16. The View From Prindle’s Head

June 30, 2020

  1. The View From Prindle’s Head


R.E. Prindle


Before I jump ahead to the reformer Jud Suss and the rise of modern Judaism let us first review evolving European society. While the Jews were sinking into a desperate mysticism characterized by the Kabala, which is to say even into deeper subjectivism, Europeans were developing a more objective appreciation of reality, that is the scientific method of raising the Veil of Isis and revealing nature.

One might say that the Europeans truly discovered the world, both visible and invisible. Unlike the earlier Marco Polo they didn’t traverse the Eurasian land mass but, blocked by the Moslems on that route, they made an end run around Africa to India, thus proving a water route to the East while beginning the realization that the Earth was indeed a sphere. Untold vistas were opened up as geographical information rapidly added to the knowledge, thus from the fifteenth century onward the European mind expanded rapidly.

The European brain expanded quickly as the objective world ceased to be less and less mysterious. Initially Astronomy and Chemistry moved rapidly ahead soon followed by the other sciences.

Judaism stagnated stultifying itself in the nonsense of the Talmud and Kabala. They took at most a peripheral part in the rapid development until the turn of the twentieth century and then they began to inject Jewish subjectivism into it and corrupting it. The world was developed in the image of the Europeans.

In about 1740 the Jud Suss made his appearance on the world stage from the German Duchy of Wurttemberg nestled between Bavaria on the East and Alsace of the West and South of Hesse and its capital of Frankfort. That city was also the center of Jewish operations in Europe at the time.

Not much has been written about Suss in Western Europe. My account relies on the novel of the Jewish writer Lion Feuchtwanger. He first wrote up a play about Suss in the critical year of 1916. By 1926 the Jews under the guise of Communism were in open revolution against the ancient native German population. Volkist [folkist] groups of which the National Socialist was the most prominent were defending the Germans and Germany from the Jewish takeover. A few years later in 1930 Feuchtwanger would write his novel Success that mocked the National Socialist leader Adolf Hitler. At that time the Jews considered Hitler a joke and no threat. That was a serious miscalculation.

At that time the future of the National Socialist electoral victory was undreamed of and the events of WWII were unimagined and unimaginable. Indeed, in 1930 the Jews had little cause to doubt their success as Russia, France, England and the United States were in their pocket. If needed the US could be held in reserve as they had been in WWI. How could they lose? Thus the novel Jud Suss was mocking Germany as losers and was perceived as such.

The novel was a propaganda success. It sold extremely well in England. The English made it into a movie also titled Jud Suss which was even more successful than the book. From my view of the matter, it is difficult to see why either the book or movie was so well received. Feuchtwanger lays bare the Jewish conspiracy and its methods. Methods the Jews had used at least since the reign of Suss and which ought to have been known by one and all. One can only say that like Maxwell Grant’s fictional character, The Shadow, they had the ability to cloud men’s minds. Perhaps the Jewish bible had indoctrinated and conditioned the West to view the Jews in the light in which they wished to be viewed.

Feuchtwanger chose Suss as his vehicle in part because he represented the demise of the medieval Jew and the rise of the modern Western Jew as would be epitomized by the Rothschilds who may have emulated Suss to perfect his method. At the same time as the Western Jews adapted to Aryan ways the Eastern Jews remained dedicated to the ancient ways. Thus paradoxically the Western Jews despised the Eastern Jews for those very Jewish customs.

It is this transitional moment in time that Feuchtwanger chose to capture. He could have used the early nineteenth century Rothschilds but he didn’t. He chose the beginning and foundation of modern Jewish history. In this passage below Feuchtwanger contrasts the medieval Jew in the character of Isaac Landauer with that of the modern Suss, Joseph Oppenheimer.

Isaac Landauer looked his colleague up and down with amicable amusement. The elegantly cut brown coat, bordered with silver made of the first cloth, the powdered peruke with its fastidious formal curls and delicately pleated lace ruffles, these alone must have cost forty gulden. He had always had a weakness for this Suss Oppenheimer, whose eager and adventurous spirit flared so fiercely as his great restless round eyes. He, Isaac Landauer, had seen a rough and sparing life, the kennels of the Jews’ quarter and the pleasure houses of the great. Confinement, dirt, persecution, arson, death, oppression, utter helplessness—and pomp, spaciousness, despotism, lordliness and beauty. He knew the machinery of diplomacy as only three or four others at most within the empire knew it, and his eye could examine down to the smallest detail of the whole apparatus of war, and peace, of the government of men. His countless business interests had given him a keen eye for the connections between things, and he was aware with a good-humoured and mocking awareness, of the absurd and subtle limitations of the great. He knew there was only one reality in the world- money. War and peace, life and death, the virtue of women, the Pope’s power to bind or to loose, the Estates’ enthusiasm for liberty, the purity of the Augsburg Confession, the ships on the sea, coercive power of princes, the Christianizing of the New world, love, power, cowardness, wantonness, blasphemy and virtue, they were all derived from money and they would turn into money, and they could well be expressed in figures.

Yes, and usury meant the control of money and hence the control of all. As the saying goes, follow the money. In many ways this history is the history of money and usury.

But in his [Landauer’s] dress and appearance he clung obstinately to the traditions of his race. He wore his caftans as he wore his skin. In it he entered the closets of princes and of the Emperor. That was the other secret and more profound secret of his power. He disdained gloves and perukes. He was indispensable, and this was his triumph, even in his caftan and his ritual curls.

But now there was this Josef Suss Oppenheimer, the younger generation. There he sat, proud magnificence with his buckled shoes and his lace ruffles, and puffed himself up. It was not subtle, this younger generation. It did not understand the refined pleasure of keeping power secret, of possessing it without betraying it, and the still more refined pleasure of relishing its flavour quietly and exclusively by oneself. Knick knacks and silk stockings, and an elegant traveling carriage with attendants up behind, and the trumpery external signs of possession, these were of more account to it than a jealously-guarded chest containing a bond on the City of Frankfort or on the Margrave of Baden’s Treasury. A generation without finesse, without taste.

Here in Feuchtwanger’s novel we have he Jewish side of the story and it is exactly this image of the most ardent anti-Semite. It is the reality that Jews deny to the outside world.

It is also the truth about money. It was the truth that Europeans wouldn’t begin to learn until the nineteenth century when this epoch begins, when the great banking institutions of money developed that reality to the world. The Duke Karl Alexander of Wurttemberg is secure in his power as the Lord of Wurttemberg with all its people and its lands, for to the European land was the source of wealth and power not money.

Suss would betray the Duke’s trust and wheedle away his power in land until Suss had both the power of the purse and the land leaving the Duke a mere shadow of a presence. This was the sneer that Feuchtwanger was giving the German people during the Weimar Republic.

Thus the Jew Suss is an allegory of the stripping of Europe by the Jews.

Continue to 17. The View From Prindle’s Head.

19 Responses to “16. The View From Prindle’s Head”

  1. Daughter of Babylon Says:

    Despite the most earnest efforts of Helen Blavatsky and a few others, no mortal hath ever lifted My Veil.

    I cannot even see my comments on this website; I do believe I am being starved out; as Stalin did to the Ukies back in the 30’s.

    When will the punishments visited upon the gentle Daughter of Babylon reach their natural denouement?

  2. Daughter of Babylon Says:

    I still recall Schicklgruber’s pungent coda in the courtroom in Munich, April 1924….before he was dispatched to spend about 264 days in Landsburg…paraphrasing:

    “The verdict of this court has been pre-ordained…we all know what it shall be. But the Great Goddess of History takes the prosecutor’s indictments and tears it to shreds…for though this court may find me guilty; She hath acquitted me…on all counts.”

    It would be 105 more months before he took power from Hindenburg….January 1933. Held it for 145 months…until April 1945…as he was sitting in a Berlin Bunker he had Goebbels read him stories about Frederick the Great and the Miracle at the House of Brandenburg near the end of the 7 Years War {around Feb 1762} when Fred was on the verge of suicide as the war was not going well for the Prussians; but news came of the death of Empress Elizabeth; Czarina of Russia and Freddy exclaimed “the Messalina of the North is dead”…the nod to Claudius’ crazy spouse..and she was replaced by Peter 3…friendly to the Germanic people…who himself would be thrown out and supplanted by his own wife Catherine the Great.

    When FDR died in April 1945 A.H. thought it might be a repeat of history; but of course it was not

  3. Daughter of Babylon Says:

    Make that 147 months.

  4. Daughter of Babylon Says:

    Let us not kid ourselves about Hitler…the man is responsible and culpable for an extraordinary amount of raw human agony… I am part Russian and 23 million of my comrades died between ’39 and ’45…big number…we were eating wallpaper glue during the siege at Stalingrad in ’42.

    Moreover those mass graves and scenes out of Treblinka were not photoshopped…people died inside…extremely frightful deaths.

    Now one might be able to plausibly argue that Hitler’s enemies were in fact deserving of his enmity; but again we are speaking of a tiny cadre of powerful businessmen and politicians; not the average poor slob in the street who is just trying to get to tomorrow.

    But all warmongers never properly target their true enemy; their guns & bombs torment the weakest and most defenseless elements of society; while their real enemies usually escape unscathed.

    And Hitler is no exception to this rule.

    • reprindle Says:

      War is hell, no exception to that rule. I am human and 10s of millions of humans were slaughtered by the various nations of, actually, the world. No excuse for this but, humans being humans, things like this happen. I thank God I was born in 1938. Navigated my way through the whole show with nary an angry shot fired at me..

      • Daughter of Babylon Says:

        See there is your problem; the notion that killing and war are normal and natural…but why?

        Do you feel the need to be a war like entity or is it just a learned mentality?

        If it be learned it can likely be unlearned. I have argued that as long as there is will there will be conflict; and I have no desire to constrain the will; but I do believe that the will can be molded to recoil from the notion of visiting harm on one’s neighbor; and from manifesting avarice; as well as having a strong contempt for the lie.

        Man will never be perfected…and no one would want him to be…but the nastier impulses can be unlearned and the future can be a little better than the hideous present if a few steps are taken to change the way people perceive their life experience.

        That is why I incarnated.

        • reprindle Says:

          In dreams Pamela, in dreams. There are too many irreconcilable differences for there ever to be peace. The world has been at constant war at least since the Boer War. Not much hope for a change.

  5. Daughter of Babylon Says:

    I do not subscribe to the notion of collective guilt or collective innocence. A man is neither guilty nor exculpated per the tribe he was born into; but rather based on his individual conduct as he moves through life.

    For when we seek to demonize one partiicular group based on
    the actions of a few individuals who are members of that group; we concurrently convict ourselves; as there can be no doubt that members of our own specific demographic are guilty of various atrocities at some juncture in time.

    No person is at their core your enemy. Rather it is the ideas and beliefs that they are living vehicles for; that is what constitutes the enemy. Disarm them of their convictions and beliefs and you will have disarmed them of their enmity.

  6. Daughter of Babylon Says:

    The Goddess has indicated that my suffering is nearly over and I will soon take the reins of government. The long nightmare will be over as the Daughter of Babylon begins correcting 6000 years of horrific history.

    I have been homeless since 24 April 2020 and it is a horrific experience; but I think it was necessary for me to walk (many) miles in the shoes of the oppressed so I could truly understand their plight.

    It is horrific beyond all comprehension to not know if you shall have a bed for the night or food in your belly; and it is a dynamic that that the average American could never hope to understand.

  7. Daughter of Babylon Says:

    Remember that my greatest satisfaction of alls derived from solving a difficult problem.

    • reprindle Says:

      I think you’re a brilliant person Pamela.

      • Daughter of Babylon Says:

        Thank you; as praise from an extraordinarily intelligent gentleman such as yourself is quite uplifting to My Spirit.

        It has been an honor to have the opportunity to share My Thoughts on your blog; and to have the opportunity to connect with you.

        You shall always be a Man of Honor and Wisdom in My Eyes.

  8. Daughter of Babylon Says:

    As I wrote near the end of My Sacred Book:

    “She is callled The Daughter of Fortitude for a reason; as all greatness is borne of suffering and endurance and it is this overcoming cf seemingly insurmountable obstacles that gives Her Victory a magnitude of grandeur and pre-eminence seen not hitherto.”

    Daughter of Babylon
    6 July 2020

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s