medium bombers to use against England and Roosevelt knew this but we were still required to darken our windows to conceal our location and air wardens manned lookout towers.  This was really crazy stuff.  On this one occasion my mother and I were on a bus downtown when the sirens went off.  The bus stopped and we unloaded and were directed to stand in a store front. I could hear two men disgustingly talking about how stupid it was to stand enclosed by glass.  The shattering glass would kill us if any bombs didn’t.

Perhaps the US was feeling guilty for its genocidal bombing of German civilians but that’s how hysterical they were from 1940 on.  The atmosphere surrounding Lindbergh must have been horrendous.  The situation was brought to fruition when Roosevelt led the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor of the Hawaiian Islands.  The Germans had signed a mutual defense pact with the Japanese that if one were attacked the other would come to its aid. 

Then, with the opening of the Pacific War Hitler foolishly honored a pact that he need not have as Japan opened the hostilities.  The pact had been signed with the notion that the Japanese would attack the Soviets in the west.  Short on oil the Japanese abandoned that play moving South.

Jud Suss was to be avenged.  Germany was no match for the combined power of the USSA and USSR.

When it comes to holocausts Europe had been destroyed in the name of Suss.  A hundred million Europeans died in that genocidal holocaust of the Second Thirty Years War.  Nor did the suffering end with the German capitulation.  Dwight Eisenhower who proudly proclaimed that he had sat at the feet of that wise man Bernard Baruch sought to destroy as many as he could.  Eisenhower virtually murdered whole German army corps., leaving them unfed and unprotected over the coldest winter in many years.  The German genocide continued for years as US Jews swarmed triumphantly over Germany. 

It would take them a few years but ultimately the oppressed and depressed Germans would pardon Jud Suss and the Jews rehabilitated that sinner.  It only took them 200 years but the job got done. 

Jud Suss And The Origin Of World War I And II

by

R.E. Prindle

As a preface to this essay refer to the essay linked here.   This essay is an extension.

The Jud, or Jew, Suss as he was known was a Court Jew to Duke Karl Alexander of Wurttemberg, a province of Southern Germany next Bavaria.  He set about to usurp Duke Alexander’s position as ruler.  He committed heinous crimes against the Duke’s subjects.  When the Duke died in 1738 Suss was arrested, tried, convicted and executed.

The execution of Joseph Oppenheimer, the Jud Suss, for heinous crimes against the German people of Wurttemberg was taken by the Jews as a bigoted attack on the Jewish people throughout Central Europe.

Suss had been an adviser to the Duke Karl Alexander the lawful ruler.  Taking advantage of his position as Karl Alexander’s Court Jew  Suss cunningly attempted to usurp the Duke’s position and become the ruler of Wurttemberg himself.  His crimes were egregious and when Karl Alexander died Suss was arrested, tried and executed.

What the Jews considered the injustice of the execution rankled with them for two hundred years before they found the means to avenge it.  That vengeance was the total destruction of all of Germany and the attempted genocide of the German people along with the devastation of all Europe.

No one except for the very astute of Jewish theologians could have guessed this underlying motive for the origins of World War I and II.  The first intimation of the outcome rippled from a 1916 play celebrating Suss by Lion Feuchtwanger that was performed once and then withdrawn.  1916 was not the right time.

Then in 1925 and 1926 two new examinations of the Suss affair appeared.  In 1925 the same Lion Feuchtwanger rewrote the play into his novel, Jud Suss which appeared immediately in English translation as The Jew Suss; a year later a woman called Selma Stern published her historical study titled, The Court Jew having Suss as the central figure although the study examines the phenomenon of the Court Jew in the eighteenth century Holy Roman Empire, that is Germany and Austria.

The Court Jew arose after the end of the First Thirty Years War in 1848 taking form thereafter until the Napoleonic period.  After Napoleon the modern institutionalized State appeared, democratic in form, which gave a larger and freer organization in which anti-social organizations were allowed more latitude.  Thus, using decentralized democracy the Jewish central power from the beginning of the nineteenth century rose managed by the Rothschild family.

Both Feuchtwanger and Stern emphasize the centrality of the Suss affair and their desire to replicate the state of affairs which Suss almost achieved, that is the supremacy of the Jew.  In Germany where the action was played out in the twentieth century the Volkist Movement led by Adolf Hitler and National Socialists proved an unexpected stumbling block to Jewish plans which were proceeding as planned after the Suss model.

In 1930 an International Bank was formed in Europe headquartered in Basle, Switzerland.  This bank may be considered the European Equivalent of the Federal reserve of the United States. With the two banks allied the Jews would have had control of Western currency.   I quote from Edith Starr Miller’s Occult Theocrasy, Vol. II of 1933 pp. 658           

Quote:

The internationalization of finance reached its apotheosis when, on April 23, 1930 the International Bank at Basle, commissioned to enroll the central banks of nine nations in its membership was founded.

As for the delegates from the different countries attending the meeting their names signify little for, owing to the speed and unanimity with which official appointments were made, it is evident that they were all instructed, or, in other words pledged, to obey orders.  By whom were the orders given?  History may answer that question some day!

The significance of this international institution was commented upon in an article entitled “Mammon being enthroned” by “Arthurian” in the Referee dated Sunday, April 13, 1930, in the following terms which, while constituting a warning to the English people, is actually an appeal to the people of the world.

“One is amazed at the equanimity with which Sir Charles Addis describes the difficulty of enabling the Bank for International Settlements to avoid interference with the Sovereign Rights of the people of each of so many countries!  Surely the possibility alone ought to be adequate condemnation of the bank.  The opening for chicanery, brute force, bribery, corruption and war, in the supposed solution of this problem, is unprecedented in the history of the world. 

“The Bank is to exist for fifty years, if it can, it is to pay no taxes during all that time, and its assets and deposits are to be immune from seizure, confiscation, and censorship, in peace or war; it is also to be subject to no restriction or prohibition of any kind on its imports and exports of gold or currency.  So little do Government decisions regarding the Bank really count that, before the scheme has been sanctioned, the first part of the subscription has already been subscribed.  The Bankers and businessmen to be associated are to ensure that there will be no uncertainty about the business that the Bank will promote, industrial depression and financial uncertainty are, of course, going to be cured by them—so they say.  The Governor of the Bank of England (Mr. Montagu Norman) is going to be a director of this foreign Bank.  What an honour!  This Board, with the daily lives of hundreds of millions of people at its mercy, is going to meet at least ten times a year—four times in Basle… ‘The Bank owes allegiance to no single Government.’  It need keep no currency reserve…”

‘This Bank that owes no allegiance to anyone, can do as it likes…. Mammon is enthroned upon the world, to make what profits it can, with unrestricted powers, it has control of the ‘Machinery of Reparations’ [war reparations] which contains the means by which the wherewithal to liquidate Reparations can be squeezed out of the receivers at a profit to the payers…Economic control involves political control as well as every other control of any people.  Truly, the megalomania of finance never went further, truly there has never been anything like it in the world before….

“People of England!  Remember how the stranglehold of the Bank of England on all other banks, on all the other financial houses, upon every business and upon every home and family has grown from the comparatively negligible sum of 1,200,000 pounds of similar credit free of interest and the’ usufruct’ thereof.  This new usufruct will be the impoverishment, debasement, extinction, and disintegration of all that the masses of this country care for, and the certain decline and fall and redistribution into foreign hands, of the British Empire…

Unquote.

In 1933 when the National Socialists were elected in Germany, it’s leader, Adolf Hitler disrupted the whole scheme, not only in Europe but in the US.  1933 was also the year the Jews returned to Washington DC under the aegis of FDR, and the year that the Jews declared war on Germany.  It was also the year that Feuchtwanger translated his book to the screen in the English movie Jud Suss and its American edit, much different than the English version, titled Power.

The following year, 1934, Hollywood produced the supporting propaganda film The Rothschilds celebrating Nathan Rothschild’s seizure of the Bank of England.  The two films rankled the Germans as the movies attacked the National Socialist government.  They, in their turn several years later, would counter the two Jewish propaganda films with answering films of their own.

Ancillary to the Suss films in March of 1941 the US Jews through their American Jewish Committee and its agent from Newark, New Jersey, Theodore Kaufman with the assistance of B’nai B’rith published a little pamphlet called Germany Must Perish in which Kaufman and the Jewish organizations advocated the dismemberment of Germany and the genocide of the German people, man, woman and child within one generation.  They did succeed in wiping Prussia from the map.

This pamphlet was issued as though from a crank so the AJC, ADL, B’nai B’rith could dissociate themselves from their product if it failed.  However the pamphlet received maximum exposure, was seriously considered and eventually moved into FDR’s program.

In 1945 the Jewish Secretary of the Treasury and soi-disant co-president Henry Morgenthau Jr.  published his own book based on the ideas of the AJC and Kaufman titled Germany Is Our Problem that was then known as the Morgenthau Plan.  He didn’t clarify whether ‘Our’ represented the Jews or the US.  FDR, now deceased in April 1945, had backed this plan now called the Morgenthau plan but Harry Truman succeeding Roosevelt was horrified by it and dismissed Morgenthau.

The denouement to the Suss affair occurred a few years later when the Jews finally rehabilitated Suss and he was declared innocent of all charges and wrongfully executed.  That part of the war was over.  Thus the Jews wreaked havoc on Germany and the Germans in the name of Joseph Suss Oppenheimer.  Suss was his last name, by the way and he was from Oppenheim.

.II.

What was the relationship of the Jews and Germans through the centuries?  Selma Stern will have to be our guide as she very generously favors us with a fairly accurate history.  The unsigned preface introduces us to the problem, p. xi:

Quote:

 Sharing in two different cultural heritages, the Jewish and the German, she did not feel the tension of such a relationship as a perplexing inner conflict and contrast; this dual heritage served rather to enrich her being and to broaden her Lebensgefuehl.  She was therefore in a position to study, from a positive historical standpoint, the chief problems that interested her, namely, the emancipation of the Jews, that is, the process of becoming an integral part of the political, economic and social life of the State, and the assimilation of the Jews, that is, the process of their self-adaptation to the culture and spirit of their surroundings.

Unquote.

A key phrase is …’becoming an integral part’…  That doesn’t mean that Jews would blend in with the German people because in so doing they would lose their Jewish identity.  It means that they would compete with the Germans assuming important positions as Jews to influence German life in their direction much as Suss was doing in attempting to usurp preeminence from Duke Karl Alexander.

This is the problem Napoleon had with the Jews.  He thought emancipation meant that the Jews would give up their national identity and become merely a French religious sect.  Instead the Jews cared little about religion but were fierce nationalists, a nation within a nation as they had always been but now without any restriction of the activities to become preeminent.

Just as assimilation to the Jews didn’t mean consolidation but ‘their self-adaptation to the culture and spirit of their surroundings’, that is, the outside veneer.  Thus they would dress, adopt the German language as a second language but still maintain their national identity secretly as they did in Spain and Portugal.

This would be the root of the problem that their twentieth century messiah, Sigmund Freud, would implant when he devised the method to subvert European morals, mores and customs.

Mrs. Stern on p.179 of her Court Jew explains Jewish expectations as a nation within the German nation:

Quote:

Thus the Jewish communities in the period following the Thirty Years War represented everywhere autonomous, corporate bodies possessing their own treasuries, their own welfare and educational institutions, their own legal and tax systems, their own synagogues and cemeteries.  They were governed by elders (Parnassim) elected by members of the community, who had also the right to choose all the communal officials.  The elders were the spokesmen for the community in its relations with the State, drew up the budget, obtained loans, determined assessments and turned over the money gathered by the tax collecters to the State treasury.  To a certain extent they even supervised commerce and the moral behavior of the members of the community, utilizing at times their power to fine or banish.

Unquote.

As can be seen ‘integration in the State’ meant merely that Jews should be give a free hand to the Jews while sapping the strength of the whole as they expected special treatment as God’s chosen people.  For that soon meant that the Jews wanted to be co-rulers as Suss nearly obtained in Wurttemberg, or may have actually and then usurp pre-eminence.

Duke Karl Alexander, who was deeply involved in European affairs having to fend off the French invaders had to entrust internal State affairs to someone.  The Estates were useless because they didn’t understand international problems.  The Duke then chose to rely on Suss.  Suss quickly expanded into a co-ruler much as Bernard Baruch and Henry Morgenthau Jr. did in the US Wilson and Roosevelt administrations in the twentieth century.  He as they exploited his position.  His hatred of the Germans meant humiliating and humbling them while exalting his own nation, the Jews.

This was the same thing happening in twentieth century Germany, Russia, the US, France and England.  WWI was a bold move by the Jews to seize Europe.

This is the way Feuchtwanger describes the wild fancies of Suss that caused him to be hanged by angry Wurttembergers:  pp 131-132.

Quote:

To maintain his house in such princely magnificence and to keep the Duke in the hollow of his hand he needed money, money poured out at his feet in fantastic profusion.  In Vienna, among his relatives the Oppenheimers, the Imperial bankers, he had learned to handle large sums.  But now the revenue of the whole Duchy ran through his fingers; he could dispose of the income of two hundred towns and twelve hundred villages.  With feverish industry he cast it here and there, and let roll in mad gyration.  He had dealing with all the financiers in Europe, and through his innumerable  and mostly Jewish agents the money of Swabia flowed through the most complicated channels, founded plantations in the Dutch East Indies, bought horses in Barbary, and sent trains of elephants and black slaves down to the coast of Africa.  His fundamental principle, and his deliberate goal, was a fevered and whirling exchange of commodities.  Not large profits on single transactions, but a huge total profit through making a little on everything.

His private income was enormous.

Unquote.

This was what all the Court Jews did although not placed high the governments as was Suss.  They all had fabulous establishments rivaling or besting the highest dignitaries of the State governments.  Perhaps even topping the kings.  Where did the money come from?  Usury from the common folks and massive skimming from government contracts.  In other words, from the blood and sweat of the peoples.  Naturally it caused resentment; the Jews prospered while the Germans suffered.  In retaliation when the debt load became too enormous the various governments refused to pay.  What else could happen?  What does anti-Semitism have to do with it?  Pure economics.  Over grasping reaps its due.

Feuchtwanger is writing a novel, however he and Selma Stern are using private histories of the Jews not available to goy historians.  Mrs. Stern makes a reference to ‘the chronicles’ so both she and Feuchtwanger must have had access to chronicles and other material.

It is certain that Suss was internetting with Jewish contacts throughout Europe.  He spent much time in Frankfurt where he had an additional establishment outside the ghetto.  Frankfort and Prague were the two great Jewish nerve centers at the time.  Suss himself must have been a very important Jew among his people else how could he arrange slave purchases in Africa  and horses from the Barbary Coast.  How much money did that take?  And the taxpayers of Wurttemberg were financing such transactions and getting nothing in return.  Were they unjustifiably angry?  No. No.  Suss was executed with just cause.

While employed by Duke Karl Alexander he was allowed to operate in his own interests which were very lucrative.  He must have been a great prince among his people.  He had monopolies on several commodities forcing Wurttemburgers out of business while using as Feuchtwanger says, Jewish agents, wide associations with other Court Jews so that Jews being an international network speaking the same language while being familiar with both Jewish and Europeans laws and customs had an inestimable advantage over a German people divided into over 250 constituencies.

Suss traveled extensively and frequently.  At one point he took a ‘vacation’ visiting the Jewish communities of Holland, England and France.  Thus he was able to coordinate Jewish commercial and political activities in a veritable international Jewish conspiracy.  He became a sort of Jewish messiah only a couple decades after Sabbatai Zevi had died and while Hasidism and Frankism were beginning to thrive.  Thus, at the end of his career a martyr for the nation, a crucified messiah.  He was duly revered and mourned while vengeance was sworn in the hearts of his people.

The above representation is not my invention but spoken from the Jewish hearts and mind of Stern and Feuchtwanger.  Now we must turn  to the resurgence of hope to redress Suss during the Weimar Republic of 1920s Germany.  The field of interest will extend to France, England and the Soviet Union in Europe as well as the United States of America, that the Jews called the New Jerusalem.

.3.

The Role of Money

Probably not too many people really understand the role money plays in society and politics.  Having been granted a monopoly of usury by the Catholic Church in early times the Jews knew exactly what money could do and did.  Lending without interest of course is a futile exercise.  So interest either simple or compound in low digits is necessary, but using the knowledge of compound interest the Jews were able to subject all societies in which they were involved sometimes charging 50 percent or even 100  Obviously all currency would gravitate into their hands.

Feuchtwanger explains the role of money succinctly.  On pp. 12-13 his fictional Court Jew Landauer expostulates:

Quote:

He knew that there was only one reality in this world—money.  War and peace, life and death, the virtue of women, the Pope’s power to bind or to loose, the Estates’ enthusiasm for liberty, the purity of the Augsburg Confession, the ships on the sea, the coercive power of princes, the Christianizing of the New World, love, piety, cowardice, wantonness, blasphemy and virtue, they were all derived from money, and they could be expressed in plain figures.

Unquote.

It is a mistake, a cynical belief, to think that these qualities were derived from money.  They could be corrupted by money but not derived from it.  A too close relationship with money corrupted the Jewish attitude to it.  Jewish morality is based on ‘by any means necessary’.  Thus, the Jews knew that they could obtain their desires by the use of money either through giving it or denying it.

In Spain before the Moslem conquest the Jews had obtained complete mastery through the use of money.  They, as tax farmers, obtained the money for the Court while as tax farmers exploiting the people of their freedom, foisting usury on them and then making them debt slaves while the Jews lived in luxury at their expense.

The same was true just West of Wurttemberg in Alsace of the time of Suss.  By late century Alsace was totally enslaved by usury rescued only by Napoleon who compelled the Jews to moderate their usury allowing the Alsatians some relief.

Now, while Suss was exposing the vulnerability of the goyim, or Germans in this case, not only making himself co-ruler along side Karl Alexander, but actually his superior by an adroit use of money he was carefully observed by the father of Mayer Amschel Bauer soon Rothschild and clearly saw the procedure.  He educated his son Mayer Amschel in Suss’ methods.  Fate played into Mayer’s hands in 1806 when Napoleon invaded Hesse-Cassel and the Jewish quarter of Frankfort.  The Margrave of Hesse-Cassel was a very rich man whose wealth Napoleon coveted.  To protect his wealth the Margrave entrusted Mayer Amschel, who functioned as a Court Jew with enormous wealth.  Mayer Amschel knew exactly what to do with it.  Mayer had five sons distributed in the capitals of Europe and England bound by him to cooperate with each other to secure the money of Europe.

England and France, that is Napoleon, were at war.  So as to weaken Napoleon Mayer despatched a huge sum to his son Nathan in England.  Nathan soon found the means.  The French had ravished Spain and the English had sent an army to Spain under General Wellesley.  Nathan Rothschild who had obtained a monopoly of gold with the wealth of the Margrave in England affirmed his ability to get the gold to Spain.

Nathan had originally been sent to England to take over the textile industry.  He failed.  In shifting for himself he turned to crime, smuggling and then banking.  His brother James was established in Paris so between them they arranged to get the gold to Spain through many hands and commissions.  This set Nathan up.  He couldn’t dominate as yet but he was substantial.  Then, Napoleon lost his prestige in the Russian campaign and was exiled to Elba.  Risking all, Napoleon escaped to meet his defeat at Waterloo.

England was on tenterhooks awaiting the result of the battle of Waterloo.  Nathan Rothschild construed to make the stock exchange believe that Wellesley lost causing a panic in which financially astute bankers in a panic sold wildly driving prices down precipitately.  Having advance knowledge that the British won Nathan bought up the stocks at absurdly low prices and became the dominant force on the exchange while owning the Bank of England.  A dependency of England became his private property.  He had nearly assumed Suss’ wish.

Suss had become a secular saint to the Jews who desired nothing more than vengeance for what they considered a wrongful execution.  They did not forget.  As with Suss in Wurttemberg, Nathan Rothschild who was now the richest man in England, possibly the world, through the judicious use of money began the effort to establish his family as co-rulers of England regardless of which party was in office.

.4.

The Problem And Towards A Solution

There is an eternal conflict between the Jew and the other and it is of Jewish making.  Mrs. Stern in her Court Jew explains it succinctly.  I had come to this conclusion myself through long lucubration and deep study but you probably wouldn’t believe me so let her tell it.  Pp. 131-2:

Quote:

Like most men of action Suess did little reflecting about his conception of State and society.  We can therefore deduce his political theories only from his actions.  Since very one of his acts was the consequence of some immediate experience, it was not as a result of abstract contemplation but rather as a result of observing existing States that he came to the conclusion that the absolute monarchy was a necessity for the German territories.  His study of the cameralists and of the philosophical theorists of his period, whose works were found in his library, doubtlessly also played a part in making him a proponent of the modern doctrine of natural law.

The form of State which he wanted to establish in Wuerttemberg was the stern police State of the eighteenth century.  He believed that it could be constructed like a machine, according to certain logical principles, without paying attention to the organic development of the people, the constitution, the economy and the social order of the country.  He unquestionably was familiar with the history of the Wuerttemberg constitution and he was well acquainted with the Swabian character.  Nevertheless it seemed to him that if one appealed to reason it was entirely possible to replace the medieval dualistic State by the sensible and utilitarian police and welfare State.

This State was to be led by a monarch whose function he considered to be of the utmost importance.  The ruler was for him identical with the State itself.  Just as the State must possess complete power, so the ruler must enjoy unlimited authority.  He must consequently possess a large standing army so that he can make his importance felt at home and abroad.  He must be in a position to dictate laws to neighboring princes and, if need be, to subjugate the surrounding imperial free cites.  To make his greatness evident he must maintain a magnificent court and through his wealth and splendor be set off from the masses and be distinguished from ordinary mortals.

For in him rests complete sovereignty.  The people, incapable of determining their own fate, have no right to share in the government or to question the monarch’s acts.  By virtue of his absolute power, the prince can declare all previous agreements null and void.  Should the people offer resistance, the regent was free to use force, intrigue and espionage to enable him to attain his goal.  “For whoever wishes to achieve his purposes,” he asserts in a quite Machiavellian vein, ‘must use those ways and means which are effective in that direction.”

Unquote.

And that pretty well sums up the direction that 21st century America is headed.  It also sums up the eternal Jewish notion of government.  Of course, the ideal was to have Jews being the government and having a favored place for all Jews over the other.  It would seem clear then that since Suss was actually attempting a complete revolution over the people, laws, mores and manners of the Wurttembergers that he was justifiably executed.

So, this is the Jewish ideal and that ideal is to ‘integrate’ it into the State not only as an equal but an unchallengeable superior.  This is what they have striven for over history.  In Russia after the Russians appropriated the Pale of the Settlement the Jews wished for autonomy within the Russian empire which the Russians refused to grant.

As equal means that one or the other had to be superior, warfare existed for a hundred years or so until the Jews finally succeeded in conjunction with other subject peoples in overthrowing the Russian government, even replacing the Russian people with the name Soviet Union.  Russia was erased, vengeance was nearly complete.

So also in the United States after the huge influx of revolution minded Russian Jews from 1870 to 1914 which I will address shortly.

In seventeenth century England, while after Cromwell’s victory over the Crown, the Jews were readmitted having been banned in 1290 for usury excesses, but they were only tolerated having no political rights same as the Catholics.  Nathan Rothschild as the richest man in England gave this lack of rights  a grudging acceptance; his successor, Lionel Rothschild, made it his responsibility  to obtain those political rights in which he was ultimately successful aided by the renegade Jew Benjamin Disraeli who posing as a Christian did have political rights.

It is not my purpose to fellow the Jewish trajectory throughout the nineteenth century but there was a significant event in 1830 which played out in the aftermath of the 1830 July Revolution in France.  Ever since the expulsion of the Moslems from Spain in 1492 Moslem raiders known as the Barbary Pirates from Algeria had preyed on the Mediterranean shores of Europe plundering, burning and abducting tens of thousands of Europeans for slavery in Moslem lands.  Eugene Sue, the French novelist, has a good novel titled the Knight of Malta describing such a raid.

In any event in 1830, Europeans finally took action and invaded Algeria annexing it as a province of France.  Now, it so happens that a Jewish lawyer and politician named Adolph Cremieux was able behind everyone’s back to include a clause including Algerian Jews as French citizens thereby reversing the Algerian situation elevating Jews over Moslems.  That would be a problem for Charles de Gaulle to deal with if the fifties of the twentieth century.   That was the nature of the warfare between Jews and Europeans in the battle for ‘equality.’

The Jews discovered the US after the 1848 Revolution that sent thousand of Jews and Communists to the shores of the US.  Plans were immediately drawn to bring over the Russian Jews.  The Civil War in the US delayed that procedure until the 1870s when the millions began to arrive.

When the numbers were sufficient in New York City where the bulk of immigrants resided, the Jews began the drive to become an autonomous people in the US.  Today Rockland County in New York State is an autonomous State of Jews with an outlier in the borough of Brooklyn.  Rockland County is exactly what Mrs. Stern described in the quote from The Court Jew.

The German Jews or 48ers, as they were known, while Jews thought themselves superior and above the Russian Jews while having been in the US for better than fifty years thus acclimatizing themselves after a fashion they, after 1900, began to direct or influence US foreign affairs away from US interests towards Jewish needs.  As you may well imagine the primary target was to make war from US shores on Russia.  Not only did the Jews make the US a sanctuary base of operations so did the Irish in their war on England, the Indians in their war on England,  the Chinese in their revolution and many others.  Millions upon millions of dollars of US currency went to wars from the US.  When I say war I mean asymmetrical war.  The Jews could not command armies which in fact were very small, but they could control politics.  From the US they were instrumental in fomenting the failed 1905 Russian revolution.  As part of the revolution Jacob Schiff, commanding 200 million or more dollars loaned them to Japan enabling them to fight the Russians in Manchuria.

Jacob Schiff was a major financier commanding the Kuhn-Loeb/Harriman combination.  He was a trustee of the Equitable Assurance Association.  It had the two hundred million Schiff illegally abstracted to loan to the Japanese.  By any means necessary.

President Theodore Roosevelt hosted the signing of the peace treaty at Plymouth New Hampshire at which Schiff and his fellow Jews participated thus confirming Jewish direction of the revolution.  If that was not an acknowledgement of an act of war using Japanese and US surrogates I don’t know what would be.  And the Jews were not through with the Russians yet nor would be down to the time of this writing of 2021.

The next stage was to get the US to break off diplomatic relations with Russia.  This came about because Jewish revolutionary activities against Russia increased in the wake of the Japanese War and would continue to increase until they murdered the Russian Czar, Nicholas II and his entire family in 1917 during the Soviet Revolution.

Russia in defense against the subversive activities of the Jews going and coming to and from Russia simply banned all Jews entry from Europe and that naturally included Jews residing in the US.  The Jews who were attempting to form a Kehilla in New York City, that is an autonomous Jewish State, somewhat in the manner of Rockland County, now claimed that the Russians discriminated against US citizens by refusing them entry as Jews, therefore the US should not tolerate this and break off diplomatic relations with Russia.  Schiff was sent storming from the Jewish State in New York City to the US capital in Washington DC to demand that President Taft break off relations with Russia, that Taft, for some incomprehensible reason, did.

Matters had now reached a breaking point in Europe but two things were needed in the US for war to begin.  One was that Taft be defeated in the 1912 election as he could not be relied on to follow Jewish direction.  The second and perhaps more important but dependent on the first was to secure control of the currency.  An absolute necessity as would be indicated by the Jewish attempt to unite the European banks under their control in 1930.  US currency would fall to their control in 1913 when their presidential appointee Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act shortly after taking office.  At that point it was a matter of time for the Jews to control the currencies of the European States and the US all bearing interest.  Jewish activities required huge amounts of money.

In 1912 an election between Taft and a Democratic candidate meant that Taft would be elected.  Thus the election had to be rigged or controlled for the Jews to succeed.  Not to be daunted the first step was to cultivate the Governor of New Jersey, Woodrow Wilson, as their pocketed presidential candidate.  To bring Wilson in they chose a wolf of Wall Street, Bernard Baruch.  Both Baruch and Wilson were from South Carolina so one may assume that having that in common along with Baruch’s reputation and wealth a relationship could be developed.

Baruch then introduced Wilson to the various Wall Street Jewish money men.  Schiff agreed and Wilson was in.  Step two was to split the vote with a strong third party candidate.  In such a three way race it was possible to slip Wilson in.  And so it was.  Wilson #1, Roosevelt #2 and Taft #3.

For their third party candidate they chose the very popular ex-president Theodore Roosevelt.  The impulsive Teddy who was feuding with Taft because the latter didn’t follow Roosevelt’s program close enough eagerly snapped at the bait founding the Bull Moose Party.  He was never forgiven this traitorous act by his fellow Republicans.  TR died in 1919.  The first thing Woodrow Wilson did as President was to sign the Federal Reserve into existence in 1913.  The Fed is a privately owned bank functioning independently of the US government and the Jews owned it collecting interest on every dollar issued.  WWI could now begin and in August 1914 it did.  As the Jews inferred to Henry Ford in 1916 they were in charge and they were.

Zionism was formed in 1897 by Theodore Herzl in Vienna quickly becoming the driving force of Jewish aspirations.  Through Zionism the Jews hoped to be able to acquire Palestine as a Jewish country.  They claimed some right of entailment. God gave it to them so it was permanently entailed to them eternally.  Having roots in Germany as we’ve seen they were trying to con Germans into acquiring Palestine as their homeland.  The Germans were reluctant and in 1916 gave their refusal.

And now our complexity increases a great deal.  Let us recall that the Jews are a separate nation pursuing its own goals; while having no offensive forces they were equal in influence with any of the participants in politics.  Woodrow Wilson was the Jews’ creature and creation.  He was totally beholden to them.  Bernard Baruch who inducted Wilson into the Jewish power structure would be made a co-president officially much as Suss was a co-equal in power to Duke Karl Alexander of Wurttemberg when the US entered the European fray.

Baruch has slipped from the public consciousness today.  Except for specialist historians  it is unlikely to find any one who knows his name much less anything about him.  In his time he was true eminence gris functioning behind the scenes.  I think it necessary to sketch him a little.

He was born in 1870 during Reconstruction.  His father was a doctor who moved the family to New York City in 1881 when Baruch was eleven.  He graduated from the City College of New York.  His first impulse was to be a professional gambler.  But as any pro gambler knows the odds are against you.  If you can’t change the odds you can’t win in the long run.  To win consistently you have to be able to fix the game.  All games are fixed in someone’s favor.  Only a ‘sucker’ thinks otherwise.  Thus one is either ‘wise’ or a ‘sucker.’  Unable to defeat the odds Baruch rejected gambling choosing to become a scarcely less respectable Bear speculator on Wall Street where at the time you could easily fix the game.

It was easier to fix a stock decline than an increase so he became despised as the Bear of Wall Street.

He was very ‘lucky’ as a Bear and made a fortune before the age of thirty.  If he graduated at the age of twenty-two and made a fortune before thirty, say twenty-nine, that meant he had only seven years to do it. Less his gambling period.  Quite extraordinary but things were very loose, unregulated at that period on Wall Street.  In 1903 he established his own firm having bought a seat on the exchange.  He remained a lone wolf probably because there is no one to share your secrets and confidentiality was important to him.

Now a very rising star in Jewish circles his thoughts turned toward politics although he preferred to remain in the background rather than run for office.  Elective office might not have been an option at the time because of his nationality.  In preparation for his political career Baruch bought an immense nearly seventy thousand acre estate in South Carolina called the Hobcaw Barony.

This expanse included land and water, hunting, fishing and boating.  In the coming years he would entertain lavishly mixing politicians, sports and entertainment figures so that he could know anyone prominent.  Son Eliot Roosevelt wrote a series of Eleanor Roosevelt murder mysteries, one of which took place at the Barony with real live characters Eleanor, Humphrey Bogart and others.  In his declining years of influence he gave the Barony to his daughter, it still exists as a park.

After inauguration Wilson began filling posts with his Jewish benefactors.  Louis Brandeis became the first Jewish Supreme Court Justice of the US in the critical year of 1916 that would be the premier State after the war.  He was an ardent Zionist and a fanatical Jew.  So, a mere twenty years after Herzl created Zionism a Jew claimed a seat judging US law.

Already closely associated with fellow lawyer Felix Frankfurter the pair would triumph when FDR entered Washington. Frankfurter became a law professor at Harvard University where he trained a whole generation of lawyers that accompanied himself and Brandeis to Washington where they were known as Frankfurter and his Happy Hot Dogs.  They were all Red and many became Soviet spies.

The teens of the twentieth century is when the Jews began their takeover of the US.  They virtually owned New York City making it their headquarters and capital whence worldwide Jewish affairs were coordinated.  Every summer dozens of top operators trooped off to Europe where the next years activities were organized.  These were what Henry Ford called the International Jews.  They were a specific group and did not include the general Jewish population.

In New York City a serious attempt was made to recreate the Russian political organization know as the Kehilla.  It is important here to note the mental state of the immigrants from the Pale.  They had been at war for a hundred years with the Russians which they personalized as the Czar.  They were in full revolutionary mode.  Zionism had inflamed them.  They did not come so much as immigrants as invaders.  I have read no study of their mindset and know of none but this was it.  They wanted autonomy in Russia and meant to have it in the US, the New Jerusalem.

The Kehillah sought to replicate the ideal political organization described by Selma Stern as noted above.  The Jews attempted to form an autonomous State within the US State much as in Rockland County New York today.  They attempted to impose Yiddish as a second official language which they pursue down to this day.

Realizing that the European war was about to begin their plan was to remove all the Jews of Europe from harm’s way bringing them to the US.  Facilities were developed to receive this mass of about seven to eight million people at New Orleans and Corpus Christi.  The plan was about to be put into execution but too late as the war in Europe began in August, 1914.

Baruch rather than take an early appointment in Wilson’s government which was his due opted instead to wait and see.  He ultimately would accept a government post just after 1916 as the US prepared for war.  Why is 1916 so important?

Nineteen sixteen was an interesting year.  After two years of indiscriminate slaughter of the prime manhood of all England and Europe the Germans became disgusted at this slaughter so that they made peace offers to the French and British to call the whole thing off.  Both States would decline the peace offers opting for continuing the slaughter.  Also as noted, the Germans refused to promise Palestine to them as a homeland.

An interesting thing occurred in the US.  In 1912 the automobile tycoon, Henry Ford, had declared a 100 per cent increase in wages, a doubling, from the US standard of 2.50 to 5.00 dollars an eight hour shift.  This was perhaps the most astonishing act since the founding of the country.  He coupled the wage increase with a decrease in the price of the Model T.  He became a real hero.  By 1916 he was perhaps the most revered man in America and in much of the civilized world.  That’s a dangerous position as people in a position to injure you take it.  Get Henry.

Quite naturally the Jews had a plan and the plan was the famous Peace Ship, Oscar II.  In the height of his glory a Mrs. Schwimmer persuaded him to rent a ship, take a group of celebrities aboard go to Europe and personally negotiate a peace.  Ford who did believe that his manufacturing techniques would bring the millennium bit.

Today, of course, the whole notion seems preposterous but then when people were unaware of the German peace offer it seemed ludicrous although in the circumstances was within the realm of possibility.  Individuals had much more influence in those days and Henry Ford’s influence was immense.  Henry was very aware of the situation in Europe.  The Jews were also.  They knew the Germans were offering a peace proposal and they knew the French and English would reject it.

So, instead of sending Henry to France and England that really needed persuading they destined Ford for Germany.

Aboard the Oscar II as well as Mrs. Schwimmer were Jewish agents including Herman Bernstein of the American Jewish Committee, he was a very well informed person being sent also on a mission.  They were getting a free ride and as they knew the Germans knew of the missions intent they were sure that  a submarine would not torpedo the ship assuring a safe passage.  On shore Herman Bernstein of the AJC bolted the ship heading for his assignment.

Now, on the journey, as Henry Ford revealed, he was told by Schwimmer and Bernstein of how the Jews began the war and that he was merely duped as only they could end the war.  Of course, the Jews denied they had ever said such a thing so that Henry was not only ridiculed for making the trip but inventing a preposterous anti-Semitic lie.  There is no evidence either way so one must either believe Henry or the Jews.  I believe Henry, he has a better record for telling the truth.  Nevertheless the Peace Ship episode seriously damaged his reputation, becoming what one might call intentional defamation.  Other assaults would ensue making him look like a boob.  They’ll getcha if you don’t look out and often if you do.

So, now, up to 1916 the Jews had been neutral or leaning to a German victory, but, they wanted the Germans to guarantee that in that event to hand over the land of Palestine.  In 1916, perhaps coinciding with Ford’s adventure the Germans informed them, no deal.  Infuriated a Jewish embassy approached Great Britain and said:  Let’s deal.  The result was that Lord Balfour gave them a written promise that Palestine was theirs if the war swung in the direction of the Allies.  That could happen only one way.  That way was for the Jews to bring the US into the war.

The Jewish game involved the destruction of Czarist Russia.  In March of 1917 Czar Nicolas abdicated the throne of Russia.  That was the moment the Jews were waiting for, in April the US entered the war;  Bernard Baruch had continued to cultivate Woodrow Wilson.  His influence on Wilson was enormous.  Thus the US entered the war and Baruch after biding his time sought government employment.  Wilson not only gave him control of the whole of US industry and business as the chairman of the War Industries Board but…Jud Suss revisited…, made Baruch his co-president with full independent powers. Baruch’s decisions could not be appealed.  He was a dictator or in the nomenclature of the time, a Czar.  He had full plenipotentiary powers.  He was a Jewish dictator of the United States in full.  Well, as you may believe, this astonished and perplexed everyone who were left scratching their heads.  Not that you will read this in any academic history.

We must now interrupt the narrative here to insert the EuroAmerican reaction to the Soviet Revolution in Russia.  Remember Russia disappeared from the map at this time, in the hauteur of their victory the Jews wiped the name from the maps replaced by the title, The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.  Quite an astonishing turnaround.

The revolution was more of a revolution of subject peoples rather than a revolution of Russians.  When Russians expanded West into Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland and by accident as it were, the Jews of what would be named the Pale of the Settlement, they tried to Russify the subject populations not unlike the US trying to Americanize the immigrants from the same places.  The Americans succeeded because the immigrants moved into an established culture while the Russians tried to impose their culture on populations in situ.

Led by the Jews a revolutionary furor built up  that expressed itself in the revolution of 1905 just after the Jews formed their Zionist front. And then came the successful Bolshevik revolution of 1917.  The yeast of the 1917 Soviet Revolution was the Jews.

Unlike the Russian serfs who had been kept dumb and down for hundreds of years the Jews had formed a major role as students in the Russian University system hence had a population ready to form a dominant role in the revolutionary government.  At the same time they had fomented the German revolution in the wake of the Armistice.  Thus both the Russian Czar and the German Kaiser had been removed replaced by so-called democracies.  A ‘democratic’ revolution was the result.

The Jewish-German revolution was frustrated by the veterans returning from the Western front.

At the same time, as we have seen, the Jews had virtual control of the US through the co-presidency of Bernard Baruch.  In England the Rothschilds had a major influence as well as in France.  The age old dream of world domination thus seemed to be within reach.

As a nation the Jews were represented at the Paris Peace talks as well as forming a large representation in the US delegation. Baruch had not been invited but wouldn’t have missed it for the world. It is also not improbable that as his power with the WIB had collapsed with the end of the war that he fled the US for a more secure Europe to escape hard feelings.  His high handedness would come back on him.

The Jews astounding presence as a co-equal nation alarmed a large part of the goyim of all countries creating strong anti-Jewish reaction.  After all the Jewish advance into power since their emancipation of a mere hundred years is something to be marveled at.  A loud cry went up.  The alarmed Jews aggressing further sent up a shout of anti-Semitism while moving to shut down the literature exposing their activities.  This even went to the point of censoring such thought. And successfully censoring it.

Chief among the literature was a slim volume called The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.  The book first entered Europe in Russia in 1905 but was ignored making no impression.  It was most likely, the issue has never been settled, written at the 1897 founding meeting of Zionism in Vienna.  It outlined the Zionist method for world domination.  This was rather damning evidence so the Jews called the text a forgery even though the evidence of the plan was clearly visible to the naked eye.  No matter, the propaganda value of a book was slight while soon being augmented by much better propaganda methods, specifically phonograph records, radio, sound movies and finally 24/7 television.

Another chief volume alarming the world was an also slim volume titled:  The Cause of World Unrest by that world famous author, Anon.  This volume was quickly followed by Henry Ford’s articles in his newspaper, The International Dearborn Independent.  The ninety-two articles were collection in four slim volumes, slim volumes were impressive in those days, titled The International Jew.  International brought the focus down to a Jewish cabal excluding the general population.  The articles were not anti-Semitic, they were directed at a cabal.

Thus a battle of words was waged until, probably, the Aaron Sapiro trial between them and Ford in 1927.  More battles were waged through 1945 but they took a different form.  To backtrack a little…

.5.

Navigating Still Waters.

Bernard Baruch as WIB, War Industries Board director, acted as a dictator.  He issued ukases like a Czar that must be obeyed, no questions asked, no discussions.  Baruch had full plenipotentiary powers.  There was no way to appeal his decisions.  He was also a full fledged socialist as was Woodrow Wilson.  Under cover of wartime emergency powers as would recur in WWII Baruch tried to gather all American economic activity under the umbrella of the WIB.  There he could dictate who made what and when and where while allocating resources.   If you displeased him you went off allocation.

Most businessmen wished to cooperate under the delusion that they were furthering the war effort rather than surrendering their legitimate rights.  The entire country was cooperating, it was like individualism evaporated over night.  Everyone but a few fell into lock step.  And then there was Detroit.

The auto makers objected strenuously and went on making cars, especially the Dodge brothers and Henry Ford.  They were industrialists, they made things, while Baruch ripped money off as a Wall Street speculator.  He was intelligent enough with a wide ranging intelligence but he never worked the assembly line.  He knew little or nothing about manufacturing except perhaps statistics. The automakers saw no reason to give their business model and manufacturing details to someone who after the war would be, along with his people, in possession of something they could use to further their interests over the other. Baruch was Alfred Dreyfus on steroids.  Baruch was compiling a mountain of information about US industry that could easily been shared with his fellow Jews to the detriment of the industrialists of the US. 

One might consider Baruch in this instance to Dreyfuss in France.  Dreyfuss was a French intelligence officer who was convicted of giving secrets to the Germans during the eighteen nineties.  It was one of the biggest news stories of the century.  It took the Jews five years or so to get the verdict reversed.  Of course it wasn’t that Dreyfuss wasn’t spying but he wasn’t spying for the Germans, hence, not guilty, but he was transmitting secrets to his fellow Jews much as Baruch was in a position to do.  In the twentieth century Johnathan Pollard was doing what Dreyfuss had done and the information Pollard transmitted to his fellow Jews in Israel damaged the US a great deal.  There is no reason not to believe that the Dreyfuss and Pollard affairs are not doubles.

Baruch personally held contentious meetings with the three dissenting automakers.  These would have repercussions in a couple years.  They were loud noisy meetings during which the Dodge Brothers voiced certain national aspersions about Baruch.  There is no question that the Brothers should have been more temperate.  On the other hand there was this question of national loyalty.  It has been truly said that no man can serve two masters.  Given our just discussed Dreyfuss case there was every reason for the Dodges and Ford to be concerned.  I have no idea what the three thought of the Dreyfuss case which was certainly live in their minds as it had just occurred a few years previously but Baruch should have been a little more understanding. 

Baruch was not a forgiving guy as we shall soon see.  Ford was more circumspect according to Baruch but he was nevertheless bucking Baruch’s infallibility as a Jew.  Remember that there was no appeal to Baruch’s decisions, he had full dictatorial powers.

Ford’s reputation rested on the assembly line, mass production, the marvelous organization that allowed him to mass produce hundreds of autos a day.  He once turned out a finished car from ore to finished machine in a single twenty-four hour day.  That was a pretty astonishing stunt and unequaled stunt.  There was no one else who could even conceive such a deed.

Today it is impossible for younger people, or even older people, to understand the reputation that Ford made.  He was a one-man industrial revolution.  From doubling wages to making the most inexpensive cars in the world as his fable assembly line boggled every mind.  Aldous Huxley in his novel Brave New World tongue in cheek even reset the calendar from AD to year one AF, After Ford.

So, to humiliate Ford Baruch gave him the seemingly impossible task to mass produce the Eagle Patrol Boat, starting from scratch.  While Ford did mass produce them, without knowledge of ships and sea, the Eagles were rather unwieldy boats but serviceable while casting aspersions on Ford’s mass production methods.  But then, how many people bought cars and how many bought Eagle boats?

The same stunt was played on Ford during WWII when he was asked or ordered to mass produce B-24 bombers not only from scratch but without production facilities.  Those had to be found, and built to entirely new specifications before he could begin.  Talk about Hercules and the Augean Stables.  He was able to produce a plane an hour and that would have been equivalent to several hundred cars.

Now, both Wilson and Baruch wanted to regiment Americans into good Socialists.  The American ideal had been laissez-faire, or extreme individualism- Jesse James, Billy the Kid, the Daltons-you know, Do What Thou Wilt.  That’s pretty close to anarchism and totally impracticable but soul satisfying.   The Jewish ideal was slowly being imposed in contradiction was a regimented collective in which every minute was controlled.  America had extreme diversity in every field of endeavor.  The American socialist ideal was to reduce everyone to equality, except the Rabbis.

The post-Civil War era from 1865 to 1914 was the heart of the Golden Age which was a wide open time of unequaled opportunity and unrivalled opulence.  This was when Thorsten Veblen wrote his famous Theory of the Leisure Class (1899) condemning conspicuous consumption against what created so much that was fabulous in American Civilization. 

It wasn’t so much that Veblen was against leisure as he himself lived with time on his hands but it was sans funds.  He couldn’t consume conspicuously.

As Baruch waved his magic wand of an unlimited power that Jud Suss would cried from envy, equity was the order of the day.  Baruch was devising schemes.  A socialist ideal at the time, and this may be related to Veblen, was that there should be no distinction in dress.  All should dress alike.  As a starter Baruch’s plan was that there should be only eight different  dress styles for women, this was nation wide all economic classes,  of the most economical of fabrics that all women of all classes would be required to wear, shoes were reduced to three or four types, affordable to all and Baruch was just getting started.  If you’re wondering about a source it comes straight from the horse’s mouth, Baruch’s auto biography. Also, remember, that at the time the entire clothing industry was in Jewish hands, all apparel from hats to shoes, this would have post war consequences..

That would have happened but unfortunately for Baruch and his Socialists the war ended on November 11, 1918.  The tremendous ordeal was over; as soon to be President Harding would say:  Back to normalcy.  Like the world of 2021 it was a new idea of normal.

In 1916 Lion Feuchtwanger revived the memory of Jud Suss when he wrote a play exalting the Jewish hero.  1916 was not a propitious time to reveal future plans so the play was shut down after one performance.  Quite possibly it was only meant for one performance and those who were meant to see it had seen it.

At about the same time the Jew, Walter Rathenau of Germany publicly pronounced that when the war was over there would be no going back to the nineteenth century, it would be to a new reality. In other words, it would be a world in which Jews dominated.

He said that there were three hundred people in the West who managed affairs and he knew every one of them and that there would be a different political organization.  Like all predictions of the future it didn’t work out quite like Rathenau projected but it did come close.  Weimar Germany was dominated by the Jews and in their minds they almost realized Suss’ dream.

Thus, when that Great Betrayal called the Armistice was announced the German Communist revolution commenced and was launched under the direction of the two Jews Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknect. 

The Kaiser was deposed seeking refuge in Holland.  The soldiers returning from the Western Front took up the battle to defeat the Communists.  The State was rescued but as Rathenau had predicted the Weimar Republic heavily represented by Jews was nothing like the nineteenth century.

The Jews did not give the battle up so easily and street warfare continued through the years of the Republic.  Under the guise of Communists the Jews were confronted by Volkist groups of which the most prominent were the National Socialists.

From the Jewish perspective the Weimar Republic was a realization of Suss, the German Moses, attempt to take over Wurttemburg.  Thus, Feuchtwanger’s novel Jud Suss and Selma Stern’s quasi-history coming in 1925-26 were much more than literary events, they celebrated the supposed arrival of the Jewish millennium and the Jewish redemption.

This dream was interrupted by the government falling to the National Socialists in January of 1933.  The Jews immediately declared war on Germany.  In England the war was announced in the Daily Express  under the banner headline Judea declares War On Germany:  Jews of the world unite in action.  Thus, one might say the long run up to the fighting began in Germany, at the beginning of 1933.  In the US the official of the American Jewish Committee, Samuel Untermyer, announced the war after the Jews returned to Washington under the aegis of FDR in March.

Thus, one must say the long run up to the outbreak of the shooting war began in Germany, in March 1933 as they began mobilizing for the isolation of Germany with boycotts, blockades and other harassments.  The US, England and France enclose Germany from the West while the gigantic Soviet Union fenced them in from the East.  Britain and France with strong Communist and Jewish influence set up Polish treaties so that combined with Russia war could be forced on Germany.

.6.

Back In The USSA

The Armistice came in November of 1918 cutting Baruch’s political career short, just as he was really getting rolling.  In his autobiography he describes what he would have done if the war had continued.  He was not invited to attend Wilson to Paris but he abandoned his job and went anyway where he entertained lavishly.

 When the was over and people had time to reflect Baruch’s reputation took a major hit so that he was no longer trusted.  He wandered ‘lonely as a cloud’ during the twenties with the Republicans in power but still as a figure.

When FDR came in in 1933 Baruch expected to be made co-president to FDR but the President rejected him perhaps remembering his activities in 1918 that disqualified him for office.  In the end Baruch could be found sitting on a park bench across from the White House looking longingly from afar.  He held a sort of court there. 

Before I attack the core of the twenties, in the US the war of the Jews on Ford and the Suss revival in Germany, I’d like to bridge the political situation from the physical collapse of Wilson to the Era of Roosevelt.

The center of Jewish activities was in New York.  Make no mistake, the Jews were acting as an independent political entity directing their world wide affairs from what would become the Big Bagel. It is important to understand that, the Jews considered themselves to be beholden to no one.

They tasted rather astonishing success under Wilson but then the Republican interregnum of 1929 to 1933 left them out in the cold.  So their understanding of America was essentially New York City.  They had no chance in 1920 while the 1924 election was a time of intense Democratic disorganization so Coolidge wedged through.

The Jews were cultivating Al Smith an Irish Catholic who they put in the governor’s office.  If one was New York centered Al Smith might have seemed a good national candidate but as a New York City, Tammany Hall, Irish Catholic he wasn’t nationally minded as he chose for his campaign song:  The Streets of New York.

Many readers might view with horror my mentioning that Al was a Catholic Irishman but those were times when these things mattered.  Anti-Catholic sentiment was very strong while the Irish had controlled Tammany Hall since their arrival in the US.  Tammany was the symbol of corruption so Smith had a lot to overcome.  He also had a strong New York accent so he wasn’t the ideal candidate when Herbert Hoover and a strong economy opposed him.

Smith’s defeat left the Jews in a quandary as their only backup was a very sick Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  Roosevelt had served in the Wilson administration as an under Secretary of the Navy.  In 1920 he had run with Cox as his VP when they were swamped by Harding.  He was a believer in Wilson’s ideology. Then, in 1921 Roosevelt was struck down with a severe case of polio that destroyed his legs.  Roosevelt would never take an unassisted step again.

Smith had been serving as governor of New York under Jewish management, abandoning the post to run for the presidency.  Roosevelt was the only backup they had.  He ought not to have accepted the call to replace Al as governor as he was still a very sick man obsessed with recovering the use of his legs.  He very reluctantly ran, succeeded, filled two terms.  Thus, in 1932 he was the sole candidate the New York Jews had. Capturing the presidency was a real coup.  Politically things were changing fast so that Jews could be elected for State positions.  Herbert Lehman was thus selected to succeed Roosevelt as governor.  In broad terms then the years from 1918 to1932.

Back to the US in 1918.  The world was in turmoil.  All was quiet on the Western Front even though Germany was still blockaded in a way that differed little from genocide. No food was allowed into the country from abroad.  The Germans were in a difficult position with its population starving and dying.  The situation was only relieved when Herbert Hoover led the move to release the blockade thus rescuing the Germans from mass deaths and possibly totally.  This is real and this is true.  The same will be repeated after WWII.  This cruelty has nothing to do with the Jewish war casualties called the holocaust.  German hatred began in 1871 with the union of all the Germans.  Once united economic competition began with the French, English and Americans.  The fact is that those three countries could not compete economically with the Germans.  There are many who say that the main cause of the war was to remove Germany as a competitor.  I believe it.

While the Western Front was quiet it was not so in the East warfare existed for another three or four years.  While it is little known the war in Russia was carried on by British, US and Japanese troops.  Armies of Czarist partisans and lots of others such as the Czechs which is quite a story.

The Soviets fighting on all four fronts, North, South, East and West still managed to keep the Germans occupied in the German Revolution and brutally took over Hungary always murdering the thousands in a manner little different from genocide.  In these Eastern Front battles the Jews were foremost in planning and execution.  The atrocities committed by them have been swept under the rug, suppressed so that any information on them is difficult to procure and then unbelievable.

On the home front Wilson was pushing hard for his dream baby of the League of Nations.  The notion was very strong that WWI was the end of wars.  It was thought that that the League would do it.  Wiser heads thought otherwise considering the very idea ridiculous. They prevailed at the time.  The issue was a hot one in the 1920 election.  Harding was even forced to agree to advance the cause but after the election and his victory the issue was allowed to drop.  However the proponents merely regrouped forming the Council On Foreign Relations that vowed that there would be a League.  The CFR worked hard as an alternate government then came into their own when FDR was elected.  FDR was a member of the CFR.  The League in Europe broke up in the thirties but undeterred heads were already busy planning the United Nations.  Roosevelt didn’t live to see his dream come true but even in the turmoil of the ending war the UN was made a fact without discussion or a vote.  Never let a good disaster go to waste.

Of course Wilson had a mental break down and for the last two years of his term was never seen in public.  Baruch back from Paris found himself bereft of the terrific power he had as head of the WIB and the co-presidency.  He was now merely a rich Jew but not without influence.  He had neither forgotten nor forgiven  the fierce resistance of the Detroit automakers to his autocratic rule.

It may be a coincidence that he and Horace Dodge met in the same New York City Hotel in 192O.  By 1920 Prohibition was in force so that bootleg or bathtub gin was the drink of the day.  While Baruch was cold and distant Dodge was warm and friendly inviting Baruch upstairs for a drink.  Baruch haughtily informed Dodge that he didn’t drink and wished him well.  Wished him well…Dodge died that night from bad gin. Was he murdered by Baruch?  A little later John Dodge died a mysterious death.  Was it a coincidence that both Dodges died?

Not too long after Henry Ford driving  home one night was forced off the road over an embankment almost into the River Rouge.  Fortunately he was only badly shaken up but not seriously injured or killed.  Can it be a coincidence that all three men who had antagonized Bernard Baruch either met their deaths or survived an attack?  There is no proof that it wasn’t a coincidence but three men who Baruch hated dying almost in a group?  Think what you will but I give my vote for a guilty Baruch.

.7.

Henry Ford And The Jews

Henry Ford was the greatest genius of the twentieth century and in his own way a great philanthropist in that his work created livelihoods for hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions.  His action forced others to increase wages.  He didn’t hoard his money but spread it around, doubling wages and lowering the price of his cars.  These actions were done in violation of the business code prevailing.  These actions brought the business community down on his head and every effort was made to humiliate him, destroy his mammoth reputation and to filch his company from him.  The post-war years brought him misery.

His great success gave him a feeling of great omnipotence, he began to think he could solve any problem no matter how difficult.  This attitude brought him into renewed contact with the Jews.  His first encounter was in 1916 and the Peace Ship.  He was humiliated in this endeavor which was very philanthropic.  His second encounter was in 1917-18 with Bernard Baruch and the WIB that had its own consequences including an attempted assassination.

Then in 1919 after an attempt by stockholders of which there were a few to force him to increase dividends he was forced to buy them out.  In order to do that he had to go to the bankers who he had always abhorred.  For some reason he dealt with Jewish bankers. Near insanity given his previous experiences.  It was a short term loan that had to be paid in full.  In 1920 his financial position was not so sharp.  The Jews refused to extend the loan or accommodate him in any way.  They were salivating in the expectation of acquiring Ford Motors on the cheap.  However Ford sucked it up, reorganized, sold everything he didn’t need, and paid on the date disappointing his creditors.  He escaped their clutches.

Now, after the Soviet Revolution and the noticed involvement of the Jews in Russia, Germany, Hungary and elsewhere, a great alarm arose in the various nations that the Jewish dream of world conquest was nearing reality.  It was said there was a Jewish problem.  Henry set out to solve that problem and end it forever.  While he was great on mechanical problems this socio-political problem required a different approach.  Bear in mind that the Jews were already on his case.  They didn’t respond to his ministrations.

So, he tried to apply reason to an irrational problem.  That’s never going to work.  Not realizing this he set to work to expose the effects of several million Jews on American civilization in a series of articles in his newspaper the International Dearborn Independent.  He was now condened as the Great Anti-Semite.  Something like the anti-Christ of Christians.

In order to write these articles he amassed an amazing Jewish library.  Probably nothing like it in the world.  He hired a man named William Cameron to research and write the articles.

Henry published an article a week demonstrating adverse Jewish activities affecting American civilization.  He made the mistake of reprinting the Protocols in the first several articles reprinted in the first volume of The International Jew.  Or, perhaps it was an act of defiance as the Jews had suppressed the book in America and the world.  Then, through his researcher and writer William Cameron an amazing series of articles showing how influential and detrimental these activities were.  The articles then were collected in four slim volumes under the stormy title:  The International Jew.  A more politic title might have served better; perhaps After The Deluge referring to immigration.  Ford wasn’t much of a propagandist or he wouldn’t have published under that title. The Leftist writer Frederick Lewis Allen writing in 1932 covering much of this same ground used the more sentimental title Only Yesterday.  Disarms the reader and suggests pure sentimentality.

 Ford’s title was offensive to the Jews even though titled titled their own volumes Born A Jew and others that you would swear were conceived by ‘anti-Semites.’  No matter.

The whole of the Jewish world rose up in condemnation.  Remember that these articles continued to appear for two years as Ford fought back giving as good as he got.  As he was now considered the world’s leading anti-Semite he came under tremendous pressure not only from organized Jewry but from family, friends, relations and many others.  Fortunately his cars continued to sell.  Ford had his security chief Henry Bennett and his Service Dept.  on the job investigating the Jews and the Jews had their organized and deputized people working on Ford.  This was quite a drama better than anything, even the Trump administration of the twenty-first century.  The war would evolve in differing forms through 1945 when Henry was thoroughly beaten.

After two years he could see he wasn’t going anywhere so he ended the articles.  However, his Service Department was still at work and coming up with new developments.  This was to take shape in 1924 when he became aware of the Aaron Sapiro farm co-op scheme.

If you have a sense of humor and are not bigoted toward either Ford or the Jews this episode could be a great comic movie.  It’ going to involve Sapiro, who was something of a bumbling twit, our old friend Bernard Baruch the commodities expert, Albert Lasker a prominent propagandist and  Eugene Meyer         whose function is unknown to me at this time.

His investigators reported to him the activities of a failed San Francisco Jewish attorney, Aaron Sapiro who was setting up farm co-ops.  Examining the situation Ford inferred, correctly, that an effort was underway to establish food monopolies.  And then he detected the hand of Bernard Baruch the commodities expert shadowing behind the effort.  This produced a new series of twenty articles, currently unpublished in book form, examining the effort.

Now, this part of the story brings up a new character named David Lubin.  I doubt if any reader has heard of him but he was more influential than one might think.  Lubin was a Jewish agitator who came up with the co-op plan now named the Sapiro Plan.

Rubin was an immigrant who gravitated West to Sacramento, California where he was instrumental in bringing Jewish immigrants where they congregated around Sacramento establishing citrus orchards.  At that time citrus was strictly a seasonal fruit available only at a certain time of the year.  Rubin was also instrumental in setting up a marketing organizing which was promoted by the propagandist Albert Lasker.

Sapiro met him at this period.  Lubin already had plans to migrate to Italy so he adopted Sapiro as his successor instructing him how to set up co-ops.  The co-ops weren’t set up for free but were a very lucrative business.  At his peak Sapiro took in nearly 100,000 dollars in one year.  The inflationary multiple on that is millions and millions on top of millions in today dollar.  Those fees came from the victims. 

Somewhere along the way Sapiro came to Baruch’s attention.  Harding not need a co-president Baruch had time on his hands so he teamed up with Sapiro helping to bilk the producers. 

Rubin had left the US to go to Italy to sell his plan to the King there.  He was on the way but unfortunately he died of the flu in 1919 thus stepping outside the frame of the picture.  It would have been interesting to see how he and Mussolini got along.  Lasker had joined and Eugene Meyer had signed up.  All three denied being involved when Sapiro began his lawsuit.  Without having read the articles it isn’t clear to me how they bedeviled the conspirators but Sapiro, at least, thought they impugned his character so he brought a defamation suit against Ford.

Sapiro was backed by leading American Jewish Committee officials led by their president Louis Marshall, who, I assume no reader has ever heard of.  He too was a very influential person, no Jacob Schiff but a real trouble maker.  A major propaganda campaign against Ford was raised while the trial was in progress.

The trial was called a mistrial when it was discovered that Sapiro had attempted to suborn jurors.

A retrial was possible and while that was impossible for Sapiro to finance, Ford was in the midst of designing his transition from Model T to Model A thus he couldn’t spare the time and annoyance so he actually settled the case for a million dollars. No retrial ensued.

Sapiro took the money but he had completely destroyed his reputation, thus falling by the wayside.  Baruch had wisely dissociated himself from the case, remaining in the background so he escaped with minimal damage.  Now let us return to Europe.

.8.

The Rise Of The Suss Controversy

Back in 1916 Walter Rathenau warned that Europe would not return to the status quo ante.  As he said, the nineteenth century  situation would not be reestablished.  We will have to take a moment to understand what he meant by that.  Suss had functioned mid-eighteenth century and had been succeeded by the Rothschilds who perfected his method aided by the triumphs of Democracy and the Industrial Revolution sixty years after into the nineteenth century.  But, the era of magic on which the Jewish Talmud system is erected was over.  It was no longer possible to breath into a pile of dirt and create a Golem.  While the Jews had become dominant in finances they were still marginal because of the rise of science and technology in which Jews did not participate.  The days of Golems and magic were dead.

The Jews also made no mark in literature anywhere in England, Europe or America.  The transfer of population from Russia to the US also absorbed Jewish interest although they did make a fortune with their Hamburg-America shipping line filling steerage with fellow Jews.  What a period!  History is wonderful if you have the mind for it.

Perhaps Rathenau meant that in the twentieth century Jews would be in charge.  In 1920 that seemed like a real possibility and in many ways his prediction has come true.  Feuchtwanger’s play, Jud Suss, was a minor tremor.  In 1925-26 Feuchtwanger began the rehabilitation of Suss and Selma Stern began the apotheosis.

Following Suss’ methods in Wurttemberg in Post-war Germany the Jews were rapidly approaching the success that Suss had achieved with Karl Alexander.  He had the Duke so dependent on him that Suss had very nearly supplanted the Duke as the actual authority in the State.  So in post-war Germany the Jews were in the process of supplanting the Germans as the primary race.  The ferocious inflation of 1923 when the mark was devalued to the point where you needed a trillion marks to buy a loaf of bread had devasted and impoverished the native Germans.

On the other hand if you had had other currencies such as the pound or dollar you could buy up Germany cheap.  Naturally Jews were prime beneficiaries.  On an interesting side Roosevelt, recovering from his polio discussed whether he should take advantage of the German  situation but backed out.

The Communists, much like Antifa in twenty-first century US, had control of the streets.  That means they burn and beat with impunity just like Antifa.  German Volkists such as the National Socialists were in the position of Conservatives in 21st century US in that the police were told to stand down when the Communists had the upper hand but then arrest the National Socialists when they were on top.

While the Jews denied that they were the majority of the Communist Party at the time and subsequently, in the 21st century they freely admit it.

Before the National Socialists assumed control they were the hated enemy.  Thus the Jews immediately announced open warfare when the National Socialists won the ’33 election.  They then began to manipulate the various nations to hurt the Germans in every way possibly much as they did in the presidencies of Herbert Hoover and Donald Trump.

Thus one may say with justice that the Jews initiated WWII beginning in1933.  The problem then was how to bring in the armed nations.  The Jews were clearly the aggressor nation.

Is it a coincidence then that Lion Feuchtwanger realized his cinema version of Jud Suss in 1933 as a propaganda vehicle to stir up the neutral peoples?  Essentially he was throwing down the gauntlet.  Revenge for the hanging of their secular saint Joseph Suss Oppenheimer.

This was an all out war aiming at the total destruction of the German people and the territory of Germany itself.  Germany was to be wiped from the map the same as Russia.  Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists were the good reason but not the real reason.  The real reason was a takeover of German territory while the Germans themselves were to be subject to genocide.  Stop!  Yes, that seems preposterous yet it is fully documented as we shall see.

Once the Jews began the war it was only natural that the Germans would retaliate. 

Just as there was nothing Germans could do to stop the penalties imposed on Germany or the interference in their economic affairs from outside their borders, there was little the Jews could do to prevent their harassing the Jews within their control.  World propaganda was in the control of the Jews and there was no way for the Germans to effectively counter it. 

Understanding this makes acts like Kristallnacht make sense.  There was a war in progress that the Jews began; what else could they expect?

Their propaganda machine was much more effective than the German.  The idea of Jews declaring war without a territory or army is ludicrous on the surface and few if any saw below the surface.  Perhaps the Jewish bete noir Charles A. Lindbergh did.  He was an unofficial US ambassador in Germany for years, revered by German people and government.  He must have perceived the true situation, that there was a declared war in progress.

The question was how do you overcome Jewish propaganda in the West?  Winston Churchill was firmly under the thumb of the Jews financially; without their financial support in the form of loans he could not have existed.  He worked closely with the American Roosevelt.  The latter himself was virtually a tool of the Jews.  As such he worked with them to finagle the US into the European war against all national interests.  Of course Lindbergh knew all this and he actually announced the true situation in his Des Moines speech in 1941 just before Pearl Harbor.

He announced to the assembled crowd that the British, that is Churchill, Roosevelt and the Jews were the driving force seeking to involve the US in this Jewish war.  Lindbergh was instantly declared an awful anti-Semite while his reputation was shot to ribbons.  Every newspaper in the US leaped on him.

Ford too who had multiple complaints of mistreatment by the Jews probably understood the Jewish-German situation.  His harassment by the Jews didn’t end with the termination of the Sapiro co-op case.  While the Jews were seeking for a grip on him things were relatively quiet but shortly after the inauguration of Roosevelt, the so-called hundred days, came the criminal Wagner Labor Act that gave virtually unlimited power to the labor unions over the employers.

Ford, of course, put up heroic resistance  for which he received nothing but further defamation.  Under cover of the Communist Party led by Jews the union marched on Ford Motors with the intent to tear River Rouge down stone by stone, plank by plank and smash the machines to destroy the magnificent assembly line.

So yes, Ford knew what was going on.  He had his Service Department.  He had investigators.  Of course, the Jews portrayed them as bumbling idiots but that was mere defamation.  In 1938 Ford accepted an award from Germany which convulsed the Jews.  Listen, this was America, the United States where different laws and mores from Zion ruled.  Our national interests were different than Jewish interests.  The US hadn’t declared war, Zion had.  The US was at peace with Germany but Jewish propaganda overruled reason.  This was nonsense. It is quite possible that the National Socialists with their own spy service to match that of Ford, Jews and US, understood the US machinations in their true light.

Now, I’m going to go ahead a little and then retrace my steps.  The Germans are portrayed in orthodox histories as a sort of nation consumed by an irrational hatred.  This is nonsense.  Writing in Mein Kampf Hitler said that in the conflict between the Jews and Germans that if the National Socialists lost their heads would roll in the sand.  This was true and Russia was the proof.  They did lose and Germans and Germany were only saved by the timely death of FDR in April of ’45.  His successor Harry Truman who was not in sympathy with the criminal Jewish solution.

The Jewish intent to avenge Jud Suss had always been the genocide of the German people and the dismemberment of Germany.  Remember the Amalekites.  In 1941 they came out in the open with maximum publicity and using an important member of the American Jewish Committee, Theodore Kaufman of Newark New Jersey as putative author they published a slender volume titled Germany Must Perish which outlined the method of cleansing all Germans within one generation.  A sort of eugenic plan, while erasing Germany from the map.  Prussia was actually erased from the map.  That territory no longer exists under that name.  It must be reinstated.

The book received maximum distribution and exposure.  It received serious consideration.  FDR himself was convinced.  Nor was Kaufman a sole voice.  FDR’s co-president and Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau Jr, iterated the plan in his book, Germany Is Our Problem.  ‘Our problem’ being that of the Jews not the US.  Had Roosevelt lived this plan could have been put in operation.  Actually Germany was dismembered into four zones governed by the USSA, USSR, England and France.  They were not tender and killed and as many Germans as they could get away with although Germany was spared genocide.

As you may believe the National Socialists were enraged when they learned of Kaufman’s book.  All the German leaders were well aware of Jewish criminal activities in Russia, Hungary and Germany committed after it went quiet on the Western Front.  True those evil deeds have been nearly erased from histories but those deeds were genocidal and horrendous beyond description.  They made Auschwitz look like child’s play.

As the Jews made their genocidal plans known in 1941 well before the Germans began their preemptive strike it is not remarkable that the Germans  would respond in kind.  But files disappear from the records, don’t they?

What is the difference between fleets of heavy bombers pommeling German cities with the sole intent of killing German civilians night after night for months on end and the German extermination camps?  Nothing.  Guilt?  Well, I make no excuses for mankind.

Let no one accuse me of denying any holocaust but let us include the German holocaust as well as the European holocaust that existed much longer and more effectively than the Jewish holocaust.  While the firestorm of Dresden occurred only because there were so many refugees that it was the highest concentration of Germans in one spot.  Pure unadulterated hatred can be the only excuse for Dresden.  Genocide.

Certainly as the shooting war began the Germans must have realized that propaganda was their weakest point.  The Jewish ability to create hatred of Germans far exceeded the German ability create counter-propaganda in the US and Britain.  The propaganda war then extended to the level of motion pictures

.9.

The Movies Go To War.

The Jewish Masquerade is such that have  chosen to live behind a mask in which they deny what is obvious to the causal observer.  In the US the entertainment business in general was dominated by them when not owned outright.  The movie business consisting of several studios at the time were wholly owned by Jews.

As one might expect then the immense propaganda power of the films was turned against Germany. The distribution of the English film Jud Suss, re-edited under the name Power kicked of the propaganda campaign.  Power was followed in 1934 with a falsified account of the Rothschilds activities after Waterloo.  Then there were numerous movies condemning Germany but operating behind the Mask not openly pro-Jewish.  As the theatres were predominately owned by Jews there would have been no chance of a pro-German film being shown if one had been made.

Beginning in 1940 three major German films were made:  The Eternal Jew, the German answer to Jud Suss and the answer to the Rothschilds.  The Eternal Jew may be classified as low propaganda better not having been made but Jud Suss and the Rothschilds, given movie capabilities of the times may be termed masterpieces.

The Jews denounce both movies as anti-Semitic which they weren’t.  As vehicles countering Jewish propaganda from when they announced the opening of the war in 1933 they can be considered as legitimate counter-propaganda.  There is nothing vicious about them; in fact the Jewish Jud Suss  is much more vicious as a propaganda vehicle.

Feuchtwanger’s England made film was not overly successful.  Neither the English or American public was interested in or sympathetic to any such appeal.  Feuchtwanger’s movie was so Jewdeocentric the he offended swaths of viewers and critics.  Of course, in 1933 few non-Jews and probably most Jews would not have known how to evaluate the film as they had no knowledge of the subtext.

Having viewed both the English and German versions of Suss several times I find the English version not a very good film because of Feuchtwanger’s very obvious bigotry.  The American version edited out the most offensive scenes making the movie more jumbled.  Of course, Power is a very appropriate title as Suss was trying to usurp the power of  Wurttemberg, just as the Weimar Jews were trying to wrest Germany from the Germans while believing that they were very close to success.  Given Feuchtwanger’s vile bigoted attitude, which he vaunts quite openly, I am sure the English edit offended greatly.

In the US Power of 1933 was followed in 1934 by the Hollywood film The Rothschilds.  Given the prejudices of the twenties and thirties the very title the Rothschilds would have been provocative.  The film only details the doings of the English Jew Nathan Rothschild who founded the dynasty in the post-Waterloo capture of the English economy.  In fact, Nathan Rothschild did a George Soros and neatly finessed the Bank of England making it a Jewish power center.

Having privately obtained the news of the English victory he concealed it first to drive the price of stocks down indicating a French victory and then buying up when the news of Wellington’s victory became known.  He became the richest man in England by that single coup.

The Germans watched these films in disgust.  Germans at that time were superb historians.  Their published histories are second to none.  You may be sure that they knew the history of the Court Jews of which Suss was one while having an absolutely correct understanding of the Rothschild doings in sabotaging Napoleon and diddling the English.

Thus in 1940, before Kaufman’s threat became known, they answered both Jewish movies.  What activated the National Socialists to do so in 1940 isn’t clear to me.  Perhaps in re-examining the Suss matter they put it together, in any event their Suss movie was the German side of the matter.  Two sides to every story and this was theirs. Naturally the German Suss is now characterized as the most anti-Semitic film of all time.  That is nonsense.  It is a more than decent response to the one-sided Jewish version.

In fact, the English Jewish Jud Suss presents a more unflattering picture of the Jews than the German film.  It actually shows the seamier side of the Jewish character.  It does however depict the Jewish fixation on the supposed unjustified execution of Suss.

Both Suss movies are closer to the facts than the Hollywood movie of the Rothschilds in 1934.

The Hollywood movie is just a fluff piece to show what truly fine people the Jews were and how devoted Nathan Rothschild was to his ‘adopted’ homeland.  The German film is a pretty accurate historical telling of the Rothschilds involvement in sending the money to Wellington in Spain coupled with the significant event of Waterloo.  There was nothing over stated or anti-Semitic about it.  Waterloo was a significant world changing event on more than one level deserving a detailed analysis.

I especially liked  the portrayal of Napoleon’s minister of police, Fouche in his confrontation with Nathan’s brother James.

As 1940 rolled along Churchill, the Jews and Roosevelt were frantic to get the US into the war.  Churchill knew before he led England into the war that his country could not hope to win without US involvement.  His whole game plan was to bring in the US. 

Facing determined resistance from Americans led by the America First Committee and Charles Lindbergh Roosevelt nevertheless led various subterfuges to essentially wage an undeclared war on Germany.  US navel units were used to combat the German submarine warfare.  He allowed US warships to be sunk, the most famous being the Destroyer Reuben James made famous in a propaganda song to arouse Americans.  He extended the three mile coastal limit to the middle of the Atlantic beyond Iceland.  FDR was champing at the bit sending billions of dollars of American resources to aid the Soviets who after all had declared war on the US and the world when they assumed power in 1917 and were still waging it through the Third International.

In an effort to defuse the America First Committee it’s spokesman, Charles Lindbergh was defamed as a German agent trying to deliver the US to the Germans.  As implausible as this seems the hysteria was rising so high as to be ridiculous but the American public had to be whipped up. 

As there was no way that the Germans had the military resources to conduct both a two front European war and attack the US mainland the hysteria was totally unwarranted and criminally dishonest.

As a personal anecdote, I was  three years old living a thousand miles from the Atlantic in Saginaw, Michigan far, far beyond range of any bomber in existence and the Germans did not even have any heavy or even medium bombers to use against England and Roosevelt knew this but we were still required to darken our windows to conceal our location and air wardens manned lookout towers.  This was really crazy stuff.  On this one occasion my mother and I were on a bus downtown when the sirens went off.  The bus stopped and we unloaded and were directed to stand in a store front. I could hear two men disgustingly talking about how stupid it was to stand enclosed by glass.  The shattering glass would kill us if any bombs didn’t.

Perhaps the US was feeling guilty for its genocidal bombing of German civilians but that’s how hysterical they were from 1940 on.  The atmosphere surrounding Lindbergh must have been horrendous.  The situation was brought to fruition when Roosevelt led the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor of the Hawaiian Islands.  The Germans had signed a mutual defense pact with the Japanese that if one were attacked the other would come to its aid. 

Then, with the opening of the Pacific War Hitler foolishly honored a pact that he need not have as Japan opened the hostilities.  The pact had been signed with the notion that the Japanese would attack the Soviets in the west.  Short on oil the Japanese abandoned that play moving South.

Jud Suss was to be avenged.  Germany was no match for the combined power of the USSA and USSR.

When it comes to holocausts Europe had been destroyed in the name of Suss.  A hundred million Europeans died in that genocidal holocaust of the Second Thirty Years War.  Nor did the suffering end with the German capitulation.  Dwight Eisenhower who proudly proclaimed that he had sat at the feet of that wise man Bernard Baruch sought to destroy as many as he could.  Eisenhower virtually murdered whole German army corps., leaving them unfed and unprotected over the coldest winter in many years.  The German genocide continued for years as US Jews swarmed triumphantly over Germany. 

It would take them a few years but ultimately the oppressed and depressed Germans would pardon Jud Suss and the Jews rehabilitated that sinner.  It only took them 200 years but the job got done. 

Tales of Tarzan

March 21, 2021

ERBzine 1548: Highway Ramblin’s by R.E. Prindle

ERBzine 1797a: Mysteries of London Art Gallery

ERBzine 1797: ERB Library Review by R.E. Prindle

George W.M. Reynolds‘ Mysteries Of London

Mysteries of London

by R.E. Prindle

After a stuttering beginning on his return to England from France in 1836, beginning in 1844 George Reynolds put his career in gear and began his twenty year odyssey with his novel The Mysteries of London.  This novel would stretch out over 208 weekly installments.  Did he have a writing program outlined or was he just struggling for success improvising as he went? George was not operating entirely on his own. The Mysteries seem to have been undertaken in some sort of collaboration with George Stiff, the publisher and George Vickers the printer.  George was paid as a salary five pounds a week.  At the same time as he was writing Mysteries Reynolds was also contributing to Stiff’s journal and picking up the odd job so that he had an adequate income. 

By 1846 he had had enough of writing for other people’s magazines and wanted to strike out on his own.   Upon his return from France in 1836 he landed a job with Monthly Magazine as Editor in Chief. He used that magazine as his publishing platform until he was relieved of his duties because his novel Pickwick Abroad plagiarized Dicken’s characters.   Thus while still writing under contract to Stiff and Reynolds  he established The Reynold’s Miscellany in 1846.  Then after completing his contract with thme launched his own publishing house, employing John Dicks as his printer.  Dicks was the partner he need to fulfill his own destiny.  They stayed together for the rest of Reynolds’ novelistic career.

His work with the Monthly Magazine brought him to the attention of the publishing world and Stiff and Vickers.  As, I suspect then, Stiff came up with the idea of The Mysteries of London based on his reading of Eugene Sue’s Mysteries of Paris.  Reynolds then had to organize and write the long running weekly serial.

While Dickens had worked with an artist and printer to team up to produce the spectacularly successful The Pickwick Papers, Reynolds, Stiff and Vickers were hopefully following Dickens’ example.  Reynolds had already written a long serial in his novel Pickwick Abroad.  That work may be considered a loose progenitor to the Mysteries of London.

Perhaps as Reynolds was searching for a long serial success he used his Pickwick abroad as his matrix while being heavily influenced by Pierce Egan’s Life In London of 1821.  Mysteries would follow Life In London in format fairly closely while being essentially an advanced Pickwick Abroad.

In searching for an entry point or beginning for his story Reynolds chose a curious story, that of long con involving a character named Eliza Sydney.  A long con is a long running confidence game as opposed to the short con which may take a few minutes.  A long con may take years and this one did.  Reynolds was essentially a confidence man; he understands the game.

I have read Mysteries twice now and am studying the long con of Eliza Sydney here.  It’s funny how my first reading of a book offers all surprises.  The second reading, after a period or reflection, takes a whole different aspect as though a new first reading.  The original reading stays in the back of my mind, while in a study, such as Reynolds’ corpus becomes, it is supported by additional reading that contributes new nuances to the novel in question, here, The Mysteries of London.

The Mysteries is a long succession of many inter-related novels that extend over 2500 pages in the Valancourt edition.  In Reynolds’ opening story of Eliza Sydney, now knowing the whole story of the long con, one can no longer read without integrating details of the whole story or perhaps creating a background not given in the text.

Eliza was being used by a man named Stevens who disguises Eliza as a young man, she is only sixteen, which character she must maintain at all times.  To escape detection as much as possible she is confined to her apartment.  As the story opens she is weary of isolation and decides to investigate London.

In the first scene then she is walking boldly down the street in men’s clothes, the very image of Pierce Egan’s character Corinthian Tom, the Man About Town of Life In London.  While the reader has clues that there is something wrong with the image, it isn’t clear that the young man is a woman in disguise.  Having left her  carriage behind she has wandered indiscriminately. She is now lost. 

She has wandered into the abattoir of the Smithfield district.  This area was a slaughter house of cattle, something like the old stockyards of Chicago, hence odorous and grungy.  So, Eliza has left the security of her apartment and entered Reynolds’ vision of the real London.  In addition a terrific storm was developing.  Reynolds parodies  Bulyer Lytton’s famous line from Pelham:  It was a dark and stormy night.

As the storm breaks Eliza has no refuge, but leaning up against the door of a house the door opens and she steps inside.  This is not an ordinary house, this house once belonged to the eighteenth century master criminal Johnathan Wild. In the interim from my second reading of Mysteries I had come upon the history of Johnathan Wild in Ainsworth’s Jack Sheppard, Fielding’s Jonathan Wild, and Nathaniel DeFoe’s account.  This same house figured prominently in those novels.

It contained many mysteries which Reynolds exploits here.  As the story was written Ainsworth’s Jack Sheppard was a recent hit release so most of Reynolds’ readers would have shuddered because of Ainsworth’s account.

Now, the house straddled the banks of the Fleet River that had been covered by the development of London.  At one time it had run wild and free but times have changed.  It was now part of London’s sewer system that was being newly redeveloped so one assumes a great deal of the offal of the abattoirs found its way into the Fleet, actually once a river but now a foul ditch called a river. 

As Eliza enters this forbidding house in a district of abattoirs and as a powerful storm breaks an eerie situation is portrayed which can only be truly felt if you have the background.  Shortly after Eliza enters this maze of a house and finds  her way to the first floor (second floor in US terms) a couple of the worst criminals in town, who use Wild’s abandoned house as a refuge, enter.  Thus Reynolds cleverly unites the eighteentha and nineteenth centuries.  These two desperate characters are Dick and Bill and they are waiting for Cranky Jem.  Jem will weave through the entire 2500 hundred page novel.

Eliza is discovered after hearing of plans to rob a house belonging to a man named Markham.  There’s only one thing to do about it so Bill and Dick pitch Eliza through a trap door and one is led to believe into the foul, Fleet which because of the storm is running high.  And then Reynolds terminates that episode, much as in the Perils of Pauline silent movie serial to introduce the main characters of the novel.

Eugene and Richard Markham

Chapters IV, V and VI.

Opening his novel with the tale of Eliza Sydney in Smithfield and then interrupting it with the introduction of the Markhams was probably done as a hook to interest the new reader to continue the story.  Dickens Pickwick Papers was near failing until he introduced the character Sam Weller which invigorated his tale.  To avoid that pitfall Reynolds opens with a big blast leaving the reader panting and anxious for the next installment.

This opened the way to introduce the true direction of the story which would be the careers of the Markham brothers who allow the story to continue.  That continuation being the divergent paths the two brothers will follow.  Richard that of Virtue, a la de Sade and Eugene that of Vice.  Unlike de Sade’s conclusion Richard and Virtue will triumph while Eugene and Vice will meet a sad fate.

De Sade being, of course, the famous Marquis de Sade who established the mores of Libertinism.

Before leaving the first three chapters though I want to mention a couple major influences on Reynolds.  As the novel opens in 1844 Harrison Ainsworth was issuing his novels  of his historical romances, sometimes two a year.  He was met with a rapturous response, the novels are all first rate and Reynolds must assuredly have read them.  I believe they altered his own style significantly.

At the same time there is a strong influence from Pierce Egan.  Much stronger than, I think, is suspected.  Egan died in 1849 so one wonders if their two paths crossed.  Egan was a prolific writer.  In addition to his two manuals Life In London and Real Live In London he wrote a novel that I think made a substantial impression on Reynolds titled The Life Of An Actor, meaning the kind of life actors led.  This is a quite moving excellent novel.  It has that quality of seeming to describe actual events as though the writer is participating in them that Reynolds does so well in his own novels.

A central heroine is named Eliza by Egan like Reynolds’ Eliza Sydney.  One may say such similarities are coincidental yet names are important and novelists often give tribute to their influences through the use of names and such.  Such Eganate influence do pop up, just as Life In London isn’t too far from Mysteries of London.  Continuity in Reynolds is quite prominent and he seems to want to meld all the strains of English literature into his own.

Life In London written in 1821; Reynolds might have read it some time in the late twenties whether at school or Sandhurst or he may have read it on his return to England in 1836.  I believe the reading was much earlier than his Mysteries as it seems to have had time to mature in his mind.   There is also an incident that occurs in Reynold’s Mysteries of Old London: Days of Hogarth there is a very close variation of the story of Splendid Jem in Egan’s Finish To The Adventures Of Tom And Jerry of 1828.

As I mentioned the similarity of Eliza, Reynolds seems to categorize the type of person by their names.  The name Laura is affixed to likeable females leading questionable careers who are over whelmed by circumstances. In addition the name Mortimer recurs over and over. The family name Mortimer is used in Master Timothy’s bookcase, one of Eugene Markham’s aliases is Mortimer.  The name reappears frequently.  I have no idea of its significance to Reynolds but it is apparently quite personal.

So, Chapter IV, V and VI set up the two main characters Richard and Eugene Markham.  Eugene may probably refer to Eugene Sue who had written his great success The Mysteries Of Paris shortly before Stiff hired Reynolds to write The Mysteries Of London.  Sue was of course familiar to Reynolds from his Paris days and figures in his Modern Literature of France written in 1838.

As Chapter IV opens Richard aged 15 and Eugene aged 19 are sitting on a tor between two trees discussing what they are going to do with their lives. Now, while in France a very young George Reynolds had read two novels by the libertine Marquis de Sade titles to wit Justine, or Virtue and Juliette or Vice.  De Sade as we all know devised  the philosophy of sexual cruelty which he named the height of freedom, Sadism is named after him.  The two sisters, Justine and Juliette as with the Markhams  decide between Vice and Virtue as ways of life.  Justine will take the path of virtue suffering defeat after defeat, humiliation after humiliation with virtue being her sole reward.  Juliette following the path of Vice abandons virtue entirely and engages in a life of criminal luxury.  The moral being that a life of vicious behavior is more successful than a life of Virtue.

George Reynolds was revolted by de Sade’s conclusion so in his novel, Mysteries of London, he tries to change de Sade’s conclusion making Virtue, Richard succeed over Eugene’s Vice.  Thus we must add the Marquis de Sade as a major influence on Reynolds’ novel.

Chapter V.  Time passes says Reynolds, Richard is 19 and Eugene 24. The naïve Richard beginning life meets a man on the street, one Chichester, a con man, who introduces him to a female accomplice Mrs. Arlington, a decided frail.  A frail is a female and one who has not guarded her sexual virtue and thus become a fallen woman.  Mrs. Arlington hosts a party of con men and Richard, who they know has money, with disastrous consequences for Richard and Virtue.  But first we have to return to Eliza Sydney who we last saw on the banks of the fetid Fleet River.  She, true to the Perils of Pauline fashion, survived the terrors of the Fleet.  By this installment the readers anxiety for Eliza must have reached a fever pitch so the book is firmly set and is on for the duration of four years. 

The story was extremely successful selling fifty thousand copies a week and that figure reached quickly so Reynolds knew his audience.

Eliza’s escape is a bit of a stretch, but if you’ve seen the Perils Of Pauline and serials in general all escapes are a bit of a stretch.  Four years have passed, this is a very long con, and she is comfortable in her apartment however becoming more impatient with her masquerade as a man which she finds onerous.  This very long con is approaching a denouement.

Mr. Stephens, the brain of this con needing another accomplice has met Eugene as George Montague the City Man and intends to employ him.

The Long Con develops.  Eliza’s escape is revealed and enter Eugene in his alias as the City Man, George Montague.  Interesting that George Reynolds would name his con man George.  Perhaps George Montague is the dominant side of Reynolds’ personality.  He then does an exquisite thing.

I hope I can be forgiven for revealing the Mysteries, or spoilers, but this is an analysis of how Reynolds constructed his story so one must reveal the Mysteries to display Reynolds’ art.  If we were reading for the first time Reynolds successfully conceals Eugene’s identity virtually to the last page.

In my opinion both Richard and Eugene are alter-egos of Reynolds.  That is he splits his personality so as to depict both aspects of his ego.  In doing so he more or less confesses his own criminal years from sixteen to at least twenty-one and as he displays fondness for the Long Con maybe much later.  During his years from twenty-one to thirty-six he may have made more forays into confidence games.  He certainly writes about them enough.  Eugene/Montague/Greenwood/Juliette is nothing if not a confidence man of the City.  Stock schemes, phony companies are his stock in trade.

It should be noted then, according to Guy Dicks, that his sons were involved themselves in confidence games.  Did George talk to them about schemes so that they actually followed in his footsteps?

One must question his relationship with his printer John Dicks.  The latter seems to have been a much more upright man than George.  George kept him as a mere employee until he gave up his novelistic career then strangely not only sold Dicks his copyrights but gave Dicks the right to use his name something like Lamont Cranston allowing the Shadow to use his.  Thus he threw over his former existence and walked away from his literary life.  Very extraordinary.  There is more of a mystery to Reynolds than appears on the surface.

I will have to try to fathom his relationship to his wife Susannah more deeply.

Eliza’s escape is a bit of stretch, but if you’ve seen the Perils of Pauline and serials in general all escapes are a bit of stretch.  Four years have passed, this is a very long con, and she is comfortable in her apartment however becoming more impatient with her masquerade as a man.  This very long con is approaching its denouement.  Mr. Stephens, the brain of this con needing another accomplice has met Eugene as Montague the City Man and intends to employ him.

Reynolds then does an exquisite thing.  He brings Eliza/Walter, Eugene/Montague and Richard into a fleeting association of which none of them were aware but a truly uncanny situation worthy of ETA Hoffmann.  Eugene had defrauded a man of his entire fortune by a confidence trick.  The defrauded man had committed suicide never suspecting Eugene/Montague had cheated him.  He had a daughter Eugene had been courting to whom he confided his daughter, Diana.  Naturally Eugene cold heartedly ruined her then passed her to his associate Harborough.  Arthur Chichester, Rupert Harborough and Eugene are a triumvirate.

Unbeknownst to Eugene Chichester having picked up Richard off the street, forming a fast friendship, is combining with Harborough and other associates to defraud Richard of most of his fortune.  Eliza/Walter dropped in a party Richard was attending with the con associates and there she met Richard to whom she described to Eugene without mentioning his name as an interesting young man.  So, Richard and Eugene were within a hairs breadths of each other but made no contact.  If they had Richard and Virtue would have been saved.  Eugene then had no means to save his brother from a disastrous bilking and an actual prison sentence.  Thus Richard/Justine follows the course of de Sade’s heroine.  In a hair raising way Richard become involved with Diana, his brother’s cast off mistress.

A really superb touch on the part of Reynolds and with the true situation concealed from the reader until the end of novel twenty-three hundred pages later.  But the the reader has to go back and put it all together.

The main characters of the next couple hundred pages have now been introduced:  Richard and Eugene, Arthur Chicester and Rupert Harborough.  Rupert is a terrible scoundrel and with his wife is the center of the maelstrom.

It is important to bear in mind that George Reynolds is deeply offended by de Sade’s conclusion that Virtue is futile and that Vice will succeed in the end.  The whole novel is an attempt to refute de Sade and makes Virtue/Richard triumph over Vice/Eugene.

Now the story branches further as the various strands of independent and interlocking novels increase the interest, tension and excitement.

Advance to 16 Part II  Confidence Games Short And Long.